SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

31,593 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile

29,928 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

FAQ

Q: What CPU and GPU are paired in this build?

A: This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS mobile processor with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile graphics card. The CPU is part of AMD’s 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename, while the GPU belongs to NVIDIA’s GeForce 50-series, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB206 chip.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HS has an average benchmark score of 31593, which places it 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500 (31510), 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (31508), 0.3% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (31495), and 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core 7 240H (31483). These are extremely tight margins, indicating near-identical overall performance among these four processors.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile sits at the 75th percentile among all GPUs. Its average benchmark score is 29928, which is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (29945), 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti (29783), 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (30095), and 1.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6700 (30433).

Q: What memory configuration does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HS supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also supports ECC memory, which is notable for workstation-class tasks where data integrity is critical.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have, and what are its clock speeds?

A: The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 4.00 GHz, and it boosts up to 5.20 GHz. The processor is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile comes with 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The memory clock is 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed, while the GPU core has a base clock of 907 MHz and a boost clock of 1425 MHz.

Q: Are there any measured FPS values for this specific CPU+GPU combination?

A: No. The data pack contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination. All FPS discussion in this analysis is therefore estimated from the benchmark scores, not derived from direct gameplay measurements.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5070 Mobile’s 20355 Passmark G3D score and 75th percentile position suggest strong 1080p and 1440p gaming headroom. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1003 in 3DMark and 1790 in Cinebench R23 single-core indicate it can feed frames quickly, but the lack of measured FPS data means precise refresh-rate claims remain estimates.

Streaming: The GPU’s 144 tensor cores and 36 RT cores provide dedicated hardware for encoding and AI-assisted features, while the CPU’s 16 threads handle simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The Passmark multithread score of 30098 and data encryption score of 21777 suggest the CPU can manage the extra load without collapsing frame rates, though exact streaming performance is unmeasured.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16713 and Geekbench multicore score of 12724 indicate solid rendering throughput for timeline operations and export tasks. The GPU’s 13.13 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 122238 Geekbench OpenCL score accelerate effects and preview rendering, making this a capable laptop for 1080p and 1440p video projects.

3D rendering: The combined CPU+GPU package delivers a 79th combined percentile. The CPU’s max-thread 3DMark score of 7558 and Passmark integer math score of 103044 handle geometry and physics calculations, while the GPU’s 205.2 GTexel/s texture rate and 68.40 GPixel/s pixel rate process shading and rasterization. This pairing suits small-to-medium render jobs where portability is required.

Software development: The CPU’s 16 threads and 5.20 GHz boost clock accelerate compilation, while the Passmark random string sorting score of 42386 and extended instructions score of 27480 indicate strong handling of parsing, regex, and data transformation tasks. The 8-core / 16-thread configuration provides enough parallelism for modern build tools without excessive power draw.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread Passmark score of 3878 and Geekbench single-core score of 2144 deliver responsive everyday computing. The integrated Radeon 780M GPU provides a fallback display solution when the discrete GPU is idle, and the 35W TDP CPU keeps the laptop cool enough for prolonged document editing, spreadsheet analysis, and web browsing sessions.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename. It is manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node with 25,000 million transistors packed into a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.00 GHz, and the boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz — a 1.20 GHz spread that gives the processor agility in both bursty single-threaded tasks and sustained multi-threaded workloads.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. This configuration provides low-latency access to frequently used data, which is reflected in the benchmark results. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1003 and the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1790 demonstrate strong per-core performance, while the Geekbench single-core score of 2144 confirms the architecture’s efficiency at moderate clock speeds.

Scaling from 2 threads to 16 threads shows a clear pattern. The 3DMark 2-thread score is 1952, 4-thread is 3725, 8-thread is 6205, and 16-thread (max) is 7558. The scaling from 8 to 16 threads is modest — only 21.8% improvement — which indicates that the 8 physical cores are doing most of the heavy lifting, with simultaneous multithreading providing a smaller additional gain. This is typical for Zen 4 mobile processors where power and thermal constraints limit the benefit of additional logical threads.

The Passmark suite provides deeper insight into workload-specific strengths. The integer math score of 103044 and floating point math score of 62897 indicate balanced general-purpose compute. The data compression score of 365352 is exceptionally high, suggesting strong memory subsystem performance and efficient branch prediction. Data encryption scores 21777, which is respectable for a mobile processor. The find prime numbers score of 92 is low in absolute terms but reflects the nature of that test (prime number generation is latency-sensitive and single-threaded). The physics score of 1450 is moderate, indicating that the CPU can handle gaming physics without becoming a bottleneck in most titles.

The processor sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 31593. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of that score, making the 7940HS statistically indistinguishable from the Intel Core i5-13500, Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, and Intel Core 7 240H in aggregate performance. The practical difference comes down to specific workload behavior rather than overall capability.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 82nd percentile and the GPU’s 75th percentile create a pairing where the processor has slightly more headroom relative to its peers than the graphics card does. This suggests the GPU is the primary limiter in graphics-bound scenarios, while the CPU can still deliver in compute-heavy tasks.

The CPU’s 16-thread 3DMark score of 7558 versus its single-thread score of 1003 shows a 7.5x scaling factor, indicating good multi-thread utilization. The Passmark multithread score of 30098 versus single-thread 3878 shows a 7.8x scaling factor. These ratios mean the CPU can handle parallel workloads effectively, so in gaming scenarios where a game uses 8 or fewer threads, the CPU will not bottleneck the GPU. At 4 threads, the 3DMark score is 3725, which is roughly half the 8-thread score — a sign that the CPU maintains efficiency even when core counts drop.

The GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 93 versus DirectX 11 score of 192 is notable. The lower DX12 score suggests that the GPU may struggle with draw-call-heavy or compute-heavy DX12 workloads relative to its DX11 performance, though the Geekbench Vulkan score of 116960 indicates strong low-level API performance. The Passmark G3D score of 20355 places the GPU at a level where it can drive modern titles at high settings, but the exact FPS ceiling depends on resolution and game engine.

Since no measured FPS data exists for this combination, bottleneck analysis must rely on percentile deltas. The 7-point gap between CPU (82nd) and GPU (75th) percentiles means the CPU has more relative performance available, so at lower resolutions or with lower graphical settings, the GPU will saturate first. At higher resolutions or with maxed-out settings, the GPU load increases, and the CPU’s extra headroom becomes less relevant. The 8 GB VRAM on the GPU may also become a limiting factor at 4K or with high-resolution texture packs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-only socket. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported — a feature more common in workstation platforms. PCIe support is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which is sufficient for the GPU’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, though the GPU will run at PCIe 4.0 speeds unless the platform supports Gen 5 natively.

The GPU has a 50W TDP and uses no power connectors, indicating it is a low-power mobile part intended for thin-and-light laptops. The CPU’s TDP is 35W, which is also modest for a high-core-count processor. The combined thermal envelope of roughly 85W for the CPU and GPU means the system’s power supply requirements are moderate, but the suggested PSU field is null, so no specific wattage recommendation is available. The GPU’s slot width is listed as "IGP" (integrated graphics processor), which is unusual for a discrete-class GPU and suggests it may be soldered directly to the motherboard.

A sensible next upgrade would involve increasing system RAM to the maximum supported capacity and ensuring it is DDR5 with high speed to maximize the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. For storage, PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives would take full advantage of the CPU’s 20-lane PCIe configuration. The GPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense given its mobile form factor, so the primary long-term upgrade path is moving to a newer laptop platform with a higher-tier GPU.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p and 1440p: The RTX 5070 Mobile’s 75th percentile and the CPU’s 82nd percentile make this a solid choice for high-refresh 1080p gaming and smooth 1440p gaming. The GPU’s 8 GB GDDR7 memory is adequate for current titles at these resolutions, though future games with larger VRAM requirements may need settings adjustments.

Content creators working on the go: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16713 and the GPU’s 122238 OpenCL score provide a portable editing and rendering solution. The Passmark GPU compute score of 8279 suggests the GPU can accelerate compute tasks, while the CPU handles the serial portions of production pipelines.

Software developers and data analysts: The CPU’s 16 threads, 5.20 GHz boost clock, and high Passmark integer math score (103044) make it suitable for compilation, testing, and data processing. The extended instructions score of 27480 indicates good SIMD performance for scientific computing and numerical analysis.

Students in engineering or computer science: The combination of a fast single-core score (3878 Passmark) and strong multi-core (30098 Passmark) handles everything from IDEs to simulation tools. The integrated Radeon 780M provides a power-efficient fallback for light tasks, extending battery life during lectures and library sessions.

Small business workstations: The ECC memory support and 35W TDP make this suitable for reliability-focused environments where data integrity matters and thermal output is constrained. The 79th combined percentile ensures it can handle office productivity suites, database queries, and light virtualization without strain.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s comprehensive benchmark suite shows a processor that excels in multi-threaded tasks. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16713 is 9.3x higher than the single-core score of 1790, demonstrating excellent scaling. The Geekbench multicore score of 12724 versus single-core 2144 shows a 5.9x scaling factor. The 3DMark suite shows progressive scaling from 1952 (2-thread) to 7558 (max-thread), with the 8-thread score of 6205 being 82% of the max-thread score — indicating that most real-world workloads will see near-peak performance with 8 threads.

The GPU’s benchmark results paint a picture of a capable mid-range mobile graphics solution. The Passmark G3D score of 20355 places it at the 75th percentile, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 show strong compute and low-level API performance. The Passmark DirectX scores are mixed: DirectX 9 scores 214, DirectX 10 scores 129, DirectX 11 scores 192, and DirectX 12 scores 93. The low DirectX 12 score relative to DirectX 11 is unusual and suggests the GPU may perform better in titles that use DX11 or Vulkan rather than DX12.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pair is 79th. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 31593 and the GPU’s average of 29928 combine to create a system that sits comfortably above the median but below the top-tier enthusiast laptops. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 0.3%, meaning the 7940HS is essentially tied with several other mid-range processors. The GPU’s nearest rivals include the RTX 3070 Ti at -0.1% and RTX 2080 Ti at +0.5%, indicating the RTX 5070 Mobile performs at roughly desktop RTX 3070 Ti levels.

Build Overview

This build is a laptop-class system pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile. The CPU is a mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture, and the GPU is a mobile graphics card from the GeForce 50-series, built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The build class is explicitly listed as "laptop."

The combined percentile of 79 places this system in the upper-mid range of all CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU’s 82nd percentile is higher than the GPU’s 75th percentile, meaning the processor is relatively stronger compared to its peers than the graphics card is compared to its own peers. This is a balanced pairing where neither component drastically outstrips the other, though the CPU has slightly more headroom.

The system is designed for portable performance. The CPU’s 35W TDP and the GPU’s 50W TDP keep the total power draw manageable for laptop cooling solutions. The GPU’s slot width of "IGP" and lack of power connectors indicate a highly integrated design, likely soldered to the motherboard in a thin-and-light chassis. This is not a desktop replacement; it is a high-performance ultraportable or a compact gaming laptop.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture using TSMC’s 5 nm process node. The GB206 chip contains 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The GPU has 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation units. It also includes 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores, providing dedicated hardware for ray-traced lighting and AI-accelerated features like DLSS.

The memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective speed, which is high for a mobile GPU and reflects the bandwidth efficiency of GDDR7. The pixel rate is 68.40 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 205.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 compute is 13.13 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 13.13 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating that the GPU does not have a separate boosted FP16 path but can handle mixed-precision workloads at full throughput.

The GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20355 places it at the 75th percentile. Its nearest rival is the RTX 3070 Ti, which scores 29945 on average — just 0.1% higher. The RTX 2080 Ti is 0.5% lower, and the RX 6800 is 0.6% higher. This means the RTX 5070 Mobile delivers performance comparable to a desktop RTX 3070 Ti, which is impressive for a mobile part with a 50W TDP.

The Geekbench OpenCL score of 122238 and Vulkan score of 116960 indicate strong compute and graphics API performance. The Passmark GPU compute score of 8279 is lower than the G3D score, suggesting the GPU is more optimized for graphics rasterization than for general-purpose compute. The DirectX 12 score of 93 is notably lower than the DirectX 11 score of 192, which could affect performance in DX12-only titles. However, the Vulkan score suggests that games using Vulkan will perform well.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The data pack contains no measured FPS data, so all gaming performance figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. These estimates should be treated as approximations rather than verified results.

Based on the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20355 and its proximity to the RTX 3070 Ti (which scores 29945 on average, only 0.1% higher), the RTX 5070 Mobile can be expected to deliver frame rates similar to a desktop RTX 3070 Ti in most titles. At 1080p with ultra settings, this typically translates to 60-100+ FPS in demanding AAA games, with esports titles reaching 144+ FPS. At 1440p, frame rates would be lower, likely in the 50-80 FPS range for AAA games at ultra settings.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 1003 in 3DMark and 3878 in Passmark indicate it can support high frame rates without bottlenecking the GPU in most scenarios. The 8-core / 16-thread configuration ensures that even CPU-intensive games that use 8 or more threads will have sufficient processing power. The Passmark physics score of 1450 suggests the CPU can handle game physics calculations without significant impact on overall performance.

The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor at 4K resolution or with high-resolution texture packs. At 1080p and 1440p, 8 GB is generally sufficient for current titles, but future games may require reduced texture quality to stay within memory limits. The 384.0 GB/s bandwidth helps mitigate this, but capacity is the more critical constraint.

The low DirectX 12 score (93) compared to DirectX 11 (192) is a concern for DX12-heavy titles. Games that rely heavily on DX12 features like mesh shaders or async compute may perform below expectations. In contrast, Vulkan-based games should perform well given the 116960 Vulkan score. The tensor cores and RT cores enable DLSS and ray tracing, which can boost frame rates in supported titles even when the raw rasterization performance is moderate.