SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + AMD Radeon 740M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

89 Score

Top 11% Ranking

89 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 11% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

89%

GPU

88%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

31,593 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 740M

12,870 Benchmark Score

Top 12% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS pairs an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 processor with the Radeon 740M integrated graphics, a combination aimed squarely at thin-and-light laptops where CPU muscle matters more than GPU horsepower. The processor side is a clear standout: its 82nd percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms the vast majority of installed processors, while the GPU sits at the 53rd percentile, making it an average integrated solution. This asymmetry defines the entire platform—a workhorse CPU paired with a modest graphics engine, producing a combined percentile of 68. The data shows a mobile chip built for demanding productivity tasks, not for pushing high frame rates at high resolutions.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7940HS is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, packing 25,000 million transistors into a 178 mm² die. It uses the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, and operates across 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock sits at 4.00 GHz, rising to 5.20 GHz under boost. This is a 35 W TDP part, which is modest for an 8-core design, indicating aggressive power management and efficient silicon rather than raw clock headroom.

The benchmark data reveals a processor with strong multi-threaded scaling. The 3DMark suite shows a progression from 1,003 in single-thread to 1,952 in 2 threads, 3,725 in 4 threads, 6,205 in 8 threads, and 7,553 in 16 threads, with max-thread performance at 7,558. The scaling from 4 to 8 threads is nearly linear (a 66% increase), while going from 8 to 16 threads adds only about 22%, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 8 cores in that particular workload. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 16,713 versus a single-core score of 1,790 indicates a parallel efficiency that is typical for a modern 8-core part. The Geekbench scores of 12,724 multi-core and 2,144 single-core reinforce the same picture: a CPU that excels when all cores are engaged.

For real workloads, the PassMark suite offers the most granular view. Integer math scores 103,044, floating point math scores 62,897, and extended instructions hit 27,480. The data compression score of 365,352 is notably high, while random string sorting at 42,386 indicates solid memory and cache throughput. The find prime numbers score of 92 is the low outlier, reflecting that single-threaded integer loops are not this chip's strongest suit. The 16 MB shared L3 cache, paired with 1 MB L2 per core and 64 KB L1 per core, provides enough capacity for most productivity workloads but is not a gaming-focused cache design.

The nearest rivals in the average benchmark score are the Intel Core i5-13500, Intel Core Ultra 5 225H, AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX, and Intel Core 7 240H, all within 0.3% of the 7940HS's average score of 31,593. This puts the 7940HS in a tight cluster of mid-range to upper-mid-range processors, where the differences are noise-level. The 7940HS does not decisively beat any of them; it sits at the top of that cluster by a hair. The single-thread score of 3,878 in PassMark and 1,003 in 3DMark single-thread suggests it holds its own in lightly threaded tasks, but the real story is the multi-core performance at a 35 W envelope.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7940HS uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-only socket. This immediately limits upgrade potential, as the CPU is soldered to the motherboard in most laptop designs. The data shows the processor supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is a feature more common in workstation-class hardware than consumer laptops. The memory bus width is dual-channel, and the memory type is DDR5, which is the current standard.

The platform provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. This is sufficient for a discrete GPU and one or two NVMe drives, though the Radeon 740M in this build is an integrated GPU that uses the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The integrated graphics relies on system memory, so the bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s is shared between CPU and GPU tasks. The GPU's memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," meaning performance will vary based on the laptop's RAM configuration—dual-channel DDR5 at higher speeds will benefit the iGPU, while single-channel setups will cripple it.

The TDP values are telling: the CPU runs at 35 W and the GPU at 45 W. The suggested PSU is not listed, but the combined thermal budget of roughly 80 W for the chipset components indicates this is a laptop designed for thin chassis with modest cooling solutions. The GPU has no power connectors and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor), so it draws power from the motherboard. A sensible next upgrade from this platform would be a laptop with a discrete GPU, since the CPU has enough headroom to feed a mid-range mobile graphics card. The CPU's multi-core scores suggest it would not bottleneck a discrete GPU in most tasks, but the platform's socket and power delivery are fixed, so the only real upgrade path is a new system.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks paint a clear picture of a processor that performs well above average. The average benchmark score of 31,593 places it in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it outperforms 82% of processors in the database. The nearest rivals are all within 0.3% of this score, so the 7940HS is not a class leader but rather a strong mid-pack contender. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,713 is a figure that would have been top-tier for desktop processors just a few years ago, now delivered in a 35 W mobile package. The single-core score of 1,790 in R23 is more modest, reflecting the boost clock of 5.20 GHz but also the power constraints of a mobile chip.

The GPU benchmarks are far less impressive. The Radeon 740M scores 10,172 in Geekbench OpenCL and 15,568 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average benchmark score of 12,870. This places it at the 53rd percentile of all GPUs, which is essentially average. Its nearest rivals are the AMD FirePro W5100 (0.2% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro 455 (0.3% ahead), and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 (0.3% ahead), while the AMD Radeon RX 580 is 0.4% ahead. These are all older discrete GPUs, which tells you the 740M is roughly on par with a mid-range desktop GPU from several generations ago. The RX 580, a popular budget card from 2017, is only marginally faster, which contextualizes the 740M as a capable entry-level graphics solution but nothing more.

The combined percentile of 68 reflects the CPU's strength pulling the overall score up, while the GPU drags it down. The data shows a system that is far better suited to compute tasks than graphics tasks. The CPU's multi-threaded scores are consistently strong, while the GPU's scores are merely adequate for basic rendering and video playback.

Who Should Build It

The Ryzen 9 7940HS with Radeon 740M is a laptop combination targeting users who need CPU performance without a discrete GPU. The 82nd percentile CPU ranking means this is a machine for professionals who spend their day compiling code, running simulations, or processing data, not for gamers seeking high frame rates. The GPU's 53rd percentile indicates it can handle light gaming and basic graphics work, but it is not a creator's tool for heavy rendering.

The benchmark data suggests several specific user profiles. Software developers will benefit from the 16 threads and strong multi-core scores in compilation tasks, where the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 16,713 indicates a machine that can chew through build pipelines. Students and small business workstations running office suites, web applications, and spreadsheet calculations will find the single-thread performance of 3,878 in PassMark more than sufficient. The ECC memory support makes it a candidate for workstations where data integrity is critical, even if the integrated GPU limits the scope of what can be done graphically.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will be constrained by the GPU. The 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 performance of the Radeon 740M is a hard ceiling for GPU-accelerated workloads. The CPU can handle the encoding and decoding side of video editing, but the render and effect pipeline will be slow. For 3D modeling, the CPU's 16 threads will help with physics simulations and geometry calculations, but the GPU's 256 shading units and 8 ROPs will bottleneck any real-time viewport rendering. This is not a machine for serious graphics work; it is a machine for computation that occasionally does light graphics.

Balance and Bottleneck

The most obvious bottleneck in this pairing is the GPU. The CPU scores in the 82nd percentile while the GPU sits at the 53rd percentile, a 29-point gap that indicates a severe imbalance. The CPU is capable of feeding a much faster GPU, but the 740M cannot keep up. In CPU-bound workloads like data compression (365,352 in PassMark) or integer math (103,044), the system will feel fast. In GPU-bound workloads like OpenCL compute (10,172 in Geekbench), the system will feel slow.

The FPS scaling is not measured for this combination, but the benchmark scores provide a proxy. The GPU's average score of 12,870 versus the RX 580's 12,928 (0.4% faster) suggests frame rates in games would be similar to that older discrete card, which is to say playable at low settings at 1080p in most titles but not at high settings. The CPU's high single-thread score means it will not be the limiting factor in games; the GPU will cap frame rates long before the CPU does. In CPU-intensive tasks like physics calculations (PassMark physics at 1,450), the CPU will shine, but in GPU-intensive tasks like pixel pushing (pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s), the 740M will struggle.

The memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is another potential bottleneck. The iGPU shares this bandwidth with the CPU, so heavy CPU loads will starve the GPU of memory access and vice versa. This is a fundamental limitation of integrated graphics, and it explains why the GPU's performance is listed as "System Dependent." A laptop with fast dual-channel DDR5 will get better GPU performance than one with slower or single-channel memory.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not a viable scenario. The Radeon 740M lacks the raw throughput to push high frame rates at 1080p, let alone higher resolutions. The GPU's 2.867 TFLOPS and 53rd percentile ranking place it firmly in entry-level territory, suitable for esports titles at low settings but not for modern AAA games at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU can handle the encoding side, with 16 threads and strong multi-core scores, but the GPU is too weak for concurrent gaming and streaming. The 2.867 TFLOPS is insufficient for real-time video encoding while also rendering a game. A dedicated capture card or a lower streaming resolution would be required, but the CPU's Cinebench R23 score of 16,713 suggests software encoding is feasible at modest settings.

Video editing: The CPU is the star here, with multi-core scores that can handle 4K timeline scrubbing and export. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,713 indicates a machine that can process video files efficiently. However, the GPU's 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs will make effects, transitions, and color grading slow. The system will feel responsive for editing but will lag during rendering.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be acceptable, with the 16 threads providing a solid foundation for software renderers. The PassMark floating point score of 62,897 indicates a competent CPU for ray tracing in software. GPU-based rendering is not viable; the 740M's 256 shading units are a fraction of what dedicated renderers require.

Software development: This is the sweet spot. Compilation, unit testing, and code analysis benefit from the 16 threads. The PassMark integer math score of 103,044 and random string sorting of 42,386 suggest strong performance in algorithmic tasks. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds.

Student and office work: The single-thread score of 3,878 in PassMark ensures that web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheet work are snappy. The 82nd percentile CPU ranking means this laptop will handle anything a student or office worker throws at it, with the integrated GPU providing adequate support for video playback and basic presentations.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame rows, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's average score of 12,870 and its position between the RX 580 (12,928) and the FirePro W5100 (12,847) suggest that this system would deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with low to medium settings in most games. Esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or League of Legends might run at 60 FPS or higher on low settings, given the CPU's strong single-thread performance. More demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 or Starfield would likely struggle to maintain 30 FPS even at the lowest settings. The CPU would not be the limiting factor; the GPU's 8 ROPs and 20.4 GPixel/s pixel rate would cap fill-rate-bound scenarios. For any gaming beyond light, casual titles, a discrete GPU is required.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS processor with the AMD Radeon 740M integrated GPU. The CPU is a high-end mobile part, ranking in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is a mainstream integrated solution, ranking in the 53rd percentile. The combined percentile of 68 reflects a system that is better than most laptops but not a high-performance gaming machine. The processor's 8 cores and 16 threads on the Zen 4 architecture at 4 nm provide excellent compute performance for a 35 W TDP. The Radeon 740M, based on RDNA 3.0 architecture, offers 256 shading units at up to 2,800 MHz boost, delivering 2.867 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. This pairing produces a system that excels at productivity, development, and general-purpose computing, with modest gaming capabilities. It is a machine for professionals and students who need CPU muscle, not for gamers or graphics professionals.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7940HS compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HS has an average benchmark score of 31,593, which is 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i5-13500 (31,510), 0.3% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H (31,508), 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 5980HX (31,495), and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core 7 240H (31,483). These differences are negligible, putting all five processors in the same performance tier.

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking and what does it mean?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HS ranks in the 82nd percentile of all CPUs, meaning it performs better than 82% of processors in the database. This places it firmly in the upper-mid-range tier for mobile processors.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking and how does it compare to discrete GPUs?

A: The Radeon 740M ranks in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 12,870 is 0.2% lower than the AMD FirePro W5100 (12,847 is actually higher by 0.2%? The deltaPct values show FirePro at 0.2% ahead), 0.3% lower than the Radeon Pro 455, 0.3% lower than the GTX 590, and 0.4% lower than the RX 580. It performs roughly on par with those older discrete cards.

Q: What memory does the CPU support and what is the bandwidth?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940HS supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, a feature typically found in workstation-class hardware.

Q: Can this system handle 3D rendering workloads?

A: CPU-based rendering is feasible, as the 16 threads and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 16,713 provide solid performance for software renderers. GPU-based rendering is not practical, as the Radeon 740M's 2.867 TFLOPS and 256 shading units are insufficient for modern GPU render engines.

Q: Is this system suitable for gaming at high refresh rates?

A: No. The Radeon 740M's 53rd percentile ranking and low pixel rate of 22.40 GPixel/s make it unsuitable for high-refresh gaming. Estimated frame rates would be playable at 1080p low settings in esports titles, but demanding games would likely run below 30 FPS.

Q: What is the CPU's socket and does it allow for upgrades?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This means the CPU is soldered to the motherboard and cannot be upgraded. The platform's memory and storage can be changed, but the processor and GPU are fixed.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: The CPU scores 3,878 in PassMark single-thread and 1,790 in Cinebench R23 single-core. These scores indicate strong performance for everyday tasks like web browsing and office applications, but they are not class-leading, as the 5.20 GHz boost clock is limited by the 35 W TDP.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS + AMD Radeon 740M

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

AMD Radeon 740M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Usage Scenarios

Gaming Performance

Build Overview

FAQ

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds