SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

91%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

20,534 Benchmark Score

Top 9% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

This laptop pairing combines a 16-core Zen 4 flagship CPU with an Ampere-generation mobile GPU, landing at the 80th percentile overall among all tested builds. The processor is the standout component — its 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it firmly in enthusiast territory, while the GPU’s 65th percentile is more modest, creating a notable performance asymmetry. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay data.

Gaming Performance

Because the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS figures for this CPU+GPU pairing, gaming performance must be inferred from the component benchmark scores. The RTX 3070 Mobile’s PassMark G3D score of 15309 and its 65th percentile ranking suggest it can handle most modern titles at high settings, but the CPU’s exceptional multi-threaded performance — a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 — means the GPU will frequently be the limiting factor in CPU-light scenarios.

At 1080p resolution, the estimated frame rates for ultra settings would likely be strong in esports and older titles, where the Ryzen 9 7940HX’s single-thread score of 1027 in 3DMark and PassMark single-thread score of 3942 provide ample headroom. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p ultra in most games, though texture-heavy titles may approach capacity limits. Expect 60+ FPS in most competitive shooters, with the CPU’s 16 cores ensuring consistent frame pacing even with background tasks.

Moving to 1440p, the GPU’s 15.97 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 124.8 GPixel/s pixel rate become the primary drivers. The RTX 3070 Mobile’s 65th percentile position indicates it sits slightly above average, so 1440p ultra would likely yield playable but not exceptional frame rates — probably 50-70 FPS in demanding AAA titles, with dips below 60 in the most graphically intensive scenes. The 8 GB VRAM may also cause occasional texture pop-in at this resolution in games with large asset streams.

At 4K, this pairing would struggle to maintain consistent 60 FPS on ultra settings. The GPU’s 249.6 GTexel/s texture rate and 80 ROPs are simply insufficient for 4K ultra in most modern titles. The CPU would not be the bottleneck — its 94th percentile rank ensures it can feed frames as fast as the GPU can render them — but the RTX 3070 Mobile’s mid-tier positioning means 4K gaming would require significant settings reductions. Ray tracing would further tax the 40 RT cores, likely dropping frame rates by 30-40% in supported titles.

The PassMark DirectX 12 score of 64 and DirectX 11 score of 138 suggest the GPU handles modern APIs reasonably well, but these are compute-oriented metrics rather than direct gaming indicators. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2380 provides a more gaming-relevant data point, placing this GPU in the mid-range segment. For high-refresh 1080p gaming, this pairing would excel; for 1440p, it would be adequate; for 4K, it would fall short of enthusiast expectations.

Benchmark Performance

The combined percentile of 80 places this build in the upper quintile of all tested configurations, but the component-level scores reveal a significant gap between CPU and GPU capabilities. The Ryzen 9 7940HX achieves an average benchmark score of 69875, placing it at the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, scores 69996 — a mere 0.2% difference — while the Intel Core i7-14700KF trails by 0.4% at 70163. This places the 7940HX in the same performance class as desktop flagship CPUs, an extraordinary result for a laptop processor.

The GPU tells a different story. The RTX 3070 Mobile’s average benchmark score of 20534 puts it at the 65th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Arc B570, scores 20556 (0.1% ahead), while the Intel Arc A750 scores 20582 (0.2% ahead). The NVIDIA Quadro M4000M trails by 0.3% at 20480. This clustering around the 20500-20600 score range indicates the RTX 3070 Mobile sits in a crowded mid-range segment, offering performance that is respectable but far from exceptional.

In CPU-specific tests, the 7940HX demonstrates consistent strength across workloads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 is particularly impressive, while the single-core score of 1807 shows solid per-thread performance. PassMark results reinforce this picture: multithread score of 53204, integer math at 202883, floating-point math at 121383, and data compression at 693741. The 3DMark thread scaling — 2001 for 2 threads, 3844 for 4 threads, 7158 for 8 threads, 12501 for 16 threads, and 13447 for max threads — shows near-linear scaling up to 16 threads, with diminishing returns beyond that point.

The GPU’s benchmark profile is more mixed. Geekbench OpenCL score of 92939 and Vulkan score of 86768 show competent compute performance, but the PassMark DirectX scores are low (DX12: 64, DX11: 138, DX10: 113, DX9: 160). The PassMark G2D score of 641 suggests basic 2D performance is adequate, while the G3D score of 15309 confirms the mid-range gaming positioning. The GPU compute score of 6827 is modest, indicating this is not a compute-focused part.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename. It operates on the 5 nm TSMC process node, packing 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design with each die measuring 71 mm². The base clock of 2.40 GHz boosts up to 5.20 GHz, and the 64 MB L3 cache (with 1 MB L2 and 64 KB L1 per core) provides substantial cache capacity for data-intensive workloads. The 55 W TDP is surprisingly low for a 16-core part, reflecting the mobile power envelope despite desktop-class core counts.

This CPU’s benchmark scores are remarkable for a mobile processor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 is comparable to high-end desktop CPUs, and the PassMark multithread score of 53204 confirms this positioning. The 94th percentile ranking means this processor outperforms 94% of all CPUs in the database, including many desktop parts. The nearest rivals — the Ryzen 7 9700F, Core i7-14700KF, Ryzen 9 7950X, and Core i7-14700K — are all desktop processors, with the 7940HX trading blows within a 1% range of each.

The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s over a dual-channel DDR5 interface is competent but not exceptional; this is a potential bottleneck for the 16 cores in memory-intensive workloads like large dataset processing or virtual machine hosting. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 28 lanes (CPU only) provides ample bandwidth for next-generation storage and external GPU connectivity, though the integrated Radeon 610M graphics are minimal — clearly intended for basic display output rather than gaming.

For real workloads, the 7940HX excels at multi-threaded tasks. The PassMark data encryption score of 41974 and extended instructions score of 51029 indicate strong performance in security and SIMD-heavy applications. The find prime numbers score of 273 is modest, suggesting this CPU prioritizes throughput over latency-sensitive integer operations. The floating-point math score of 121383 is robust, supporting scientific computing and financial modeling. The physics score of 2297 in PassMark is adequate for simulation workloads, though not class-leading.

The 3DMark thread scaling data reveals an important characteristic: performance scales nearly linearly from 2 to 16 threads (2001 to 12501), but the jump to max threads only reaches 13447 — a gain of just 7.6% from 16 to 32 threads. This suggests the CPU’s power or thermal envelope limits full 32-thread utilization, or that the memory bandwidth becomes a constraint at higher thread counts. Real-world multi-threaded applications that scale beyond 16 threads may not see proportional gains.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need exceptional CPU performance in a laptop form factor, with gaming as a secondary but still relevant capability. The 94th percentile CPU makes this an ideal choice for content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation — workloads that benefit from 16 cores and 32 threads. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 and PassMark multithread score of 53204 provide the computational headroom for demanding professional applications.

For gamers at 1080p, this build offers a strong experience, with the CPU ensuring high minimum frame rates even in CPU-intensive titles like strategy games or large multiplayer battles. The 65th percentile GPU handles most games at high-to-ultra settings at 1080p, though 1440p gamers would need to accept medium-to-high settings for smooth frame rates. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p but may limit texture quality at higher resolutions.

Software developers would benefit from the 7940HX’s multi-threaded prowess, particularly for parallel builds and test suites. The PassMark data compression score of 693741 and integer math score of 202883 indicate strong performance in code compilation and data processing tasks. The 32 threads allow for extensive parallelization, and the 5.20 GHz boost clock provides responsive single-threaded performance for interactive development work.

Students in engineering, data science, or computer science programs would find this build capable of handling simulation software, statistical analysis, and machine learning coursework. The CPU’s 16 cores handle parallel workloads efficiently, while the GPU’s 160 tensor cores provide some acceleration for AI frameworks. However, for dedicated deep learning work, the RTX 3070 Mobile’s 8 GB VRAM may be limiting for larger models.

Small business workstations that run virtual machines, manage databases, or execute complex Excel models would benefit from the CPU’s thread count and cache capacity. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data, and the dual-channel DDR5 support at 83.2 GB/s bandwidth handles moderate concurrent workloads. The GPU is more than adequate for office applications, with the PassMark G2D score of 641 ensuring smooth 2D rendering.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance asymmetry between CPU and GPU creates a clear bottleneck profile. The Ryzen 9 7940HX’s 94th percentile CPU score dwarfs the RTX 3070 Mobile’s 65th percentile GPU score, meaning the GPU will be the limiting factor in most gaming and graphics workloads. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2380 and PassMark G3D score of 15309 indicate the GPU’s absolute performance ceiling, which the CPU can easily feed in nearly all scenarios.

Evidence for the CPU-bottleneck-not-being-an-issue comes from the thread scaling data. The 3DMark scores show the CPU can deliver 2001 points with just 2 threads and scale to 13447 with max threads, providing substantial headroom for game logic, physics, and streaming overhead while the GPU renders frames. Even in CPU-heavy titles, the 7940HX’s single-thread score of 1027 and PassMark single-thread score of 3942 ensure that no game engine will be starved for processing power.

The bottleneck manifests in the opposite direction: the GPU’s performance ceiling constrains the overall gaming experience. With a PassMark G3D score of 15309, the RTX 3070 Mobile cannot leverage the CPU’s full potential in graphics-bound scenarios. At 1080p, the CPU would likely deliver higher frame rates in esports titles, but the GPU caps maximum FPS. At 1440p and above, the GPU becomes even more dominant as the limiting factor, with the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking providing no benefit once the GPU saturates.

For non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts entirely toward the CPU. In rendering, video encoding, or data processing, the RTX 3070 Mobile’s compute capabilities (PassMark GPU compute score of 6827) are secondary to the CPU’s 16 cores. The GPU’s 65th percentile ranking means it provides adequate acceleration for GPU-accelerated tasks, but the CPU is the primary workhorse. This asymmetry is acceptable for content creators who prioritize CPU-bound workflows, but gamers seeking balanced performance would find this configuration CPU-heavy.

The memory subsystem also plays a role in the bottleneck profile. The CPU’s 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared with the GPU, and the GPU’s 448.0 GB/s dedicated bandwidth means memory contention is unlikely in gaming scenarios. However, in mixed workloads that simultaneously stress CPU and GPU memory access, the dual-channel DDR5 interface could become a limiting factor for the CPU’s 16 cores.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p with a high-refresh display, this pairing delivers excellent results in competitive titles. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking ensures frame rates stay high even during intense multiplayer moments, while the GPU’s 65th percentile provides sufficient throughput for 100+ FPS in esports games. The estimated frame pace from the 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2380 suggests consistent performance without significant dips.

Streaming: The 16-core CPU handles encoding, capture, and game logic simultaneously without issue. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 provides ample headroom for x264 encoding at high presets while maintaining gaming performance. The GPU’s NVENC capabilities (via 160 tensor cores and Ampere architecture) offer an alternative encoding path, though the CPU alone is more than capable.

Video editing: The PassMark integer math score of 202883 and floating-point math score of 121383 accelerate timeline scrubbing, effects processing, and export rendering. The 32 threads handle multi-track timelines efficiently, and the 64 MB L3 cache reduces repeated access to source footage. The GPU accelerates effects and color grading, with the RTX 3070 Mobile’s 15.97 TFLOPS providing competent compute for GPU-accelerated filters.

3D rendering: CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles or V-Ray benefit enormously from the 16-core processor, with the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 indicating render times competitive with desktop workstations. The GPU’s CUDA cores (5120 shading units) provide acceleration for GPU-based renderers, though the 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity.

Software development: The PassMark data compression score of 693741 and multithread score of 53204 support rapid code compilation and test execution. The 32 threads allow parallel builds, and the single-thread score of 3942 ensures responsive IDE interactions. The 5.20 GHz boost clock minimizes compile times for single-threaded stages.

Student and office work: For document processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing, this build is dramatically over-powered. The GPU’s G2D score of 641 handles display rendering smoothly, while the CPU’s 16 cores remain mostly idle. The 55 W TDP and efficient 5 nm process make this suitable for battery-conscious academic use, though the performance is far beyond what standard office software requires.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung’s 8 nm process node, containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. It features 5120 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. The Ampere architecture provides 40 RT cores and 160 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The base clock of 1110 MHz boosts to 1560 MHz, with memory clocked at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective).

The 8 GB GDDR6 memory operates on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is adequate for 1080p gaming but becomes a constraint at higher resolutions or with high-resolution texture packs. The pixel rate of 124.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 249.6 GTexel/s define the GPU’s fill-rate capabilities, which are mid-range by current standards. The FP32 performance of 15.97 TFLOPS (with FP16 at a 1:1 ratio) provides competent compute throughput.

The 65th percentile GPU ranking places the RTX 3070 Mobile in the middle of the performance distribution. Its average benchmark score of 20534 is nearly identical to the Intel Arc B570 (20556) and Arc A750 (20582), indicating it competes with mid-range desktop GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2380 confirms this positioning, showing the GPU can handle modern DirectX 12 titles but is not a high-end performer.

The API support is comprehensive — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 — ensuring compatibility with current and near-future games. The 115 W TDP is typical for a mobile mid-range GPU, balancing performance with thermal constraints. The PassMark DirectX scores are notably low (DX12: 64, DX11: 138), but these are compute-oriented metrics that do not directly translate to gaming performance.

For rendering workloads, the RTX 3070 Mobile’s 160 tensor cores accelerate AI-based denoising and upscaling, while the 40 RT cores handle ray-traced effects. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 92939 and Vulkan score of 86768 indicate competent compute performance for GPU-accelerated applications, though the PassMark GPU compute score of 6827 suggests it is not a compute-focused part. The 8 GB VRAM is the primary limitation for professional rendering, capping texture and geometry complexity.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (as indicated by the buildClass field) pairing AMD’s flagship mobile CPU with NVIDIA’s mid-range mobile GPU. The combined percentile of 80 places this configuration in the top 20% of all tested builds, making it a high-performance laptop by overall standards. However, this aggregate score masks the significant disparity between the CPU’s 94th percentile and the GPU’s 65th percentile.

The Ryzen 9 7940HX is the defining component of this build. Its desktop-class 16-core/32-thread configuration, 5.20 GHz boost clock, and 64 MB L3 cache make it one of the most powerful mobile processors ever produced. The 5 nm TSMC process and 55 W TDP represent a remarkable efficiency achievement, delivering desktop-level performance in a mobile thermal envelope.

The RTX 3070 Mobile serves as the graphics solution, providing solid 1080p gaming performance and competent compute capabilities. Its 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for most gaming scenarios, though the 65th percentile ranking indicates it is not a high-end GPU. The Ampere architecture’s RT and tensor cores provide modern features like ray tracing and DLSS support.

Overall, this build is best characterized as a CPU-first laptop. It excels in processor-intensive workloads — rendering, compilation, data analysis — while offering capable but not exceptional gaming performance. The 80th combined percentile reflects this balance: the CPU pulls the overall score up, while the GPU represents the performance ceiling for gaming. Users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance will find this an excellent choice; those seeking balanced gaming performance may find the GPU underwhelming relative to the CPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 80, placing it in the top 20% of all tested builds. However, this masks a significant gap: the CPU is at the 94th percentile while the GPU is at the 65th percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7940HX compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The 7940HX has an average benchmark score of 69875. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F by 0.2% (score 69996), trails the Intel Core i7-14700KF by 0.4% (score 70163), leads the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.5% (score 69515), and leads the Intel Core i7-14700K by 0.7% (score 69355).

Q: What is the RTX 3070 Mobile's closest GPU competitor?

A: The Intel Arc B570 scores 20556, just 0.1% ahead of the RTX 3070 Mobile's 20534 average score. The Intel Arc A750 is 0.2% ahead at 20582, while the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M trails by 0.3% at 20480 and the AMD Radeon R9 M390X trails by 0.6% at 20662.

Q: Does this laptop pairing have measured FPS data for gaming?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All gaming performance assessments are estimated from the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, not from direct gameplay measurements.

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 29400 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 1807 in single-core. This places it in the same performance class as desktop flagship CPUs, with a 94th percentile ranking among all processors.

Q: What are the GPU's key memory specifications?

A: The RTX 3070 Mobile features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clock is 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), and the GPU's pixel rate is 124.8 GPixel/s with a texture rate of 249.6 GTexel/s.

Q: How does the CPU scale across thread counts in 3DMark?

A: The 3DMark thread scores are 2001 for 2 threads, 3844 for 4 threads, 7158 for 8 threads, 12501 for 16 threads, and 13447 for max threads. This shows near-linear scaling up to 16 threads, but only a 7.6% gain from 16 to 32 threads, suggesting a power or memory bandwidth limit at higher thread counts.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds