SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What CPU and GPU are paired in this build?

A: This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, a 16-core/32-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series based on Zen 4 (Dragon Range) architecture, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, a Turing-architecture mobile workstation GPU featuring 16 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread configuration?

A: The Ryzen 9 7945HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. It carries a 55 W TDP and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: What are the CPU's benchmark scores in key tests?

A: The CPU scores 33,459 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1,940 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 18,254 in Geekbench multi-core, and 2,391 in Geekbench single-core. Its 3DMark max-threads score is 13,612.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, placing it exactly at the median of the GPU performance distribution.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this build is 71, indicating that the pairing outperforms roughly 71% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact combination?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All frame rate discussions must be treated as estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

# Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,459 and its 3DMark max-threads score of 13,612. The CPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 60,099 places it at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 92% of processors in the database. This is a top-tier mobile processor by any measure.

The single-thread performance is equally impressive for a laptop chip. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,940 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,391 indicate strong per-core efficiency, which is critical for lightly-threaded workloads and gaming responsiveness. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,058 and 2-thread score of 2,063 confirm that the Zen 4 architecture scales well even at low thread counts.

Scaling from 2 threads to 4 threads yields a score increase from 2,063 to 3,972, nearly doubling performance. The 8-thread score of 7,355 continues this near-linear scaling, and the 16-thread score of 12,737 shows only slight diminishing returns as the scheduler begins to manage more threads. The max-threads score of 13,612 is only 6.9% higher than the 16-thread score, indicating that the additional threads beyond 16 provide modest but measurable gains.

The GPU side tells a different story. The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, with an avgBenchmarkScore of 0 (no benchmark entries exist in the FACT PACK). This means the GPU is exactly mid-pack in the overall GPU landscape. In the context of this build, the CPU is clearly the dominant component in terms of relative performance ranking.

The combined percentile of 71 reflects the overall system capability. This places the pairing above the median but below the top quartile of all builds. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking is dragged down by the GPU's 50th percentile, resulting in a combined score that is solidly above average but not elite.

When compared to nearest rivals, the CPU's avgBenchmarkScore of 60,099 is virtually identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60,104 (0% delta), and only 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900F at 60,008. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D trails by 0.8% at 59,641, while the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T leads by 0.8% at 60,572. This clustering suggests the Ryzen 9 7945HX is right at the competitive frontier for its performance class.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU is stark. The CPU operates at the 92nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. This 42-point gap indicates that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The CPU has substantial headroom to drive more capable graphics hardware.

In CPU-bound scenarios such as physics simulation, data compression, and multi-threaded rendering, the Ryzen 9 7945HX will not be the constraint. Its PassMark physics score of 2,500 and data compression score of 707,249 demonstrate massive compute throughput. The floating-point math score of 123,390 and integer math score of 207,524 further confirm that the CPU can handle demanding mathematical workloads without breaking a sweat.

In GPU-bound scenarios such as high-resolution gaming, ray tracing, and video encoding, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh will be the limiting factor. Its 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 293.8 GTexel/s texture rate are respectable but not class-leading. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means half of all GPUs will outperform it.

The FPS scaling picture, while estimated, reinforces this analysis. At lower resolutions, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 1,940) will allow the GPU to reach its maximum frame rate potential. At higher resolutions, the GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM capacity will determine the ceiling, and the CPU will be underutilized.

For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample capacity. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,355 indicates that even with eight threads dedicated to encoding, the remaining threads can maintain high frame rates in games. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it can handle concurrent workloads without becoming a bottleneck.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7945HX uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This socket supports the 7000 series of mobile processors, and the platform is designed for high-performance laptops rather than desktop systems. The memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported for error-sensitive workloads.

PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU. This provides substantial bandwidth for NVMe storage and external GPU enclosures, though the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh itself uses PCIe 3.0 x16. The integrated Radeon 610M GPU provides basic display output and is sufficient for power-saving modes, though the discrete GPU handles all demanding graphics work.

The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the GPU's TDP is 110 W, for a combined 165 W of processor power draw. The FACT PACK lists no suggested PSU for the GPU, and the power connector is listed as "None" since this is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor. For a laptop, the power delivery system is fixed at the factory, so upgrade paths are limited to what the chassis can support.

A sensible next upgrade would be to pair this CPU with a more capable GPU in a future laptop chassis. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and 16-core/32-thread configuration will remain relevant for years. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache and 5.40 GHz boost clock provide headroom that a more powerful GPU could exploit. Alternatively, users could upgrade to the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, which is only 0.8% slower in average benchmark score, but the 3D V-Cache variant may offer better gaming performance in cache-sensitive titles.

The platform's DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity ensure that storage and memory upgrades are future-proof. The 28 PCIe lanes from the CPU allow for multiple high-speed NVMe drives, and the dual-channel memory controller can be populated with high-capacity DDR5 modules.

# GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh is built on the Turing architecture using TSMC's 12 nm process. The chip, designated TU104B, contains 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 25.0M per mm². This is a large, power-hungry chip designed for professional mobile workstations.

Memory configuration is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. This capacity and bandwidth support large datasets, high-resolution textures, and multi-tasking with multiple GPU-accelerated applications.

The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. It features 48 RT cores for ray tracing and 384 tensor cores for AI acceleration. The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 9.400 TFLOPS, while FP16 performance is 18.80 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

The 50th percentile ranking reflects that this GPU is mid-pack in overall performance. For rendering workloads, the 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 compute means it can handle moderate 3D scenes and CAD models, but it will struggle with extremely complex scenes that require more compute throughput. The 48 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is useful for architectural visualization and product design, but the performance will not match higher-tier GPUs.

The 384 tensor cores enable DLSS and other AI-accelerated features. This is particularly relevant for rendering with denoising and for machine learning inference tasks. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage for large models and high-resolution textures, allowing the GPU to handle datasets that would exceed the capacity of 8 GB or 12 GB cards.

The GPU's production status is end-of-life, with a release date of June 2020. Its predecessor is the Quadro Pascal-M and its successor is Ampere-MW. This means the architecture is several generations old, and newer GPUs in the same class will offer better performance per watt and more advanced features.

# Gaming Performance

Note: No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following frame rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

The CPU's strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core: 1,940, Geekbench single-core: 2,391) suggests that this build can drive high frame rates in CPU-bound gaming scenarios. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,058 and 2-thread score of 2,063 indicate that the processor will not limit frame rates in most games.

The GPU's 50th percentile ranking and 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance suggest that at 1080p resolution with ultra settings, this build should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, likely in the 60-90 FPS range for demanding games and higher for esports titles. At 1440p, frame rates would drop, with some AAA games potentially falling below 60 FPS on ultra settings.

At 4K resolution, the GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth allow it to load high-resolution textures, but the 9.400 TFLOPS of compute will limit frame rates. Users should expect 30-50 FPS in demanding titles at 4K ultra, which is playable but not ideal for high-refresh displays.

The 48 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the performance impact will be significant. Ray-traced games at 1080p may see frame rates drop by 30-50% compared to non-ray-traced settings. DLSS support via the 384 tensor cores can mitigate this by rendering at a lower resolution and upscaling, potentially recovering much of the lost performance.

For esports titles like competitive shooters and MOBAs, the CPU's high single-thread performance and the GPU's 3072 shading units should deliver frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. The 64 ROPs ensure efficient pixel throughput, and the 293.8 GTexel/s texture rate supports high-detail textures without bottlenecking.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process, containing 13,140 million transistors across two 71 mm² dies. This dual-die design allows for high core counts while maintaining reasonable yields and power characteristics.

The base clock of 2.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz provide a wide frequency range. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache, along with 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core, ensures that frequently accessed data stays close to the cores. The memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC capability, which is critical for workstation reliability.

The CPU's benchmark scores are outstanding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,459 places it among the fastest mobile processors ever tested. The Geekbench multi-core score of 18,254 confirms this level of performance. The 3DMark max-threads score of 13,612 shows that the CPU can maintain high throughput under sustained loads.

Single-thread performance is equally strong. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,940 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,391 indicate that Zen 4's IPC improvements are significant. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,040 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1,058 reinforce this assessment.

In real-world workloads, this CPU excels at multi-threaded tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 707,249 and floating-point math score of 123,390 demonstrate its capability for scientific computing and data processing. The integer math score of 207,524 and extended instructions score of 51,834 show strength in encryption and SIMD workloads. The random string sorting score of 81,736 indicates efficient memory management and sorting algorithms.

The 92nd percentile ranking among all CPUs places this processor in the top 8% of all processors. It is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (0% delta) and the Intel Core i9-14900F (0.2% delta), while leading the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D by 0.8% and trailing the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T by 0.8%. This tight clustering suggests that the Ryzen 9 7945HX is at the very top of its performance class.

# Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, a 92nd-percentile mobile CPU, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh, a 50th-percentile mobile GPU. The result is a laptop-class system with a combined percentile of 71, meaning it outperforms 71% of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database.

The CPU is the clear star of this build. Its 16 cores, 32 threads, and 5.40 GHz boost clock make it one of the fastest mobile processors available. The 33,459 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and 18,254 Geekbench multi-core score place it in elite territory for laptop computing.

The GPU is competent but not exceptional. Its 16 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are strong specifications for a mobile workstation GPU, but the 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 50th percentile ranking mean it is average in the broader GPU landscape.

The buildClass is "laptop," confirming that this is a mobile system. The combination of a high-end CPU with a mid-range GPU creates an imbalanced system where the CPU has significant headroom. This is typical of workstation laptops where CPU-heavy workloads like compilation, simulation, and data analysis are prioritized over GPU-intensive tasks.

The production status of the CPU is active, while the GPU is end-of-life. This means the CPU is still current, but the GPU is several generations old. The GPU's release date of June 2020 and its successor, Ampere-MW, indicate that newer mobile GPUs offer better performance and efficiency.

Overall, this build represents a capable workstation laptop that prioritizes CPU performance. It is well-suited for professionals who need maximum multi-threaded compute power and can accept mid-range GPU performance.

# Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need extreme multi-threaded CPU performance with adequate, but not class-leading, GPU acceleration. The 92nd-percentile CPU ranking makes this build ideal for professionals who spend most of their time in CPU-bound workloads.

Software developers working on large codebases will benefit from the 16 cores and 32 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 207,524 and data compression score of 707,249 indicate fast compilation times and efficient data processing. The 5.40 GHz boost clock ensures responsive single-threaded interactions in IDEs and build tools.

Data scientists and researchers running simulations or processing large datasets will appreciate the CPU's floating-point math score of 123,390 and the 64 MB of L3 cache. The ECC memory support ensures data integrity for long-running computations. The 16 GB GPU VRAM provides capacity for machine learning models that exceed typical consumer GPU memory.

Content creators working with video editing software will see strong performance in rendering and encoding tasks. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,459 indicates fast video export times, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM can hold large video buffers and effects. The 384 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated features in creative applications.

Students and small business users who need a high-performance laptop for general productivity will find this build more than adequate. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking, and the GPU can handle occasional 3D work or light gaming. The 50th percentile GPU ranking means it is competitive with mid-range consumer laptops.

Gamers at 1080p resolution will find this build capable of high frame rates in most titles, though the CPU will be underutilized in GPU-bound scenarios. The strong single-thread performance ensures that CPU-bound games run smoothly, and the 16 GB VRAM allows for high-resolution texture packs.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: At 1080p, this build should deliver frame rates well above 144 FPS in esports titles, driven by the CPU's single-thread score of 1,940 in Cinebench R23 and the GPU's 3,072 shading units. For demanding AAA games, frame rates will be lower, and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking will limit performance.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU provides ample headroom for concurrent gaming and encoding. The 3DMark 8-thread score of 7,355 indicates that even with eight threads dedicated to encoding, the remaining threads can maintain high frame rates. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking ensures smooth streaming performance.

Video Editing: Multi-core rendering will be exceptionally fast, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,459 indicating quick export times. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM can hold large video buffers, and the 384 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated effects. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-resolution video scrubbing.

3D Rendering: The CPU's floating-point math score of 123,390 and the GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 performance provide a balanced rendering platform. The 48 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and the 16 GB VRAM can hold complex scenes. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means rendering times will be average compared to higher-end GPUs.

Software Development: Compilation will be fast with the integer math score of 207,524 and data compression score of 707,249. The 64 MB of L3 cache and 5.40 GHz boost clock ensure responsive builds. The ECC memory support protects against silent data corruption during long compile sessions.

Student and Office Work: The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking ensures smooth multitasking across office applications, web browsers, and communication tools. The integrated Radeon 610M provides power-efficient display output for light tasks, while the discrete GPU activates when needed. The 16 GB VRAM supports large spreadsheets and presentations.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds