SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

31,593 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

38,135 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile form a high-end laptop pairing that targets the upper tier of mobile performance. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture chip with 7,424 shading units and 12 GB of GDDR6 memory. This combination sits at the 82nd percentile across all CPUs and GPUs, indicating strong but not class-leading performance in the mobile segment.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS uses the Zen 4 architecture with the Phoenix codename, manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The 8 cores and 16 threads are complemented by a cache hierarchy of 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, providing 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete RTX 4080 Mobile handles demanding workloads.

Benchmark data shows strong scaling from 2 to 8 threads. The 3DMark score for 2 threads is 1,952, rising to 3,725 for 4 threads, 6,205 for 8 threads, and 7,558 for max threads. The near-linear scaling from 4 to 8 threads indicates efficient core utilization, while the modest gain from 8 to max threads confirms the 8-core design is the ceiling. Single-thread performance is solid, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,003 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1,790. Multi-threaded workloads show a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16,713, which is competitive for a 35 W TDP mobile processor.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 31,593, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-13500, with an average score of 31,510, representing a 0.3% difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX scores 31,495, also 0.3% behind, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (31,508) and Intel Core 7 240H (31,483) are similarly close. This clustering indicates that the 7940HS performs essentially on par with a range of desktop and mobile competitors, with no single rival holding a decisive edge.

PassMark results reveal workload characteristics. Integer math scores 103,044, while floating-point math scores 62,897, showing roughly 1.6 times higher integer throughput. Data encryption scores 21,777, data compression scores 365,352, and extended instructions score 27,480. The multithread score of 30,098 and single-thread score of 3,878 provide context for mixed workloads. The physics score of 1,450 suggests the CPU handles simulation tasks adequately, though not exceptionally.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's individual benchmark scores establish a consistent picture. Cinebench R23 multicore at 16,713 and single-core at 1,790 show a multi-to-single ratio of about 9.3, which is typical for an 8-core processor. Geekbench scores of 12,724 multicore and 2,144 single-core align with this performance level. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7,553 nearly matches the max-thread score of 7,558, confirming that the processor's 16 threads are fully utilized without additional gains from hyperthreading beyond that point.

The GPU delivers substantial compute capability. Geekbench OpenCL scores 159,575, while Vulkan scores 145,807. PassMark G3D scores 24,926, putting the GPU at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. The average benchmark score is 38,135. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 at 38,299 (0.4% ahead), though this comparison is misleading given the architectural gulf between a mobile entry-level chip and a high-end RTX 4080 Mobile. The RTX 5080 Mobile scores 38,349 (0.6% ahead), and the RTX 4070 scores 37,648 (1.3% behind). These small deltas suggest the RTX 4080 Mobile sits in a tightly contested performance band.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 82. This means the build outperforms roughly 82% of all recorded systems, but it is not in the top tier. The data indicates that while each component is individually strong, the pairing does not reach the extreme performance of flagship mobile parts. The CPU's 82nd percentile and GPU's 81st percentile are well aligned, suggesting no major imbalance between the two components.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7940HS compare to the Intel Core i5-13500?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HS has an average benchmark score of 31,593, while the Intel Core i5-13500 scores 31,510. The difference is 0.3%, making the two processors effectively identical in overall performance.

Q: What is the CPU's single-thread performance relative to its multi-thread performance?

A: The 3DMark single-thread score is 1,003, while the max-thread score is 7,558. This represents a roughly 7.5 times improvement from single to full multi-threaded workload, reflecting the benefit of the 8-core, 16-thread design.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing and tensor operations?

A: Yes, the RTX 4080 Mobile includes 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores. The architecture is Ada Lovelace, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is uncommon in mobile processors.

Q: How does the RTX 4080 Mobile compare to the RTX 4070 in benchmark scores?

A: The RTX 4080 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 38,135, while the RTX 4070 scores 37,648. The RTX 4080 Mobile is 1.3% ahead.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The GPU has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective.

Q: Is the CPU overclockable?

A: No, the multiplier is locked. The CPU has a fixed base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, with no unlocked multiplier for user overclocking.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU's average benchmark score of 31,593 (82nd percentile) and GPU's average score of 38,135 (81st percentile) are closely matched. This alignment suggests neither component dramatically outpaces the other in synthetic benchmarks, reducing the risk of a severe bottleneck in either direction. However, workload-specific scores reveal where each component takes the lead.

The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 30,098 and single-thread score of 3,878 indicate strong general-purpose compute. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and compute score of 11,191 show that graphics and compute tasks are well-served. For gaming workloads, the GPU is likely the primary driver in most titles, as the CPU's 8 cores are sufficient for modern game engines but the GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS of FP32 performance handles the heavy graphics lifting.

In CPU-bound scenarios, such as physics simulation or data compression, the processor's 16 threads provide adequate throughput. The physics score of 1,450 and data compression score of 365,352 demonstrate competence in these areas. For GPU-bound tasks like rendering or ray tracing, the 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores accelerate workloads, though the 110 W TDP limits sustained performance compared to desktop counterparts.

The FPS scaling picture is incomplete because no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination. Benchmark scores suggest that in GPU-heavy games at high resolutions, the RTX 4080 Mobile will be the limiting factor, especially given its 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. In CPU-light esports titles, the CPU's single-thread score of 1,003 (3DMark) may cap frame rates, but the 5.20 GHz boost clock mitigates this. Overall, the balance favors the GPU for graphics workloads and the CPU for compute-heavy tasks, with no single component dominating across all scenarios.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4080 Mobile's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 12 GB GDDR6 memory can drive high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p in most titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,003 (3DMark) is sufficient for high-refresh gaming, though the lack of measured FPS data means exact frame rates are estimates.

Streaming: The 232 tensor cores and 58 RT cores enable hardware-accelerated encoding and ray tracing. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads handle encoding workloads alongside gaming, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16,713 supporting simultaneous tasks.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 12,724 and the GPU's OpenCL score of 159,575 combine for efficient timeline editing and export. The 12 GB VRAM provides headroom for effects and color grading, while the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth on the CPU side helps with large media files.

3D rendering: The GPU's 7,424 shading units and 58 RT cores accelerate both raster and ray-traced renders. The PassMark GPU compute score of 11,191 indicates strong compute throughput, though the 110 W TDP limits sustained performance on longer renders.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 103,044 and data encryption score of 21,777 support compilation and cryptographic workloads. The 16 threads handle parallel builds, and the 16 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed code.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3,878 (PassMark) and the integrated Radeon 780M provide responsive everyday performance. The GPU's presence adds capability for occasional graphics work, though the 110 W TDP is overkill for basic productivity.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need both strong CPU compute and high-end graphics in a laptop form factor. Gamers at 1440p resolution will benefit from the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, though 4K gaming may be limited by the 110 W TDP. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering can leverage the CPU's 16 threads and the GPU's tensor and RT cores. Software developers will appreciate the CPU's integer math and encryption scores for compilation and security workloads. Students and office workers in demanding fields, such as engineering or data science, will find the CPU's 82nd percentile performance adequate for their tools, while the GPU provides headroom for visualization tasks. Small business workstations requiring a single machine for mixed workloads—spreadsheets, presentations, and occasional graphics—will find the balance of CPU and GPU performance suitable.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is specific to mobile platforms. The processor supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the memory bus width is dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The GPU's TDP is 110 W, with a suggested PSU not listed; the CPU's TDP is 35 W. In a laptop, these power figures are fixed by the chassis design, so upgrades are limited to memory and storage.

A sensible next upgrade would be increasing memory capacity, as the DDR5 support and dual-channel configuration allow for higher RAM totals. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 lanes are also feasible, given the 20 available lanes from the CPU. The GPU and CPU are soldered in most laptop designs, so neither component can be swapped. The platform's production status is active for both components, meaning replacement parts remain available. The GPU's predecessor is GeForce 30 Mobile and its successor is GeForce 50 Mobile, indicating that a future laptop with a newer GPU would represent a generational jump, but within this chassis, upgrades are limited to memory and storage.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 CPU) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (Ada Lovelace GPU with 7,424 shading units and 12 GB GDDR6). The combined percentile is 82, placing this system above the majority of recorded configurations. The CPU's average benchmark score of 31,593 and the GPU's average of 38,135 are both strong, with the CPU at the 82nd percentile and the GPU at the 81st. This pairing represents a high-end mobile workstation or gaming laptop, though it does not reach the top tier of either component class. The CPU's performance is statistically tied with several rivals, including the Intel Core i5-13500 and AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, all within 0.3%, while the GPU sits in a tight band with the RTX 5080 Mobile and RTX 4070.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The data contains no measuredFps entries, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on benchmark scores. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 24,926 and the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16,713 suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, the system should deliver high frame rates in most titles, with the GPU being the primary limiter in graphics-heavy games. At 1440p, the 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient capacity for high textures, but the 110 W TDP may cause performance to scale back under sustained load. At 4K, the GPU's 24.72 TFLOPS FP32 performance is likely insufficient for ultra settings at playable frame rates in demanding titles. The CPU's single-thread score of 1,003 (3DMark) is adequate for most game engines, but frame rates in CPU-bound titles may be capped below the GPU's maximum capability. These are estimates; actual gaming performance depends on the specific laptop's cooling and power delivery.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile uses the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. The chip contains 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The GPU has 7,424 shading units, 232 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. It includes 58 RT cores and 232 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features. The base clock is 1290 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and the memory runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

The GPU's pixel rate is 133.2 GPixel/s and texture rate is 386.3 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 24.72 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 24.72 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no half-precision advantage. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Benchmark scores show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 159,575 and Vulkan score of 145,807. PassMark G3D scores 24,926, and GPU compute scores 11,191. The average benchmark score is 38,135, placing the GPU at the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the RTX 5080 Mobile, scores 38,349 (0.6% ahead), while the RTX 4070 scores 37,648 (1.3% behind). The GPU's 110 W TDP is modest for the performance level, reflecting the efficiency of the 5 nm process.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds