SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

85 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
GPU Bottleneck
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

This laptop pairing combines AMD's top-tier 16-core mobile processor with NVIDIA's professional Turing-based graphics solution, creating a system that sits at the 71st percentile overall among all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU is a clear performance leader, ranking in the 92nd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU lands exactly at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, making this a heavily CPU-dominant build. The data shows a workstation-class processor paired with a mid-tier professional GPU, and the benchmark results indicate that the processor will drive most workloads while the graphics card may limit gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion in this analysis is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, and manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 55 W TDP, making it a high-core-count mobile part that draws relatively modest power for its capabilities. The processor features a substantial cache hierarchy: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design with each die measuring 71 mm².

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, the 7945HX scores 33,459 in multi-core and 1,940 in single-core, showing strong scaling from single to multi-threaded performance. The 3DMark thread scaling tests reveal the core-count advantage: the processor scores 2,063 with 2 threads, 3,972 with 4 threads, 7,355 with 8 threads, 12,737 with 16 threads, and 13,612 with max threads. This scaling pattern shows near-linear gains from 2 to 16 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that point, indicating that the 16-core configuration is well-utilized up to the full thread count.

Geekbench results reinforce the balanced nature of this chip: 18,254 in multi-core and 2,391 in single-core. PassMark tests show particularly strong integer math performance at 207,524, floating-point math at 123,390, and extended instructions at 51,834. Data compression scores 707,249, while encryption reaches 42,703. The processor's average benchmark score of 60,099 places it in the 92nd percentile against all CPUs, and its nearest rivals show remarkable parity: the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX has an average score of 60,104 (0% difference), the Intel Core i9-14900F scores 60,008 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59,641 (0.8% behind). Interestingly, the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60,572, which puts the 7945HX 0.8% behind that server chip.

For real workloads, these scores indicate that the 7945HX can handle video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and scientific computing with ease, given its multi-core dominance. The single-thread score of 1,940 in Cinebench R23 and 1,058 in 3DMark single-thread suggest responsive everyday use and strong performance in lightly threaded applications as well. The 5.40 GHz boost clock is notable for a 16-core mobile chip, and the Zen 4 architecture's improvements over previous generations are evident in the efficiency of these scores relative to the 55 W TDP.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU in this pairing is stark. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, and the combined system lands at the 71st percentile. This 42-percentage-point gap between the processor and graphics card suggests that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU will have significant headroom in most scenarios.

For gaming, the CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads are far more than what most games require, even at high settings. The 3DMark thread scaling data shows that performance plateaus around 16 threads (12,737) with only a modest gain to max threads (13,612), meaning games that typically use 4-8 threads will not stress this processor. The GPU, with its 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, will likely be the limiting factor for frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions where GPU load increases. The CPU's 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and dual-channel DDR5 support provide ample data throughput for the GPU, but the GPU's 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is modest by modern standards.

In content creation and professional workloads, the balance shifts. CPU-heavy tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering (CPU-based), and software compilation will leverage the full 16-core capability of the 7945HX, and the GPU will be less of a constraint. GPU-accelerated rendering, however, will be limited by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh's compute capabilities. The PassMark physics score of 2,500 and multithread score of 54,548 indicate strong CPU physics simulation, which benefits gaming and simulation workloads, but the overall balance in this system is clearly CPU-first.

The data implies that users should expect CPU-bound productivity workloads to perform exceptionally well, while GPU-bound gaming and rendering tasks will be constrained by the graphics card. This is not necessarily a poor balance — it depends on the intended use case — but it is a system where the processor significantly outclasses the graphics solution.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of both components. The CPU's single-thread performance (1,940 in Cinebench R23, 1,058 in 3DMark single-thread) is more than sufficient for gaming, and the multi-core scores suggest no CPU bottleneck in modern titles. The GPU, however, with its 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, will determine the achievable frame rates.

At 1080p resolution, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh should deliver playable frame rates in most titles, with the 6 GB VRAM being adequate for current games at medium-to-high settings. The GPU's 192-bit memory bus and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest, so texture-heavy scenes and high-resolution assets may cause performance dips. At 1440p, expect frame rates to drop meaningfully, and at 4K, the GPU will likely struggle to maintain smooth gameplay in demanding titles. The 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide ray tracing and DLSS support, which can help offset raw performance limitations in supported games, but the overall GPU compute is entry-level for a 30-series class part.

The CPU's 3DMark max-threads score of 13,612 indicates that it will not bottleneck the GPU in any scenario, and the 2-thread score of 2,063 shows strong low-thread performance for older games or those with poor multi-threading. In CPU-intensive games like strategy titles or simulators, the 7945HX will provide excellent performance, but the GPU will still cap overall frame rates. Given the 50th percentile GPU positioning, this system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, with the expectation that frame rates will be moderate rather than competitive for high-refresh displays.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets professionals and power users who need exceptional multi-threaded CPU performance in a laptop form factor, with the GPU serving as a secondary consideration. Content creators working with video editing, 3D modeling, and software development will benefit most from the 16-core 7945HX, as these workloads scale well with core count and thread count. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,459 and PassMark multithread score of 54,548 demonstrate the CPU's capability for heavy compute tasks.

Students in engineering, computer science, or data science programs will find the processor's performance useful for compilation, simulation, and analysis workloads, though the GPU may be limiting for any graphics-heavy coursework. Small business workstations that require CPU-intensive applications like database processing, data encryption (PassMark encryption score of 42,703), or financial modeling will see strong performance, with the Quadro GPU providing professional driver support and reliability.

Gamers at 1080p who play less demanding titles or esports games will find this system adequate, but those seeking high-refresh gaming at 1440p or 4K should look elsewhere. The system is also suitable for developers who need to run virtual machines, containers, or extensive build processes — the 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache provide excellent throughput for parallel workloads. The 92nd percentile CPU ranking makes this a top-tier processor choice, while the 50th percentile GPU positions it as a mid-range graphics solution.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX delivers a comprehensive benchmark suite that confirms its flagship mobile status. In 3DMark, the processor scores 12,737 with 16 threads and 13,612 with max threads, representing strong scaling from the 2-thread score of 2,063 and 4-thread score of 3,972. The 8-thread score of 7,355 shows consistent gains, and the single-thread score of 1,058 rounds out a well-balanced thread-scaling profile. Cinebench R15 results show 5,289 in multi-core and 308 in single-core, while R23 improves to 33,459 and 1,940 respectively.

Geekbench scores of 18,254 multi-core and 2,391 single-core align with the other benchmarks, placing the CPU in the 92nd percentile against all CPUs. The average benchmark score of 60,099 puts it in close competition with the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60,104, 0% difference), Intel Core i9-14900F (60,008, 0.2% ahead), and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59,641, 0.8% behind). PassMark tests show particularly strong performance in data compression (707,249), integer math (207,524), and floating-point math (123,390), with a multithread score of 54,548 and single-thread score of 4,040.

The GPU's benchmark data is sparse — there are no benchmark scores listed for the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, and no nearest rivals are provided. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs is the primary comparative metric, placing it at the median of all graphics cards. The combined system percentile of 71 indicates that the CPU's high performance lifts the overall pairing above the median, even though the GPU sits at the midpoint. This combined picture suggests a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks while offering moderate GPU performance relative to the broader ecosystem.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The average benchmark score of 60,099 places it 0% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60,104), 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-14900F (60,008), and 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (59,641).

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 192-bit bus and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the mobile Dragon Range platform.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7945HX supports ECC memory, which is valuable for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the Turing architecture (chip TU106) on a 12 nm process from TSMC, with 10,800 million transistors.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The pairing ranks at the 71st percentile overall, with the CPU at 92nd percentile and GPU at 50th percentile.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU will easily keep up with any game, but the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS and 6 GB VRAM will limit frame rates to moderate levels at 1080p. The 50th percentile GPU ranking suggests that high-refresh (144+ Hz) gaming is possible in esports titles but unlikely in demanding AAA games.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU provides ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding, with the PassMark multithread score of 54,548 indicating strong parallel processing. The GPU's NVENC capabilities (via Turing architecture) can offload encoding, though the 6 GB VRAM may be constrained with game and stream simultaneously.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,459 and Geekbench multi-core of 18,254 indicate fast export and rendering times in CPU-based workflows. The GPU's 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores can accelerate effects and AI tools, but the 6 GB VRAM may limit complex timeline performance.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be excellent given the 64 MB L3 cache and 16 cores, with PassMark floating-point math at 123,390. GPU rendering will be constrained by the Quadro's 5.299 TFLOPS, putting it below many desktop-class cards.

Software development: The 32 threads and 64 MB L3 cache make compilation and parallel builds fast, with PassMark integer math at 207,524 and data encryption at 42,703. The processor's 92nd percentile ranking ensures top-tier developer performance.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 4,040 in PassMark and 1,940 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive everyday use, while the 55 W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a laptop. The Quadro GPU provides professional driver certification for workstation applications.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is built on the AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket for the Dragon Range platform. Memory support includes DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes (CPU only), enabling fast NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity, though the current GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16.

The GPU is an MXM Module with no power connectors required, operating at 80 W TDP. The suggested PSU is not listed for this mobile configuration, which is expected since laptop power delivery is handled by the system's internal power supply. The CPU's 55 W TDP combined with the GPU's 80 W TDP means the total system power draw is moderate for a high-performance laptop.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the GPU with a newer, more powerful MXM module if the laptop chassis supports it, as the CPU has significant headroom — its 92nd percentile ranking means it is not the bottleneck in most workloads. Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 modules would benefit memory-intensive applications, and adding PCIe Gen 5 NVMe storage would take advantage of the CPU's 28 PCIe lanes. The GPU is listed as end-of-life, so replacement with a current-generation part would provide the most significant performance uplift for gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX processor with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh GPU. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor in the 92nd percentile, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, creating a combined system percentile of 71. The CPU is an active production part released in January 2023, while the GPU is end-of-life with a release date of May 2019, representing a significant generational gap between the two components.

The pairing is best described as a CPU-first workstation laptop, where the processor's 16 cores and 32 threads deliver exceptional compute performance for professional workloads, while the GPU provides adequate but not outstanding graphics capabilities. The CPU's average benchmark score of 60,099 and its tight competition with rivals like the Intel Core i9-14900F (within 0.2%) and AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D (within 0.8%) establish it as a leading mobile processor. The GPU's lack of benchmark data and absence of nearest rivals make direct comparisons difficult, but the 50th percentile ranking is clear.

The system's overall tier, based on the 71st percentile combined ranking, places it above the majority of laptop configurations in the database, driven primarily by the CPU's exceptional performance. This is a build for users who prioritize processing power over graphics performance, and the data suggests it will excel in CPU-intensive tasks while being adequate for mainstream gaming and GPU-accelerated workflows.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a professional mobile GPU based on the Turing architecture, using the TU106 chip manufactured on TSMC's 12 nm process with 10,800 million transistors and a 445 mm² die size. It features 1,920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The GPU operates at a base clock of 945 MHz and a boost clock of 1380 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration includes 6 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's compute performance is rated at 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.60 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1 ratio), with pixel rate of 88.32 GPixel/s and texture rate of 165.6 GTexel/s. The 80 W TDP is modest, and the MXM Module form factor with no power connectors suggests it is designed for laptops with integrated power delivery.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with modern APIs. Its 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs places it at the median, which is consistent with its specifications — it is a mid-range professional GPU with entry-level ray tracing capabilities. The absence of benchmark scores and nearest rivals in the data makes it difficult to assess its exact performance tier, but the specs indicate it is suitable for professional applications like CAD, 3D modeling, and light rendering, while gaming performance will be modest.

The GPU's Turing architecture, while older than current generations, provides solid feature support including hardware ray tracing and tensor cores for DLSS. The 6 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming and professional workloads, but may be limiting for high-resolution textures or large 3D scenes. The 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is moderate, and the 192-bit bus is narrower than enthusiast-class GPUs, indicating that memory-intensive workloads will see performance constraints.