SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

95 Score

Top 5% Ranking

95 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 5% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 860M

26,401 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and AMD Radeon 860M combination is a laptop-class pairing that lands in the 83rd percentile overall, but it is a study in contrasts: a 16-core, 32-thread flagship mobile CPU paired with an entry-level integrated GPU. The data shows no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct gaming tests. This is not a gaming-first build; it is a productivity and compute platform with modest graphics capability.

Gaming Performance

There are no measured FPS values in the data for this CPU+GPU combination, meaning all gaming expectations must be derived from the GPU’s synthetic benchmark results. The AMD Radeon 860M sits at the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26401. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 (deltaPct -0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (deltaPct 0.3%), and the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary (deltaPct -0.6%). These deltas are remarkably tight—the 860M is effectively within one percent of these three very different cards, which suggests its real-world gaming performance will be highly workload-dependent.

Given the 860M’s 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with a boost clock of 3000 MHz, the estimated FPS at 1080p ultra settings would likely land in the low-to-mid 30s for modern AAA titles. At 1440p, the frame rate would drop further, likely into the mid-20s, as the GPU’s 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the limiting factor. Competitive esports titles with lower graphical demands could see higher numbers, but the data does not support claims of smooth high-refresh-rate gaming. The 8 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but with only 16 ROPs, ray-traced workloads will severely tax the pixel throughput, making RT features impractical at playable frame rates in most scenarios.

The CPU’s 3dmark scores—12501 in the 16-thread test and 13447 in max-thread—are exceptionally high for a mobile processor, meaning the processor will never be the bottleneck in gaming. The GPU will be the definitive constraint in every gaming scenario, and users should expect 1080p as the realistic ceiling for playable performance, with settings tuned down from ultra to achieve stable frame rates. The data indicates this is a system for gaming at 1080p with reduced settings, or for older titles, rather than a high-end gaming machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the mobile Dragon Range series. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a peak bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it does not support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity is Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU, which is generous for a laptop part and allows for fast NVMe storage connectivity. The GPU, however, is an integrated part with a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, and since it is an IGP with no power connectors, there is no discrete GPU upgrade path within this chassis.

The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 15 W, and the suggested PSU field is null for the GPU. In a laptop context, this means the system’s power delivery is fixed by the chassis design, and there is no user-accessible PSU headroom to consider. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing system memory capacity and speed, as the GPU uses System Shared memory and its bandwidth is listed as System Dependent—faster DDR5 would directly benefit iGPU performance. The CPU is multiplier-unlocked, but in a mobile chassis with a 55 W TDP, overclocking headroom is minimal.

The data suggests the upgrade path is limited to memory and storage, not to GPU or CPU swaps, given the soldered nature of laptop components. Users coming from older laptops will see a massive CPU uplift, but those expecting to extend this system’s lifespan with a future GPU upgrade will be disappointed—the platform is what it is from day one.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks are outstanding. In Cinebench R23, the Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 29400 in multicore and 1807 in single-core. The multicore score is the standout, placing it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 69875, which puts it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-14700KF, and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X. The CPU’s 3dmark scores scale well with thread count: 2001 for 2 threads, 3844 for 4 threads, 7158 for 8 threads, 12501 for 16 threads, and 13447 for max threads. This scaling shows strong efficiency, with the 16-thread score reaching 93% of the max-thread score, indicating that the 16-core design is well-utilized.

In PassMark, the CPU scores 53204 in multithread, 202883 in integer math, 121383 in floating point math, and 693741 in data compression. The single-thread PassMark score is 3942, and the data encryption score is 41974. These numbers indicate a processor that excels at heavily threaded productivity tasks—compression, encryption, and scientific math—while still offering respectable single-thread performance for everyday responsiveness.

The GPU benchmarks are more modest. The Radeon 860M scores 22759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30043 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average of 26401. The Vulkan score being 32% higher than the OpenCL score suggests the RDNA 3.5 architecture is better optimized for modern graphics APIs. Combined, the CPU’s 94th percentile and the GPU’s 72nd percentile produce a combined percentile of 83, which reflects a system that is far stronger on the processor side than on the graphics side.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need intense CPU compute in a laptop form factor with occasional light gaming or graphics acceleration. The Ryzen 9 7940HX’s 29400 Cinebench R23 multicore score makes it ideal for content creators running video encoding, 3D rendering, or batch photo processing—workloads that scale across 16 cores and 32 threads. Software developers compiling large codebases will benefit from the 202883 integer math score and the 41974 encryption score, which also indicates strong performance for security-related tasks.

Students in engineering or data science fields will find the CPU capable for simulations and data analysis, but the GPU’s 72nd percentile means CAD or GPU-accelerated machine learning will be constrained. Small business workstations running virtualization or database workloads will see excellent CPU throughput, with the 693741 compression score suggesting strong performance for database operations. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings are the only gaming audience this system serves, and it will not satisfy enthusiasts seeking high refresh rates or high-resolution gaming. The data indicates a clear split: this is a CPU-first machine with GPU capabilities as a secondary feature.

Balance and Bottleneck

The bottleneck analysis is unambiguous. The CPU sits in the 94th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 72nd percentile—a 22-point gap that means the GPU is the limiting factor in any graphics-bound workload. The CPU’s 3dmark max-thread score of 13447 versus the GPU’s average benchmark score of 26401 shows the processor can feed the GPU far more data than the GPU can process, leading to GPU-bound scenarios in gaming and rendering.

In gaming, the estimated FPS scaling would show the CPU maintaining high frame pacing while the GPU struggles to push frames, meaning the 860M will be pegged at 100% utilization while the CPU idles. In productivity, the reverse is true: the CPU will max out its 16 cores, and the GPU will have minimal involvement unless the software uses OpenCL or Vulkan acceleration. The 3.072 TFLOPS FP32 figure is the hard ceiling for graphics performance, and it is roughly one-tenth of what a high-end discrete GPU would offer, so the balance is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound tasks. The data shows no scenario where this pairing is balanced; it is a workstation CPU with an entry-level GPU bolted on.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 860M is built on the Krackan Point chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm TSMC process. It has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, which are modest figures that cap fill-rate-heavy workloads. FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same rate (1:1), indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration for AI workloads.

Memory is System Shared with a System Dependent bandwidth, meaning performance scales with the system’s DDR5 speed and channel configuration. The 8 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, but the low ROP count and modest pixel rate will make RT performance weak. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring modern API compatibility. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 30043 versus the OpenCL score of 22759 shows a 32% advantage for Vulkan, suggesting games using Vulkan will perform noticeably better than those using OpenCL-based compute. The GPU’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, is within 0.1% in average score, but the 860M has more shading units and higher clocks, so its real-world edge will come in Vulkan titles. For rendering, the 860M is adequate for 1080p video decode and light 3D previews, but not for final-frame rendering or GPU compute tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, and fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB L3, totaling a substantial 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The transistor count is 13,140 million across a dual-die design with each die measuring 71 mm².

The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29400 is exceptional for a 55 W mobile part, outperforming the Intel Core i7-14700KF by 0.4% and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.5% in average benchmark scores. The PassMark multithread score of 53204, combined with the 202883 integer math score, indicates excellent throughput for compile jobs and data processing. The single-thread score of 3942 in PassMark and 1807 in Cinebench R23 shows the 5.20 GHz boost clock is effective for lightly threaded tasks like web browsing or office applications. The architecture supports DDR5 memory with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for the 16-core design but not extreme. The data shows this CPU is a top-tier mobile processor, ranking in the 94th percentile, and its performance is competitive with desktop parts like the Ryzen 9 7950X, making it a compelling choice for any CPU-bound workload.

Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, a 16-core Zen 4 mobile flagship, with the AMD Radeon 860M, an RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU. The build class is laptop, and the combined percentile is 83, placing it in the upper tier of all systems but with a significant skew toward CPU performance. The CPU’s 94th percentile versus the GPU’s 72nd percentile means the overall tier is defined by the processor’s excellence, not the graphics. This is a workstation-class CPU in a laptop chassis with entry-level integrated graphics, suitable for users who prioritize compute performance over gaming. The pairing is unusual—most 16-core CPUs are paired with discrete GPUs—but the data shows it is a viable choice for developers, researchers, and content creators who need maximum CPU power and only occasional graphics acceleration. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, which is surprising given the 860M’s integrated nature, but the tight deltaPct values (0.3%) suggest the 860M punches above its weight in synthetic benchmarks, even if real-world gaming will favor the discrete card’s dedicated memory bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 83, which places this laptop build in the upper tier of all systems, though this is driven primarily by the CPU’s 94th percentile rather than the GPU’s 72nd percentile.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7940HX compare to the Intel Core i7-14700K?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HX has an average benchmark score of 69875, which is 0.7% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700K’s score of 69355, making the AMD part slightly faster on average.

Q: What is the Radeon 860M’s closest rival in benchmark scores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is the closest rival, with an average score of 26421 versus the 860M’s 26401, a delta of -0.1%, meaning the two are statistically tied.

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 7940HX support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory. It supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a peak bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The Radeon 860M delivers 3.072 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, with FP16 at the same 3.072 TFLOPS rate (1:1).

Q: How many ray tracing cores does the Radeon 860M have?

A: The GPU has 8 ray tracing cores, but with only 16 ROPs, ray-traced performance is expected to be limited.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 29400 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which places it in the 94th percentile among all CPUs and within 0.4% of the Intel Core i7-14700KF’s average score.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + AMD Radeon 860M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

AMD Radeon 860M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds