SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

93%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

31,593 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

27,435 Benchmark Score

Top 7% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a high-end laptop combination that sits in the 78th percentile of all CPU+GPU pairings in the database — a strong showing for a mobile platform. The data shows a build where the processor is the relative strength (82nd percentile versus all CPUs) and the graphics subsystem, while comfortably upper-tier (73rd percentile versus all GPUs), is the component that will define the performance ceiling in graphically demanding workloads. No measured frame-rate data exists for this exact combination in the database; all FPS discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than measured.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor built on TSMC's 4 nm process under the Phoenix codename, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. It is a mobile-part (market segment: Mobile, Socket FP8) with a TDP of just 35 W, which makes its benchmark results disproportionately strong for the power envelope. The die measures 178 mm² and packs 25,000 million transistors; each core carries 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 cache, with 16 MB of shared L3.

The benchmark picture is one of balanced, high-throughput performance. The single-thread results — 1003 in 3DMark single-thread, 283 in Cinebench R15 single-core, 1790 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 2144 in Geekbench single-core, and 3878 in PassMark single-thread — indicate snappy per-core responsiveness, which matters for game engine logic, browser tabs, and lightly threaded applications. The multi-thread results scale cleanly: 3DMark scores climb from 1952 at 2 threads to 3725 at 4 threads, 6205 at 8 threads, and 7558 at max threads. Note how close the 16-thread (7553) and max-thread (7558) figures are — with 16 threads across 8 cores, the chip saturates its own thread count, and there is no additional headroom beyond simultaneous multithreading.

Cinebench R23 multi-core at 16713 confirms genuine content-creation throughput, and Geekbench multi-core at 12724 reinforces it. PassMark multithread lands at 30098, backed by integer math at 103044, floating point at 62897, data compression at 365352, and encryption at 21777 — a profile well suited to compilation, file compression, and general computational workloads. Against its nearest rivals, the 7940HS is effectively dead level: its average benchmark score of 31593 sits 0.3% above the Intel Core i5-13500 (31510), the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (31508), the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (31495), and the Intel Core 7 240H (31483). That a 35 W mobile part matches desktop-class and higher-power mobile rivals on aggregate score is the headline takeaway.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7940HS compare to its closest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 31593 is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-13500, Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, and Intel Core 7 240H — statistically a tie across the board.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the platform support?

A: Dual-channel DDR5 delivering 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported.

Q: Does the CPU have integrated graphics?

A: Yes — the Radeon 780M is integrated, useful for light workloads and display output independent of the discrete GPU.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Mobile compare to rival GPUs?

A: Its average score of 27435 is essentially identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (delta 0%), marginally ahead of the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (1.1%), and slightly behind the RTX 3090 (-0.5%) and Radeon Pro Vega 20 (-1.5%).

Q: Is the CPU multiplier unlocked?

A: No. The multiplier is locked, so tuning headroom is limited by design.

Q: Are there measured game frame rates for this pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination; frame-rate expectations in this article are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: What PCIe support does the build offer?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only); the GPU connects over PCIe 4.0 x8.

Benchmark Performance

Starting with the CPU: the aggregate average benchmark score is 31593, placing the 7940HS in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs in the database. The suite spans 3DMark scaling tests (1952 / 3725 / 6205 / 7553 / 7558 from 2 threads to max, plus 1003 single-thread), Cinebench R15 (2656 multi, 283 single), Cinebench R23 (16713 multi, 1790 single), Geekbench (12724 multi, 2144 single), and a full PassMark block culminating in 30098 multithread and 1450 physics.

The GPU side records a PassMark G3D score of 19587, GPU compute at 8399, Geekbench OpenCL at 109197 and Vulkan at 108367. The older DirectX breakdown (223 for DX9, 179 for DX11, 116 for DX10, 85 for DX12) and the 2D score of 763 round out the picture. The aggregate average of 27435 puts the RTX 4070 Mobile in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs — upper quartile, but clearly a step below the CPU's relative standing.

The combined percentile of 78 tells the story: this is a well-matched, genuinely fast pairing whose overall tier is pulled slightly by a GPU that, while strong (it trades blows with desktop-class hardware like the RX 6700 XT and RTX 3090 on aggregate score), is the less exceptional of the two components.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU sits at the 82nd percentile; the GPU at the 73rd. That gap defines the bottleneck structure of this laptop. In graphically demanding games and GPU-rendered workloads, the RTX 4070 Mobile is the limiting factor — the 7940HS has single-thread and multi-thread reserves to spare, as its near-tie with desktop-tier rivals like the Core i5-13500 demonstrates. The PassMark physics score of 1450 reflects a processor that will not be the frame-rate constraint in most titles.

Conversely, in CPU-bound scenarios — heavy compilation, code compilation across many threads, physics simulation, streaming with encoding overhead — the 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 chip holds its own while the GPU idles. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth is the more likely pressure point at high resolutions and ultra texture settings; when VRAM saturates, the CPU's strength cannot compensate. PCIe 4.0 x8 for the GPU link is adequate but narrower than a full x16 connection, which can matter marginally in transfer-heavy situations. Balanced overall, with the graphics subsystem as the practical ceiling.

Gaming Performance

This exact pairing has no measured FPS entries in the database, so the figures discussed here are estimates inferred from the benchmark scores, not measurements. The evidence base: a PassMark G3D score of 19587, Geekbench Vulkan at 108367 and OpenCL at 109197, and an aggregate GPU score that matches the RX 6700 XT and sits within roughly a percentage point of hardware in the RTX 3090's scoring neighborhood.

What does that imply qualitatively? At 1080p with ultra settings, this class of GPU performance indicates high-refresh gameplay is realistic in most mainstream titles, with the 82nd-percentile CPU feeding frames without stalling. At 1440p, expect high frame rates in esports titles and comfortably playable ultra-settings performance in demanding AAA games. At 4K ultra, the 8 GB VRAM buffer and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth become the constraint, and settings reductions are advisable. The 36 RT cores and 144 tensor cores mean ray-traced effects and AI upscaling features are available to recover performance where supported. Treat all of this as a scoring-based estimate — the database lacks measured game runs for this combination.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 1003 single-thread 3DMark score and 2144 Geekbench single-core result indicate the per-core speed to sustain high frame rates, and the GPU's 73rd-percentile standing supports 1080p and 1440p high-refresh play. 4K ultra is achievable with settings adjustments given the 8 GB VRAM.

Streaming: 16 threads, a PassMark multithread of 30098, and data compression at 365352 show the encoding and multitasking overhead of streaming while gaming is well within capability, though simultaneous heavy encode will shave GPU-bound frame rates.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 16713 and Geekbench OpenCL at 109197 indicate solid timeline scrubbing and export performance. The 89.6 GB/s of DDR5 bandwidth helps, and the tensor cores accelerate AI-assisted effects.

3D rendering: Rendering throughput is CPU-strong (R23 multi 16713) while GPU rendering is mid-upper tier (Vulkan 108367, compute 8399). Complex scenes exceeding 8 GB of VRAM will need to fall back to CPU rendering or out-of-core methods.

Software development: PassMark integer math at 103044, string sorting at 42386, and multithread at 30098 point to fast compilation and responsive tooling. The tie with the desktop Core i5-13500 means desktop-class build times in a laptop.

Student and office work: Overkill in the best sense. Single-thread snappiness (3878 PassMark single-thread) covers everyday tasks effortlessly, the Radeon 780M iGPU and ECC support add resilience, and the 35 W TDP favors battery-friendly light use.

Upgrade Path and Platform

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop), so the upgrade path is inherently constrained. The CPU is soldered to Socket FP8 with a locked multiplier, and the GPU is an integrated mobile part (slot width IGP, no power connectors) on PCIe 4.0 x8 — neither is user-replaceable. Memory is DDR5 dual-channel at 89.6 GB/s; maximizing installed capacity is the one meaningful lever if the laptop's DIMM/soDIMM design allows it. The CPU's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes supports fast NVMe storage, so adding a second high-speed drive is the most practical performance upgrade.

Power headroom is defined by the components' envelopes: a 35 W CPU TDP and a 115 W GPU TDP. With no suggestedPsu value in the data — appropriate for a laptop, where the chassis and battery design governs delivery rather than a user-selected PSU — the takeaway is that sustained performance depends on the OEM's cooling implementation rather than anything the user can change. The sensible "next upgrade" is a platform replacement, not a component swap.

Build Overview

This pairing is a high-end gaming-and-creation laptop: AMD's Zen 4 Phoenix flagship-adjacent mobile CPU mated to NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace mid-upper mobile GPU. The combined percentile of 78 places it firmly in the top quartile of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database. The CPU contributes a 31593 average score at the 82nd percentile; the GPU a 27435 average at the 73rd percentile. Architecturally it is a modern stack — 4 nm CPU silicon, 5 nm GPU silicon, DDR5, PCIe Gen 4, DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, OpenGL 4.6 — with 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 GPU compute and 4608 shading units. Both components carry Active production status. The tier verdict: upper-tier mobile performance with desktop-class CPU company, as its 0.3% scoring gap to desktop and mobile rivals alike confirms.

Who Should Build It

Buyers who benefit most are those who need desktop-adjacent throughput in a portable chassis. Gamers targeting 1080p and 1440p high-refresh play are the core audience — the GPU's scoring neighborhood (level with the RX 6700 XT, within a percentage point of the RTX 3090 on aggregate) supports that use case directly, while 4K-ultra gamers should temper expectations against the 8 GB VRAM buffer. Content creators editing video or running moderate 3D workloads get a validated profile: R23 multi at 16713 and OpenCL at 109197 cover both CPU and GPU pipelines. Software developers — particularly those compiling large codebases — get desktop-class times per the integer math and multithread scores. Students and small-business workstation users get durable everyday responsiveness plus ECC memory support for data-integrity-sensitive work. It is not the right machine for buyers chasing absolute flagship GPU performance; it is the right machine for those who want an 82nd-percentile CPU and a 73rd-percentile GPU in one chassis, and the 78th combined percentile says that trade is a good one.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds