SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

This laptop-class build pairs AMD's 16-core Zen 4 Dragon Range flagship with NVIDIA's Turing-based Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile GPU. The combination sits at the 71st percentile overall against all tested laptop configurations, with the CPU ranking in the 92nd percentile among all processors while the GPU lands at the 50th percentile among all graphics cards. The data indicates a substantial processing core with mid-tier graphics capability, making this a workstation-oriented platform rather than a gaming-first system.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile's 50th percentile standing among all GPUs places it at the median of the graphics landscape, which suggests it can handle competitive esports titles at moderate settings but will struggle to sustain high frame rates at maximum detail in demanding AAA games. The CPU's single-thread score of 1058 in 3DMark and 1940 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicates adequate per-core performance for driving high-refresh displays, though the GPU becomes the limiting factor in most gaming workloads.

Streaming: The RTX 5000 Mobile includes 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores, which provide hardware acceleration for encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features. The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads offer substantial headroom for simultaneous game rendering and stream encoding, with the PassMark multi-thread score of 54548 confirming strong parallel processing capability. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth on the GPU supports high-bitrate encoding without bottlenecking the video pipeline.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's 33459 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 compute delivers a balanced platform for video editing workflows. The 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM on the GPU provides ample capacity for large timelines and effects-heavy projects, while the 83.2 GB/s system memory bandwidth on the CPU side allows smooth playback of high-resolution footage. The GPU's 97.92 GPixel/s pixel rate and 293.8 GTexel/s texture rate handle compositing and color grading tasks efficiently.

3D rendering: The CPU excels in this workload, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 54548 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 33459 that places it near the top of mobile processors. The GPU's 3072 shading units and 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput provide respectable CUDA-accelerated rendering performance, though the 50th percentile GPU standing means it trails dedicated rendering cards. The 64 MB shared L3 cache on the CPU helps maintain high utilization during complex scene compilation.

Software development: The 16-core/32-thread configuration with a PassMark integer math score of 207524 and data compression score of 707249 indicates strong performance for compilation tasks and code analysis. The 5.40 GHz boost clock on a single core delivers responsive IDE interaction, while the 2-thread 3DMark score of 2063 confirms quick thread spawning for build tools. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running test suites.

Student and office work: This configuration is substantially overprovisioned for typical productivity tasks, with the 92nd percentile CPU ranking providing far more compute than document editing or spreadsheet analysis requires. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics offer a low-power fallback for basic display output, though the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile's 110 W TDP dominates power consumption. The 16 GB VRAM is excessive for office workloads but provides future-proofing for emerging AI-assisted productivity tools.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7945HX compare to its nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 8745HX?

A: The two processors are statistically tied, with the Ryzen 9 7945HX scoring an average benchmark of 60099 against the Ryzen 7 8745HX's 60104, a delta of 0 percent. This indicates the 16-core configuration offers no meaningful advantage over the 8-core part in aggregate workloads.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile and what does it mean?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it performs better than half of all graphics cards tested and worse than the other half. This places it as a mid-tier mobile graphics solution.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing manual overclocking. The base clock of 2.50 GHz can be raised, though the 55 W TDP limits the practical headroom in a laptop chassis.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is also supported for error-correcting workloads.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its predecessor and successor?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile's predecessor is the Quadro Pascal-M series, and its successor is the Ampere-MW generation. The production status is end-of-life, indicating it is no longer actively manufactured.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined system ranks at the 71st percentile among all laptop configurations, reflecting the strong CPU contribution offset by the mid-tier GPU.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU pairing. All gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a pronounced imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The Ryzen 9 7945HX's 92nd percentile standing among all CPUs contrasts sharply with the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile's 50th percentile GPU rank. In CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, rendering, and data processing, the processor delivers top-tier performance with a PassMark multi-thread score of 54548 and Cinebench R23 multi-core of 33459. However, in GPU-bound tasks like gaming at high resolutions or GPU-accelerated rendering, the graphics card becomes the limiting factor.

The 3DMark thread scaling results illustrate the CPU's strength: the max-thread score of 13612 is only 6.9 percent higher than the 16-thread score of 12737, indicating the processor approaches saturation at 16 threads with minimal benefit from additional threads. The single-thread score of 1058 and 2-thread score of 2063 show consistent per-core performance. In gaming, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking means frame rates will be constrained by graphics throughput, not CPU capability. The CPU can easily feed the GPU in most scenarios, but the GPU cannot fully utilize the CPU's available headroom.

For mixed workloads, the 83.2 GB/s system memory bandwidth may become a secondary bottleneck when the GPU requires frequent data transfers, though the 448.0 GB/s GPU memory bandwidth provides adequate local storage. The 110 W GPU TDP versus the 55 W CPU TDP indicates the graphics card consumes twice the power, suggesting thermal constraints will affect GPU boost behavior more than CPU performance in sustained loads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets professionals who require exceptional CPU compute with moderate GPU acceleration. Software developers working on large codebases will benefit from the 16-core/32-thread design and 207524 PassMark integer math score, which dramatically reduces compilation times. Data scientists and researchers running parallel workloads can leverage the 54548 multi-thread score and 707249 data compression score for efficient data processing.

Content creators working primarily in CPU-rendered workflows, such as video encoding or 3D scene preparation, will find the 33459 Cinebench R23 multi-core score delivers near-desktop-class performance. The 64 MB L3 cache helps maintain high throughput in cache-sensitive applications. Students in engineering or computer science programs will have substantial headroom for coursework, though the system is overkill for basic academic tasks.

