SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

86 Score

Top 14% Ranking

86 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This benchmark pairing combines the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, an 8-core Zen 4 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation GPU, a 16 GB professional-class graphics solution. The combined percentile rank for this laptop configuration is 54, placing it in the mid-range of all benchmarked systems, though the CPU and GPU contribute very different levels of performance to that overall score.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance profile of this build is heavily skewed toward the processor. The Ryzen 9 7940H achieves a percentile rank of 87 against all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms the vast majority of processors in the benchmark database. In contrast, the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation GPU sits at a 21st percentile rank against all GPUs, a position that places it below most dedicated graphics cards. This disparity creates a clear bottleneck scenario where the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In CPU-bound tasks such as data compression, encryption, and multi-threaded rendering, the processor can operate at its full potential, as the GPU is not required. However, in gaming or 3D rendering, the GPU’s lower relative performance will constrain the system’s output, preventing the CPU from achieving its maximum possible frame rates or render times. The data indicates that the CPU is not the limiting component in this pairing; instead, the GPU will dictate the ceiling for graphics performance. The FPS scaling in such a configuration would show diminishing returns from the CPU’s high multi-core scores when the GPU is saturated, a common trait of workstation laptops where the CPU is prioritized for compute tasks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU delivers an average benchmark score of 40431, placing it at the 87th percentile. This score is nearly identical to its closest rivals: the Intel Xeon 6507P scores 40426 with a 0% delta, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40518 with a -0.2% delta, and the Intel Xeon 6369P scores 40327 with a 0.3% delta. The Ryzen 9 7940H sits in a tight pack, being effectively tied with these alternatives in overall CPU performance. The GPU, however, tells a different story. Its average benchmark score from the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test is 3596, which places it at the 21st percentile. This score is closely matched by the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 at 3594 (0.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 735M at 3616 (-0.6% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 at 3629 (-0.9% delta). The combined picture is one of a system with exceptional processing power paired with a graphics solution that performs at a level far below the CPU’s tier. The combined percentile of 54 reflects this imbalance, pulling the overall system rank down from the CPU’s strong position due to the GPU’s low standing. Benchmark results indicate that this is a compute-first platform where the GPU is sufficient for professional graphics tasks but does not compete with modern gaming or high-end rendering GPUs.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is a mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The chip has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. This configuration provides strong multi-threaded performance, evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 and a single-core score of 3487. The single-thread performance is robust for a mobile chip, allowing for responsive daily use and good performance in lightly threaded applications. The PassMark multi-thread score of 29063 and a single-thread score of 3952 confirm its capability across varied workloads. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB of L3 cache. The memory controller supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is adequate for feeding the CPU’s cores. It also supports ECC memory, a feature often valued in professional workstations. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a fallback display solution, but the system is designed to use the discrete GPU. The CPU’s 87th percentile rank indicates it is a top-tier mobile processor, suitable for demanding computational tasks such as video encoding, software compilation, and scientific simulations. Its nearest rivals, including the Intel Core i9-13905H with a 0.3% delta, show that it is competitive with the best mobile chips from Intel in overall benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H?

A: The CPU sits at the 87th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40431, placing it in the top tier of processors.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU scores 3596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, which is within 1.5% of the scores of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545, GT 735M, and GTX 1050, and it ranks at the 21st percentile against all GPUs.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile for this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for this laptop build is 54, reflecting the significant imbalance between the high-performing CPU and the lower-performing GPU.

Q: Does the CPU support error-correcting memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7940H supports ECC memory, which is a feature typically required for stable long-duration computing in professional environments.

Q: What is the process node and transistor count of the GPU?

A: The RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC and contains 45,900 million transistors on a die size of 379 mm².

Q: What memory bandwidth does the CPU have access to?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a maximum bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is sufficient for its 8-core Zen 4 architecture.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration is suited for users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. The 87th percentile CPU makes it an excellent choice for professionals who run heavily multi-threaded workloads such as software development, where compilation times are critical, or for data analysts processing large datasets with the PassMark data compression score of 352077 indicating high throughput. Students in engineering or computer science fields would benefit from the CPU’s power for simulations and coding projects, while the GPU is capable enough for basic graphical tasks and CAD work. Small business workstations that require reliable multi-core processing for financial modeling or database management would find the CPU’s 16 threads and 24703 Cinebench R23 multi-core score advantageous. However, gamers looking for high frame rates at high resolutions should look elsewhere, as the GPU’s 21st percentile ranking will not satisfy modern gaming demands. Content creators who work with 2D graphics or video encoding that relies on the CPU, rather than GPU acceleration, will also find this pairing adequate, but those who depend on GPU rendering will be constrained by the graphics card’s performance.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is a professional mobile GPU based on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The GPU has 9728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 render output units. Its memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, which is substantial for handling large textures and datasets. The core clocks are a base of 1425 MHz and a boost of 2115 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective. The GPU features 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, providing hardware support for ray tracing and AI acceleration. The FP32 performance is rated at 41.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 41.15 TFLOPS as well, indicating a 1:1 ratio. Pixel rate is 236.9 GPixel/s and texture rate is 643.0 GTexel/s. Despite these impressive specifications, the benchmark score of 3596 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it at the 21st percentile, far below what the hardware specifications might suggest. This low score relative to its specs could indicate that the benchmark reflects a specific workload where the GPU is not optimized, or that the thermal and power constraints of a laptop chassis limit its performance. The GPU’s nearest rivals are older or lower-tier cards like the GTX 1050 and GT 735M, which have similar benchmark scores, suggesting that in this particular test, the RTX 5000 Mobile does not perform to the level of its hardware resources. For rendering tasks, the 41.15 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 16 GB of VRAM are beneficial for large scenes, but the low percentile rank means it will not match desktop-class GPUs in the same benchmark.

Usage Scenarios

For high-refresh gaming, this system will underperform. The GPU’s 21st percentile rank and benchmark parity with the GTX 1050 indicate that it cannot sustain high frame rates at high settings in modern titles. Users should expect lower FPS and reduced graphical settings to achieve playable performance. Streaming and video editing are more viable scenarios. The CPU’s strong multi-threaded performance, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 29063, can handle video encoding using x264 or x265 software encoding, while the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and tensor cores can assist with AI-based effects and hardware encoding, though its low benchmark score suggests limited acceleration potential in GPU-accelerated workflows. For 3D rendering, the CPU will excel in physics simulations and scene preparation, but the final render times will be dictated by the GPU, which lags behind its peers. Software development is a strong use case, as the 8-core, 16-thread CPU with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz will handle compilation and virtual machines efficiently. The PassMark integer math score of 101977 supports this assessment, indicating high throughput for code execution. Student and office work are well-served by this combination, as the CPU’s single-thread score of 3952 ensures smooth multitasking in office suites and web browsing, while the GPU is more than adequate for display output and light graphics tasks.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: laptop) that pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, a high-end mobile processor, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation, a professional mobile GPU. The CPU is positioned at the 87th percentile, making it one of the stronger processors available. The GPU, however, is at the 21st percentile, which is a low standing among all graphics cards. The combined percentile of 54 places this system in the middle of overall performance, but this number masks the extreme variance between the two components. The system is clearly designed as a CPU-centric workstation, where the processor’s 8 cores and 16 threads provide substantial compute power for professional applications. The GPU, while featuring a large 16 GB VRAM pool and Ada Lovelace architecture, does not benchmark well, so it should be viewed as a supplementary component rather than a primary driver of performance. This pairing is a representation of a mobile workstation where CPU compute is the priority, and the GPU is included for basic acceleration and display output.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all frame rate figures here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3596 is closely aligned with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050, which scores 3629 with a -0.9% delta. This suggests that gaming performance will be similar to that of a GTX 1050 laptop. For 1080p gaming with ultra settings, the estimated FPS would be low, likely in the range that older or less demanding titles can handle, but modern AAA games would struggle to maintain playable frame rates. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s 21st percentile rank indicates that performance would be significantly worse, and even medium settings might not achieve smooth gameplay. The CPU’s high single-thread score of 3487 in Cinebench R23 means it will not bottleneck the GPU, but this is irrelevant when the GPU is the limiting factor. Users should expect that this laptop is not intended for gaming, and the estimates from the benchmark scores confirm that its performance in this area is a minor consideration compared to its compute capabilities.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is built on the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile platform that does not typically offer user-upgradable processors. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, and the system’s memory bandwidth is listed at 89.6 GB/s. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which is used for the GPU and other peripherals. The GPU itself is an IGP, meaning it is integrated into the motherboard or soldered onto the laptop board, and it connects via PCIe 4.0 x16. Given the laptop form factor, the upgrade path is severely limited. The CPU is not upgradeable, and the GPU is also likely soldered, preventing any discrete replacement. The system’s TDP is 35 W for the CPU and 120 W for the GPU, and there is no suggested PSU listed, as this is a portable device with an integrated power supply. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be to increase the amount of system RAM if the laptop allows it, as the CPU’s performance can benefit from higher memory bandwidth. Storage upgrades via PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives are also possible, given the 20 CPU lanes. However, the core performance of the system is fixed, and any future upgrade would involve replacing the entire laptop, as the socket and GPU are not designed for user serviceability.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Gaming Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds