SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

83 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
92%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score
Top 8% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H, an 8-core Zen 4 mobile processor from the 7000 series, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile, a Turing-architecture GPU featuring 16 GB of GDDR6 memory. The CPU sits at the 87th percentile among all tested processors, while the GPU lands at the 50th percentile, and the combined system ranks at the 69th percentile. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the CPU’s Cinebench and Passmark scores and the GPU’s architectural specifications, not from direct testing.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance relative to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940H scores 24,703 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 10,375 in Cinebench R20 multi-core. Its average benchmark score of 40,431 is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon 6507P (40,426, 0% delta) and the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (40,518, -0.2% delta), while it sits 0.3% ahead of the Intel Xeon 6369P and Intel Core i9-13905H, each scoring 40,327 and 40,313 respectively.

Q: How does the GPU compare to other graphics cards in the database?

A: The Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile holds the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it sits exactly at the median. It has no nearest rivals listed in the data, and its average benchmark score is 0, as no GPU-specific benchmark tests were recorded for this part.

Q: What memory bandwidth does the GPU provide?

A: The GPU features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7940H supports ECC memory. It uses dual-channel DDR5 memory with a total bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and the memory bus is dual-channel.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-threaded performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The CPU scores 3,487 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 1,464 in Cinebench R20 single-core. Its Passmark single-thread score is 3,952, placing it well above the midpoint for typical laptop processors.

Q: Which architecture and process node does each component use?

A: The CPU is built on AMD’s Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Phoenix, using a 4 nm process from TSMC with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The GPU uses NVIDIA’s Turing architecture with the TU104 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die.

Q: What is the power envelope for each component?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 watts, while the GPU has a TDP of 110 watts. The GPU is an integrated-class part (IGP slot width) with no power connectors, and it is marked as end-of-life, with a release date of June 7, 2020.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s strong single-thread score of 3,487 in Cinebench R23 and 3,952 in Passmark single-thread suggests it can keep up with modern game logic and physics at high frame rates. The GPU, however, sits at the 50th percentile, and with 9.400 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, it is more suited to 1080p high-refresh or 1440p medium settings rather than pushing extreme frame rates at 4K. Estimated FPS in demanding titles will likely fall short of the highest refresh-rate monitors.

Streaming: The GPU includes 384 tensor cores and 48 RT cores, which can assist with encoding and AI-based enhancements, but the lack of measured FPS data means real-time streaming performance is speculative. The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a Passmark multithread score of 29,063, provide enough headroom for software encoding alongside gaming, though the 35 W TDP may limit sustained all-core loads.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,703 places it near the 87th percentile, indicating strong rendering performance for timeline scrubbing and export tasks. The GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle large 4K video buffers, and its 293.8 GTexel/s texture rate helps with effects processing, though the Turing architecture lacks the newer ray-tracing capabilities of later generations.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the Ryzen 9 7940H delivers a Passmark integer math score of 101,977 and a floating-point math score of 62,057, which are solid for a mobile part. The GPU’s 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 and 18.80 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) allow for accelerated rendering in applications that support CUDA or OptiX, but the 50th percentile ranking suggests it will be outclassed by desktop-class GPUs.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark data compression score of 352,077 and data encryption score of 21,096 indicate fast compilation and cryptographic operations. The 16 threads and 16 MB of shared L3 cache support parallel builds, while the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth reduces bottlenecks in memory-heavy workloads like database queries.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread scores are more than adequate for web browsing, document editing, and spreadsheets. The integrated Radeon 780M graphics provide a fallback for display output, and the 35 W TDP means the system can run efficiently on battery, though the GPU’s 110 W TDP suggests this is not an ultra-portable configuration.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 40,431, placing it at the 87th percentile among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the Intel Xeon 6507P scores 40,426 (0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40,518 (-0.2% delta), the Intel Xeon 6369P scores 40,327 (0.3% delta), and the Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40,313 (0.3% delta). This means the Ryzen 9 7940H offers performance indistinguishable from these four competitors, with differences well under 1%.

In Cinebench R15, the CPU scores 2,490 multi-core and 351 single-core. The R20 results show 10,375 multi-core and 1,464 single-core, while R23 shows 24,703 multi-core and 3,487 single-core. Passmark results include a multithread score of 29,063, a single-thread score of 3,952, integer math at 101,977, floating-point math at 62,057, and extended instructions at 26,804. The GPU, by contrast, has no benchmark scores recorded and an average score of 0, with a 50th percentile ranking. The combined system percentile is 69, indicating that the CPU carries most of the performance weight in this pairing.

The combined picture shows a processor that competes with top-tier mobile and entry-level server parts, while the GPU is strictly mid-range. For workloads that scale across cores, the CPU is the clear strength; for graphics-heavy tasks, the GPU will be the limiting factor.

Balance and Bottleneck

The CPU’s 87th percentile versus the GPU’s 50th percentile creates a clear imbalance: the processor is far more capable relative to its peers than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, software compilation, or multi-threaded rendering, the Ryzen 9 7940H will perform near the top of its class, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 24,703 and Passmark multithread at 29,063. The GPU will not constrain these tasks.

In GPU-bound scenarios, such as gaming at high resolutions or ray-traced rendering, the Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile becomes the bottleneck. Its 50th percentile ranking means half of all GPUs are faster, and its 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest by modern standards. With no measured FPS data, frame rates are estimates, but the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle large textures, while its 97.92 GPixel/s pixel rate limits fill-rate-heavy scenes.

The 69th combined percentile reflects this split: the system outperforms most laptops overall, but users expecting GPU-heavy workloads to match the CPU’s relative strength will be disappointed. The 35 W CPU TDP and 110 W GPU TDP also indicate thermal constraints, where the CPU may boost to 5.20 GHz in short bursts but sustain lower clocks under all-core loads.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who prioritize CPU throughput over GPU raw power. Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,703 and Passmark floating-point math of 62,057, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM handles large project files. Software developers will find the Passmark data compression score of 352,077 useful for build tools, and the 16 threads speed up parallel compilation.

Gamers at 1080p or 1440p with mid-range settings are the realistic audience, given the GPU’s 50th percentile standing. The CPU’s single-thread scores (3,487 in R23, 3,952 in Passmark) prevent CPU-related frame drops, but the GPU will cap maximum FPS. Students and office workers will rarely stress either component, and the CPU’s efficiency at 35 W TDP supports long battery sessions, though the GPU’s 110 W TDP means the system is not a featherweight.

Small business workstations that run database queries, financial modeling, or scientific simulations will see the most benefit, as these tasks are typically CPU-bound and leverage the processor’s 87th percentile ranking and ECC memory support.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rates are estimates based on the CPU’s benchmark scores and the GPU’s specifications. The CPU’s single-thread performance is excellent, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3,487, which should avoid bottlenecks in most game engines. The GPU’s 50th percentile ranking, 9.400 TFLOPS FP32, and 64 ROPs suggest 1080p gaming at high settings is achievable, with estimated FPS in the 60-90 range for less demanding titles and 40-70 for AAA games.

At 1440p, the GPU’s 448.0 GB/s bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM will handle memory-hungry scenes, but the 97.92 GPixel/s pixel rate may drop FPS to 30-60 depending on the title. At 4K, the GPU is likely insufficient for smooth gameplay, with estimates below 30 FPS in most modern games. The 48 RT cores provide some ray-tracing capability, but Turing’s first-generation RT hardware is slower than later architectures, so enabling ray tracing will further reduce frame rates.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike or Overwatch, the CPU’s high single-thread performance could push FPS above 144 at 1080p, but the GPU’s fill rate will be the ceiling. The lack of measured data means these figures are directional, not definitive.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile is a Turing-architecture GPU built on the TU104 chip, fabricated on a 12 nm process with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, with a memory clock of 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The GPU has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operations units.

The 48 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, while 384 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS and similar features. The GPU’s FP32 throughput is 9.400 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 18.80 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 97.92 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 293.8 GTexel/s. Base clock is 1035 MHz, boosting to 1530 MHz.

The 50th percentile ranking places this GPU at the median, meaning it is neither a high-end nor a low-end part. For rendering tasks, the 16 GB VRAM is generous and supports large scenes, but the 9.400 TFLOPS FP32 is modest compared to newer GPUs. The 12 nm process node also means higher power consumption per unit of performance, with a 110 W TDP. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. Its production status is end-of-life, with a release date of June 7, 2020.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: “laptop”) pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The GPU is a Turing-based mobile part with 16 GB VRAM.

The combined system percentile is 69, which means this configuration outperforms 69% of all tested systems in the database. The CPU’s 87th percentile is the primary driver of this ranking, while the GPU’s 50th percentile pulls the overall score down. This is not a balanced high-end gaming machine; it is a CPU-centric workstation with a mid-range GPU.

The CPU’s TDP of 35 W is typical for a high-performance mobile processor, while the GPU’s 110 W TDP suggests a larger chassis with adequate cooling. The GPU is marked as “IGP” for slot width, indicating it is soldered or integrated into the motherboard, with no power connectors. The build class of laptop means all components are constrained by thermal and power limits.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is a mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, containing 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The CPU has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The TDP is 35 watts, making it efficient for a high-performance mobile part.

The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes and includes integrated Radeon 780M graphics. Its socket is AMD Socket FP8, and it is currently in active production.

Benchmark results show strong multi-core performance: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 24,703, Cinebench R20 multi-core at 10,375, and Cinebench R15 multi-core at 2,490. Single-core scores are equally solid, with Cinebench R23 at 3,487, R20 at 1,464, and R15 at 351. Passmark results include a multithread score of 29,063, single-thread at 3,952, integer math at 101,977, and floating-point math at 62,057. The CPU’s 87th percentile ranking places it among the top 13% of all processors tested.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is specific to mobile platforms, so upgrades are limited to replacing the entire motherboard or system. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5, with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for a single high-end GPU or multiple NVMe drives.

The GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 bus interface, which is older than the CPU’s PCIe Gen 4 capability, meaning the GPU may not fully utilize the CPU’s available bandwidth. The GPU’s TDP is 110 W, and there is no suggested PSU listed, but in a laptop, the power delivery is fixed by the chassis. The GPU is end-of-life, so a sensible next upgrade would be to a newer-generation mobile GPU with higher performance, though the motherboard’s compatibility would need to be verified.

The CPU’s 35 W TDP leaves thermal headroom for a more powerful GPU in a future system, but the current pairing’s combined percentile of 69 suggests that upgrading the GPU alone would yield the largest performance gain for gaming. For CPU-bound workloads, the Ryzen 9 7940H is already near the top of its class, so further CPU upgrades would require a platform change to a different socket. The memory support for DDR5 and ECC makes this platform suitable for workstations, but the laptop form factor limits expansion options.