SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

88 Score

Top 12% Ranking

88 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation represents a high-end mobile workstation configuration aimed at demanding professional and enthusiast workloads. This pairing combines a 16-core Zen 4 Dragon Range processor with an Ada Lovelace professional mobile GPU, and benchmark data reveals a compelling but nuanced performance profile. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU, despite its professional positioning, lands at the 21st percentile in the single available 3DMark Steel Nomad test, creating an interesting balance discussion for potential builders.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the AD103 chip using TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 45,900 million transistors across a 379 mm² die. The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This substantial VRAM capacity positions the card for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and complex scenes that would exhaust lesser mobile GPUs. The memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed, which is a respectable configuration for professional mobile workloads.

Clock speeds are set at 1425 MHz base and 2115 MHz boost, which are moderate figures for a mobile part but consistent with the power envelope. The GPU's TDP is rated at 120 W, a significant power draw for a laptop component, indicating that this is not a thin-and-light solution but rather a performance-focused mobile workstation. The card has no power connectors, as it draws power directly through the IGP slot configuration, and its display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," meaning the actual ports vary by laptop implementation.

The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, alongside 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. This hardware configuration provides the foundation for hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-assisted features like DLSS. The pixel rate is 236.9 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 643.0 GTexel/s, indicating strong fill-rate capabilities for a mobile GPU. FP32 performance is rated at 41.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 achieving the same figure at a 1:1 ratio, which is notable for compute-heavy tasks such as machine learning inference or scientific simulations that can leverage mixed-precision operations.

The single benchmark score for this GPU is from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it achieved 3596. This score places the GPU at the 21st percentile among all GPUs, which is surprisingly low given the professional positioning. However, the nearest rivals listed are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545, GeForce GT 735M, GeForce GTX 1050, and AMD Radeon HD 6770 — all older or entry-level desktop parts. The deltaPct values are minimal: 0.1% ahead of the GT 545, 0.6% behind the GT 735M, 0.9% behind the GTX 1050, and 1.5% behind the HD 6770. This suggests that in the Steel Nomad workload, the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada performs similarly to these much older GPUs, which is an anomaly that warrants investigation — it is possible the mobile variant is heavily power-limited or thermally constrained in this specific test, or that the benchmark is not representative of the card's professional strengths.

For rendering workloads, the combination of 16 GB VRAM, 576 GB/s bandwidth, and 76 RT cores suggests strong performance in GPU-accelerated renderers that utilize ray tracing, such as those found in DCC applications. The tensor cores also enable AI denoising and upscaling features that can accelerate final-frame renders. The data shows a GPU that is designed for professional tasks rather than raw gaming rasterization, which may explain the modest Steel Nomad score compared to its specifications.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 1027 in single-thread, 2001 in 2-threads, 3844 in 4-threads, 7158 in 8-threads, 12501 in 16-threads, and 13447 in max-threads. This scaling from 2 to 16 threads shows near-linear improvement, indicating that the processor can effectively utilize its 16 cores and 32 threads. The max-thread score of 13447 is only 7.6% higher than the 16-thread score, suggesting that simultaneous multithreading (SMT) provides diminishing returns beyond 16 physical cores.

In Cinebench R23, the CPU achieves 1807 single-core and 29400 multi-core scores. The multi-core result is particularly strong, placing the processor in the 94th percentile among all CPUs. The average benchmark score is 69875, which is used for comparison against nearest rivals. The nearest competitors are the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F with an average score of 69996 (0.2% higher), Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70163 (0.4% higher), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69515 (0.5% lower), and Intel Core i7-14700K at 69355 (0.7% lower). These deltas are all under 1%, indicating that the Ryzen 9 7940HX performs essentially on par with these desktop-class rivals, which is remarkable for a mobile processor.

The PassMark suite provides additional insight into specific workload characteristics. The CPU scores 202883 in integer math, 121383 in floating-point math, 53204 in multithread, 3942 in single-thread, 693741 in data compression, 41974 in data encryption, 51029 in extended instructions, 81775 in random string sorting, 2297 in physics, and 273 in find prime numbers. These scores indicate a balanced processor that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads competently, with particularly strong data compression and integer math performance.

The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, as previously noted, places it at the 21st percentile. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 58, which reflects the strong CPU contribution offset by the GPU's lower relative standing. The combined picture is of a laptop that excels in CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and scientific computing, while the GPU, despite its professional credentials, may not deliver the gaming or rasterization performance that its name suggests. The data shows a significant imbalance: a CPU that rivals desktop parts in the 94th percentile paired with a GPU in the 21st percentile.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The processor contains 13,140 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design with each die measuring 71 mm². It has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The TDP is rated at 55 W, which is modest for a 16-core part and indicates that the mobile platform is prioritizing efficiency while still achieving high boost clocks.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 cache is beneficial for workloads that exhibit data locality, such as database operations or certain scientific simulations. Memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The processor does not support ECC memory, which may be a consideration for mission-critical professional workloads where error correction is required. PCIe support is Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connections to GPUs and NVMe storage.

The integrated graphics are provided by the Radeon 610M, which is a basic solution for display output and light 2D workloads, but it is not intended for gaming or compute tasks. The processor uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking on supported systems, although this is less common in mobile form factors due to thermal constraints.

The benchmark scores translate to real-world performance in several ways. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1807 indicates strong per-thread performance, which is critical for applications that are not well-parallelized, such as legacy software or certain productivity tools. The multi-core score of 29400 is exceptional for a mobile processor, rivaling desktop parts like the Ryzen 9 7950X, which scores 69515 on average benchmark and is only 0.5% higher than the 7940HX's average. This suggests that the 7940HX can handle heavily threaded workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing without the need for a desktop workstation.

The PassMark scores provide further granularity. The integer math score of 202883 and floating-point math score of 121383 indicate strong arithmetic performance, while the data encryption score of 41974 and extended instructions score of 51029 show that the processor handles cryptographic and SIMD workloads efficiently. The single-thread score of 3942 is respectable, and the multithread score of 53204 reflects the 16-core design. The data compression score of 693741 is particularly high, making this processor well-suited for file archiving, database compression, and similar tasks.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied to the measured performance

The target user for this build is a professional who requires desktop-class CPU performance in a mobile form factor, with the GPU serving as a secondary consideration. The 94th percentile CPU ranking makes this laptop ideal for software developers who compile large codebases, data scientists running complex simulations, and researchers conducting computational analysis. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400 means that tasks like code compilation, which are often highly parallelized, will complete quickly.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU's multi-threaded prowess. The 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with the 64 MB L3 cache, provide the computational headroom needed for timeline scrubbing, effect rendering, and export encoding. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth, while not top-tier in gaming benchmarks, are sufficient for GPU-accelerated effects and previews in professional video editing software.

For students in engineering, computer science, or natural sciences, this laptop offers the processing power to run simulations, analyze datasets, and compile programs without the need for a separate desktop system. The processor's strong single-thread score of 1807 in Cinebench R23 ensures that even less-parallelized academic software runs smoothly. Small business workstations that handle financial modeling, database management, or CAD software will also find the CPU performance compelling, though the lack of ECC memory support may be a limitation for some enterprise applications.

Gamers who prioritize CPU-bound titles, such as strategy games or simulation games with complex AI, will find the Ryzen 9 7940HX to be an excellent foundation. However, the GPU's 21st percentile ranking suggests that high-end gaming performance may not be this system's primary strength. Gamers at 1080p with moderate settings may still have a satisfactory experience, but those seeking maximum frame rates at 1440p or 4K should consider whether the GPU meets their expectations.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU in this pairing is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The processor's 94th percentile ranking indicates that it is among the top 6% of all CPUs, while the GPU's 21st percentile places it in the bottom fifth of all GPUs. This creates a scenario where the CPU is unlikely to be the limiting factor in most workloads, and the GPU will often be the bottleneck.

In CPU-intensive workloads such as software compilation, scientific computing, or data processing, the CPU's performance will dominate, and the GPU will have minimal impact. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400 and the PassMark multithread score of 53204 demonstrate that the processor can handle demanding computational tasks without assistance from the GPU. In these scenarios, the system will perform admirably, and the GPU's lower percentile is irrelevant.

In GPU-bound workloads such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU's 21st percentile ranking will be the limiting factor. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, which is comparable to older GPUs like the GTX 1050, suggests that gaming performance will be modest. For a game that is GPU-limited, the frame rate will be dictated by the GPU's capabilities, and the CPU's high performance will not translate into higher FPS beyond the GPU's output limit. The FPS scaling in GPU-bound scenarios will be constrained by the GPU, meaning that even with a powerful CPU, the gaming experience will be similar to what a GTX 1050-class GPU would deliver.

The combined percentile of 58 reflects this imbalance, indicating that the overall system performance is dragged down by the GPU. For users who primarily perform CPU-heavy tasks and use the GPU only for display output or light acceleration, this pairing is well-suited. However, for users who expect balanced performance across both CPU and GPU workloads, the GPU will be a persistent bottleneck.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, which places it at the 21st percentile, suggests that high-refresh gaming at demanding settings is not achievable. The GPU is comparable to a GTX 1050 in this benchmark, indicating that esports titles at lower settings may run acceptably, but modern AAA games at high refresh rates will likely fall short of expectations.

Streaming: The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400, provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming. The processor can handle both game logic and encoding without significant performance degradation, making this laptop suitable for streaming even if the GPU's gaming performance limits the game quality settings.

Video editing: The combination of the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance and the GPU's 16 GB VRAM makes this system capable of handling 4K video editing timelines. The PassMark data compression score of 693741 indicates fast processing of intermediate codecs, while the GPU's tensor cores can accelerate AI-based editing features.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400 will accelerate CPU-based renderers, while the GPU's 76 RT cores and 16 GB VRAM support GPU-accelerated ray tracing. However, the GPU's 21st percentile ranking suggests that GPU rendering performance will be modest compared to higher-tier mobile GPUs.

Software development: The CPU's 94th percentile ranking and strong multi-threaded performance make this an excellent choice for compiling large codebases. The PassMark integer math score of 202883 indicates fast arithmetic operations, and the 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for iterative compilation tasks.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1807, ensures that everyday productivity applications run responsively. The 16 cores provide headroom for multitasking, such as running multiple virtual machines or handling large spreadsheets, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for display output and office graphics.

Gaming Performance — estimated from benchmark scores

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, as the FACT PACK contains no entries in the measuredFpsUltraByGame field. Therefore, all FPS discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, which places it at the 21st percentile and comparable to a GTX 1050, suggests that gaming performance will be modest. The nearest rival comparisons show the GPU performing within 1.5% of older parts like the GT 545, GT 735M, GTX 1050, and HD 6770.

At 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA games will likely struggle to maintain smooth frame rates, as the GPU's performance class is well below what is typically required for such titles. Esports games like Counter-Strike or League of Legends may achieve playable frame rates at medium or low settings, but high-refresh displays will not be fully utilized. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU will be severely constrained, and even older games may require reduced settings to achieve acceptable performance.

The CPU's strong performance, with a 94th percentile ranking, will ensure that frame rates are not CPU-limited in most scenarios. This means that in games where the GPU can deliver sufficient FPS, the frame pacing will be consistent, and there will be no stuttering due to CPU bottlenecks. However, the overall gaming experience will be defined by the GPU's limitations, and users should not expect performance that matches the CPU's high-end positioning.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

This build is a laptop-class system that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, a 16-core Zen 4 processor from the 7000 series, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation, a professional GPU built on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The buildClass is "laptop," indicating that this is a mobile workstation rather than a desktop configuration. The CPU is designed for the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to high-performance mobile platforms, and the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, which is standard for mobile discrete graphics.

The overall tier of this system is defined by its percentiles. The CPU's 94th percentile ranking places it in the top tier of processors, while the GPU's 21st percentile places it in the lower tier of GPUs. The combined percentile of 58 reflects a system that is above average overall but with a significant performance skew toward the CPU. This is a workstation-oriented pairing where the CPU is the primary driver of performance, and the GPU provides professional features like 16 GB VRAM and RT/tensor cores rather than raw gaming power.

The CPU's release date is January 2024, while the GPU was released in March 2023, making this a relatively recent pairing with active production status for both components. The CPU has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking, which is unusual for a mobile part and suggests that some laptop manufacturers may offer performance tuning options. The GPU has no suggested PSU, as it is a mobile component that draws power from the laptop's power delivery system, and its 120 W TDP is substantial for a mobile GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking among all processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms 94% of processors in the benchmark database.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score, and how does it compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU scores 3596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is 0.1% ahead of the GeForce GT 545, 0.6% behind the GT 735M, 0.9% behind the GTX 1050, and 1.5% behind the Radeon HD 6770.

Q: What are the CPU's Cinebench R23 scores?

A: The CPU achieves 1807 in single-core and 29400 in multi-core Cinebench R23 tests.

Q: Does this laptop support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the memory support specifications.

Q: What is the CPU's cache configuration?

A: The CPU has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache, providing a total of 64 MB of L3 for the entire processor.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, enabling high-bandwidth connections to GPUs and storage devices.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, and sensible next upgrades

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This socket is not interchangeable with desktop AM5 sockets, meaning that CPU upgrades are limited to other FL1-compatible processors within the same generation. The memory support is DDR5 with dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. Users can potentially upgrade memory capacity, but the platform does not support ECC memory, which may limit its appeal for certain professional applications.

The PCIe support is Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. This means that the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes are available for other devices, such as NVMe storage, which can take advantage of the higher bandwidth. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 connection is sufficient for its bandwidth needs, and upgrading to a PCIe 5.0 GPU would not be possible without a platform change, as the GPU's bus interface is fixed.

The GPU's TDP is 120 W, and there is no suggested PSU because this is a mobile component that draws power from the laptop's power delivery system. The CPU's TDP is 55 W, and the combined power draw of the CPU and GPU is 175 W, which requires a substantial laptop power adapter and adequate thermal solution. There is no PSU headroom to discuss in the traditional desktop sense, as the power delivery is integrated into the laptop design.

A sensible next upgrade for this system, assuming the laptop form factor allows it, would be to increase memory capacity or speed, as the dual-channel DDR5 configuration can be expanded to larger capacities. Storage upgrades to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives would also be beneficial, given the CPU's 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The GPU and CPU are both soldered or otherwise non-upgradeable in most laptop designs, so the primary upgrade path is limited to memory and storage. For users seeking higher GPU performance, a different laptop model with a more powerful GPU would be necessary, as the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada is constrained by its 21st percentile ranking in the Steel Nomad benchmark.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores

Gaming Performance — estimated from benchmark scores

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class, and overall tier

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom, and sensible next upgrades

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds