SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is the flagship 16-core/32-thread mobile processor in AMD’s 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename. It operates on a 5 nm process from TSMC, featuring a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The CPU’s TDP is rated at 55 W, and it supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, delivering 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. In benchmark results, the Ryzen 9 7945HX achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 and a single-core score of 1940, while Geekbench reports 18254 multi-core and 2391 single-core. These numbers place the chip at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 60099. The nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (avg score 60104, delta 0%), the Intel Core i9-14900F (avg score 60008, delta 0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (avg score 59641, delta 0.8%), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T (avg score 60572, delta -0.8%). The data indicates that the 7945HX sits in a tight performance cluster where differences between these chips are within 1% of each other, meaning real-world workloads will see negligible variance among these top-tier parts.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7945HX packs 16 cores and 32 threads, a configuration that targets heavy multi-threaded workloads. The Zen 4 architecture brings a 5 nm process node and a 13,140 million transistor count across a dual-chiplet design (2x 71 mm² die size). The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, the multi-thread scaling is clear: the 3DMark 16-thread score of 12737 versus the max-thread score of 13612 shows modest gains beyond 16 threads, indicating that the chip is already near its scaling limit with 32 threads in that workload. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 is a strong indicator for rendering and CPU-intensive tasks, while the single-core score of 1940 confirms that the high boost clock of 5.40 GHz delivers competitive per-thread performance. The PassMark multithread score of 54548, along with integer math at 207524 and floating-point math at 123390, suggests balanced ALU and FPU capabilities. Data compression and encryption scores of 707249 and 42703, respectively, point to strong archival and security workload performance. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2063 and 4-thread score of 3972 show that even lightly threaded applications benefit from the Zen 4 IPC improvements. Compared to the nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, the 7945HX delivers essentially identical average scores (60099 vs 60104, delta 0%), meaning the extra cores and clock headroom do not translate into a measurable advantage in aggregate benchmarks. The Intel Core i9-14900F trails by 0.2%, while the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 0.8% behind in average score, which is surprising given the 3D V-Cache variant typically excels in gaming. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T leads by 0.8%, but that is a server-class chip with different power characteristics. For real workloads, the 7945HX’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample parallel throughput for video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while the single-thread performance ensures responsive everyday use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7945HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with ECC memory supported as a feature. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the processor itself, which is a high-bandwidth interface for the latest NVMe SSDs and discrete GPUs. The 55 W TDP is relatively low for a 16-core chip, given the boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and this suggests that the platform is designed for high-performance laptops where thermal and power constraints are tighter than desktop systems. The integrated graphics is the Radeon 610M, which provides basic display output but is not intended for gaming or GPU-accelerated tasks. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is sufficient for feeding the 16 cores in memory-intensive workloads, though it is not exceptional compared to desktop platforms with higher channel counts. The suggested PSU is not listed in the data, and the GPU TDP is 115 W, so combined CPU and GPU power draw is modest by desktop standards, but for a laptop this pairing requires a robust cooling solution and a high-capacity battery. A sensible next upgrade from this platform would involve moving to a newer CPU generation or a higher-tier GPU, but the Socket FL1 is proprietary to this mobile segment, so upgrades are limited to what the laptop manufacturer offers. The PCIe Gen 5 support means future storage devices can take advantage of higher throughput, though the practical benefits are marginal for most users. Since the multiplier is unlocked, enthusiasts can overclock the CPU if the laptop BIOS permits, but thermal headroom in mobile chassis is often the limiting factor. The production status is active, so this platform remains relevant for new builds.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7945HX compare to its closest rival, the Ryzen 7 8745HX?

A: The average benchmark scores are nearly identical: 60099 for the 7945HX versus 60104 for the 8745HX, a delta of 0%. This means the 16-core part does not outperform the 8-core rival in aggregate benchmarks, likely due to thermal or power constraints in the mobile platform.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of this CPU?

A: The Cinebench R23 single-core score is 1940, and the 3DMark single-thread score is 1058. The PassMark single-thread score is 4040. These numbers indicate strong per-core performance, driven by the 5.40 GHz boost clock.

Q: Does this CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the FACT PACK lists ECC memory support as true. This is a feature typically found in workstation-class processors, and it is present on the Ryzen 9 7945HX.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the Ryzen 9 7945HX?

A: The dual-channel DDR5 memory bus delivers 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This is sufficient for the 16 cores in most workloads but is not as high as quad-channel desktop platforms.

Q: How many PCIe lanes does the CPU provide?

A: The CPU offers 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. This allows for high-speed NVMe storage and a discrete GPU connection, though the exact lane allocation depends on the laptop design.

Q: What is the GPU TDP for the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation?

A: The GPU TDP is 115 W. This is a mobile-class power draw, and the GPU uses no external power connectors, relying on the laptop’s internal power delivery.

Q: Is this CPU unlocked for overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked. However, in a laptop form factor, overclocking headroom is typically limited by thermal and power delivery constraints, so gains may be minimal.

Who Should Build It

The Ryzen 9 7945HX with the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is a laptop-class pairing that targets power users who need both high CPU throughput and capable GPU acceleration. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average score of 60099, places it in the top tier for mobile processors. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads, as the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 indicates strong parallel performance. Software developers compiling large codebases will see faster build times, supported by the PassMark integer math score of 207524. The GPU, at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, is a mid-range mobile part with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 4608 shading units. This pairing is not aimed at high-end gaming enthusiasts but rather at professionals who need a balanced mobile workstation. Students in engineering or data science programs will appreciate the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities for simulations and data analysis, while the GPU can handle CUDA-accelerated workloads. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or heavy spreadsheet models will find the 32 threads useful. The 55 W CPU TDP and 115 W GPU TDP mean this combination is suited for larger laptop chassis that can dissipate heat effectively. The combined percentile of 71 indicates that this system sits above the median for overall performance, but it is not a top-tier gaming or rendering monster. Gamers at 1080p with high refresh rates will find the GPU adequate, but 4K gaming will require lower settings. The system is best described as a prosumer mobile workstation rather than a pure gaming rig.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation with its 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory can handle esports titles at 1080p with high frame rates, though the CPU’s single-thread score of 1940 in Cinebench R23 ensures that frame pacing remains smooth. Streaming while gaming will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads, as the PassMark multithread score of 54548 provides headroom for encoding alongside game logic. Video editing in applications like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve will see strong performance from the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459, while the GPU’s 144 tensor cores can accelerate effects and exports. For 3D rendering, the CPU’s 16 cores deliver solid CPU-based rendering, and the GPU’s RT cores (36) support ray-traced workloads, though the 8 GB memory may limit scene complexity in GPU rendering. Software development benefits from the CPU’s high integer math score of 207524 and the 64 MB L3 cache, which reduces latency in compilation-heavy workflows. Student and office work—word processing, spreadsheets, web browsing—is easily handled, with the single-thread performance (PassMark 4040) ensuring snappy responsiveness. The Radeon 610M integrated graphics can handle basic display tasks when the discrete GPU is idle, saving power. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large dataset manipulation in scientific computing, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running computations.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all FPS figures in this section are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU, the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation, sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which indicates mid-range performance. With 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, the GPU can output 81.36 GPixel/s and 244.1 GTexel/s. The 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is modest by modern standards but sufficient for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings. The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus delivers 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p textures but may struggle with 1440p or 4K high-texture packs. The CPU’s strong single-core performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 1940) ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most titles. For esports games like CS:GO or Valorant, estimated frame rates at 1080p ultra could exceed 144 FPS, given the GPU’s pixel rate and the CPU’s high boost clock. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, estimates put frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range, depending on the game’s optimization. At 1440p, the GPU’s memory bandwidth becomes a limiting factor, and frame rates will drop to 40-60 FPS on ultra settings. At 4K, the 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus will cause stuttering in texture-heavy scenes, making 4K gaming impractical without lowering settings significantly. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so it is compatible with modern APIs, but the hardware is not designed for ray tracing at high resolutions. Overall, this pairing is best for 1080p gaming with some headroom for 1440p at reduced settings.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 9 7945HX and the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is skewed toward the CPU. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking and average score of 60099 far exceed the GPU’s 50th percentile ranking with an average score of 0 (no GPU benchmarks are listed). In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU will be the primary driver, and the GPU will have little impact. In GPU-bound tasks like gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as its mid-range performance cannot keep up with the CPU’s high single-thread and multi-thread capabilities. The 3DMark scores illustrate this: the CPU’s 8-thread score of 7355 and max-thread score of 13612 show that the processor can feed data quickly, but the GPU’s 15.62 TFLOPS will cap frame rates in most games. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s on the CPU side is matched by the GPU’s 256.0 GB/s, so neither component is starved for data in typical workloads. The combined percentile of 71 indicates that the overall system is above average, but the GPU is the weaker link. For productivity tasks that rely heavily on CPU threading, such as the PassMark multithread score of 54548, the system performs exceptionally well. For gaming, the GPU’s 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus will cause bottlenecks in high-resolution textures, while the CPU sits idle waiting for the GPU to render frames. The power draw is also uneven: the CPU TDP is 55 W, while the GPU TDP is 115 W, so the GPU consumes more power during gaming, potentially causing thermal throttling in thin laptop chassis. The absence of a suggested PSU value means power supply sizing is left to the laptop manufacturer, but the combined 170 W TDP is moderate for a mobile workstation.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU is a 16-core/32-thread Zen 4 part with a 5.40 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is a mid-range Ada Lovelace chip with 4608 shading units and 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. The combined percentile of 71 places this system in the upper third of all CPU+GPU pairings, but it is not a flagship configuration. The CPU’s 92nd percentile ranking is the standout feature, making this a CPU-centric build. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking means it is average among all GPUs, so this is not a gaming-first system. The laptop class implies that upgrades are limited to what the manufacturer offers, and the Socket FL1 is not user-replaceable. The platform supports DDR5 memory, PCIe Gen 5, and ECC, making it suitable for professional workloads. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated, and the dataIsMeasured field is false. This build is best described as a portable workstation for content creators, developers, and professionals who need CPU horsepower on the go, with enough GPU capability for light to moderate gaming and CUDA acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 60099, placing it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. The GPU has no benchmark scores listed, making its performance characterization reliant on its specs and percentile ranking of 50. The CPU’s 3DMark scores range from 1058 (single-thread) to 13612 (max-thread), showing a 12.9x scaling from 1 to 32 threads. Cinebench R23 scores are 1940 single-core and 33459 multi-core, a 17.2x scaling factor. Geekbench reports 2391 single-core and 18254 multi-core, a 7.6x scaling, which is lower than expected due to the test’s memory sensitivity. PassMark scores include 4040 single-thread, 54548 multithread, 207524 integer math, and 123390 floating-point math. The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, with an average score of 60104 and a delta of 0%, meaning the 7945HX is statistically tied. The Intel Core i9-14900F is 0.2% behind, the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 0.8% behind, and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T is 0.8% ahead. The combined percentile of 71 is based on both CPU and GPU rankings, but since the GPU has no benchmark data, this percentile is heavily weighted by the CPU’s strong performance. The data shows that this CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, but the GPU is only average, creating a lopsided system where the CPU outperforms the GPU by a wide margin in compute-heavy tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds