SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

92%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

23,628 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It belongs to the 7000 series and is fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration. The base clock runs at 2.50 GHz with a boost clock up to 5.40 GHz, and the chip carries a 55 W TDP. This is a high-core-count part aimed at heavy multi-threaded workloads, and the benchmark data confirms that positioning.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 pool. Memory support is DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, yielding 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU also exposes PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the processor itself, which matters for future storage and GPU connectivity in a laptop chassis. There is an integrated Radeon 610M GPU for basic display output, though the discrete RTX 3080 Mobile will handle all serious graphics work.

Benchmark results place this CPU in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs, which puts it in the top tier of mobile processors. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,459 is a strong indicator of sustained all-core performance. Single-core performance is also respectable, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,940 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,391. The 3DMark thread scaling tests show a clear pattern: 2-thread score of 2,063, 4-thread score of 3,972, 8-thread score of 7,355, 16-thread score of 12,737, and max-thread score of 13,612. The jump from 8 to 16 threads is substantial, but the gain from 16 to max threads is modest, suggesting that the 16-core configuration is well-utilized but the memory bandwidth or power envelope begins to limit further scaling.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded strength. The multithread score is 54,548, with integer math at 207,524 and floating-point math at 123,390. Data compression scores 707,249, which is exceptional for a laptop chip. Encryption performance is also strong at 42,703. The single-thread PassMark score of 4,040 is competitive but not class-leading; the data suggests this CPU's identity is squarely in multi-core throughput rather than raw single-core speed.

Looking at nearest rivals, the data shows a tight cluster. The AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX has an average score of 60,104, essentially identical to the 7945HX's 60,099 (0% delta). The Intel Core i9-14900F scores 60,008, a 0.2% advantage for the 7945HX. The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D scores 59,641, putting the 7945HX 0.8% ahead. The Intel Xeon Gold 6338T scores 60,572, which is 0.8% higher than the 7945HX. This means the 7945HX is statistically indistinguishable from these rivals in aggregate benchmark terms, but the 7945HX's advantage is its mobile form factor with 16 cores and 32 threads, which typically comes at a power cost that these desktop or workstation parts do not face.

For real workloads, this CPU will excel in video encoding, 3D rendering, software compilation, and any task that can use 16 cores. The 32 threads make it a capable workstation-class mobile processor. Single-threaded tasks like web browsing or office applications will feel responsive due to the 5.40 GHz boost clock, but the real value is in threaded productivity. The data compression and encryption scores suggest strong performance in file archiving and security workloads. The 92nd percentile ranking means this CPU outperforms roughly 92% of all CPUs in the database, which is remarkable for a laptop part.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is built on the Ampere architecture with the GA104 chip, fabricated on Samsung's 8 nm process. It packs 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die, which translates to a transistor density of 44.4M per mm². The GPU has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation units. It also includes 48 RT cores for ray tracing and 192 tensor cores for AI-accelerated workloads. The base clock is 1,110 MHz with a boost clock of 1,545 MHz, and memory runs at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

Memory configuration is 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, providing 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is a crucial spec: 8 GB is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming in most titles, but it can be a limiting factor at 4K with high-texture packs. The bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is healthy for the memory size, and the 256-bit bus is standard for this class. The GPU's pixel rate is 148.3 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 296.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is rated at 18.98 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 18.98 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is notable for compute tasks that can leverage lower precision.

The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, meaning it is fully compatible with modern gaming APIs and ray-traced titles. It connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. The TDP is 115 W, which is a modest power target for this class, and it has no dedicated power connectors since it is a mobile part. Display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," which means the laptop manufacturer determines the physical ports.

Benchmark results place the RTX 3080 Mobile in the 69th percentile among all GPUs, which is solid but not top-tier. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,644. Geekbench OpenCL scores 104,831, and Vulkan scores 104,066. PassMark G3D scores 16,321, with GPU compute at 7,276. The DirectX 12 PassMark score is 72, DirectX 11 is 146, DirectX 10 is 120, and DirectX 9 is 170. The G2D score is 637. These numbers indicate a capable GPU that handles both gaming and compute workloads, though it is not the fastest mobile GPU available.

Nearest rival comparisons show a tight grouping. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z has an average score of 23,736, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 3080 Mobile's 23,628. The RTX 3070 Ti Mobile scores 23,518, putting the RTX 3080 Mobile 0.5% ahead. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 scores 23,877, which is 1% higher. The AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 scores 23,315, putting the RTX 3080 Mobile 1.3% ahead. This means the RTX 3080 Mobile is in the same performance band as these rivals, with differences well within margin of error.

For rendering workloads, the 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced scenes and DLSS upscaling. The 18.98 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is solid for 3D rendering in Blender, Maya, or similar software. The FP16 1:1 ratio means compute tasks that use half-precision will see full throughput. The 8 GB VRAM is the main constraint for large scenes or high-resolution textures, but for most 1080p and 1440p workloads, it is adequate. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that memory-bound tasks are not starved.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance tier of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 81, meaning this build outperforms 81% of all recorded CPU and GPU combinations in the database. This places it in the upper-middle tier of laptop configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rival, the Ryzen 7 8745HX?

A: The Ryzen 9 7945HX has an average benchmark score of 60,099, while the Ryzen 7 8745HX scores 60,104, a 0% delta. In practical terms, the two are performance peers, with the 7945HX offering 16 cores and 32 threads versus the 8745HX's 8-core configuration, but the aggregate scores show no meaningful difference.

Q: Is the RTX 3080 Mobile faster than the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile?

A: Yes, but only marginally. The RTX 3080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 23,628, while the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile scores 23,518, putting the RTX 3080 Mobile 0.5% ahead. This is within noise and not a decisive performance gap.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU, and why does it matter?

A: The RTX 3080 Mobile has 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus. This high bandwidth is important for texture streaming and memory-bound rendering tasks, and it is sufficient for smooth 1440p gaming in most titles.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7945HX supports ECC memory, which is a workstation-class feature. This makes the platform suitable for error-sensitive compute tasks like data analysis or long-running simulations where memory corruption is a concern.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and platform?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is the mobile platform for Dragon Range processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, providing a modern foundation for high-speed storage and GPU connectivity.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread performance?

A: The CPU scores 1,940 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 33,459 in multi-core, which is a 17.2x scaling factor from 1 to 32 threads. The 3DMark single-thread score is 1,058, while max-thread is 13,612, showing that the multi-thread advantage is substantial but not perfectly linear.

Who Should Build It

This CPU and GPU pairing is aimed at users who need serious compute power in a laptop form factor. The 92nd percentile CPU and 69th percentile GPU make this a strong choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D modeling, or software development. The 16-core, 32-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,459 will handle video rendering and code compilation without breaking a sweat. The Radeon 610M integrated GPU is a fallback for basic display tasks, but the RTX 3080 Mobile is the primary graphics solution.

For gamers, this build is best suited for 1080p and 1440p play. The RTX 3080 Mobile's 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are well-matched to these resolutions, and the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,058) ensures that game logic and physics are not bottlenecked. The 69th percentile GPU ranking means it will handle most titles at high settings, but it is not a 4K ultra machine. The 48 RT cores enable ray tracing, but enabling it will reduce frame rates, so DLSS is recommended for ray-traced titles.

Developers and data scientists will appreciate the 32 threads and ECC memory support. The PassMark data encryption score of 42,703 and data compression score of 707,249 indicate strong performance in security and archival workloads. The floating-point math score of 123,390 is useful for numerical simulations. Students in engineering or computer science fields will benefit from the CPU's multi-core prowess for compiling and running simulations, and the GPU's compute performance (PassMark GPU compute score of 7,276) supports machine learning workloads at a modest scale.

Small business workstations that need to handle CAD, video editing, or database processing will find this build capable. The CPU's 92nd percentile ranking means it outperforms most desktop CPUs, and the GPU's 69th percentile is adequate for professional visualization. The 8 GB of VRAM is a consideration for large 3D scenes, but for typical workstation tasks, it is sufficient. The build is not suited for extreme multi-GPU rendering or 4K video editing with heavy effects, but for mainstream professional workloads, it is a solid choice.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a CPU-heavy pairing. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is at the 69th percentile. This imbalance means the CPU will not be the limiting factor in most workloads; the GPU will hit its ceiling first in gaming and graphics-intensive tasks. In CPU-bound scenarios like software compilation, the GPU will be idle, and the CPU's 32 threads will be the star. In GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions, the GPU's 8 GB of VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth will be the constraint.

The 3DMark thread scaling data provides evidence of the CPU's headroom. The max-thread score of 13,612 is only 6.9% higher than the 16-thread score of 12,737, suggesting that the CPU is near its practical limit in all-core workloads. This means the CPU is well-utilized but not oversubscribed; there is no significant bottleneck from memory bandwidth or power delivery. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 16,321 versus the CPU's multi-thread score of 54,548 indicates that the CPU is far more capable in raw compute than the GPU, which is typical for this class.

In gaming, the balance depends on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,058) will be sufficient to feed the GPU, and the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. At 1440p, the GPU's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM will be stressed, and the gap between CPU and GPU capabilities will narrow. At 4K, the GPU will be severely limited by VRAM capacity, and the CPU will be underutilized. The combined percentile of 81 reflects this balance: the build is well-rounded but not optimized for any single extreme.

The FPS scaling data is not measured for this exact combination, so all gaming expectations are estimated from benchmark scores. The CPU's 92nd percentile and GPU's 69th percentile suggest that the GPU will be the limiting factor in most games, and frame rates will be typical of a mid-range to upper-mid-range laptop GPU. The CPU will not cause stutters or physics bottlenecks, but the GPU's 8 GB VRAM will cap texture quality in newer titles.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile. All frame rate figures below are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results. The data indicates that this pairing is a capable 1080p and 1440p gaming machine, with the CPU providing ample headroom and the GPU setting the performance ceiling.

At 1080p, the RTX 3080 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 16,321 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,644 suggest that most modern titles will run at high to ultra settings with frame rates in the 80-120 FPS range, depending on the game's optimization. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for 1080p textures, and the 448.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures smooth texture streaming. The CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,058) will not bottleneck the GPU, so frame rates will be GPU-limited.

At 1440p, the GPU's 69th percentile ranking means it will handle most titles at medium to high settings. Frame rates will drop to the 60-90 FPS range for demanding titles, and ray tracing will require DLSS to maintain playable frame rates. The 8 GB VRAM becomes a concern at 1440p with high-texture packs, as some modern titles exceed 8 GB of VRAM usage. The 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate, but the capacity limit will cause stutters in VRAM-heavy scenes.

At 4K, the GPU is not well-suited. The 8 GB VRAM is a hard limit, and the 69th percentile ranking indicates that 4K gaming is out of reach for most titles at high settings. The CPU would not be the bottleneck, but the GPU will struggle with even medium settings at 4K. The estimated frame rates at 4K would be in the 30-50 FPS range for non-demanding titles and below 30 FPS for AAA games. This build is best treated as a 1080p high-refresh or 1440p balanced gaming laptop, not a 4K machine.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 60,099, placing it in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs. The most relevant scores are Cinebench R23 multi-core at 33,459 and single-core at 1,940, Geekbench multi-core at 18,254 and single-core at 2,391, and 3DMark max-thread at 13,612. The PassMark multithread score is 54,548, with integer math at 207,524 and floating-point math at 123,390. These numbers position the CPU as a top-tier mobile part, outperforming 92% of all CPUs in the database.

The GPU's average benchmark score is 23,628, placing it in the 69th percentile among all GPUs. The key scores are 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2,644, Geekbench OpenCL at 104,831, Geekbench Vulkan at 104,066, and PassMark G3D at 16,321. The PassMark GPU compute score is 7,276. These scores indicate a solid mid-to-upper-tier mobile GPU, outperforming 69% of all GPUs.

The combined picture is a laptop that is CPU-dominant. The 92nd percentile CPU paired with a 69th percentile GPU means that the system will excel in CPU-bound tasks like rendering, compilation, and data processing, while gaming and GPU compute will be average-to-good but not exceptional. The combined percentile of 81 reflects this: the build is better than 81% of all recorded combinations, but the GPU holds it back from the top tier. The nearest rival comparisons confirm this: the CPU is statistically tied with the Ryzen 7 8745HX and Core i9-14900F, while the GPU is statistically tied with the GTX TITAN Z and RTX 3070 Ti Mobile.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket for Dragon Range processors. This socket supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, and the CPU carries 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The platform is modern, but it is not upgradeable in the traditional sense: the CPU is soldered to the motherboard in most laptop designs, and the GPU is also non-removable. The upgrade path is therefore limited to memory and storage.

The CPU supports DDR5 memory, and the current memory bandwidth is 83.2 GB/s. Upgrading to higher-capacity or higher-speed DDR5 modules could improve performance in memory-bound workloads, but the dual-channel bus is a fixed constraint. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes from the CPU support the latest NVMe SSDs, so adding a Gen 5 storage drive would be a sensible upgrade for faster load times and data access. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is compatible with the CPU's Gen 5 lanes, but the GPU itself is not upgradeable.

The CPU TDP is 55 W, and the GPU TDP is 115 W, for a combined thermal envelope of 170 W. There is no suggested PSU value in the data, but the laptop's power adapter must deliver at least this combined TDP plus headroom for the rest of the system. The GPU has no dedicated power connectors, as it is a mobile part, so the motherboard provides all power. A sensible next upgrade would be to increase memory capacity to 32 GB or 64 GB for heavy multitasking, or to add a high-capacity Gen 5 NVMe drive for storage. The CPU and GPU are at their performance limits within this platform.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 part with a 92nd percentile ranking, and the GPU is an Ampere-based mobile part with a 69th percentile ranking. The combined percentile is 81, which places this laptop in the upper-middle tier of all recorded builds. It is a desktop-class CPU in a mobile chassis, paired with a mid-to-upper-tier GPU.

The CPU is the star of this build. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 33,459 is exceptional for a laptop, and the 92nd percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. The GPU is capable but not class-leading; its 69th percentile ranking and 8 GB of VRAM are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming and mainstream rendering, but they are not top-tier. The overall tier is a high-performance laptop for content creation and productivity, with gaming as a secondary but solid capability. This is not a maximum-performance gaming laptop, but it is a well-rounded workstation-class machine that can handle almost any task thrown at it, with the GPU being the only notable limitation.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

GPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds