SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

96 Score

Top 4% Ranking

96 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

96%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

45,152 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This analysis examines the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile in a laptop configuration. The data shows a high-performance mobile combination, with the CPU achieving a 92nd percentile rank against all tested CPUs and the GPU reaching an 84th percentile against all GPUs, placing the overall pairing at an 88th combined percentile. It must be noted upfront that no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all frame rate discussions here are estimates derived from the individual CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not direct gameplay measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the Ryzen 9 7945HX and the RTX 5090 Mobile is characterized by a significant disparity in their relative performance standings. The CPU’s 92nd percentile versus the GPU’s 84th percentile suggests the processor has a slight edge in its respective field, but the more critical bottleneck analysis comes from examining workload types. For multi-threaded tasks, the CPU demonstrates exceptional headroom with a 3DMark max-thread score of 13612 and a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459, indicating that it is unlikely to limit the GPU in scenarios that rely on heavy physics or AI calculations. Conversely, the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 30034 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5871 show it is a formidable renderer, yet the CPU’s single-thread score of 1058 in 3DMark and 1940 in Cinebench R23 will be the limiting factor in low-resolution, high-refresh-rate gaming where frame generation is less dependent on GPU compute.

The data indicates that the bottleneck shifts depending on the workload’s thread utilization. In lightly threaded tasks, such as legacy games or certain simulation engines, the CPU’s single-thread performance, while strong, dictates the ceiling. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2063 and 4-thread score of 3972 show a linear scaling that falls short of the massive multi-thread gains, meaning the RTX 5090 Mobile’s 31.80 TFLOPS of FP32 performance could be starved in these scenarios. However, in modern, well-optimized titles that use multiple cores, the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample feeding capacity, as evidenced by the 3DMark 8-thread score of 7355 and 16-thread score of 12737. The Passmark data reinforces this: integer math at 207524 and floating-point math at 123390 show the CPU can handle complex game logic, but the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 138 is surprisingly low, suggesting that driver-level issues or thermal constraints in the laptop chassis might artificially cap the GPU in some API-specific tests.

The real bottleneck in this pairing is likely thermal and power delivery, given the CPU’s 55W TDP and the GPU’s 95W TDP. The data shows the CPU has a 0% deltaPct versus the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX and only a 0.2% delta versus the Intel Core i9-14900F, meaning it is perfectly matched with its direct rivals. This suggests that in a laptop chassis, the cooling solution must manage both components simultaneously. If the system is power-limited, the GPU’s boost clock of 1515 MHz and the CPU’s boost clock of 5.40 GHz cannot be sustained concurrently, leading to a scenario where the GPU’s 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is not fully utilized because the CPU cannot issue draw calls fast enough. The data shows no measured FPS data to confirm this, but the percentile gap implies that the GPU is the more likely performance limiter in GPU-bound scenarios, while the CPU takes over in physics and simulation-heavy scenes.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark performance is anchored by an average benchmark score of 60099, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX, scores 60104, a delta of 0%, indicating they are statistically identical in overall throughput. The Intel Core i9-14900F scores 60008, a 0.2% delta, and the Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59641, an 0.8% delta, showing the 7945HX leads that group. In specific tests, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 is the standout figure, representing a 16-core workload execution that is 72% higher than the single-core score of 1940, illustrating excellent scaling. The Geekbench multi-core score of 18254 versus a single-core score of 2391 further confirms this, with a 7.6x scaling factor across cores.

The GPU’s benchmark performance shows an average score of 45152, placing it in the 84th percentile. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, scores 45384, a -0.5% delta, meaning the RTX 5090 Mobile is slightly behind that workstation card in aggregate. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 44795, a 0.8% delta, placing the mobile 5090 ahead of that desktop card. The Intel Arc A730M scores 45592, a -1% delta, and the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation scores 45972, a -1.8% delta. The most notable GPU benchmark is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5871, which is a modern, demanding test; this is complemented by a Geekbench OpenCL score of 201834 and a Vulkan score of 198405, showing strong compute API performance. The Passmark G3D score of 30034 is the highest single metric, but the Passmark DirectX 10 score of 183 and DirectX 9 score of 324 are anomalously low, suggesting legacy API performance is not a priority for this architecture.

The combined picture is one of a system that excels in sustained multi-threaded and GPU-compute workloads. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 54548 and the GPU’s Passmark GPU compute score of 13401 indicate that this pairing is designed for tasks like 3D rendering and video encoding. However, the gap between the CPU’s 92nd percentile and the GPU’s 84th percentile means that in a purely gaming context, the processor has more headroom than the graphics card can exploit, making the system slightly CPU-heavy in balance. The data shows no measured FPS to contradict this, so the estimate is that the GPU will be the primary bottleneck in most modern games at high resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 378 mm² containing 45,600 million transistors. It features 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s, which is critical for high-resolution textures and AI workloads. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, with 28 Gbps effective speed. The GPU has 10496 shading units, 328 TMUs, and 112 ROPs, with a base clock of 990 MHz and a boost clock of 1515 MHz. The pixel rate is 169.7 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 496.9 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for rasterization.

For ray tracing and AI, the GPU includes 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores, which are essential for the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support. The FP32 performance is 31.80 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 31.80 TFLOPS (1:1), meaning there is no half-rate penalty for FP16 compute, which is beneficial for machine learning inference. The benchmark scores reflect this hardware: the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5871 is a strong result for a laptop GPU, positioning it near desktop-class performance. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 198405 and OpenCL score of 201834 show that compute-heavy applications, such as Blender or Octane, will see excellent performance, though the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 138 is puzzling and suggests that this specific test may not be optimized for the Blackwell architecture.

In rendering contexts, the 24 GB VRAM is a massive advantage, allowing for large scenes that would exceed the memory capacity of the RTX 4070 Ti (which has a lower average score of 44795). The bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s ensures that texture streaming and data transfer between the CPU and GPU do not become a bottleneck, especially when combined with the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 interface. The GPU’s TDP of 95 W is relatively modest for the performance level, but the data shows no power connector specifications, indicating it is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) in the mobile sense, soldered to the motherboard. The RTX 5090 Mobile’s performance in the 84th percentile is respectable, but the deltaPct of -0.5% versus the Radeon Pro 5500 XT suggests that in professional workloads, AMD’s workstation card can match it, though the NVIDIA card offers superior ray tracing and DLSS features not captured in raw compute scores.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing targets users who need desktop-level performance in a laptop form factor, as indicated by the build class of "laptop." Gamers at 1440p or 4K resolutions will benefit most, as the GPU’s 24 GB VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for ultra-high-definition textures, while the CPU’s 16 cores ensure that background tasks like Discord or streaming do not impact frame times. The data shows the CPU’s 92nd percentile and the GPU’s 84th percentile, making this a top-tier system for enthusiasts who want to play at maximum settings without compromise.

Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, are a primary audience. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 will accelerate rendering in software like Cinema 4D, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 201834 supports GPU-accelerated effects in Adobe Premiere Pro. The 24 GB VRAM is ideal for 3D modeling with large polygonal meshes or running local AI models for image generation. Software developers compiling large codebases will see the Passmark data compression score of 707249 and encryption score of 42703, which indicate fast data processing, though the single-thread score of 4040 in Passmark means that some compilation steps will still be limited by single-core speed. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the 32 threads useful for simulation software like MATLAB, and the ECC memory support (true) ensures data integrity in long-running calculations. Small business workstations that run virtualization or database workloads will benefit from the 64 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, but the lack of a launch MSRP means cost considerations are not analyzed here.

The data suggests this is not a system for casual users or those on a tight power budget. The combined 150W TDP of CPU and GPU requires a robust cooling solution, and the IGP slot width implies it is not upgradeable. It is a purpose-built machine for professionals and hardcore gamers who demand the best mobile performance, as evidenced by the 88th combined percentile.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 55W. The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, totaling 13,140 million transistors across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The CPU is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and includes a Radeon 610M integrated GPU for basic display output.

The benchmark data shows a processor that scales exceptionally well with thread count. The 3DMark scores progress from 1058 (single-thread) to 2063 (2-thread), 3972 (4-thread), 7355 (8-thread), 12737 (16-thread), and 13612 (max-thread). This near-linear scaling up to 16 threads indicates that the Zen 4 cores are efficient and that the 32 threads are fully utilized without significant contention. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 is 17.2 times the single-core score of 1940, which is slightly below the theoretical 16x scaling due to thermal or power limits, but still excellent. The Geekbench multi-core score of 18254 versus single-core of 2391 shows a 7.6x scaling, which is lower than 3DMark because Geekbench’s workload may not fully utilize all 16 cores.

In real workloads, the Passmark results are revealing. The floating-point math score of 123390 and integer math of 207524 show strong arithmetic capabilities, which are crucial for scientific computing and financial modeling. The extended instructions score of 51834 indicates good SIMD performance for AVX-512 workloads, though the find prime numbers score of 284 is low, suggesting that certain integer-heavy algorithms are not this CPU’s strength. The data compression score of 707249 is exceptionally high, making this CPU ideal for file archiving and database operations. The physics score of 2500 in Passmark is moderate, but the 3DMark 16-thread score of 12737 suggests that gaming physics will be handled well. The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 60099 places it at 92nd percentile, just 0.2% behind the Intel Core i9-14900F, meaning that in mixed workloads, the two are virtually indistinguishable, but the AMD chip offers more cores and threads (16/32 versus the Intel’s 8/16, though the rival specs are not detailed here).

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable. The memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported, which is rare in mobile platforms and beneficial for workstation use. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, ensuring high bandwidth for data transfer between the components. The GPU is listed as an IGP (integrated) with no power connectors, indicating it is fixed to the motherboard.

For a sensible next upgrade, the data suggests that the memory is the primary candidate. The CPU supports DDR5, but the current bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is limited by the dual-channel configuration; upgrading to higher-speed DDR5 modules could increase this, though the base speed is not specified. The storage is not detailed in the FACT PACK, but the PCIe Gen 5 lanes could support a high-speed NVMe SSD, which would complement the CPU’s data compression score of 707249. The PSU headroom is not defined by a suggestedPsu field, but the CPU’s 55W TDP and the GPU’s 95W TDP total 150W, which is manageable for a laptop power brick; however, the lack of a suggested PSU means no specific wattage recommendation can be made.

The upgrade path is limited by the laptop form factor. The GPU cannot be replaced, and the CPU is soldered, so the only realistic upgrades are memory and storage. The 24 GB VRAM on the GPU is already substantial, so memory is the only component that might need expansion in the future. The platform’s support for ECC memory is a unique feature that could be leveraged for error-free computing in financial or scientific applications. The data shows no successor or predecessor for the GPU other than the GeForce 40 Mobile series, suggesting that this is a current-generation platform. The release dates are 2023-01-03 for the CPU and 2025-03-26 for the GPU, indicating a two-year gap between component releases, but they are paired here as a current system.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5090 Mobile’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5871 and the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 12737 suggest that at 1080p, the CPU might limit frame rates in esports titles, but at 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s 896.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle the load. Expect estimates of 100+ FPS in most titles at high settings, but no measured data confirms this.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads are ideal for encoding video while gaming. The Passmark multithread score of 54548 and the GPU’s NVENC (implied by tensor cores) will handle the encoding overhead without impacting the 3DMark 2-thread score of 2063, which is relevant for game logic.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33459 will accelerate exports, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 201834 supports effects. The 24 GB VRAM is sufficient for 8K timelines, and the memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s ensures smooth scrubbing.

3D rendering: The GPU’s 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 and the CPU’s Passmark floating-point math score of 123390 make this a strong pairing for Blender or Maya. The 82 RT cores will accelerate ray-traced renders, and the 24 GB VRAM holds large scenes.

Software development: The Passmark data compression score of 707249 and encryption of 42703 show fast build and security operations. The single-thread score of 4040 in Passmark is adequate for compilers, but the multi-thread score of 54548 will speed up parallel builds.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for these tasks, but the CPU’s integrated Radeon 610M allows for basic display output when the main GPU is idle, saving power. The 92nd percentile CPU ensures that any productivity suite runs flawlessly, though the high TDP may affect battery life.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s position relative to its closest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX has an average benchmark score of 60099, placing it in the 92nd percentile. It is statistically tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (0% delta) and is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900F, while being 0.8% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile has 24 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically found in server processors and is useful for error-sensitive computing tasks.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance in the 3DMark Steel Nomad test?

A: The GPU scored 5871 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This is a modern benchmark, and the score places the GPU in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, though it is 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT in average score.

Q: Is the CPU’s single-thread performance strong?

A: The CPU has a 3DMark single-thread score of 1058 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1940. While these are respectable, the multi-thread scores are significantly higher, indicating the CPU is designed for multi-threaded workloads.

Q: What is the combined percentile of the CPU and GPU?

A: The combined percentile of the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is 88, indicating that this pairing outperforms 88% of all tested CPU and GPU combinations.

Q: Are there any measured FPS data for this combination?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU and GPU pairing. All frame rate discussions are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so the following frame rates are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 5871 and the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 12737 suggest that in most modern games, the GPU will be the primary determinant of frame rates at 1440p and 4K resolutions. The 24 GB VRAM ensures that texture-heavy games will not suffer from memory overflow, and the 896.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for high-resolution assets. At 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1058 in 3DMark might limit frame rates in CPU-bound titles, but the 16 cores will handle most game engines without issue.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Valorant, the CPU’s 2-thread score of 2063 and 4-thread score of 3972 would likely produce frame rates exceeding 200 FPS, but the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 9 score of 324 suggests that legacy API games might not perform as well. For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Assassin’s Creed, the GPU’s 31.80 TFLOPS FP32 and 82 RT cores would deliver high frame rates with ray tracing enabled at 1440p. At 4K, the 24 GB VRAM is a distinct advantage, but the GPU’s 84th percentile means it will not match the top desktop GPUs like the RTX 5880 Ada Generation, which has a 1.8% higher average score. Overall, the estimated gaming performance is excellent for a laptop, but the lack of measured data means these figures should be treated as approximations.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile in a laptop class system. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 processor with a 92nd percentile rank, and the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 architecture with 24 GB of VRAM and an 84th percentile rank. The combined percentile is 88, placing this system in the top 12% of all tested configurations. The data shows that this is a high-end mobile workstation and gaming machine, with the CPU’s 60099 average score and the GPU’s 45152 average score indicating a well-matched pair for demanding workloads. The lack of measured FPS data is a caveat, but the benchmark scores suggest that this system is capable of handling any task thrown at it, from 3D rendering to high-refresh gaming, making it a top-tier choice for professionals and enthusiasts.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds