SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

60,099 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX mobile processor with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated GPU. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread Zen 4 part from the Dragon Range series, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution. Together they place this laptop configuration at the 82nd combined percentile in the database.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket, and the platform is classified as a laptop build. Memory support is limited to DDR5, operating in dual-channel mode with a measured memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU also supports ECC memory, which is a notable feature for workstation-oriented workloads in a mobile chassis. PCIe connectivity is provided by Gen 5 with 28 lanes available from the CPU alone; the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is sufficient for an integrated part.

Because this is a laptop build, the upgrade path is fundamentally constrained. The Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU (IGP) with a slot width of "IGP" and no separate power connectors. The CPU has a TDP of 55 W and the GPU a TDP of 15 W, yielding a combined thermal envelope of 70 W that is well within typical laptop cooling capabilities. There is no suggested PSU data in the database, but given the low power draw and the fixed nature of a laptop, power supply headroom is not a user-serviceable concern. A sensible next upgrade, if the chassis allows, would be to increase system memory capacity or speed, since memory bandwidth is system dependent for the GPU and the dual-channel DDR5 configuration at 83.2 GB/s is the primary shared resource. No discrete GPU upgrade is possible without a different platform.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU demonstrates strong multi-threaded performance. In 3DMark, it scores 12,737 in the 16-thread test, 7,355 in 8-thread, 3,972 in 4-thread, 2,063 in 2-thread, and 1,058 in single-thread. The maximum-thread score reaches 13,612. Cinebench R23 results show 33,459 in multicore and 1,940 in single-core; Geekbench yields 18,254 multicore and 2,391 single-core. PassMark scores include 54,548 multithread, 4,040 single-thread, and specialized tests such as 707,249 in data compression, 42,703 in data encryption, and 123,390 in floating-point math.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 60,099, placing it at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals show that the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX has an average score of 60,104 (delta 0%), meaning effectively identical performance. The Intel Core i9-14900F is 0.2% lower, the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 0.8% lower, and the Intel Xeon Gold 6338T is 0.8% higher. These deltas indicate that the 7945HX is firmly in the top tier of mobile and desktop processors, with performance essentially matching the best of the previous generation.

The GPU, AMD Radeon 860M, produces Geekbench OpenCL score of 22,759 and Vulkan score of 30,043. Its average benchmark score is 26,401, which places it at the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with an average score of 26,421 (delta -0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 with 26,331 (delta 0.3%), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary with 26,553 (delta -0.6%), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 with 26,683 (delta -1.1%). Thus, the Radeon 860M performs on par with a dedicated mobile GTX-class GPU, sitting just 0.3% ahead of the RTX 5060 and 0.1% behind the MX550.

The combined picture is a CPU that is in the top 8% of all CPUs (92nd percentile) and a GPU that is in the top 28% (72nd percentile). The overall build percentile is 82, meaning it outranks the vast majority of configurations. The CPU is clearly the stronger component; the GPU, while respectable for an integrated solution, does not match the CPU's relative standing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 72nd percentile and its Vulkan score of 30,043 suggest it can handle esports titles at lower resolutions with high frame rates. However, no measured FPS data exists for this build, and the GPU is only slightly ahead of an RTX 5060 in average score, so demanding AAA titles will likely require reduced settings to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1,940 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 4,040 PassMark) ensures that CPU-bound titles will not be a bottleneck.

Streaming: With 16 cores and 32 threads, the CPU has ample headroom for encoding while gaming. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33,459 and PassMark multithread of 54,548 indicate that the CPU can handle concurrent gaming and encoding workloads without significant performance degradation. The GPU’s integrated nature does not have dedicated encoding hardware, so streaming would rely on the CPU’s encoding capabilities.

Video editing: The CPU’s Geekbench multicore of 18,254 and 3dmark max threads of 13,612 support smooth timeline scrubbing and rendering in software. The GPU’s 512 shading units and 32 TMUs provide acceleration for effects and transitions. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is adequate for 4K video editing, though shared with the GPU.

3D rendering: The PassMark floating-point score of 123,390 and integer math of 207,524 highlight the CPU’s raw compute power. The GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 performance can assist in viewport rendering but is not intended for heavy final-frame renderer tasks. The CPU’s 64 MB L3 cache and 13.14 billion transistors contribute to efficient multi-frame rendering.

Software development: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2,391 Geekbench and 4,040 PassMark single-thread provide fast compile times for single-threaded parts of a build. The 32 threads accelerate parallel compilation, with a 16-thread score of 12,737. The GPU is not a primary factor in development, but its Vulkan support (1.4) enables API testing.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 92nd percentile ensures instant response in word processors, spreadsheets, and browser workloads. The GPU’s 72nd percentile is more than enough for desktop compositing and 2D graphics. The 55W CPU and 15W GPU draw minimal power, making this a quiet and battery-efficient configuration for everyday tasks.

Who Should Build It

The build is aimed at users who need exceptional CPU performance in a laptop form factor. The 92nd percentile CPU makes it a prime candidate for content creators, software developers, and researchers who run CPU-intensive workloads such as 3D simulation, data analysis, and heavy compilation. The GPU’s 72nd percentile allows for casual gaming and accelerated graphics, but it is not a gaming-first platform. Gamers targeting 1080p or lower resolutions with moderate settings will find the system capable, especially for esports titles. Students and office workers benefit from the low power draw and high responsiveness. Small business workstations that rely on multithreaded productivity apps will find the 16-core CPU capable of handling large spreadsheets, virtual machines, and database queries. The inclusion of ECC memory support makes it suitable for sensitive data integrity tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a CPU-heavy build. The CPU sits at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU is at the 72nd percentile. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor for most titles, especially at higher resolutions. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1,940 (Cinebench R23) and 4,040 (PassMark) ensures it can feed the GPU, but the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 and 16 ROPs cap the rendering throughput. In contrast, for CPU-bound workloads such as compilation, video encoding, and 3D scene construction, the CPU dominates and the GPU is rarely a bottleneck. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared, and with the GPU using system memory, memory bandwidth could become a secondary constraint in heavy multitasking, but the dual-channel DDR5 configuration is adequate. The performance deltas from the rivals show that the GPU’s average score is within 1.1% of the NVIDIA RTX A4000, but the CPU is within 0.8% of the Xeon Gold 6338T, meaning the CPU is more tightly grouped at the top of its field than the GPU is.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK. All frame-rate expectations are estimated from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 30,043 and OpenCL of 22,759 indicate a performance level comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (delta -0.1%) and slightly above the RTX 5060 (delta 0.3%). Therefore, the Radeon 860M should deliver playable frame rates at 1080p in esports and older AAA titles, with medium to low settings required for recent demanding games. The CPU’s high single-thread performance (1,940 Cinebench R23 single) ensures that the CPU will not cause frame drops in CPU-limited scenes. For 720p gaming, the GPU will be the primary bottleneck. In the absence of measured data, these estimates are based on the relative scores and should be used as a general guide.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process. It has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. Memory is system shared, meaning the GPU uses the same DDR5 memory as the CPU, with a dual-channel bus and 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, though the actual bandwidth is "System Dependent". The GPU contains 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, and 8 ray-tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 3.072 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is also 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1). It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 26,401 places it at the 72nd percentile, with rivals like the RTX 5060 and MX550 within 0.3% or less. For rendering workloads, the 512 shading units and 8 RT cores provide hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the low ROP count and shared memory limit its utility for heavy 3D rendering. The 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 is sufficient for moderate graphics tasks but not for professional-grade rendering.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU has ECC memory support.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the CPU?

A: The dual-channel DDR5 configuration provides a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: How many ray-tracing cores does the Radeon 860M have?

A: The GPU has 8 ray-tracing cores.

Q: What is the CPU’s base and boost clock speed?

A: The base clock is 2.50 GHz and the boost clock is 5.40 GHz.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The build is at the 82nd percentile among all configurations.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The GPU has a FP32 performance of 3.072 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the CPU have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, the CPU includes a Radeon 610M as integrated graphics, but this build uses the Radeon 860M as the primary GPU.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture and codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process and contains 13,140 million transistors on a die size of 2x 71 mm². The cache structure includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The base clock is 2.50 GHz, with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and it has a TDP of 55 W. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it has a PCIe Gen 5 interface with 28 lanes from the CPU. It supports ECC memory, has an unlocked multiplier, and is an active production part released on 2023-01-03.

Benchmarks show a high multi-threaded performance: 33,459 in Cinebench R23 multicore, 18,254 in Geekbench multicore, and 54,548 in PassMark multithread. Single-thread performance is also strong, with 1,940 in Cinebench R23 single and 4,040 in PassMark single. These scores place the CPU at the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. The nearest rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 8745HX with a delta of 0%, and the Intel Core i9-14900F is 0.2% lower, indicating the 7945HX is effectively tied with the best mobile processors. For real workloads, the 16 cores and 32 threads enable heavy parallel tasks such as video rendering, code compilation, and simulation. The single-thread performance ensures snappy responsiveness and good performance in lightly threaded applications.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX mobile CPU with the AMD Radeon 860M integrated GPU. The CPU is a 16-core Zen 4 part with a 55 W TDP, and the GPU is a 15 W RDNA 3.5 integrated solution. The combined percentile of the build is 82, indicating that it performs better than 82% of all recorded builds. The CPU is the standout component, ranking at the 92nd percentile, while the GPU ranks at the 72nd percentile. This is a high-performance mobile workstation that can handle CPU-intensive tasks and also provides a capable integrated graphics solution for casual gaming and desktop productivity. The lack of a discrete GPU means it is not a hardcore gaming machine, but the CPU’s top-tier performance makes it a strong choice for developers, creators, and professionals who need a portable powerhouse.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds