SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

96%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

Balance and Bottleneck

This pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a study in asymmetry. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, sitting at the 94th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile against all GPUs. That gap—44 percentile points—tells you which component is the bottleneck in the vast majority of workloads. The processor has far more headroom than the graphics card can exploit in gaming and GPU-accelerated rendering.

The data confirms this imbalance. The CPU's multi-threaded scores are exceptional: a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 29400 and a PassMark multi-thread score of 53204. These are numbers that rival desktop-class 16-core parts, as shown by the nearest rivals list where the Ryzen 9 7940HX trails the Intel Core i7-14700KF by only 0.4% in average benchmark score and actually leads the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.5%. Meanwhile, the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a Turing-generation part from 2019, with 3072 shading units and a 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. It is a competent mid-range mobile GPU, but it is not in the same league as the CPU.

In gaming, the bottleneck will almost always be the GPU. The CPU's 16 cores and 32 threads, boosting to 5.20 GHz, are more than sufficient to feed the Quadro's 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. Even at lower resolutions where CPU load is higher, this processor should keep frame rates from being CPU-limited in most titles. The situation inverts for some productivity tasks: in CPU-heavy workloads like data compression (PassMark score of 693741) or multi-threaded physics calculations (PassMark physics score of 2297), the GPU is largely idle and the CPU's performance ceiling is what matters. For GPU-accelerated rendering or machine learning inference, however, the Quadro's 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores become the limiting factor.

The FPS scaling picture is estimated rather than measured, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the benchmark data. Based on the benchmark scores, the practical takeaway is this: the CPU will rarely hold back the GPU, but the GPU will hold back the CPU in graphics-bound scenarios. This is not necessarily a bad thing—it means the system has upgrade potential on the GPU side without changing the platform.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is built on the Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It carries 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory runs at a base clock of 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. These are solid specifications for a mobile workstation GPU, particularly for large datasets and high-resolution textures.

Clock speeds are moderate for the era: a base clock of 1035 MHz and a boost clock of 1530 MHz. The FP32 compute of 9.400 TFLOPS is respectable for a mobile part but well below what modern high-end laptop GPUs offer. The FP16 performance of 18.80 TFLOPS (at a 2:1 ratio) shows the Turing architecture's strength in half-precision workloads, which matters for AI inference and some renderers that use FP16 accumulation.

The RT and tensor hardware is a key feature. With 48 RT cores and 384 tensor cores, this GPU can handle real-time ray tracing and DLSS-style tensor operations, though the 12 nm process and Turing architecture mean these capabilities are a generation behind current Ampere or Ada parts. The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s, figures that indicate strong fill-rate performance for its class.

The GPU's percentile rank of 50 against all GPUs means it sits exactly in the middle of the distribution. That is a useful reference point: half of all GPUs benchmarked are faster, half are slower. For a laptop GPU, this is a mid-range workstation part, not a flagship. The absence of any benchmark scores in the data (the GPU's avgBenchmarkScore is 0 and its benchmarks list is empty) means the percentile ranking is derived from historical data rather than fresh measurements on this specific pairing.

The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a potential limitation. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, but the GPU is limited to PCIe 3.0. For most gaming and rendering workloads, PCIe 3.0 x16 provides sufficient bandwidth, but it does cap the theoretical data transfer rate compared to what a Gen 4 or Gen 5 GPU could achieve. The 16 GB VRAM is the standout feature here—it is ample for 4K textures and large 3D scenes, and it exceeds what many desktop GPUs in this performance tier offer.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are comprehensive and impressive. In 3DMark threaded tests, the Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 12501 in the 16-thread test, 2001 in the 2-thread test, 3844 in the 4-thread test, 7158 in the 8-thread test, and 13447 in the max-thread test. The single-thread score is 1027. These numbers show strong scaling from 2 to 16 threads, with the max-thread score only slightly above the 16-thread result, indicating that the 32 threads provide diminishing returns beyond 16 in this particular benchmark.

Cinebench R23 results are the headline: 29400 multi-core and 1807 single-core. The multi-core score positions this chip firmly in desktop-replacement territory. The nearest rivals list confirms this: the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F averages 69996 (a 0.2% delta), the Intel Core i7-14700KF averages 70163 (a 0.4% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X averages 69515 (a 0.5% delta in favor of the 7940HX). This means the 7940HX is effectively trading blows with high-end desktop CPUs from the same era, despite being a mobile part with a 55 W TDP.

PassMark results reinforce the CPU's strength. The multi-thread score of 53204 is elite, while the single-thread score of 3942 is strong. Data compression scores 693741, encryption scores 41974, and extended instructions score 51029. Floating-point math hits 121383, integer math hits 202883, and random string sorting scores 81775. The find prime numbers score of 273 is modest, reflecting that this workload is not optimized for Zen 4's design. The physics score of 2297 is competitive.

The GPU side has no measured benchmark scores in this data pack, so its performance must be inferred from its specifications and percentile rank. The 50th percentile against all GPUs suggests it performs around the median, which for a laptop part means it can handle esports titles at high frame rates and AAA games at medium to high settings at 1080p or 1440p, but it is not built for 4K maxed-out gaming.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 72. This is a reasonable overall tier: the CPU pulls the average up, while the GPU keeps it from being a top-tier gaming machine. The pair rank by FPS is null because no measured FPS data exists for this combination, meaning any FPS discussion is estimated from the component scores.

Who Should Build It

This is a laptop build (buildClass is "laptop"), and the target user is someone who needs CPU horsepower above all else. The Ryzen 9 7940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor that benchmarks at the 94th percentile against all CPUs. The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a capable but mid-range GPU at the 50th percentile. This combination suits users whose primary workload is CPU-bound but who still need a competent GPU for graphics acceleration.

Content creators who work with video encoding, 3D modeling, or software compilation will benefit most. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 53204 indicate strong performance in threaded workloads. Video editors using CPU-based rendering will see fast export times, and developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 32 threads. The 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM on the GPU also helps with GPU-accelerated effects in video editing, even if the GPU compute is not top-tier.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p will find this system capable, provided they are not chasing maximum frame rates in the latest AAA titles. The GPU's 50th percentile means it is a middle-of-the-road gaming GPU, but the CPU's high single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 1027, PassMark single-thread of 3942) ensures that game logic and physics are handled smoothly. Esports titles and older AAA games will run well; newer, demanding games will require settings adjustments.

Students and small business users who need a powerful workstation for engineering simulations, data analysis, or scientific computing will find the CPU's 16 cores and 64 MB of L3 cache beneficial. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s (dual-channel DDR5) supports these workloads. The lack of ECC memory support is a caveat for mission-critical scientific work, but for general productivity, this is not a concern.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU will not be the bottleneck here. The 3dmark_8_threads score of 7158 shows strong multi-threading for modern game engines, and the single-thread score of 1027 is competitive. The GPU, however, sits at the 50th percentile, so expect 1080p high-refresh (144Hz) gaming in esports titles, but 1440p high-refresh in AAA games will be a stretch. Estimated FPS, based on the GPU's class, suggests medium settings at 1440p for demanding titles.

Streaming: The 16 cores and 32 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark data encryption score of 41974 and extended instructions score of 51029 indicate strong performance in encryption workloads, which is relevant for stream security. The GPU's NVENC encoder (part of the Turing architecture) can offload encoding, but the CPU can handle x264 encoding at reasonable presets without compromising game performance, given the multi-thread scores.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400 ensures fast timeline rendering and export in CPU-based workflows. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM handles large 4K timelines and GPU-accelerated effects, though the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 compute is not exceptional for heavy effects stacks. The 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth is sufficient for multi-stream 4K playback.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be excellent—the PassMark floating-point math score of 121383 and integer math score of 202883 support this. GPU-based rendering (e.g., in Blender or similar) will be limited by the Quadro's mid-range compute, but the 16 GB VRAM allows for large scenes that might exceed smaller GPUs. The 48 RT cores provide some ray tracing acceleration, though not at the level of newer architectures.

Software development: The 32 threads are a boon for compilation. The PassMark multi-thread score of 53204 and the 3dmark_max_threads score of 13447 show sustained performance under heavy thread loads. The 64 MB L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data structures. The PCIe Gen 5 support (28 lanes from the CPU) means fast NVMe storage is available for build caches.

Student and office work: This is overkill for typical office tasks, but for engineering students running simulations or data science workloads, the CPU is ideal. The 3dmark_4_threads score of 3844 and 2_threads score of 2001 show that even lightly-threaded tasks are snappy. The integrated Radeon 610M provides a fallback for basic display output, though the Quadro will be the primary GPU.

FAQ

Q: Is this laptop good for gaming?

A: It is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, with the CPU providing strong physics and game logic performance. The GPU sits at the 50th percentile against all GPUs, so high-refresh 1080p in esports is achievable, but 1440p maxed-out AAA gaming is not realistic.

Q: How does the CPU compare to desktop parts?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HX is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-14700KF in average benchmark score, making it effectively a desktop-class CPU in a laptop form factor.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and why does it matter?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. This allows large 3D scenes and high-resolution textures to fit in VRAM without spilling to system memory, which is important for professional rendering and GPU compute workloads.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No. The memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, but ECC memory is not supported. This is a consideration for scientific computing where error correction is critical.

Q: What is the CPU's TDP and does it affect performance?

A: The CPU has a 55 W TDP. Despite this relatively low power envelope for a 16-core part, it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400, which is comparable to higher-wattage desktop CPUs.

Q: Is the GPU end-of-life?

A: Yes. The production status is "End-of-life," and the GPU was released in 2019. The successor is listed as "Ampere-MW," but this Turing part is still functional for the workloads described.

Q: Can the GPU handle ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 48 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), so it can handle real-time ray tracing. However, the performance will be lower than newer architectures, given the 12 nm process and 2019 release date.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread mobile processor from the 7000 series, codenamed Dragon Range, built on the Zen 4 architecture. It is fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration. The base clock is 2.40 GHz and the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz, which is an aggressive boost for a mobile part. The TDP is 55 W, and the multiplier is unlocked, allowing for overclocking if the laptop's cooling and power delivery permit.

The cache hierarchy is generous: 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. This large L3 cache is a signature of Zen 4's chiplet design and helps with latency-sensitive workloads. The memory support is DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. ECC memory is not supported, which is typical for consumer and gaming-focused parts.

The socket is AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to this mobile platform. The integrated graphics is a Radeon 610M, which provides basic display output and video decode capabilities, but is not intended for gaming. The CPU supports PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, which is forward-looking for storage and GPU connectivity, though the Quadro GPU is limited to PCIe 3.0.

Benchmark results show a processor that scales well with thread count. The 3dmark scores climb from 2001 with 2 threads to 13447 with max threads, an increase of over 6.7x from 2 to 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400 is a strong indicator of sustained multi-threaded performance, and the single-core score of 1807 is competitive for daily tasks. The PassMark single-thread score of 3942 confirms this.

The nearest rivals list places the 7940HX in elite company. It is 0.2% behind the Ryzen 7 9700F, 0.4% behind the Core i7-14700KF, 0.5% ahead of the Ryzen 9 7950X, and 0.7% ahead of the Core i7-14700K. These delta percentages are tiny, meaning the 7940HX is effectively at parity with high-end desktop CPUs from the same generation. The average benchmark score of 69875 and the 94th percentile rank against all CPUs underscore its position as a top-tier mobile processor.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is soldered and not upgradeable in the traditional sense. The laptop form factor limits most upgrades to memory and storage. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, so upgrading to faster or higher-capacity DDR5 modules is possible if the laptop's BIOS and motherboard support it.

The GPU is also soldered and not upgradeable. The Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, which is a limitation given the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support with 28 lanes. There is no suggested PSU for this laptop, as the power supply is integrated into the laptop's design. The GPU has a 110 W TDP, and the CPU has a 55 W TDP, so the total power draw for these two components is 165 W, plus overhead for the rest of the system. This is a reasonable power envelope for a high-performance laptop, but it means the laptop's cooling solution must be robust.

A sensible next upgrade would be external: an eGPU enclosure connected via the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes, if the laptop supports Thunderbolt or another external GPU interface. This would bypass the soldered Quadro and allow a modern desktop GPU to take advantage of the CPU's high performance. Alternatively, upgrading storage to a Gen 5 NVMe SSD would leverage the CPU's PCIe lanes for faster load times and data access, given the processor's high bandwidth capabilities.

The platform is otherwise mature. The CPU's production status is "Active," meaning it is still in production, while the GPU is "End-of-life." This suggests the CPU has a longer support lifecycle than the GPU, and future driver updates for the Quadro may be limited. The memory controller supports DDR5, which is the current standard, and the 5 nm process node at TSMC ensures good power efficiency for a 16-core part.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile. The CPU is a 16-core Zen 4 processor from the Dragon Range series, released in early 2024, with a 94th percentile rank against all CPUs. The GPU is a Turing-generation Quadro from 2019, released in mid-2019, with a 50th percentile rank against all GPUs. The combined percentile is 72, placing this system in the upper-middle tier of all benchmarked configurations.

The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is significantly more powerful than the GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 69875 places it among the top 6% of all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the median. This creates a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks—compilation, simulation, video encoding—but is only average in GPU-bound tasks like gaming or GPU rendering. The lack of measured FPS data for this combination means that all performance expectations are derived from the individual component scores.

The build class is "laptop," which implies a mobile workstation or high-performance gaming laptop. The 55 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP are typical for a desktop replacement laptop, requiring a substantial cooling solution. The 16 GB of GDDR6 VRAM on the GPU is a highlight, providing ample memory for professional workloads. The overall tier, based on the 72nd percentile, is a capable system that will handle most productivity tasks with ease, but gamers should temper expectations for the latest AAA titles at maximum settings. This is a workstation-first, gaming-second configuration, and the benchmark data supports that characterization.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds