SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

97 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 3% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
96%
VS
GPU
97%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score
Top 4% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score
Top 3% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + AMD Radeon 8050S

This mobile pairing combines AMD's 16-core Zen 4 Dragon Range processor with the RDNA 3.5-based Strix Halo integrated GPU, creating a laptop platform that sits at the 92nd percentile across all CPU+GPU combinations. The CPU delivers a 94th-percentile ranking among all processors, while the GPU holds an 89th-percentile position among all graphics solutions. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussed below is estimated from the individual benchmark scores rather than from direct FPS measurements.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a system where the CPU and GPU are closely matched in overall capability, though they excel in different workload domains. The processor's 16 cores and 32 threads generate a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,400, placing it within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i7-14700KF. This level of multi-threaded performance means the CPU will rarely be the limiting factor in gaming scenarios, where the GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS of FP32 compute becomes the primary constraint.

The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 and Vulkan score of 58,398 indicate a graphics solution that outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M by 0.3% but trails the AMD Radeon RX 7600M by 2.6%. In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression (PassMark score of 693,741) and encryption (41,974), the processor's 32 threads provide ample headroom, while in GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering and high-resolution gaming, the integrated graphics will determine the ceiling. The 55 W TDP for both components suggests a balanced power envelope where neither unit starves the other, though the system-shared memory architecture means the GPU's bandwidth is "System Dependent" rather than fixed, potentially creating a memory-bandwidth bottleneck in memory-intensive scenarios.

The single-thread CPU score of 1,027 in 3DMark and 1,807 in Cinebench R23 shows strong per-core performance for a mobile part, but the 2-thread score of 2,001 in 3DMark reveals that lightly-threaded workloads will not fully utilize the 16-core design. The 8-thread score of 7,158 and 16-thread score of 12,501 demonstrate scaling efficiency, with the max-thread score of 13,447 showing only marginal gains beyond 16 threads, indicating that the workload scaling plateaus as thread counts approach the physical core count.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 89th-percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput suggest capable 1080p performance at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates cannot be confirmed. The CPU's 94th-percentile position ensures that even at high refresh rates, the processor will keep up with the GPU's output in most titles.

Streaming: The 16-core/32-thread configuration provides substantial headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The PassMark multi-thread score of 53,204 and the 3DMark max-thread score of 13,447 indicate that background encoding tasks will have ample CPU resources without starving the game thread.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,400 and the PassMark floating-point math score of 121,383 position this platform for smooth 4K timeline editing and effects rendering. The GPU's 32 RT cores and DirectX 12 Ultimate support enable hardware-accelerated effects, though the system-shared memory bandwidth will influence how quickly large projects load.

3D rendering: The CPU's 29,400 Cinebench R23 multi-core result places it within 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-14700K, making it a strong choice for CPU-based rendering workloads. The GPU's 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate provide supplemental acceleration for viewport rendering and GPU-accelerated engines.

Software development: The 32 threads and 64 MB of L3 cache support heavy parallel compilation workloads. The PassMark integer math score of 202,883 and random string sorting score of 81,775 indicate strong performance for code compilation and data processing tasks common in development environments.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 3,942 in PassMark and 1,807 in Cinebench R23 ensure responsive everyday computing. The 55 W TDP for both CPU and GPU means the platform can operate in slim laptop chassis without excessive cooling requirements, making it suitable for portable productivity systems.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename, fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a dual-chiplet design measuring 2x 71 mm². The 16 cores and 32 threads operate at a base clock of 2.40 GHz and boost up to 5.20 GHz, with an unlocked multiplier for enthusiast tuning. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, providing substantial data locality for multi-threaded workloads.

The benchmark results show a processor that competes with desktop-class parts. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,400 places it within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-14700K, while the single-core score of 1,807 demonstrates strong per-thread performance. The PassMark multi-thread score of 53,204 and average benchmark score of 69,875 confirm the 94th-percentile ranking, with the nearest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F at a 0.2% difference in average score.

The 3DMark thread-scaling results provide insight into the core architecture. The 2-thread score of 2,001 and 4-thread score of 3,844 show linear scaling, while the 8-thread score of 7,158 and 16-thread score of 12,501 demonstrate that the processor maintains efficiency up to 16 threads. The max-thread score of 13,447 is only 7.6% higher than the 16-thread score, indicating that SMT (Simultaneous Multi-Threading) provides diminishing returns beyond the physical cores. The PassMark extended instructions score of 51,029 and data encryption score of 41,974 highlight the AVX-512 and AES-NI capabilities useful for scientific computing and security workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The processor uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. Memory support is limited to DDR5 with a dual-channel bus providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is not supported. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, enabling high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and external GPU enclosures. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide basic display output when the discrete GPU is not active.

The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 and operates as an IGP (Integrated Graphics Processor) with a 55 W TDP and no external power connectors. This means the platform does not require a separate power supply upgrade path—the entire system is constrained by the laptop's power delivery. The GPU's memory is "System Shared," meaning it draws from the same DDR5 pool as the CPU, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." This architecture limits the potential for GPU memory upgrades, as the system RAM determines graphics performance.

For users seeking more graphics performance, the platform's PCIe 5.0 x16 interface and 28 CPU lanes theoretically support external GPU enclosures, though the laptop form factor and IGP design make this an uncommon upgrade path. The CPU's unlocked multiplier allows for performance tuning within the laptop's thermal envelope, but the 55 W TDP for both components suggests the cooling solution is designed for a specific power budget. The nearest GPU rivals—the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M at 0.3% higher score and the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 at 2.5% lower—indicate that the integrated graphics sits in a performance tier comparable to mid-range discrete mobile GPUs, so users seeking substantial graphics upgrades would need to consider a different platform entirely.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 69,875 places it at the 94th percentile among all processors, with a 0.2% deficit to the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and a 0.4% deficit to the Intel Core i7-14700KF. The processor outperforms the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.5% and the Intel Core i7-14700K by 0.7%, demonstrating that this mobile chip competes favorably with desktop parts in aggregate benchmarks. The Cinebench R23 results are particularly strong: 29,400 in multi-core and 1,807 in single-core, representing the 16-core/32-thread configuration's full capabilities.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 62,108 places it at the 89th percentile among all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 outpaces the Vulkan score of 58,398 by 12.7%, suggesting that the RDNA 3.5 architecture performs better in OpenCL workloads than in Vulkan compute tasks. The GPU outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M by 0.3% but trails the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 2.5%, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M by 2.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 2.7%.

The combined percentile of 92 indicates that this CPU+GPU pairing outperforms 92% of all tested platform combinations. The CPU's 94th-percentile ranking is slightly higher than the GPU's 89th-percentile position, suggesting that the processor is the stronger component in this pairing. The PassMark results show a balanced profile: integer math at 202,883, floating-point math at 121,383, and data compression at 693,741, which collectively support the platform's strong all-around performance for both compute and creative workloads.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8050S is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture with the Strix Halo chip, fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process with a die size of 308 mm². The GPU operates at a base clock of 1295 MHz and boosts up to 2800 MHz, with 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations units. The 32 RT cores provide hardware ray tracing support, and the DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) API compliance ensures compatibility with the latest graphics features. The GPU also supports OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The memory configuration uses "System Shared" memory, meaning the GPU draws from the same DDR5 pool as the CPU rather than having dedicated VRAM. The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all described as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," indicating that graphics performance will vary based on the system's memory configuration. The pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s are strong for an integrated solution, and the FP32 throughput of 11.47 TFLOPS (with FP16 at 11.47 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio) provides solid compute performance.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 and Vulkan score of 58,398 place the GPU at the 89th percentile, outperforming the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M by 0.3% but trailing the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 by 2.5%, the AMD Radeon RX 7600M by 2.6%, and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP by 2.7%. The 55 W TDP and IGP slot width mean the GPU is designed for integration into laptop motherboards rather than as a discrete card, with display outputs described as "Portable Device Dependent." The predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile, indicating a significant architectural leap from the older GCN-based designs to the current RDNA 3.5 implementation.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this CPU+GPU combination, so the following frame-rate expectations are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements. The GPU's 89th-percentile ranking and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest that 1080p gaming at high settings should be playable in most titles, with the 32 RT cores enabling ray-traced effects at reduced resolutions or with upscaling. The CPU's 94th-percentile position ensures that even in CPU-intensive games, the processor will not bottleneck the graphics solution.

At 1440p resolution, the system-shared memory bandwidth limitation becomes more significant, as the GPU competes with the CPU for the same DDR5 pool. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth from the CPU's dual-channel configuration is shared with the GPU, potentially constraining texture loading and frame buffer operations at higher resolutions. The GPU's 179.2 GPixel/s pixel rate supports high-resolution rendering, but the "System Dependent" memory bandwidth means actual performance will vary based on the laptop's specific memory configuration.

For esports titles and less demanding games, the combination of the CPU's 3,942 PassMark single-thread score and the GPU's 358.4 GTexel/s texture rate should deliver high frame rates at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA titles, the GPU's performance relative to the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% lower score) and AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (0.3% lower score) provides a reference point: users should expect performance in the range of these mid-range discrete mobile GPUs, which typically handle 1080p high settings at 60+ FPS in most modern games.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX compare to desktop processors?

A: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,400 places it within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X and 0.7% of the Intel Core i7-14700K, while the single-core score of 1,807 demonstrates competitive per-thread performance for a mobile part.

Q: What is the GPU's performance tier relative to discrete mobile GPUs?

A: The Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62,108, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M and 2.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, placing it in the mid-range discrete mobile GPU category.

Q: Does the GPU have dedicated VRAM?

A: No, the GPU uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it draws from the same DDR5 pool as the CPU. The memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all "System Dependent," so graphics performance depends on the system's memory configuration.

Q: What is the CPU's thread scaling behavior?

A: The 3DMark results show linear scaling from 2 threads (2,001) to 8 threads (7,158), with the 16-thread score of 12,501 and max-thread score of 13,447 indicating that SMT provides only marginal gains beyond the 16 physical cores.

Q: What ray tracing hardware does the GPU include?

A: The GPU includes 32 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the system-shared memory architecture will influence ray tracing performance.

Q: What is the CPU's memory bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This bandwidth is shared with the GPU, which has "System Dependent" memory bandwidth.

Q: How does the platform's overall performance compare to other CPU+GPU combinations?

A: The combined percentile of 92 means this pairing outperforms 92% of all tested platform combinations, with the CPU at the 94th percentile and the GPU at the 89th percentile.

Who Should Build It

This platform targets laptop users who need desktop-class multi-threaded performance in a portable form factor. The CPU's 94th-percentile ranking and 16-core/32-thread configuration make it suitable for content creators working with video editing (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,400), 3D rendering (PassMark floating-point math score of 121,383), and software development (PassMark integer math score of 202,883). The GPU's 89th-percentile ranking accommodates 1080p gaming at high settings, making it viable for gamers who prioritize CPU-heavy workloads alongside gaming.

Students and office workers benefit from the single-thread performance (PassMark single-thread score of 3,942) and the 55 W TDP for both components, which enables slim laptop designs with adequate battery life. Small business workstations that handle data compression (PassMark score of 693,741) and encryption (41,974) will find the 32 threads well-suited for database operations and secure file handling. The platform is less ideal for users seeking maximum gaming performance at 1440p or 4K, as the system-shared memory architecture and GPU's performance relative to the Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% lower) suggest resolution scaling will be limited.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class platform combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX processor with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. The CPU is a 16-core/32-thread Zen 4 part from the Dragon Range series, built on TSMC's 5 nm process, with a 94th-percentile ranking among all CPUs. The GPU is an RDNA 3.5-based Strix Halo integrated solution on TSMC's 4 nm process, with an 89th-percentile ranking among all GPUs. The combination achieves a 92nd-percentile overall ranking, indicating a high-tier mobile platform that competes with desktop systems in multi-threaded workloads while providing mid-range discrete-class graphics performance. The 55 W TDP for both components ensures the platform can be deployed in portable laptop chassis without extreme cooling requirements, and the PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides future connectivity options for external peripherals.