SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

93 Score

Top 7% Ranking

93 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 7% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

31,593 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8050S

62,108 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

This mobile pairing combines an 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 processor with a RDNA 3.5 integrated GPU, landing in the 86th percentile overall among all laptop configurations. The CPU holds an 82nd percentile rank, while the GPU sits higher at 89th percentile, indicating the graphics side is the stronger partner. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussion is estimated from benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS is built on TSMC's 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. It belongs to the 7000 series mobile lineup, code-named Phoenix, and uses the Zen 4 architecture. The chip features 8 cores and 16 threads with a 4.00 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost clock, all within a 35 W TDP. Cache configuration includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth and ECC capability, connected via PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes.

Benchmark results show a strong multi-threaded performer. Cinebench R23 multi-core score reaches 16,713, while single-core hits 1,790. Geekbench multi-core records 12,724 and single-core 2,144. The 3DMark suite reveals scaling from 1,003 single-thread to 7,558 at max threads, with 8-thread scoring 6,205 and 16-thread at 7,553. PassMark multi-thread score is 30,098, with single-thread at 3,878. Integer math achieves 103,044, floating-point math 62,897, and extended instructions 27,480. Data compression scores 365,352, while encryption hits 21,777.

The average benchmark score of 31,593 places this CPU in the 82nd percentile of all processors. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: Intel Core i5-13500 at 31,510 (0.3% ahead), Intel Core Ultra 5 225H at 31,508 (0.3% ahead), AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX at 31,495 (0.3% ahead), and Intel Core 7 240H at 31,483 (0.3% ahead). This means the 7940HS is essentially performance-equivalent to those chips — the deltas are negligible. In real workloads, this translates to snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks and capable multi-core throughput for content creation, though it is not a class leader.

The single-thread score of 1,790 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong per-core performance, suitable for lightly threaded applications like office productivity and web browsing. The 16-thread score of 7,553 in 3DMark demonstrates that the chip scales well across all cores, making it viable for parallel workloads such as video encoding and 3D rendering. The PassMark physics score of 1,450 suggests competent physics simulation in games, though the integrated GPU handles most gaming loads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The GPU's 89th percentile ranking versus the CPU's 82nd creates a configuration where the Radeon 8050S is the more capable component relative to its peers. In CPU-bound scenarios, the 7940HS holds up well, but the GPU will typically be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive tasks. The GPU's average benchmark score of 62,108 is roughly double the CPU's 31,593, indicating the graphics processor delivers proportionally more compute capability.

For gaming at high refresh rates, the CPU's single-thread performance (3,878 in PassMark single-thread) is adequate to feed the GPU without creating a significant bottleneck in most titles. However, in esports games where frame rates exceed 200 FPS, the CPU's 8-core/16-thread configuration with 5.20 GHz boost can become the limiting factor. The 3DMark 2-thread score of 1,952 shows modest dual-core performance, which could constrain very high refresh rate scenarios.

In productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's multi-thread score (16,713 in Cinebench R23) versus the GPU's compute scores (65,818 OpenCL, 58,398 Vulkan) means rendering tasks that leverage GPU acceleration will favor the graphics side, while CPU-only tasks like code compilation will rely entirely on the processor. The 35 W CPU TDP paired with the 55 W GPU TDP suggests a total package around 90 W, which is modest for a laptop and indicates the system prioritizes efficiency over raw throughput.

The absence of measured FPS data means bottleneck analysis relies on percentile deltas. The 7-point gap between GPU (89th) and CPU (82nd) percentiles suggests that in most gaming workloads, the GPU will saturate before the CPU, which is generally a favorable balance for smooth frame delivery. In CPU-heavy simulations or strategy games, the processor's 82nd percentile ranking could become the constraint.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU's 89th percentile rank and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest strong 1080p performance at high settings, though the 2,048 shading units and 64 ROPs may limit 1440p ultra settings. The CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock supports high frame rates in less demanding titles.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU with PassMark multi-thread score of 30,098 can handle encoding while gaming, though the integrated GPU's shared memory architecture may compete with game assets for bandwidth. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provides adequate headroom for simultaneous tasks.

Video editing: Cinebench R23 multi-core of 16,713 and Geekbench multi-core of 12,724 indicate smooth 4K timeline scrubbing and export. The GPU's Vulkan score of 58,398 accelerates effects and color grading. The 16 MB L3 cache helps with large media files.

3D rendering: The CPU's multi-thread performance places it 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-13500, making it suitable for CPU-based renders. GPU rendering benefits from the 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, though the shared memory system may limit complex scenes.

Software development: PassMark integer math of 103,044 and data compression of 365,352 indicate fast code compilation and package management. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, while the 4 nm process keeps power draw low during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 1,790 in Cinebench R23 ensures responsive document editing and web browsing. The integrated Radeon 780M (included with the CPU) provides basic display output, and the 35 W TDP supports all-day battery life in typical productivity use.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh displays will find this pairing well-suited, given the GPU's 89th percentile ranking and the CPU's 82nd percentile ensuring minimal bottleneck. The GPU sits 2.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, indicating competitive 1080p performance. Content creators working with video or 3D assets benefit from the CPU's 16,713 Cinebench R23 multi-core score, while the GPU's OpenCL score of 65,818 accelerates GPU-accelerated effects.

Developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the PassMark integer math score of 103,044 and the 16-thread configuration. Students and office workers get a capable machine for productivity tasks, with the CPU's single-thread performance handling everyday applications without strain. Small business workstations requiring ECC memory support (enabled by the CPU) and efficient power consumption (35 W TDP) are viable use cases.

The laptop form factor (buildClass: laptop) means this is not a DIY desktop build. Users should look for laptops featuring this CPU+GPU combo, targeting configurations with adequate cooling to sustain the 5.20 GHz boost clock. The GPU's 55 W TDP and integrated nature (slotWidth: IGP) mean no discrete graphics card is present, simplifying thermal design but limiting upgradeability.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 31,593 places it in the 82nd percentile of all processors, with rivals within 0.3% — a statistical tie. The GPU's average score of 62,108 puts it in the 89th percentile, with the Radeon Pro W6600M 0.3% ahead, the Radeon Pro Vega 56 2.5% ahead, the RX 7600M 2.6% ahead, and the RX 9060 XT LP 2.7% ahead. This means the GPU is competitive with mid-range discrete mobile GPUs, despite being integrated.

The combined percentile of 86 reflects a balanced pairing where the GPU slightly outperforms the CPU relative to their respective pools. The GPU's Geekbench OpenCL score of 65,818 and Vulkan score of 58,398 demonstrate strong compute capability. The CPU's 3DMark scores show scaling from 1,003 single-thread to 7,558 max-thread, indicating efficient multi-core utilization.

In practical terms, this pairing delivers CPU performance comparable to a desktop Core i5-13500 (0.3% delta) and GPU performance between a Radeon Pro W6600M and Radeon Pro Vega 56. The 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 throughput places the GPU in capable territory for both gaming and compute workloads.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-only socket with no desktop equivalent. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability, and the system uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes. The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 but uses system shared memory, so bandwidth is system-dependent.

The 35 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP indicate a combined ~90 W thermal envelope, which is modest. The suggestedPsu field is null, meaning no external PSU is needed — this is an integrated laptop solution. The GPU's power connectors are listed as "None," confirming no external power is required.

For upgrades, the laptop form factor limits options. The CPU is soldered (Socket FP8 is typically BGA), and the GPU is integrated. The most sensible next upgrade would be to a newer platform entirely, such as a future Ryzen generation with a higher percentile ranking. The DDR5 memory can potentially be upgraded in capacity, but the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is fixed by the memory controller. The PCIe Gen 4 lanes support fast NVMe storage, which can be upgraded for faster load times.

The Radeon 8050S has a release date of January 5, 2025, and succeeds Polaris Mobile. Its production status is Active, meaning drivers and support are current. The CPU's production status is also Active, so BIOS updates and software optimization continue.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rival?

A: The 7940HS scores 31,593 average, which is 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-13500 (31,510), Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (31,508), AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (31,495), and Intel Core 7 240H (31,483) — essentially performance-equivalent.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The AMD Radeon 8050S ranks in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 62,108.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation reliability.

Q: What is the total thermal design power?

A: The CPU has a 35 W TDP and the GPU has a 55 W TDP, totaling approximately 90 W.

Q: Is there measured gaming FPS data for this combination?

A: No, there is no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU pairing. All gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores.

Q: What architecture does the GPU use?

A: The Radeon 8050S uses RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with 2,048 shading units and 32 ray tracing cores.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class configuration (buildClass: laptop) pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS with the AMD Radeon 8050S integrated GPU. The CPU is a mobile 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 processor on a 4 nm node, while the GPU is an RDNA 3.5 integrated solution with 2,048 shading units and 32 RT cores. The combined percentile rank is 86, indicating this pairing outperforms 86% of all laptop configurations in the database.

The GPU is the stronger component, ranking 89th percentile versus the CPU's 82nd. This is a balanced mobile platform suitable for gaming and content creation, with the CPU providing solid multi-threaded performance and the GPU delivering competitive graphics compute. The system uses shared memory (System Shared), meaning the GPU draws from the same DDR5 pool as the CPU, with bandwidth dependent on the system configuration.

The CPU's average score of 31,593 and GPU's 62,108 combine for a system that handles both CPU-intensive and GPU-accelerated workloads effectively. This is not a high-end desktop replacement — the 35 W CPU TDP and 55 W GPU TDP suggest a thin-and-light or mainstream laptop — but it offers strong performance within that class.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures are estimated from benchmark scores rather than observed results. The GPU's 89th percentile rank and 11.47 TFLOPS FP32 compute suggest strong 1080p gaming capability at high settings in most titles. The 2,048 shading units and 64 ROPs indicate a mid-range GPU comparable to the Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% behind in average score).

For esports titles like Fortnite or Valorant, the CPU's 5.20 GHz boost clock and PassMark single-thread score of 3,878 should support frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p, likely 200+ FPS in lighter titles. The GPU's texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s provide sufficient fill rate for high-refresh 1080p gaming.

For AAA games at 1080p ultra settings, the GPU's 2,048 shading units will deliver playable frame rates, likely in the 60-90 FPS range depending on the title. The 32 RT cores enable ray tracing, though performance will be modest given the integrated nature and shared memory bandwidth. At 1440p, the GPU may struggle with ultra settings, but medium-to-high settings should remain playable.

The shared memory architecture means game performance is system-dependent — laptops with faster DDR5 will see better FPS. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth from the CPU's dual-channel controller is the ceiling, and games with large texture pools may experience stutter if memory capacity is insufficient. Overall, this pairing targets 1080p gaming as its primary use case, with 1440p possible at reduced settings.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + AMD Radeon 8050S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

AMD Radeon 8050S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds