SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + AMD Radeon 8060S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

97 Score

Top 3% Ranking

97 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8060S

55,757 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and AMD Radeon 8060S pairing represents a high-tier mobile computing solution, placing in the 91st percentile overall for combined performance. This Dragon Range CPU and Strix Halo GPU combination targets a laptop class build where raw processing power meets substantial integrated graphics capability, positioning it as a formidable platform for demanding workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon 8060S is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture using a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 308 mm². It operates with a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The GPU relies entirely on System Shared memory, meaning its VRAM size, bus width, and bandwidth are System Dependent rather than fixed specifications. This shared memory architecture allows the GPU to dynamically utilize system RAM, which can be beneficial for flexibility but ties graphics performance to the system’s memory configuration.

The GPU’s compute configuration includes 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It also features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 185.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 464.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 14.85 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (at a 1:1 ratio). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs. The Radeon 8060S is designated as an IGP with no power connectors and a 55 W TDP, and it interfaces via PCIe 5.0 x16.

In benchmark testing, the Radeon 8060S achieves a score of 2162 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its OpenCL score is 84626, and its Vulkan score is 80483 in Geekbench. These results place the GPU in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 55757. The data indicates that this integrated solution performs at a level comparable to discrete graphics cards. Specifically, the nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB with an average score of 55698 (a delta of 0.1%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 at 56083 (delta -0.6%), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54828 (delta 1.7%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 at 54247 (delta 2.8%). These figures show that the Radeon 8060S sits within a tight competitive band, effectively matching the performance of the RX 6750 GRE and coming within a fraction of a percent of the RTX 5080’s benchmark score.

For rendering workloads, the 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, combined with the 40 ray tracing cores, provides a robust foundation for real-time graphics and ray-traced effects. The benchmark scores suggest that the GPU can handle demanding rendering tasks at high settings, given its proximity to the performance of established discrete GPUs. However, the System Shared memory means that overall rendering performance will be influenced by the system’s RAM speed and capacity, a factor that must be considered when evaluating the complete platform.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX show strong multi-threaded performance. In 3DMark tests, the CPU scores 12501 with 16 threads, 2001 with 2 threads, 3844 with 4 threads, 7158 with 8 threads, 13447 with max threads, and 1027 in single-thread. Cinebench R23 results are 29400 for multi-core and 1807 for single-core. PassMark tests further demonstrate the CPU’s capabilities: data compression scores 693741, data encryption scores 41974, extended instructions score 51029, find prime numbers scores 273, floating point math scores 121383, integer math scores 202883, multithread score is 53204, physics scores 2297, random string sorting scores 81775, and single-thread scores 3942.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69875, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are closely matched: the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has an average score of 69996 (delta -0.2%), the Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163 (delta -0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515 (delta 0.5%), and the Intel Core i7-14700K scores 69355 (delta 0.7%). The Ryzen 9 7940HX is essentially neck-and-neck with these desktop-class processors, trailing the i7-14700KF by only 0.4% and leading the 7950X by 0.5%. This indicates that the mobile CPU delivers performance on par with high-end desktop parts from the same period.

The GPU’s average benchmark score of 55757 places it in the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The combined picture reveals a system where the CPU is in the 94th percentile and the GPU is in the 87th percentile, resulting in a combined percentile of 91. This suggests a well-matched pairing where the CPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the GPU, but both components are high performers in their respective fields. The data shows that the CPU’s multi-threaded prowess, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400, complements the GPU’s solid 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2162, creating a platform capable of handling both processor-intensive and graphics-intensive tasks.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the CPU and GPU is characterized by a slight CPU advantage in percentile ranking, with the CPU at 94% and the GPU at 87%. This 7-percentage-point gap suggests that in most workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor, particularly in graphics-heavy applications. The CPU’s high multi-threaded scores, such as the 53204 PassMark multithread score and the 29400 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, indicate that it can feed data to the GPU efficiently without becoming a bottleneck in most scenarios.

However, the nature of the bottleneck depends on the specific workload. In gaming at high resolutions, the GPU is likely to be the constraint, given that its performance is comparable to discrete GPUs like the RX 6750 GRE. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1027 in 3DMark and 1807 in Cinebench R23 are strong, meaning it can handle the per-thread demands of game logic. Conversely, in CPU-bound tasks such as data compression (PassMark score 693741) or integer math (202883), the processor will be the primary driver, and the GPU will have minimal impact.

The absence of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that FPS scaling cannot be directly quantified. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing. Therefore, frame rate expectations must be estimated from the benchmark scores. Given the GPU’s performance level, which is within 0.6% of the RTX 5080’s average score, one would expect the GPU to be the limiting factor at 1080p and 1440p resolutions in demanding titles. At lower resolutions or less demanding games, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance could theoretically allow the GPU to reach higher frame rates, but the GPU’s ceiling remains the primary constraint. The data suggests a balanced system where the CPU has headroom to support future GPU upgrades, while the current GPU can fully utilize the CPU’s capabilities in most gaming scenarios.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the overall performance percentile of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and AMD Radeon 8060S combination?

A: The combined percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing is 91, indicating it outperforms 91% of all tested system combinations.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX compare to the Intel Core i7-14700KF in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX has an average benchmark score of 69875, which is 0.4% lower than the Intel Core i7-14700KF’s score of 70163.

Q: What is the GPU’s performance relative to the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has an average benchmark score of 55757, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB’s score of 55698.

Q: What are the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core scores?

A: The CPU scores 29400 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1807 in Cinebench R23 single-core.

Q: Does the Radeon 8060S support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 8060S features 40 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: What is the CPU’s memory bandwidth specification?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: How does the CPU’s multi-threaded performance compare to the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX has an average benchmark score of 69875, which is 0.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X’s score of 69515.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with a transistor count of 13,140 million and a die size of 2x 71 mm². The CPU has a base clock of 2.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. It supports DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and offers a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The processor uses the AMD Socket FL1 and has 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only). It includes integrated Radeon 610M graphics and has an unlocked multiplier.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of L3 cache. The CPU’s benchmark scores demonstrate its capability across various real-world workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400 indicates strong performance in video rendering, 3D modeling, and other multi-threaded tasks. The PassMark data compression score of 693741 and integer math score of 202883 suggest excellent performance in file archiving, encryption, and general productivity applications. The floating point math score of 121383 is particularly relevant for scientific computing and engineering simulations.

The single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 score of 1807 and a PassMark single-thread score of 3942, ensures responsive performance in everyday tasks like web browsing, office applications, and light coding. The 3DMark scores show a scaling pattern from 2001 with 2 threads to 13447 with max threads, indicating that the processor efficiently utilizes its 32 threads for parallel workloads. The nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i7-14700K and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, are all within 0.7% of its average score, confirming that this mobile CPU delivers desktop-class performance. For content creators, developers compiling code, and researchers running simulations, the high multi-threaded throughput will translate directly into reduced processing times.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is built for the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to mobile platforms. This socket is not swappable in the traditional sense; it is soldered or embedded in the laptop motherboard. Therefore, the CPU upgrade path is limited to the platform itself, meaning users cannot swap the processor for a different socket type. The memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This is a modern standard, and users can potentially upgrade memory capacity or speed within the laptop’s constraints.

The CPU provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth interface suitable for the fastest NVMe SSDs and external GPU enclosures, though the latter is uncommon in laptops. The GPU, Radeon 8060S, also uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, but since it is an IGP with System Shared memory, its performance is tied to the system RAM. The TDP for both the CPU and GPU is 55 W each, and the GPU has no power connectors, drawing power from the motherboard. The suggested PSU field is null, indicating no specific PSU recommendation is provided for this mobile platform.

For a sensible next upgrade, the most impactful change would be increasing system memory capacity and speed, as the GPU’s shared memory architecture directly benefits from faster and more abundant RAM. Given the CPU’s performance is already in the 94th percentile, it is unlikely to be a bottleneck for any current software. The GPU, while strong, is the component with more room for improvement; however, in a laptop, the GPU is typically not upgradeable. Therefore, the primary upgrade path for this platform is memory, followed by storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The platform has limited PSU headroom concerns since the TDP is fixed, and the power delivery is designed by the laptop manufacturer.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

This CPU+GPU combination is well-suited for users who need high-performance computing in a laptop form factor. Gamers playing at high resolutions will benefit from the GPU’s performance, which is within 0.6% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080’s average score and 2.8% ahead of the RTX 4080. The GPU’s 87th percentile ranking indicates it can handle demanding titles at high settings, making it suitable for gaming enthusiasts who prioritize graphical fidelity.

Content creators, particularly those working with video editing, 3D rendering, and animation, will find the CPU’s multi-threaded performance valuable. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29400 and the PassMark multithread score of 53204 indicate that the CPU can significantly reduce render times in applications like Blender, Premiere Pro, and After Effects. The GPU’s 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 40 ray tracing cores also assist in GPU-accelerated rendering and real-time previews.

Software developers and data scientists will benefit from the CPU’s high integer math score of 202883 and extended instructions score of 51029, which speed up code compilation, data processing, and machine learning workflows. Students in engineering or computer science fields, as well as small business workstations handling complex spreadsheets, databases, or virtualization, will find the 16-core/32-thread configuration ample for their needs. The CPU’s data compression score of 693741 is particularly useful for tasks involving large file archives or database management. The combination’s 91st overall percentile ensures that it is a top-tier performer, suitable for users who require a single system to handle a diverse range of intensive tasks without compromise.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with the AMD Radeon 8060S in a laptop class configuration. The CPU is a 16-core, 32-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture, and the GPU is an integrated Radeon 8060S based on RDNA 3.5. The combination achieves a combined percentile of 91, placing it in the top 10% of all system pairings. The CPU’s 94th percentile ranking and the GPU’s 87th percentile ranking define this as a high-tier mobile platform.

The CPU’s average benchmark score of 69875 puts it in direct competition with desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-14700K and AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, while the GPU’s average score of 55757 rivals discrete desktop graphics cards such as the RX 6750 GRE and RTX 4080. This pairing is notable for achieving near-desktop performance in a power-constrained laptop form factor, with both components rated at a 55 W TDP. The Radeon 8060S is an IGP with System Shared memory, which distinguishes it from discrete GPUs but does not appear to significantly hamper its benchmark performance. Overall, this build represents a premium mobile solution for users who demand high performance across both CPU-intensive and GPU-intensive tasks, as evidenced by its strong showing in the 91st overall percentile.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and AMD Radeon 8060S. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data for this pairing, so all frame rate discussions here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, confirming that the following expectations are projections, not empirical test results.

Based on the GPU’s average benchmark score of 55757 and its 87th percentile ranking, the Radeon 8060S is expected to deliver playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p resolutions in most modern titles. The GPU’s performance is within 0.1% of the Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and within 0.6% of the RTX 5080, suggesting that it should match the gaming capabilities of these discrete cards. At 1080p, the system should achieve high frame rates in esports titles and medium-to-high settings in AAA games. At 1440p, frame rates would likely drop but remain playable in many titles. 4K gaming would be more demanding, and the GPU may struggle to maintain high frame rates at ultra settings, given that its performance is comparable to mid-range desktop cards rather than top-tier ones.

The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1027 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1807, ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities, with a max-thread 3DMark score of 13447, also support modern games that utilize multiple cores. However, since the GPU is the lower-performing component relative to its peers, it is likely to be the primary determinant of frame rates. Users should expect the system to handle 1080p gaming with ease, 1440p gaming with some settings adjustments for demanding titles, and 4K gaming at lower settings or with upscaling technologies. These estimates are derived from the benchmark scores and should be validated through real-world testing.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + AMD Radeon 8060S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

AMD Radeon 8060S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

Who Should Build It — target users and industries tied strictly to the measured performance

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds