SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
92%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile

23,628 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile pairing represents a high-end laptop configuration that combines a 16-core Dragon Range processor with an Ampere-generation GPU. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile among all processors, while the GPU holds the 69th percentile among all GPUs, creating an asymmetric performance profile where the processor significantly outclasses the graphics solution. This analysis examines the platform characteristics, benchmark results, and workload suitability of this mobile combination, with the caveat that no measured FPS data exists for this exact pairing—all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates derived from component-level benchmark scores.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX utilizes the AMD Socket FL1 interface, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. This socket supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel memory bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The platform is designed around the Zen 4 architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process node, with the CPU itself containing 13,140 million transistors spread across a dual-die configuration of 2x 71 mm². For storage and expansion, the CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for next-generation NVMe drives and external devices, though the GPU interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x16.

The CPU has a 55 W TDP, which is remarkably efficient for a 16-core part, and the GPU carries a 115 W TDP. Combined, the thermal and power envelope of this pairing suggests a system that requires robust cooling but remains within the range of high-performance laptops rather than desktop replacements. The platform does not support ECC memory, which positions it for consumer and prosumer workloads rather than mission-critical server applications. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a basic display output capability, allowing for power savings during light tasks without engaging the discrete GPU.

A sensible next upgrade path for this platform is limited by the socket’s mobile-specific nature. The Socket FL1 interface is tied to the Dragon Range generation, meaning future processor upgrades would require a new motherboard and chassis. The DDR5 memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes, however, ensure that storage and memory components can be carried forward to newer platforms. Users looking to extend the lifespan of this system would benefit most from upgrading storage to PCIe Gen 5 NVMe drives and ensuring memory is populated at peak dual-channel speeds, as the CPU’s 83.2 GB/s bandwidth ceiling is a critical resource for multi-threaded workloads.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung’s 8 nm process, containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. This capacity and bandwidth are adequate for 1440p gaming and content creation, though the 8 GB VRAM may become a constraint for 4K textures or large machine learning models. The memory operates at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, which is competitive for the 30-series mobile lineup.

Clock speeds are set at 1110 MHz base and 1545 MHz boost, with the GPU’s 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines driving a pixel rate of 148.3 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 296.6 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 18.98 TFLOPS, with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio of 18.98 TFLOPS, indicates strong compute capability for general-purpose workloads. The RTX 3080 Mobile includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, providing hardware acceleration for ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 support ensure compatibility with modern rendering APIs.

Benchmark results show the GPU scoring 2644 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 104831 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 104066 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score of 16321 places it in the 69th percentile among all GPUs, while the GPU compute score of 7276 reflects its parallel processing strength. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, scores 0.5% higher on average, while the AMD Radeon RX 9070 sits 1% behind. These deltas indicate the RTX 3080 Mobile is closely matched with its immediate competitors, with the performance gap being negligible in real-world scenarios. The GPU’s end-of-life production status suggests it is being phased out, but its benchmark scores remain relevant for current gaming and creative applications.

Benchmark Performance

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX delivers exceptional multi-threaded performance, scoring 13447 in 3DMark Max Threads and 29400 in Cinebench R23 Multicore. The single-thread score of 1807 in Cinebench R23 and 1027 in 3DMark Single Thread confirms strong per-core efficiency from the Zen 4 architecture. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69875 places it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (0.2% behind), Intel Core i7-14700KF (0.4% behind), and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X (0.5% ahead). This positioning shows the 7940HX is competitive with desktop-class processors despite its mobile form factor.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 23628 places it in the 69th percentile, with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scoring 0.5% higher and the AMD Radeon RX 9070 scoring 1% lower. The combined percentile for this pairing is 82, indicating that the overall system performance is strong but dragged down by the GPU’s relatively lower standing. The CPU outperforms its GPU counterpart by a significant margin—94th versus 69th percentile—which has implications for workload balance that will be explored in the next section.

PassMark results for the CPU show strong integer math performance at 202883, floating-point math at 121383, and data compression at 693741. The encryption score of 41974 and extended instructions score of 51029 highlight the CPU’s capability for security and vectorized workloads. The GPU’s PassMark DirectX scores are notably low (72 for DX12, 146 for DX11), which is unusual but may reflect driver or benchmark variance rather than actual gaming capability, as the 3DMark and Geekbench scores paint a more favorable picture.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between the CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck dynamic. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 69th percentile suggests that in most gaming scenarios, the RTX 3080 Mobile will be the limiting factor. The CPU has more than enough headroom to feed the GPU in frame generation, meaning that frame rates will be constrained by the GPU’s rasterization and shading throughput rather than CPU physics or draw call processing.

In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression, encryption, or software compilation, the Ryzen 9 7940HX will excel, but the GPU will remain underutilized. The PassMark multithread score of 53204 and physics score of 2297 indicate the CPU can handle complex simulations and calculations without bottlenecking. Conversely, in GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming or 3D rendering, the RTX 3080 Mobile’s 18.98 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will be fully utilized, while the CPU idles at a fraction of its capacity.

The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured for this exact pairing, can be inferred from the component percentiles. At 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1807 Cinebench R23 single-core) could allow the GPU to reach its maximum output, but the GPU’s 69th percentile still caps absolute frame rates. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the bottleneck, with the CPU’s advantage becoming less relevant. The 8 GB VRAM may also introduce a capacity bottleneck in texture-heavy titles, potentially causing stuttering or reduced texture quality at higher resolutions.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from component benchmark scores. The CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score of 12501 and the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2644 provide a basis for these estimates. Based on the GPU’s 69th percentile ranking and its proximity to the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile, this pairing is expected to deliver high refresh rate gaming at 1080p for most titles, with frame rates exceeding 100 FPS in esports and competitive games.

At 1440p, the RTX 3080 Mobile’s 8 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth should support 60-100 FPS in AAA titles with high settings, though the GPU’s 18.98 TFLOPS FP32 throughput will limit maximum frame rates. For 4K gaming, the GPU’s 69th percentile position suggests that 30-60 FPS is achievable in optimized titles, but the 8 GB VRAM capacity may force reduced texture settings. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (1027 3DMark single-thread) ensures that minimum frame rates remain stable, avoiding CPU-induced stutters even in demanding scenes.

The RTX 3080 Mobile’s 48 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, but the 69th percentile GPU ranking indicates that ray-traced workloads will significantly reduce frame rates compared to rasterized rendering. DLSS via the 192 tensor cores can mitigate this performance hit, but the overall gaming experience is best characterized as strong for 1080p and capable for 1440p, with 4K being a stretch target.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who require exceptional multi-threaded CPU performance alongside solid GPU capability. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation will benefit from the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking, which rivals desktop-class processors like the Intel Core i7-14700KF (0.4% difference). The GPU’s 69th percentile provides adequate acceleration for GPU-accelerated effects and rendering, though it may not be the primary compute engine.

Developers compiling large codebases will find the 16-core/32-thread configuration with a PassMark multithread score of 53204 invaluable for parallel builds. Students in engineering or data science programs can leverage the CPU’s floating-point math score of 121383 and extended instructions score of 51029 for simulations and numerical analysis. Small business workstations requiring data compression (693741 PassMark score) or encryption (41974) will process large datasets efficiently.

Gamers seeking a high-refresh 1080p experience will be well served, as the CPU’s single-thread performance ensures no bottleneck in competitive titles. However, gamers targeting 4K or maximum ray tracing may find the GPU limiting due to its 69th percentile standing and 8 GB VRAM. The system is less suitable for users whose primary workload is GPU compute, such as machine learning researchers, given the RTX 3080 Mobile’s compute score of 7276 in PassMark.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process. The base clock of 2.40 GHz boosts to 5.20 GHz, with a 55 W TDP that belies its high core count. The CPU includes 64 KB L1 cache per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB L3 cache, providing ample on-chip storage for working sets. The dual-die design with 13,140 million transistors suggests a chiplet architecture similar to desktop Ryzen parts, but adapted for the FL1 mobile socket.

Benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1807 and multi-core score of 29400 show a 16.3x scaling factor, indicating excellent thread efficiency. The 3DMark scores progress from 1027 (single-thread) to 2001 (2-thread), 3844 (4-thread), 7158 (8-thread), 12501 (16-thread), and 13447 (max-thread), with the slight drop from 16 to max threads suggesting thermal or power limits are approached at full load.

PassMark scores reinforce this picture: the multithread score of 53204 and single-thread score of 3942 demonstrate a 13.5x scaling, while integer math (202883) and floating-point math (121383) show balanced ALU and FPU performance. The data compression score of 693741 indicates strong memory and cache utilization, and the find prime numbers score of 273 is notably low, suggesting this workload may not align with the CPU’s architecture. The avgBenchmarkScore of 69875 places it just 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, confirming its desktop-class capability.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 82, driven by the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 69th percentile ranking.

Q: How does the CPU compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 0.5% lower in average benchmark score, with 69875 versus 69515, making the difference negligible.

Q: What memory type and bandwidth does this platform support?

A: The platform supports DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, providing a maximum memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, with ECC not supported.

Q: Is the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM sufficient for modern gaming?

A: The 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but may limit 4K texture quality.

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing and tensor core configuration?

A: The RTX 3080 Mobile includes 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, enabling hardware ray tracing and AI acceleration via DLSS.

Q: How does the GPU compare to the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile?

A: The RTX 3080 Mobile scores 0.5% lower than the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile in average benchmark score, making them effectively equivalent in performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s process node and transistor count?

A: The CPU is manufactured on a 5 nm TSMC process with 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, the CPU’s single-thread score of 1807 in Cinebench R23 ensures no bottleneck at 1080p, while the GPU’s 69th percentile ranking supports frame rates above 100 FPS in less demanding titles, though the 8 GB VRAM limits ultra settings at higher resolutions.

Streaming benefits from the CPU’s 16 cores and 32 threads, with the PassMark multithread score of 53204 allowing simultaneous game encoding and streaming without performance degradation, while the GPU’s NVENC (implied by tensor cores) offloads encoding tasks.

Video editing workloads leverage the CPU’s data compression score of 693741 and floating-point math of 121383, enabling fast timeline scrubbing and export times; the GPU’s 104831 Geekbench OpenCL score accelerates effects and color grading.

3D rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D will see strong CPU performance from the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400, while the GPU’s 18.98 TFLOPS FP32 provides moderate GPU-accelerated rendering support.

Software development benefits from the CPU’s integer math score of 202883 and extended instructions score of 51029, which accelerate code compilation and vectorized operations, though the GPU remains underutilized in this scenario.

Student and office work is over-served by this hardware, but the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking ensures responsiveness in multitasking, while the integrated Radeon 610M can handle basic display tasks while the discrete GPU is idle.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, a 16-core Zen 4 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile, an Ampere-generation GPU, in a laptop class configuration. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking among all processors and the GPU’s 69th percentile ranking among all GPUs combine for a system at the 82nd overall percentile. This pairing is characterized by a significant CPU advantage, making it ideal for compute-heavy workloads, while the GPU provides solid but not class-leading gaming and rendering performance.

The system is best described as a workstation-class laptop with gaming capabilities, where the CPU’s desktop-level performance (comparable to the Ryzen 9 7950X) is the primary selling point. The GPU, while capable, is the limiting factor for high-resolution gaming and GPU-accelerated compute, as evidenced by its proximity to the RTX 3070 Ti Mobile in benchmark scores. For users prioritizing multi-threaded CPU performance in a mobile form factor, this build delivers exceptional value; for those seeking balanced gaming performance, the GPU may prove to be the bottleneck.