SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation form a laptop-class pairing with a combined percentile of 69. The CPU sits at the 87th percentile of all CPUs in the database, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all frame-rate discussions in this document are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentiles.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data shows a clear asymmetry: the CPU is a high-end mobile processor, while the GPU is a median mobile graphics part. With the CPU at the 87th percentile and the GPU at the 50th, the GPU is the limiting component in graphics-bound workloads. The CPU’s single-thread PassMark score of 3,952 and its 8‑core/16‑thread design are more than sufficient to feed a GPU that ranks at the median. In CPU-heavy tasks such as integer math (101,977), data compression (352,077), and encryption (21,096), the CPU is not the constraint.

The GPU’s memory bandwidth is 576 GB/s, while the CPU’s system memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s. These are separate pools. In gaming, the CPU must deliver draw calls and game state updates; the CPU’s 5.20 GHz boost and 8 cores provide ample headroom. The GPU’s 50th percentile means the frame rate will be capped by the GPU in most 3D scenes. The TDP budget is 35 W for the CPU and 120 W for the GPU; under sustained load, the GPU will draw the majority of the power, and a shared thermal envelope will likely throttle the GPU before the CPU.

The combined percentile of 69 sits between the CPU’s 87th and the GPU’s 50th, reinforcing that the GPU is the bottleneck in combined workloads. For CPU-only applications — compilation, data compression, cryptography — the CPU can run at full speed within its 35 W TDP, but for gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the GPU’s 120 W TDP and median performance define the ceiling.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with 576 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 40,431. The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40,518 (deltaPct −0.2), the Intel Xeon 6507P scores 40,426 (deltaPct 0), the Xeon 6369P scores 40,327 (deltaPct 0.3), and the Core i9-13905H scores 40,313 (deltaPct 0.3).

Q: Does the CPU have an integrated GPU?

A: Yes, it includes a Radeon 780M integrated GPU, which can handle display output and light graphics tasks.

Q: What process node is used?

A: The CPU is built on TSMC’s 4 nm process, and the GPU uses TSMC’s 5 nm process.

Q: What PCIe version does the CPU support?

A: The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark results are strong across both single- and multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23 it scores 24,703 in multi-core and 3,487 in single-core. Cinebench R20 yields 10,375 multi-core and 1,464 single-core, while R15 gives 2,490 multi-core and 351 single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multi-thread score of 29,063, single-thread of 3,952, integer math of 101,977, floating-point math of 62,057, data compression of 352,077, data encryption of 21,096, extended instructions of 26,804, physics of 1,300, find prime numbers of 81, and random string sorting of 42,093.

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 40,431, placing it at the 87th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Xeon 6507P at 40,426 (deltaPct 0), the Core Ultra X7 368H at 40,518 (deltaPct −0.2), the Xeon 6369P at 40,327 (deltaPct 0.3), and the Core i9-13905H at 40,313 (deltaPct 0.3). This places the Ryzen 9 7940H within a few tenths of a percent of those high-end processors, indicating performance parity with a wide range of desktop and mobile parts.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the database, but its percentile vs all GPUs is 50, meaning it is at the median of the GPU pool. The combined percentile of 69 indicates that the CPU is the stronger component in this pairing. In mixed workloads, the CPU will often complete its portion before the GPU finishes, making the GPU the effective frame-rate and render-time limit.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread PassMark of 3,952 and 8-core/16-thread design are well suited to feeding a GPU, but the GPU’s 50th percentile means it will cap frame rates in demanding titles. The 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth can handle large textures, but the median GPU performance limits maximum refresh rates.

Streaming: The 8-core/16-thread CPU can manage game logic and stream encoding concurrently; the GPU’s 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores may assist with AI-driven features, though the database does not specify encoder support. The CPU’s multi-thread score of 29,063 and compression score of 352,077 suggest it can handle streaming overhead without becoming a bottleneck.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-core performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core 24,703, PassMark multi-thread 29,063) supports timeline processing and export. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are ample for high-resolution frames, but its 50th percentile means GPU-accelerated effects will be slower than with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU compensates in CPU-bound effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 24,703 in Cinebench R23 multi-core is strong for CPU-based rendering. The GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 76 RT cores accelerate ray-traced scenes, and the 16 GB VRAM allows large models. However, the GPU’s median ranking means render times will be mid-pack.

Software development: The CPU’s integer math score of 101,977 and data compression of 352,077 indicate fast compilation and data handling. The 8-core/16-thread design parallelizes build tasks. The integrated Radeon 780M handles display output, while the discrete GPU is not a primary factor for development.

Student and office work: The 35 W TDP CPU with a 4.00 GHz base and 5.20 GHz boost handles daily tasks with low power draw. The Radeon 780M iGPU covers display needs. The single-thread score of 3,952 ensures a responsive interface, and the discrete GPU remains available for occasional graphics work.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is an 8-core, 16-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix. It uses TSMC’s 4 nm process with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The base clock is 4.00 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 35 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB shared L3 cache. Memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC is enabled.

The CPU is part of the Ryzen 7000 series and provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes. It includes a Radeon 780M integrated GPU. The benchmark scores confirm a balanced part: Cinebench R23 multi-core 24,703, R20 multi-core 10,375, and R15 multi-core 2,490. Single-core scores are equally strong (3,487 in R23, 1,464 in R20, 351 in R15). The 87th percentile rank places it above the majority of CPUs in the database, and the nearest rival scores are within 0.3% of its average, indicating strong parity with top mobile and workstation processors.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all frame-rate figures are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentiles. The CPU’s 87th percentile and GPU’s 50th percentile suggest that the GPU will be the primary frame-rate limiter in most games. In CPU-bound titles, the CPU’s single-thread score of 3,952 and boost to 5.20 GHz should allow high frame rates, but the GPU’s median performance will still cap the maximum FPS.

For GPU-heavy games, the 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for large textures, but the GPU’s 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is at the median. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads can feed the GPU without stuttering, and the combined percentile of 69 indicates a mid-range gaming laptop rather than a high-refresh system. The GPU will limit performance in 3D scenes, while the CPU remains a strong asset.

Who Should Build It

This laptop combination suits buyers who need a high-end CPU for productivity and a mid-pack GPU for occasional gaming. Gamers targeting mainstream resolutions will find the CPU provides smooth frame pacing, while the GPU limits the maximum FPS. Developers who compile large codebases will benefit from the CPU’s integer math score of 101,977 and compression of 352,077, along with ECC support for memory stability. Video editors and 3D artists will use the CPU’s multi-core rendering (24,703 in R23) and the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM for larger scenes.

Students and office workers will appreciate the 35 W TDP and integrated Radeon 780M for daily tasks, with the discrete GPU available for occasional graphics work. Small business workstations that need a laptop with a strong CPU and a professional GPU with 16 GB VRAM and RT/tensor hardware will find this configuration adequate, though the GPU’s median performance limits the most demanding workloads.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining a high-end AMD mobile CPU (87th percentile) with a median NVIDIA mobile GPU (50th percentile). The combined percentile is 69, meaning the system is above average in the database but not in the top tier. The CPU is an 8-core/16-thread Zen 4 part with a 35 W TDP, while the GPU is a 120 W Ada Lovelace part with 16 GB GDDR6 and 32.69 TFLOPS FP32. The CPU is clearly the stronger component, and the overall system tier is mid-range to upper-mid-range.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8 and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, allowing for a discrete GPU and fast storage. The GPU has a slot width of “IGP” and no power connectors, indicating it is integrated into the laptop motherboard and not user-upgradeable. No suggested PSU is provided, as this is a mobile system with integrated power delivery.

A sensible upgrade within this platform would be to increase memory capacity or storage, using the CPU’s Gen 4 lanes. The CPU’s 35 W TDP and GPU’s 120 W TDP are fixed by the mobile design. Because the GPU is not replaceable, the only meaningful CPU-side upgrade would be to a higher-TDP processor on the same socket, though the data does not specify compatible alternatives. The GPU cannot be upgraded in a laptop.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation is based on the AD103 chip, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. It has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 576 GB/s. The memory clock is 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), with a base clock of 930 MHz and a boost clock of 1,680 MHz.

The GPU has 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. It includes 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores. The pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 32.69 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1). The TDP is 120 W, and it uses PCIe 4.0 x16. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The GPU has no benchmark scores, and its percentile is 50th, indicating median performance among the database’s GPUs. The 16 GB VRAM and 576 GB/s bandwidth are generous for a professional mobile part, and the RT and tensor cores enable ray tracing and AI workloads. However, the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is only median, meaning the GPU will be the bottleneck in most rendering and gaming tasks when paired with the higher-performing CPU.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Max-Q Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds