SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

96%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

69,875 Benchmark Score

Top 4% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and the AMD Radeon 780M represents a unique configuration in the mobile landscape, combining a high-end 16-core processor with an integrated graphics solution. The data shows a substantial performance disparity between the two components, with the CPU ranking in the 94th percentile against all processors while the GPU sits in the 61st percentile against all GPUs. This creates a system where computational muscle is abundant, but graphical capabilities are more modest, suggesting a specific use case focused on processor-intensive tasks rather than high-end gaming. The benchmark results indicate that this is a laptop platform designed for productivity, content creation, and multitasking, where the CPU is the clear star of the show.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX is a 16-core, 32-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, and fabricated on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It belongs to the 7000 series and features a base clock of 2.40 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, supported by a 64 MB L3 cache and 1 MB L2 cache per core. The processor operates within a 55 W TDP, which is notably low for a chip with this many cores, indicating efficient power management for a laptop form factor. The CPU supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it connects via PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark results for this processor are impressive across the board. In Cinebench R23, it scores 29,400 in multicore and 1,807 in single-core, demonstrating exceptional multi-threaded capability that rivals desktop-class parts. The 3DMark tests show a clear scaling pattern: 1,027 points in single-thread, 2,001 in 2-threads, 3,844 in 4-threads, 7,158 in 8-threads, 12,501 in 16-threads, and 13,447 in max-threads. This scaling suggests that the processor efficiently utilizes all 16 cores, with the jump from 8 to 16 threads nearly doubling the score, indicating strong core utilization in heavily threaded workloads. The PassMark suite reinforces this, with a multithread score of 53,204 and a single-thread score of 3,942, alongside specific tests like data compression at 693,741 and floating-point math at 121,383.

The CPU’s percentile ranking at 94 places it among the top processors, and the nearest rivals data shows it trading blows with desktop parts. It is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and 0.4% behind the Intel Core i7-14700KF, but it leads the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X by 0.5% and the Intel Core i7-14700K by 0.7% in average benchmark scores. This is remarkable for a mobile processor, indicating that the 7940HX can match or exceed the performance of high-end desktop CPUs from the previous generation in synthetic benchmarks. The implication for real workloads is that this chip can handle video rendering, 3D modeling, software compilation, and data analysis with ease, making it a top-tier choice for mobile workstations.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The Radeon 780M integrated GPU is the limiting factor here. While the CPU’s single-thread score of 1,807 in Cinebench R23 is strong, the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 is modest. This pairing is not suited for high-refresh gaming at demanding settings, as the GPU will struggle to push high frame rates in modern titles. The data suggests that esports titles at lower settings may be playable, but the experience will be constrained by the iGPU’s capabilities rather than the CPU.

Streaming: The Ryzen 9 7940HX has ample multi-threaded headroom, with a max-threads 3DMark score of 13,447 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29,400. This means the CPU can handle encoding and streaming workloads simultaneously without significant performance drops, as the 16 cores and 32 threads provide plenty of processing power for both the game and the encoder. However, the integrated GPU’s performance will limit the quality of the game being streamed, so this scenario is viable for CPU-heavy tasks but not for graphically intensive titles.

Video Editing: The processor excels in this scenario. The PassMark data compression score of 693,741 and floating-point math score of 121,383 indicate strong performance in tasks that involve video codecs, effects, and color grading. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29,400 suggests that rendering timelines and exporting final videos will be fast, making this a capable machine for 4K video editing, though the iGPU will handle preview rendering rather than GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: This is where the CPU shines brightest. The multicore performance, with a PassMark multithread score of 53,204 and a Cinebench R23 score of 29,400, is ideal for CPU-based rendering engines like those found in Blender or V-Ray. The 16 cores will crunch through complex scenes efficiently, and the processor’s 94th percentile ranking confirms its top-tier status for this workload. The GPU’s 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 performance is negligible compared to the CPU’s raw compute for rendering tasks.

Software Development: The Ryzen 9 7940HX is a powerhouse for compilation and code analysis. The PassMark integer math score of 202,883 and random string sorting score of 81,775 indicate fast processing of large codebases, while the 32 threads allow for parallel builds. The single-thread score of 3,942 in PassMark ensures that interactive development tasks like code navigation and debugging remain responsive, making this an excellent choice for developers working on complex projects.

Student and Office Work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity, but the data shows it handles it effortlessly. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,001 and single-thread score of 1,027 in Cinebench R23 mean that word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing will be snappy. The low 55 W TDP suggests good battery life for a laptop, making it a portable option for students, though the iGPU is sufficient for office tasks without any strain.

Balance and Bottleneck

The balance between the CPU and GPU is heavily skewed toward the processor, creating a significant bottleneck in graphics-bound workloads. The CPU’s percentile rank of 94 is far above the GPU’s rank of 61, and the combined percentile of 78 reflects this disparity. In gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor, as its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 is low, and it will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could support. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance, with a PassMark score of 3,942, ensures that it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, but the iGPU simply lacks the raw throughput for demanding games.

For CPU-intensive tasks, the balance is ideal, as the GPU is not involved in most compute workloads like rendering or compilation. The data shows that the CPU’s max-threads score of 13,447 in 3DMark scales well, indicating no internal bottlenecks in the processor itself. However, the memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, while high for a mobile chip, may be a limiting factor for the iGPU, which relies on system memory, but this is a secondary concern compared to the GPU’s core architecture. The system is best understood as a CPU-first machine where the GPU is a convenience for basic display output rather than a performance component.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. Gamers at 1080p with low settings might find the Radeon 780M adequate for esports titles, but the data suggests they would be better served by a dedicated GPU. Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will benefit immensely from the 16 cores and 29,400 Cinebench R23 multicore score, making this ideal for mobile workstations used by animators, architects, and video producers. Developers compiling large projects will appreciate the 53,204 PassMark multithread score, and students in STEM fields running simulations or data analysis will find the CPU’s 94th percentile ranking more than sufficient. Small business workstations that run complex financial models or database operations will also see strong performance, though the iGPU is not suited for graphical design work.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 69,875, placing it in the 94th percentile, with nearest rivals showing a tight cluster: the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F at 69,996 (-0.2%), Intel Core i7-14700KF at 70,163 (-0.4%), AMD Ryzen 9 7950X at 69,515 (+0.5%), and Intel Core i7-14700K at 69,355 (+0.7%). The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17,588, placing it in the 61st percentile, with rivals like the AMD Radeon Pro 560 at 17,551 (+0.2%), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 at 17,639 (-0.3%), AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17,666 (-0.4%), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 at 17,509 (+0.5%). The combined picture is a system with a top-tier CPU and a mid-range iGPU, where the CPU dominates the overall performance profile.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark scores?

A: The CPU is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F, 0.4% behind the Intel Core i7-14700KF, 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X, and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-14700K.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The AMD Radeon 780M uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture and is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking and average benchmark score?

A: The GPU is in the 61st percentile against all GPUs and has an average benchmark score of 17,588.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: No, the CPU does not support ECC memory, as indicated in the data.

Q: What is the CPU’s socket type?

A: The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1.

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance?

A: The GPU delivers 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated graphics processor based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, and built on a 4 nm process. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster operation units, along with 12 ray tracing cores. The GPU has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, with a pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 139.2 GTexel/s. Memory is system-shared, meaning it uses the same DDR5 memory as the CPU, with bandwidth that is system-dependent, which is a key limitation for graphics performance. The GPU’s TDP is 15 W, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, with support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark results for the GPU are modest. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, it scores 480, which is low and indicates limited gaming capability. The Geekbench scores are higher, with OpenCL at 18,602 and Vulkan at 33,683, suggesting that the GPU can handle compute tasks reasonably well for an iGPU. The GPU’s percentile rank of 61 places it in the middle of the pack, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (0.2% ahead), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.3% behind), AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.4% behind), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (0.5% ahead). For rendering, the GPU’s 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 is sufficient for light 3D work or video playback, but it will struggle with modern games at high settings, and ray tracing performance will be limited despite the 12 RT cores.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX with the AMD Radeon 780M in a laptop class system. The CPU is a high-end mobile processor with a 94th percentile ranking, while the GPU is an integrated solution with a 61st percentile ranking, resulting in a combined percentile of 78. This is a processor-centric configuration, where the CPU is designed for demanding compute tasks, and the GPU is a secondary component for basic display and light graphics work. The system is not a gaming laptop in the traditional sense, but rather a mobile workstation for users who need maximum CPU performance in a portable form factor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, as the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All FPS figures discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 480 suggests that at 1080p with ultra settings, modern AAA games would run at low frame rates, likely below 30 FPS, and would require significant settings reductions to achieve playability. Esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends might reach 60 FPS at lower settings, given the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, but the iGPU’s modest shading units and system-shared memory will cap performance. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU would be severely limited, and gaming would not be a viable use case for this system beyond very light titles.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range platform, and it supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, indicating that the platform is modern and supports fast storage and peripherals. The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 15 W, so the total power draw is modest, and there is no suggested PSU listed, implying that the laptop’s power adapter is sufficient. A sensible next upgrade would be to add a dedicated GPU via an external enclosure if the laptop supports it, but the data does not specify this. Alternatively, increasing memory capacity or speed could improve the iGPU’s performance, as it relies on system memory for bandwidth. The platform is mature, with the CPU released in January 2024, and the GPU in January 2024, so future upgrades would likely focus on the next generation of processors rather than this socket.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX + AMD Radeon 780M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX

AMD Radeon 780M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds