SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

95 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
95%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

38,349 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

This laptop combination pairs AMD's 16-core Dragon Range flagship processor with NVIDIA's newest Blackwell-generation mobile GPU, placing it in the top 87th percentile of all tested system configurations. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs while the GPU holds the 81st percentile among all GPUs, making this a high-end mobile platform where the processor slightly outranks the graphics solution in relative standing. Notably, no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing — the database contains no frame-rate rows for this combination — so all gaming performance figures discussed here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FL1, which anchors the Ryzen 9 7945HX to the Dragon Range mobile family. This is a laptop-class socket, meaning the upgrade path is fundamentally different from desktop systems — the CPU is soldered to the motherboard, and users should treat the processor as a fixed component for the life of the machine. The 7945HX itself is the top-end mobile part in the 7000 series, so even if the socket allowed swaps, there is no higher-tier Dragon Range CPU to move up to within the same generation.

Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel configuration, delivering a peak bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for a mobile workstation-class chip. The 7945HX exposes 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU, providing ample bandwidth for the RTX 5080 Mobile's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface as well as high-speed NVMe storage. For users considering an upgrade path, the practical approach is not CPU replacement but rather component-level upgrades around the fixed processor — adding more DDR5 memory, upgrading storage to Gen 5 NVMe drives, or pairing the system with an external GPU enclosure if the laptop supports it.

The power envelope is modest for the performance class: the CPU carries a 55 W TDP while the GPU is rated at 80 W. The database does not list a suggested PSU for this combination, but the combined 135 W thermal budget for the two primary compute components indicates that a laptop power adapter in the 200-300 W range would be typical for this class of machine. The GPU uses no external power connectors, consistent with its IGP slot width designation, meaning all power delivery is handled through the motherboard. For a sensible next upgrade, the most impactful changes would be increasing DDR5 memory capacity (especially for workloads that scale with memory bandwidth) and ensuring the storage subsystem uses the full PCIe Gen 5 capability of the CPU's 28 lanes.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture is one of a system that excels in heavily threaded workloads while maintaining strong single-threaded performance. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33,459 and Geekbench multicore score of 18,254 place it firmly in high-end desktop territory despite being a mobile chip. The 3DMark max-threads score of 13,612 and the 16-thread score of 12,737 show that performance scales well with core count, with only a modest drop from 16 to 32 threads — the max-threads score is just 6.9% higher than the 16-thread result, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 16 cores for this benchmark.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,952 is the headline graphics result, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 166,986 and Vulkan score of 169,754 indicate strong compute capability across different API environments. The PassMark G3D score of 27,711 and GPU compute score of 12,134 round out the picture of a GPU that handles both rasterization and compute tasks effectively. Comparing to the nearest rivals, the CPU's average benchmark score of 60,099 is essentially identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX (60,104, 0% delta) and within 0.2% of the Intel Core i9-14900F (60,008). The Ryzen 9 7945HX3D trails by 0.8% with a score of 59,641, while the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T leads by 0.8% at 60,572. The GPU's average score of 38,349 sits within 0.6% of the RTX 4080 Mobile (38,135) and within 0.1% of the MX570 (38,299), though the MX570 comparison is misleading — the near-identical average scores mask vastly different workload characteristics, with the RTX 5080 Mobile dominating in modern DX12 and compute benchmarks while the MX570 likely scores higher in legacy DirectX 9/10 tests.

The combined percentile of 87 indicates that this pairing outperforms 87% of all tested laptop configurations in the database. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking is notably higher than the GPU's 81st percentile, suggesting the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on TSMC's 5 nm process with a transistor count of 13,140 million across a dual-die design measuring 2x 71 mm². The Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, operates at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and boosts up to 5.40 GHz. This is the flagship mobile CPU in AMD's 7000 series, and the benchmark data confirms its positioning.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 pool is critical for gaming performance and for workloads with reused data sets. The PassMark integer math score of 207,524 and floating-point math score of 123,390 demonstrate the raw compute throughput available, while the data encryption score of 42,703 and data compression score of 707,249 indicate strong performance in security and archival workloads.

Single-threaded performance is excellent for a mobile chip: the 3DMark single-thread score of 1,058, Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,940, and Geekbench single-core score of 2,391 all point to a processor that can handle lightly threaded tasks with ease. The PassMark single-thread score of 4,040 confirms this. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,063 is almost exactly double the single-thread score, showing near-perfect scaling at low thread counts.

The 16-thread 3DMark score of 12,737 versus the max-threads score of 13,612 reveals an interesting scaling pattern — the processor gains only 6.9% when going from 16 to 32 threads, which suggests that the 3DMark test does not fully utilize the second CCX (chiplet complex) or that memory bandwidth becomes a limiting factor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33,459, however, shows much better scaling, indicating that the workload's threading model matters significantly for extracting full performance from this chip. The Geekbench multicore score of 18,254 and PassMark multithread score of 54,548 both reinforce the picture of a processor that excels in heavily threaded productivity workloads.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need desktop-class CPU performance in a laptop form factor. The 92nd percentile CPU ranking means this processor outperforms 92% of all CPUs in the database, making it suitable for professionals who run multithreaded workloads on the go. The 16 cores and 32 threads handle video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation with headroom to spare.

Content creators working with 4K video will benefit from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33,459, which indicates strong rendering performance in Adobe Premiere, DaVinci Resolve, and similar applications. The Geekbench multicore score of 18,254 supports this use case, as does the PassMark floating-point math score of 123,390 for scientific and engineering computations. The ECC memory support makes this platform attractive for financial modeling, data analysis, and other accuracy-critical workloads.

Software developers compiling large codebases will find the multithreaded scores compelling — the PassMark integer math score of 207,524 and the 3DMark max-threads score of 13,612 both indicate rapid build times. The 64 MB of L3 cache helps with frequently accessed code and data structures. Students in engineering or computer science programs will benefit from the combination of high CPU throughput and the GPU's compute capabilities, handling simulation software and machine learning coursework without needing a separate desktop machine.

Small business workstations that run virtualization, database management, or financial analysis software will find the 32 threads and ECC support valuable. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking and the system's 87th combined percentile ensure that office productivity, spreadsheet analysis, and presentation software run smoothly, while the CPU's single-threaded performance keeps UI interactions responsive.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination — the database contains no frame-rate rows for this pairing. All gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the individual component benchmark scores, and should be treated as approximations rather than measured results.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4,952 and its 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs suggest strong 1440p and 4K gaming capability. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking and strong single-threaded scores (3DMark single-thread: 1,058, Cinebench R23 single-core: 1,940) indicate that this processor will not bottleneck modern game engines at high frame rates. The 64 MB L3 cache is particularly beneficial for gaming, as game engines frequently access shared game data.

For esports titles running at 1080p, the combination of the CPU's high single-threaded performance and the GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute should deliver very high frame rates, potentially exceeding 240 FPS in lighter titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant. At 1440p, the GPU's 896.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 144.0 GPixel/s pixel rate should maintain high frame rates in competitive shooters. For AAA titles at 4K, the RTX 5080 Mobile's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory and 60 RT cores provide sufficient resources for high-detail settings, though frame rates will vary widely by title and optimization level.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 975 MHz with a boost clock of 1,500 MHz, which are relatively conservative clocks for a mobile part, but the architecture's efficiency compensates with a high transistor density of 120.6 million per mm².

Memory configuration is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a significant advantage over older mobile GPUs with smaller memory pools and lower bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1,750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective transfer rate. The 240 tensor cores and 60 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for AI workloads and ray tracing, respectively, with the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API support enabling full feature set access in modern games.

The compute specifications are impressive: 7,680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 96 ROPs deliver 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 23.04 TFLOPS of FP16 (1:1 ratio). The texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 144.0 GPixel/s translate to strong rasterization throughput. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 169,754 and OpenCL score of 166,986 indicate that the GPU handles compute workloads efficiently across different API environments.

The PassMark G3D score of 27,711 places this GPU in the 81st percentile, but the nearest rival data shows some oddities — the average score of 38,349 is within 0.6% of the RTX 4080 Mobile (38,135) and the MX570 (38,299), with deltas of 0.6% and 0.1% respectively. The MX570 A trails by 0.9% and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X also trails by 0.9%. This clustering suggests that the PassMark average score does not capture the RTX 5080 Mobile's strengths in modern workloads, where its Blackwell architecture and GDDR7 memory provide clear advantages over older parts.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 144.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, combined with the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1,058, should sustain high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth prevents VRAM-related frame drops in texture-heavy games.

Streaming: The 240 tensor cores provide hardware encoding and AI-enhanced streaming features, while the CPU's 32 threads handle encoding overhead without impacting game performance. The PassMark multithread score of 54,548 indicates ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33,459 and the GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 166,986 support smooth timeline scrubbing and fast export times in 4K projects. The 64 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth help with large media files.

3D rendering: The CPU's 32 threads and the GPU's 60 RT cores provide two distinct rendering paths — CPU-based renderers will benefit from the 16 cores, while GPU renderers leverage the 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The PassMark floating-point math score of 123,390 indicates strong numerical throughput.

Software development: The 16 cores and 32 threads accelerate compilation, with the PassMark integer math score of 207,524 and data encryption score of 42,703 supporting build servers and secure development workflows. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running build processes.

Student and office work: The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking ensures responsive multitasking across office applications, web browsing, and communication tools. The GPU's 81st percentile ranking handles spreadsheet rendering, presentation graphics, and video conferencing without strain.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU-GPU pairing?

A: The system sits at the 87th combined percentile, meaning it outperforms 87% of all tested laptop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7945HX compare to its nearest rival, the Ryzen 7 8745HX?

A: The two processors have nearly identical average benchmark scores — 60,099 for the 7945HX versus 60,104 for the 8745HX, a delta of 0%.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this platform support?

A: The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: Does the RTX 5080 Mobile have ray tracing hardware?

A: Yes, it has 60 RT cores along with 240 tensor cores for AI acceleration, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) features.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the RTX 5080 Mobile compare to the RTX 4080 Mobile in average benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38,349 on average, which is 0.6% higher than the RTX 4080 Mobile's 38,135.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this specific CPU-GPU combination?

A: No, the database contains no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing; all gaming performance figures are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU is the stronger component relative to its peers. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 81st percentile suggests that the processor has more headroom relative to its competition than the graphics card does. However, this does not mean the GPU is a weak link — the RTX 5080 Mobile's scores are competitive with the RTX 4080 Mobile (0.6% delta) and represent a significant step up from older mobile GPUs.

In gaming workloads, the bottleneck will depend on resolution and title. At 1080p with low-to-medium settings, the CPU's strong single-threaded performance (3DMark single-thread: 1,058) should keep frame rates high, but the GPU may become the limiting factor as resolution increases. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 144.0 GPixel/s pixel rate will determine maximum frame rates, and the CPU's 92nd percentile ranking should provide sufficient headroom to avoid processor-related frame drops.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33,459 and PassMark multithread score of 54,548 indicate that heavily threaded CPU tasks will be the primary bottleneck in scenarios like video encoding or 3D rendering on the CPU. The GPU's compute scores (Geekbench OpenCL: 166,986, Vulkan: 169,754) suggest that GPU-accelerated workloads will perform well, but the CPU's 16 cores will finish CPU-bound tasks faster than the GPU can accelerate certain workloads.

The 3DMark scaling data provides insight into potential CPU limitations: the max-threads score of 13,612 is only 6.9% higher than the 16-thread score of 12,737, indicating that the processor's second chiplet (the second 71 mm² die) does not scale perfectly in all workloads. This could manifest as a bottleneck in games that are sensitive to inter-chiplet communication latency, though the 64 MB shared L3 cache mitigates this by keeping frequently accessed data close to the cores. The GPU's 80 W TDP and the CPU's 55 W TDP mean the system has a combined 135 W thermal budget for compute components, which may limit sustained performance in thin-and-light chassis designs — users should expect some thermal throttling under extended full-load workloads in compact laptops.