Small business workstations handling financial modeling, database operations, or scientific computing can utilize the ECC memory support and robust multi-threaded performance. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM accommodates large datasets for visualization or machine learning inference, even if its raw compute is mid-tier. Gamers should look elsewhere, as the 50th percentile GPU will not deliver high-refresh experiences at maximum settings in modern titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. The 7000 series processor supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes, providing substantial bandwidth for future expansion. Memory support is limited to DDR5 in dual-channel configuration, with 83.2 GB/s peak bandwidth and ECC capability.

The GPU connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support. This mismatch means the graphics card cannot fully utilize the platform's bandwidth potential, though the GPU's 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth mitigates this limitation in practice. The GPU's power connectors are listed as "None" and slot width is "IGP," indicating it is soldered to the motherboard rather than upgradeable.

The CPU's 55 W TDP and GPU's 110 W TDP combine for 165 W of processor power draw, which is modest for a high-performance laptop. The suggested PSU field is null, but the absence of a discrete power connector on the GPU suggests it draws power from the motherboard. A sensible next upgrade would be a GPU with higher compute throughput, though the end-of-life status of the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile and the integrated nature of laptop components make this impractical. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support suggests future storage upgrades to Gen 5 NVMe drives would be fully utilized.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is built on the TU104 chip using TSMC's 12 nm process, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The GPU operates at a 1035 MHz base clock and 1530 MHz boost clock, with memory running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The 16 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus delivers 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for professional workloads.

Compute resources include 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster output units. The 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI workloads, respectively. The GPU achieves 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 18.80 TFLOPS FP16 with 2:1 ratio, with pixel rate of 97.92 GPixel/s and texture rate of 293.8 GTexel/s.

The 50th percentile standing among all GPUs indicates this card delivers average performance relative to the broader GPU landscape. For rendering, the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput handles moderate CUDA-accelerated workloads, while the 384 tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising and upscaling. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for professional applications, allowing large scenes and complex models to reside entirely in GPU memory. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support with 12_2 feature level, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensures broad API compatibility.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. Built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration, it operates at a 2.50 GHz base clock and 5.40 GHz boost clock. The 55 W TDP is remarkably efficient for the performance on offer, with an unlocked multiplier for enthusiast tuning.

Cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3 cache, which provides substantial capacity for data-heavy workloads. The processor supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability. PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes offers high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 92nd percentile among all processors. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 demonstrates exceptional multi-threaded performance, while the single-core score of 1940 is competitive. Geekbench results show 18254 multi-core and 2391 single-core. The PassMark multi-thread score of 54548, integer math score of 207524, and floating-point math score of 123390 indicate strong computational capability across diverse workloads. The 3DMark thread scaling from 2063 at 2 threads to 13612 at max threads shows near-linear scaling up to 16 threads with diminishing returns beyond.

Build Overview

This laptop-class build combines the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, a 16-core Zen 4 processor from the 7000 series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, a Turing-based mobile workstation GPU. The CPU represents the high end of mobile processing with a 92nd percentile ranking, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, creating a system that is compute-heavy but graphics-moderate.

The combined percentile of 71 places this configuration in the upper tier of laptop builds, though the disparity between components is notable. The CPU's 60099 average benchmark score is effectively tied with the Ryzen 7 8745HX at 60104 and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900F at 60008, while trailing the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T by 0.8 percent. This positions the processor as a top-tier mobile part with performance comparable to desktop CPUs.

The GPU's end-of-life production status and 2019 release date indicate this is a mature platform, with the 12 nm Turing architecture representing an older generation. The overall system is best characterized as a mobile workstation for CPU-intensive professional workloads, with the GPU providing adequate but not exceptional graphics acceleration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark suite reveals strong, consistent performance across diverse tests. The average benchmark score of 60099 places it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals showing minimal separation: the Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 60104 (0 percent delta), the Intel Core i9-14900F scores 60008 (0.2 percent delta), and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60572 (-0.8 percent delta). This clustering indicates the 7945HX is at parity with several high-end desktop and mobile processors.

Key CPU scores include a Cinebench R23 multi-core of 33459 and single-core of 1940, Geekbench multi-core of 18254 and single-core of 2391, and PassMark multi-thread of 54548. The 3DMark results range from 2063 at 2 threads to 13612 at max threads, with single-thread at 1058. Specialized PassMark tests show data compression at 707249, data encryption at 42703, extended instructions at 51834, and random string sorting at 81736.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking. The combined system percentile of 71 reflects the CPU's strong contribution pulling up the GPU's mid-tier performance. The data shows a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks while delivering average GPU performance.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 50th percentile standing among all GPUs provides a reference point: this card performs at the median of the graphics landscape.

Given the GPU's 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 16 GB VRAM, gaming performance is expected to be moderate. At 1080p resolution, the GPU should handle most titles at medium to high settings, with frame rates varying based on game optimization. At 1440p, the 50th percentile ranking suggests settings will need to be reduced to maintain playable frame rates. At 4K, this GPU will likely struggle with demanding titles, though the 16 GB VRAM prevents memory capacity from being the limiting factor.

The CPU's single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1058 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1940, is more than sufficient to feed the GPU in gaming scenarios. The 83.2 GB/s system memory bandwidth and 64 MB L3 cache provide adequate data flow for game engines. The primary constraint will always be the GPU's compute throughput, not the CPU. Players targeting high refresh rates should expect the GPU to be the bottleneck in most modern titles.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds