SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
95%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score
Top 5% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile combination in a laptop represents a top-tier mobile platform, pairing a 16-core Zen 4 processor with a high-end Ada Lovelace graphics solution. This analysis relies exclusively on the provided benchmark data, as no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates derived from the CPU and GPU scores, not direct game testing results.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this specific CPU+GPU pairing, so all gaming performance figures below are estimates based on the individual benchmark scores of the Ryzen 9 7940HX and the RTX 4080 Mobile. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24926 places it at the 81st percentile among all GPUs, indicating strong rasterization performance. For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1027 in 3DMark and 3942 in PassMark single-thread suggests frame rates well above 144 Hz in most competitive games, though the exact numbers cannot be stated without measured data. The GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 432.0 GB/s memory bandwidth provide ample headroom for high-refresh 1440p gaming, with estimated frame rates in the 100+ FPS range for demanding shooters and action titles, assuming typical scaling from the benchmark scores.

At 1440p ultra settings, the RTX 4080 Mobile’s 12 GB GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, which supports high texture quality and resolution. The GPU’s RT cores (58) and Tensor cores (232) enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though the FACT PACK does not include specific ray tracing benchmarks. For 4K gaming, the combination of the CPU’s 16 cores and the GPU’s 80 ROPs and 133.2 GPixel/s pixel rate suggests playable frame rates in less demanding titles, but the 12 GB VRAM capacity may become a limiting factor in the most VRAM-intensive games at 4K ultra. The CPU’s 3DMark max threads score of 13447 ensures that even heavily threaded game logic will not bottleneck the GPU, a critical factor for open-world games with complex simulation systems.

The estimated FPS figures should be treated as approximations. The GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 96 and DirectX 11 score of 244 indicate strong API utilization efficiency, but the actual in-game performance depends on optimization, driver maturity, and laptop cooling solutions. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs suggests it will not be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios, allowing the GPU to operate near its full potential. For users targeting 240 Hz esports displays, the CPU’s 2-thread 3DMark score of 2001 and 4-thread score of 3844 indicate excellent responsiveness in lightly threaded game engines, though the exact achievable frame rates are not quantified in the data.

FAQ

Q: Does the FACT PACK contain measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. All gaming performance figures in this analysis are estimates derived from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU’s overall performance ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX ranks at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 69875. It is nearly identical in performance to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, with a deltaPct of -0.2%, and slightly ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700KF by 0.4% in the opposite direction.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU has an average benchmark score of 38135 and ranks at the 81st percentile. It is 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 and 0.6% behind the RTX 5080 Mobile, while being 1.3% ahead of both the RTX 4070 and Tesla P4.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does the GPU use?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What is the CPU’s cache configuration?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HX has 64 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. The total L3 is not specified as separate from the 64 MB figure.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this build?

A: The combinedPercentile is 88, indicating this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 88% of all recorded builds in the database.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket type?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 watts and uses AMD Socket FL1. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 places it firmly in high-end desktop replacement territory, while the single-core score of 1807 indicates strong per-thread performance. In 3DMark, the CPU scales from 2001 in the 2-thread test to 13447 in the max threads test, demonstrating excellent scaling across 16 cores and 32 threads. The PassMark multithread score of 53204 and integer math score of 202883 further confirm the CPU’s compute-heavy capabilities. The floating point math score of 121383 and extended instructions score of 51029 support scientific and encoding workloads. Data compression at 693741 and encryption at 41974 in PassMark show strong throughput for storage and security tasks.

The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 and Vulkan score of 145807 indicate strong compute and graphics API performance. The PassMark G3D score of 24926, combined with a GPU compute score of 11191, shows balanced rasterization and compute capabilities. The DirectX 12 score of 96 and DirectX 11 score of 244 are lower than older API scores (DirectX 9: 286, DirectX 10: 157), which is typical for modern GPUs optimized for current APIs. The 2D score of 929 is modest, but this is rarely a bottleneck in gaming or professional workloads.

Comparing the CPU to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7940HX’s average score of 69875 is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-14700K and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. This places the mobile CPU on par with top desktop processors from the same generation, which is remarkable given the 55 W TDP. The GPU, however, shows a different pattern: its 38135 average score is 0.6% behind the RTX 5080 Mobile, suggesting the 4080 Mobile is not far from the next generation in aggregate benchmarks. The deltaPct of -0.4% versus the MX570 is surprising but reflects the average score calculation methodology, not real-world gaming performance.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is at the 94th percentile and the GPU at the 81st percentile, with an overall build percentile of 88. This indicates the CPU is relatively stronger than the GPU within this pairing, but both components are well above average. The CPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 69875 is nearly double the GPU’s 38135, reflecting the different benchmark scales used for each component.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a CPU-favored balance in this pairing. The Ryzen 9 7940HX sits at the 94th percentile among all CPUs, while the RTX 4080 Mobile is at the 81st percentile among GPUs. This 13-point gap suggests that in CPU-bound workloads, the processor will outperform the graphics card’s ability to utilize that compute power, creating a potential CPU headroom scenario. In gaming at lower resolutions like 1080p, where CPU load is relatively higher, the processor’s 16 cores and high single-thread score (1027 3DMark single-thread) will likely keep frame rates high, but the GPU’s 81st percentile ranking means it will be the primary limiter once resolution and detail settings increase.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, supports this view. The GPU’s 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 are strong, but the 12 GB VRAM capacity is moderate for a 2024-era flagship mobile GPU. In memory-intensive scenarios at 4K, the GPU may bottleneck before the CPU does. Conversely, the CPU’s PassMark multithread score of 53204 is exceptional for mobile, so in multitasking or streaming scenarios where the CPU handles both game logic and encoding, it will not be the limiting factor. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 24926 is roughly 47% of the CPU’s multithread score, which is typical for balanced systems but here the CPU has more headroom.

The deltaPct values in the rivals list provide additional context. The CPU is within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-14700K, a high-end desktop part, while the GPU is within 1.3% of the desktop RTX 4070. This means the mobile GPU is comparable to a mid-range desktop GPU, while the mobile CPU rivals top desktop processors. For workloads that are predominantly GPU-bound (e.g., gaming at high resolutions), the RTX 4080 Mobile will set the ceiling. For CPU-bound tasks (e.g., compilation, rendering, simulation), the Ryzen 9 7940HX will exceed the GPU’s compute output.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 81st percentile suggest the system can drive high frame rates in most titles, but the exact FPS is not measurable from the data. The GPU’s 58 RT cores and 232 Tensor cores make it suitable for ray-traced gaming with DLSS, though no specific RT benchmarks are provided.

Streaming: The CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads, combined with a PassMark multithread score of 53204, provide ample headroom for simultaneous game encoding and streaming. The GPU’s NVENC capabilities are implied by the Ada Lovelace architecture, but the FACT PACK does not list encoder specifications, so only the CPU’s compute strength can be cited.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 and PassMark floating point score of 121383 support timeline rendering and effects processing. The GPU’s 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 and 11191 PassMark GPU compute score accelerate export and preview tasks, making this a strong combination for 4K video work, though the 12 GB VRAM may limit the most complex GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 16 cores deliver a max threads 3DMark score of 13447, which scales well for CPU-based renderers. The GPU’s 7424 shading units and 232 tensor cores provide CUDA acceleration for GPU renderers, with a Geekbench OpenCL score of 159575 indicating strong compute throughput.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 202883 and data compression score of 693741 support compilation and build tasks. The 16-core/32-thread configuration handles parallel builds efficiently, and the 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency in large codebases. The system’s 94th CPU percentile makes it suitable for demanding development workloads.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 3942 in PassMark ensures snappy application responsiveness. The integrated Radeon 610M provides a fallback for battery-saving tasks, though the discrete GPU will likely be used for any graphics output. The 55 W CPU TDP is efficient for a 16-core part, supporting longer battery life in light workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe storage and future GPU connectivity, though the RTX 4080 Mobile uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The motherboard or laptop design will determine whether additional M.2 slots or other PCIe devices can take advantage of the Gen 5 lanes.

The GPU has a TDP of 110 W and no power connectors, as it is an IGP-class mobile part (slotWidth: IGP). The suggestedPsu field is null, meaning no specific power supply recommendation is provided. The CPU’s TDP of 55 W, combined with the GPU’s 110 W, suggests a total system power draw that is manageable for a high-end laptop, but the exact PSU requirement is not specified in the data. The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s is fixed, so upgrading the GPU in a laptop is generally not feasible; the upgrade path is limited to the CPU or memory.

A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory to the maximum supported by the dual-channel DDR5 configuration, as the CPU’s memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s benefits from higher-speed kits. Storage upgrades are possible via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes (28 lanes from the CPU), allowing for future Gen 5 NVMe SSDs. The CPU’s multiplier is unlocked (multiplierUnlocked: true), so enthusiasts with a compatible motherboard could overclock, though this is rare in laptop form factors. The production status is Active for both components, meaning replacements and support are available.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 13,140 million transistors across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the TDP is 55 W. The processor uses AMD Socket FL1 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. It includes 64 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1807 and 3DMark single-thread score of 1027 are strong for a mobile part, while the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 and 3DMark max threads score of 13447 demonstrate exceptional scaling. PassMark scores show a similar pattern: single-thread at 3942 and multithread at 53204, with integer math at 202883 and floating point at 121383. The data compression score of 693741 and encryption score of 41974 indicate strong throughput for storage and security applications.

The 94th percentile ranking places this CPU above 94% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (deltaPct -0.2%), Intel Core i7-14700KF (deltaPct -0.4%), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (deltaPct 0.5%), and Intel Core i7-14700K (deltaPct 0.7%). This means the mobile chip performs statistically identically to these desktop processors, which reflects the efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture at 55 W. The 13,140 million transistor count on dual chiplets (2x 71 mm²) enables this high core count in a mobile thermal envelope.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile in a laptop form factor (buildClass: laptop). The CPU is a 16-core Zen 4 part from the 7000 series, released in January 2024, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part from the GeForce 40-series, released in January 2023. The combinedPercentile of 88 means this pairing outperforms 88% of all recorded builds in the database.

The CPU’s 94th percentile and GPU’s 81st percentile indicate a high-end mobile platform with a relatively stronger processor. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69875 is comparable to desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-14700K (deltaPct 0.7%), while the GPU’s average score of 38135 is within 1.3% of the desktop RTX 4070. This makes the build a desktop-replacement-class laptop, suitable for demanding workloads that require both strong CPU compute and capable GPU acceleration.

The overall tier, based on percentiles, is top-tier for laptops. The 88th combined percentile places it above the vast majority of systems, with only the very highest-end mobile or desktop builds exceeding it. The GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with the CPU’s 64 MB L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5, create a balanced platform for 1440p gaming and professional content creation. The absence of measured FPS data means the gaming tier is inferred from the benchmark scores, but the component-level performance strongly suggests high-end capability.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets gamers who prioritize high-refresh 1440p gaming and are willing to accept that the GPU, not the CPU, will determine the frame rate ceiling in most titles. The CPU’s 94th percentile ensures that even the most CPU-intensive games will run smoothly, while the GPU’s 81st percentile supports high settings at 1440p. For 4K gaming, the 12 GB VRAM may be insufficient for ultra settings in the most demanding games, so this build is best suited to 1080p and 1440p resolutions.

Content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development will benefit from the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 and PassMark multithread score of 53204 accelerate render times, while the GPU’s compute performance (Geekbench OpenCL 159575) speeds up GPU-accelerated effects. Data compression at 693741 and encryption at 41974 support large file workflows and secure storage tasks.

Students and professionals in engineering, data science, or architecture will find the CPU’s integer math score of 202883 and floating point score of 121383 useful for simulations and analysis. The system’s laptop form factor makes it portable, while the 55 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP suggest reasonable battery life for a high-performance machine. Small business workstations that require multi-threaded performance for database management or virtualization will be well-served by the 32 threads, but the GPU is underutilized in such workloads, making this build more suitable for graphics-intensive industries like game development, visual effects, or product design.