SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

98%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

31,593 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

71,768 Benchmark Score

Top 2% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6650M is a mobile-first combination built for high-end laptop workloads. The CPU, a Zen 4 Phoenix part on TSMC’s 4 nm process, delivers strong multi-threaded results, while the GPU, an RDNA 2.0 Navi 23 chip, ranks in the 91st percentile among all GPUs. The pairing sits at the 87th combined percentile for laptops, indicating a system that balances processor-heavy tasks with capable graphics acceleration. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact combination in the data, so all frame-rate discussions below are estimates derived from benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The Radeon RX 6650M’s 91st percentile GPU ranking, with an average benchmark score of 71768, suggests it can drive high-refresh displays at 1080p in most titles. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provide sufficient headroom for modern game textures, though the estimated FPS figures will vary by title. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1003 in 3dMark_single_thread and 3878 in PassMark single-thread ensures that frame pacing remains consistent in CPU-bound scenes.

Streaming: The Ryzen 9 7940HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, which allows simultaneous game encoding and gameplay without significant frame drops. The CPU’s 3dMark_max_threads score of 7558 indicates that background streaming tasks will not starve the main game thread. The GPU’s RDNA 2.0 architecture supports hardware-accelerated encoding, though the data does not specify encoder quality; the 16,713 Cinebench R23 multi-core score suggests the CPU can handle software encoding if needed.

Video editing: Multi-threaded performance is strong, with Geekbench multicore at 12724 and PassMark multithread at 30098. The CPU’s 16 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (89.6 GB/s bandwidth) enable smooth timeline scrubbing and export workloads. The GPU’s 8.659 TFLOPS FP32 performance accelerates effects and color grading, while the 17.32 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) rate helps with half-precision compute tasks common in modern editors.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multicore at 16713 places the CPU ahead of the Intel Core i5-13500 by 0.3% in average score, making it a capable processor for CPU-based rendering. For GPU rendering, the RX 6650M’s 28 ray-tracing cores and 64 ROPs deliver a pixel rate of 154.6 GPixel/s, which supports real-time viewport rendering. The 91st percentile GPU ranking indicates that this system can handle moderate 3D scenes, though heavy production renders may benefit from a higher-tier GPU.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 365352 and extended instructions score of 27480 point to strong performance in code compilation and data processing. The 8 cores and 16 threads handle parallel build systems efficiently, while the 4.00 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock provide responsiveness for single-threaded editor tasks. The ECC memory support is a notable feature for development workstations where data integrity is critical.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs ensures snappy application launches and multitasking in office suites. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a fallback for light GPU tasks when the discrete RX 6650M is idle, reducing power draw. The 35 W CPU TDP and 120 W GPU TDP together fit within typical laptop power budgets, making this a portable option for daily academic work.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 31593, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13500, scores 31510, a delta of just 0.3%, meaning the Ryzen 9 7940HS is effectively tied with that desktop chip in aggregate performance. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225H and AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX also sit within 0.3%, showing that this mobile CPU competes with mid-range desktop parts. In multi-threaded workloads, the 3dmark_16_threads score of 7553 aligns with the max threads score of 7558, indicating that scaling plateaus at 16 threads. Single-thread performance is solid at 1003 in 3dmark_single_thread and 1790 in Cinebench R23 single-core, which is sufficient for most productivity software.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 71768, placing it in the 91st percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rival, NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal, scores 72098, a delta of -0.5%, meaning the RX 6650M is slightly behind that older desktop flagship but within a rounding error. The AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 scores 72379 (-0.8% delta), and the Radeon Vega Frontier Edition scores 73370 (-2.2% delta), confirming that this mobile GPU matches desktop parts from several generations ago. In Geekbench, the GPU scores 65800 in OpenCL and 77735 in Vulkan, showing that its compute performance scales well with graphics APIs. The combined percentile of 87 indicates that the CPU+GPU pairing is well matched for a laptop, with neither component drastically outperforming the other.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is a Zen 4 architecture processor codenamed Phoenix, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3, which is modest for a Ryzen 9 but adequate for mobile power envelopes. The 35 W TDP is low for an 8-core part, yet the benchmark scores show it punches above its thermal class—Cinebench R15 multicore at 2656 and R23 multicore at 16713 demonstrate strong sustained performance.

The CPU’s PassMark results highlight specific strengths: integer math at 103044 and floating-point math at 62897 indicate balanced arithmetic throughput, while prime number finding at 92 is low, suggesting that cryptographic or prime-heavy workloads are not this chip’s forte. Data encryption at 21777 and random string sorting at 42386 show solid data manipulation capabilities. The 3dmark tests reveal scaling: 2 threads score 1952, 4 threads score 3725, 8 threads score 6205, and 16 threads score 7553—the jump from 8 to 16 threads is only 21.7%, indicating diminishing returns for hyperthreading in this workload.

The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it has 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes from the CPU itself. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a backup GPU option, though the discrete RX 6650M will handle most graphics tasks. The memory bus width is not specified in the data, but the bandwidth figure is sufficient for feeding the CPU’s 16 threads. The multiplier is locked, so overclocking is not possible, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is already high for a mobile part.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh displays will find this pairing adequate, as the GPU’s 91st percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM support modern titles at high settings, though the lack of measured FPS data means specific frame rates are estimates. The CPU’s single-thread performance (1003 in 3dmark_single_thread) ensures that esports titles with high CPU demands will not bottleneck the GPU. Content creators working with 1080p or 1440p video will benefit from the CPU’s 16,713 Cinebench R23 multi-core score and the GPU’s 8.659 TFLOPS FP32 for accelerated effects.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the 8 cores and 16 threads, with PassMark data compression at 365352 indicating fast build times. Students and office workers who need a portable machine for research, writing, and spreadsheet work will find the 82nd percentile CPU ranking more than sufficient for everyday tasks, while the integrated graphics allow for extended battery life when discrete GPU use is unnecessary. Small business workstations that require ECC memory support (a feature listed for this CPU) can deploy this in data-sensitive roles, though the mobile form factor limits expansion.

The laptop class of this build means it is not intended for desktop upgrades; rather, it serves users who need a single device that handles both productive work and gaming. The GPU’s end-of-life production status suggests that this is a mature platform, but the CPU remains active, so replacements for failed components should be available. Users who prioritize portability over absolute performance will find this a balanced choice.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-only socket, meaning there is no desktop upgrade path. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5, and the ECC capability is a differentiator for workstation use, though the data does not specify maximum capacity. The PCIe interface is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, and the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8, which provides ample bandwidth for the RX 6650M’s 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth.

The GPU’s suggested PSU is not listed, but its TDP is 120 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 35 W, totaling 155 W for the core components. In a laptop, the power delivery is fixed by the chassis design, so a sensible next upgrade would be to a newer GPU in the same TDP class, though the data does not list a successor for the RX 6650M. The CPU’s integrated Radeon 780M can serve as a fallback if the discrete GPU fails, providing basic display output. The 4 nm process node for the CPU and 7 nm for the GPU indicate that this platform is power-efficient, but future upgrades would require a full laptop replacement rather than component swaps.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6650M is based on the Navi 23 chip with RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 11,060 million transistors on a 237 mm² die. It has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The GPU’s base clock is 2068 MHz, with a game clock of 2222 MHz and a boost clock of 2416 MHz. The memory runs at 1750 MHz, or 14 Gbps effective, which is typical for this class.

The GPU has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, producing a pixel rate of 154.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 270.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 8.659 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 17.32 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, which supports half-precision compute for AI and rendering tasks. There are 28 ray-tracing cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the data does not list tensor cores, meaning AI workloads rely on standard shader cores.

The GPU’s benchmarks show a Geekbench OpenCL score of 65800 and Vulkan score of 77735, which are close in magnitude, indicating balanced performance across compute and graphics APIs. The 91st percentile ranking among all GPUs places it above the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal by -0.5% delta, meaning it is effectively matched with that 2016 desktop flagship. The Radeon Pro Vega 64 is -0.8% ahead, further confirming that this mobile GPU punches at desktop-class levels from several generations ago.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 91st percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM suggest that at 1080p ultra settings, the RX 6650M can maintain playable frame rates in most modern titles, likely in the 60-100 FPS range for AAA games and higher for esports. At 1440p, the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth and 128-bit bus may become limiting, with estimated frame rates dropping to 40-70 FPS on ultra settings.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 3878 in PassMark ensures that in CPU-bound games, the processor will not hold back the GPU at 1080p. However, the 16 MB L3 cache is smaller than some desktop parts, which may impact performance in games with large world data. The GPU’s 28 ray-tracing cores support DXR and Vulkan ray tracing, but at 1080p, enabling RT will likely halve frame rates compared to rasterized settings. The absence of measured FPS data means these are qualitative expectations; the combined percentile of 87 suggests that the pairing is balanced, with neither component consistently bottlenecking the other in gaming workloads.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 31593, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-13500’s 31510.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The Radeon RX 6650M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU lists ECC memory support as a feature.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The GPU is in the 91st percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 71768.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 87, indicating a well-balanced laptop configuration.

Q: What is the process node for the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU is on TSMC’s 4 nm process, while the GPU is on TSMC’s 7 nm process.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 82nd percentile and GPU’s 91st percentile suggest that the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its peers than the CPU is. In gaming workloads, this means the GPU will likely be the limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU can keep up at 1080p. The CPU’s 3dmark_2_threads score of 1952 versus 4 threads at 3725 shows that single-threaded performance is adequate, but the 16 MB L3 cache may cause minor stutters in heavily threaded games.

In compute workloads like 3D rendering, the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore of 16713 versus the GPU’s 8.659 TFLOPS FP32 means that CPU-based rendering will be faster for most scenes, while GPU rendering excels in real-time viewports. The GPU’s 28 ray-tracing cores are a bottleneck for RT-heavy titles, as the rasterized performance is much stronger. The FPS scaling from the benchmark scores indicates that at 1080p, the CPU and GPU are balanced, but at 1440p, the GPU’s 128-bit bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will limit performance.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 mobile CPU with a 35 W TDP) and the AMD Radeon RX 6650M (an RDNA 2.0 mobile GPU with a 120 W TDP). The CPU ranks in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU ranks in the 91st percentile of all GPUs, giving the pair a combined percentile of 87. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 31593, nearly identical to the Intel Core i5-13500, while the GPU’s average benchmark score is 71768, matching the NVIDIA TITAN X Pascal within 0.5%. This is a high-tier laptop configuration suited for 1080p gaming, content creation, and development work, with the CPU leading in multi-threaded tasks and the GPU providing strong rasterized graphics performance. The absence of measured FPS data means that gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores, but the percentiles indicate a system that handles most modern workloads without a clear bottleneck at 1080p.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds