SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + AMD Radeon RX 6600S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

88 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 12% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
89%
VS
GPU
87%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

31,593 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6600S

10,629 Benchmark Score
Top 13% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600S is a mobile configuration built around a high-end CPU and a modestly positioned GPU. The CPU is a Zen 4 (Phoenix) 8-core, 16-thread part with a 4.00 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock, while the GPU is an RDNA 2.0 Navi 23 chip with 4 GB of GDDR6 memory. No measured FPS figures exist for this exact combination in the FACT PACK, so all frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as directional rather than definitive.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows for this pairing, meaning there are no direct 1080p, 1440p, or 4K ultra-settings frame rate measurements available. All gaming performance commentary is therefore an estimate derived from the GPU’s benchmark scores and the CPU’s compute headroom. The Radeon RX 6600S posts a Passmark G3D score of 12649 and sits at the 49th percentile among all GPUs, placing it squarely in the mid-range of the performance distribution. Its closest rivals in the data are the AMD Radeon R9 M275X (0.4% faster), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti (0.6% faster), NVIDIA Quadro K2200 (1.2% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 550X (1.4% slower). These are older or lower-tier parts, which underscores that the RX 6600S is not a high-end gaming GPU by current standards.

For esports and lighter titles, the GPU’s 224.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 7.168 TFLOPS FP32 throughput should handle 1080p at medium-to-high settings with playable frame rates, likely exceeding 60 FPS in well-optimized games. For AAA titles at 1080p ultra, the data suggests frame rates will be more constrained — the GPU’s Passmark DirectX 12 score of 56 and DirectX 11 score of 105 indicate it can run modern APIs, but the 4 GB VRAM capacity and 128-bit memory bus will limit texture-heavy scenes. At 1440p, expect significant drops; the GPU’s 49th percentile ranking implies it is below average for that resolution. At 4K, the RX 6600S is not a realistic option for ultra settings, as the combination of 4 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will bottleneck most modern titles. The CPU, in contrast, is far more capable than the GPU needs — the Ryzen 9 7940HS scores 1003 in 3DMark single-thread and 7558 in 3DMark max threads, so it will not be the limiting factor in gaming. The practical takeaway is that this pair is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium presets, with the CPU leaving headroom for background tasks or streaming.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance balance is heavily skewed toward the CPU. The Ryzen 9 7940HS has an average benchmark score of 31593 and sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs, while the RX 6600S has an average benchmark score of 10629 and sits at the 49th percentile among all GPUs. This is a clear mismatch: the CPU is roughly three times stronger in raw benchmark terms than the GPU. In gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting component almost universally, because even the CPU’s weakest relevant score (3DMark single-thread at 1003) is far above what a mid-range GPU needs to maintain its maximum output. The FPS scaling evidence is indirect but consistent — since the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 12649 is only slightly above rivals like the GTX 560 Ti, and those rivals are known to struggle with modern titles, the RX 6600S will cap frame rates well before the CPU can be stressed.

In CPU-bound workloads like physics or data compression, the bottleneck reverses. The CPU’s Passmark physics score of 1450 and data compression score of 365352 show strong multi-threaded capability, so tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering will be limited by the GPU’s compute performance (Passmark GPU compute score of 4879) rather than the CPU. The CPU’s 16 MB shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s dual-channel memory bandwidth also suggest it can feed data to the GPU quickly, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 128-bit bus will cause stalls in memory-heavy workloads. The combined percentile for this pair is 66, which is reasonable for a laptop but reflects the fact that the GPU drags the overall average down. In practice, this is a configuration where the CPU is over-provisioned for gaming, making it a better fit for productivity tasks that benefit from the 8-core/16-thread layout, with gaming as a secondary use case.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, meaning it is soldered and not user-upgradeable in most laptop designs. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory — a feature that is rare in consumer mobile parts and useful for workstation-class workloads. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), which is sufficient for a discrete GPU and an NVMe SSD, though the GPU itself uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is narrower than the full x16 but still adequate for its bandwidth needs. The GPU has no power connectors (it is an IGP-class slot width), meaning it draws power from the motherboard, and its TDP is 80 W, which is modest for a discrete mobile GPU.

The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, which is low for an 8-core Zen 4 part, but the boost clock of 5.20 GHz suggests it can punch well above its power envelope in short bursts. There is no suggested PSU listed in the FACT PACK, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified, but the combination of a 35 W CPU and 80 W GPU implies a total system draw that is well within the range of a typical laptop power brick. A sensible next upgrade, within the constraints of this platform, would be to replace the GPU with a higher-tier mobile Radeon or GeForce part, though that is rarely possible in laptops. More realistically, the upgrade path is limited to increasing memory capacity (since DDR5 is supported) or adding a faster NVMe SSD via the PCIe Gen 4 lanes. For users on this platform, the CPU will remain relevant for years, but the GPU is already at the end of its production life (marked as End-of-life with a release date of 2022-01-03), so any future performance gains will come from external GPU options or a full platform change.

Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who need strong CPU performance in a laptop form factor but do not prioritize high-end gaming graphics. The CPU’s 82nd percentile ranking and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16713 make it suitable for content creators who edit video or render 3D scenes, though the GPU’s 49th percentile will slow GPU-accelerated rendering tasks. Software developers will benefit from the 8 cores and 16 threads, as well as the ECC memory support, which is valuable for long-running computations or server-like workloads. Students and office workers will find the CPU more than adequate for multitasking, but the GPU is overkill for document work and spreadsheets — the integrated Radeon 780M graphics would handle those tasks alone, making the discrete GPU unnecessary for that audience.

Small business workstations that run CPU-bound applications like database queries or financial modeling will see strong performance from the Ryzen 9 7940HS, with its Passmark multi-thread score of 30098 and integer math score of 103044. Gamers at 1080p with medium settings are a secondary audience, but they should not expect high-refresh-rate experiences in demanding titles. The combined percentile of 66 suggests this is a balanced laptop for mixed workloads, but the GPU’s end-of-life status means it will age faster than the CPU. If the primary use case is gaming, this is not the right build; if the primary use case is CPU-heavy productivity with occasional light gaming, it is a sensible choice.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is a Zen 4 (Phoenix) part built on TSMC’s 4 nm process, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and includes ECC support, which is notable for a mobile processor. It also has an integrated Radeon 780M GPU, which provides a fallback for display output or light graphics tasks when the discrete GPU is not needed.

Benchmark scores confirm the CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance. Cinebench R23 multicore scores 16713, while single-core scores 1790 — the latter is competitive for a mobile part. Geekbench multicore scores 12724 and single-core 2144, which aligns with the 82nd percentile ranking. The 3DMark results show scaling from 1952 at 2 threads to 7558 at max threads, indicating good thread scaling up to about 8 threads (6205) and then diminishing returns beyond that, which is expected for an 8-core part. Passmark tests show a single-thread score of 3878 and a multi-thread score of 30098, with strong results in integer math (103044) and floating-point math (62897). The data compression score of 365352 and encryption score of 21777 indicate the CPU is excellent for file archiving and security workloads. The nearest CPU rivals in the data are the Intel Core i5-13500 (0.3% faster), Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (0.3% faster), AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (0.3% faster), and Intel Core 7 240H (0.3% faster) — all within a narrow margin, which means the 7940HS is essentially on par with these parts in average benchmark score. For real workloads, this translates to snappy responsiveness in single-threaded tasks and robust throughput in multi-threaded tasks like compilation or video encoding.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 6600S is an RDNA 2.0 architecture GPU based on the Navi 23 chip, built on TSMC’s 7 nm process with 11,060 million transistors and a 237 mm² die size. It has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The GPU’s base clock is 1700 MHz, with a boost clock of 2000 MHz and a game clock of 1881 MHz. Memory is 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, running at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), yielding 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The FP32 performance is 7.168 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 14.34 TFLOPS (2:1). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, covering modern graphics APIs. Its TDP is 80 W, and it has no power connectors, indicating it is designed for low-power laptop integration.

Benchmark results show a GPU that is firmly mid-range. Passmark G3D scores 12649, placing it at the 49th percentile, and the GPU compute score is 4879. DirectX 11 and 12 scores are 105 and 56, respectively, which are modest numbers suggesting that the GPU can handle current API workloads but not at high fidelity. The pixel rate is 128.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 224.0 GTexel/s, which are adequate for 1080p but will struggle at higher resolutions. The nearest GPU rivals are all within 1.4% of its average score: the Radeon R9 M275X, GeForce GTX 560 Ti, Quadro K2200, and Radeon RX 550X — all of which are older or significantly lower-tier parts. For rendering, the 4 GB VRAM is the primary limitation; modern textures often exceed 4 GB at high settings, causing stuttering or texture pop-in. The 28 ray tracing cores are present but the low compute throughput means ray tracing will be a novelty rather than a usable feature. The GPU is marked as End-of-life, which means it is no longer in active production, and its performance will not improve with driver updates.

Benchmark Performance

The combined picture from the benchmark data is one of a strong CPU paired with a modest GPU. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 31593, placing it at the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, with a 0.3% difference from its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-13500. The GPU’s average benchmark score is 10629, placing it at the 49th percentile, with a 0.4% difference from its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 M275X. The combined percentile for this pair is 66, which is above the median but not exceptional. The CPU’s Cinebench R15 multicore score of 2656 and single-core score of 283, along with the R23 scores, show a balanced design that excels in both short and long workloads. The GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 66435 is respectable for a mid-range part, but the Passmark DirectX scores (10, 11, 12, 9) suggest inconsistent performance across API generations.

The CPU’s nearest rivals all sit within 0.3% of its average score, which means the 7940HS is not a standout performer but is competitive with modern mid-range desktop and mobile chips. The GPU’s nearest rivals are all within 1.4%, but they are all older parts, which indicates the RX 6600S is not competitive with current-generation GPUs. The combined effect is that this configuration will excel in CPU-bound tasks like code compilation, video encoding, or scientific simulations, where the 8-core/16-thread layout and high boost clock shine. For GPU-bound tasks like 3D rendering or gaming, the performance will be limited by the RX 6600S, and the CPU will often sit idle. The data suggests that users should expect a system that is roughly 82nd percentile in CPU performance but only 49th percentile in GPU performance, making the overall experience feel lopsided unless workloads are carefully matched to the hardware.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the Radeon RX 6600S have?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7940HS supports ECC memory, which is unusual for a mobile processor and beneficial for workstation tasks.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking compared to all GPUs?

A: The Radeon RX 6600S ranks at the 49th percentile, meaning it is below average in performance relative to all GPUs in the database.

Q: What socket does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket, so it is not user-upgradeable in most laptops.

Q: What is the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HS scores 16713 in Cinebench R23 multicore, which is strong for a 35 W mobile part.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this configuration?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this configuration is not ideal. The GPU’s 49th percentile ranking and 4 GB VRAM will limit frame rates in modern titles to around 60 FPS at 1080p medium settings, and the CPU’s single-thread score of 1003 in 3DMark is more than sufficient to avoid bottlenecking. Streaming is a better fit: the CPU’s 16 threads and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 16713 can handle encoding (via x264) while the GPU handles rendering, though the GPU’s low compute score (4879 in Passmark GPU compute) means game capture quality will need to be conservative. Video editing is a strong scenario, as the CPU’s integer math score of 103044 and data compression score of 365352 will speed up timeline scrubbing and export, but the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM will limit effects-heavy renders. 3D rendering is mixed: CPU-based renderers will benefit from the 8 cores, but GPU-accelerated renderers like Blender Cycles will be slow due to the GPU’s FP32 of 7.168 TFLOPS and 4 GB memory. Software development is excellent, with the CPU’s multi-thread score of 30098 and ECC memory support ensuring stable compilation and server-like workloads. Student and office work is over-provisioned, but the integrated Radeon 780M allows the discrete GPU to be disabled for battery saving, making this a flexible if heavy option for daily tasks.