SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh pairing represents a specific type of mobile workstation configuration, targeting users who need strong CPU throughput alongside professional-grade graphics capabilities. The processor is a modern 8-core, 16-thread part built on TSMC's 4 nm process, using the Zen 4 architecture under the Phoenix codename. It operates with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is notably high for a mobile chip with a 35 W TDP. The graphics side is an older design, based on the Turing architecture and the TU106 chip, manufactured on a 12 nm process. This combination of a current-generation CPU with a previous-generation professional GPU creates an interesting balance that leans heavily on the processor for most tasks.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7940H is a powerhouse in terms of core configuration. With 8 cores and 16 threads, it provides the parallel processing headroom necessary for demanding multi-threaded workloads like video rendering and software compilation. The Zen 4 architecture brings a significant instructions-per-clock (IPC) improvement over older designs, and the 4 nm process node from TSMC allows these cores to run at high frequencies without exceeding the 35 W TDP. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 1 MB of L2 cache per core are moderate for a flagship mobile chip, but the memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s from dual-channel DDR5 support ensures the cores are fed with data efficiently.

Benchmark results show this CPU is a top-tier mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24703 in the multi-core test and 3487 in the single-core test. These numbers indicate that the chip can handle both heavily-threaded tasks and lightly-threaded applications with equal competence. The single-core score is particularly strong, suggesting excellent responsiveness in everyday tasks and games that rely on one or two threads. The multi-core score places it among the best mobile CPUs available, with a percentile rank of 87 against all CPUs. This means it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market, including many desktop parts. The PassMark multi-thread score of 29063 and single-thread score of 3952 reinforce this picture, showing consistent high performance across different benchmark suites.

The nearest rivals provide context for where this chip sits in the hierarchy. Its average benchmark score of 40431 is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon 6507P, which scores 40426, a delta of 0%. It also trades blows with the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H, which is 0.2% faster, and the Intel Xeon 6369P, which is 0.3% faster. The Intel Core i9-13905H is also 0.3% ahead. This puts the Ryzen 9 7940H in the same performance class as the best mobile and entry-level server chips, meaning it will not be the bottleneck in most laptop configurations. The data suggests that for real workloads, this CPU offers exceptional multi-threaded capability for rendering, encoding, and scientific computing, while its single-thread performance ensures snappy UI interactions and solid frame pacing in games.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's benchmark scores are the primary driver of this system's overall performance. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10375 and single-core score of 1464 are strong figures for a mobile processor. In PassMark tests, the data encryption score of 21096 and data compression score of 352077 highlight its capability in security and archival tasks. For floating-point math, it scores 62057, and for integer math, it achieves 101977, showing robust arithmetic processing power. The extended instructions score of 26804 indicates good support for modern SIMD workloads, while the physics score of 1300 suggests it can handle physics simulations in games and engineering applications.

The GPU, however, tells a different story. The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has no benchmark scores listed in the data, and its percentile rank against all GPUs is exactly 50, meaning it sits at the median. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, which is a data gap rather than a literal zero performance. Based on its specifications, it has 1920 shading units, 30 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores, with a boost clock of 1380 MHz. This yields an FP32 performance of 5.299 TFLOPS, which is modest by modern standards. The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus provides 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is adequate for 1080p gaming and professional 3D modeling at moderate settings.

The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 69, which places it above the majority of laptop configurations. The picture is clear: this system is CPU-bound in almost every scenario. The processor is in the 87th percentile, while the GPU is in the 50th percentile. This means the CPU has significantly more headroom than the GPU can utilize. For applications that are purely CPU-bound, such as code compilation or spreadsheet calculations, this system will perform exceptionally well. For graphics-intensive tasks, the GPU will be the limiting factor, and the overall experience will be dictated by the Quadro's capabilities rather than the Ryzen's power.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance data indicates a substantial imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's percentile of 87 versus the GPU's percentile of 50 shows that the processor is far more capable relative to its peers than the graphics card. In practical terms, this means the GPU will be the bottleneck in any workload that relies heavily on graphics processing. In gaming, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh will limit frame rates, especially at higher resolutions and detail settings. The CPU will sit idle waiting for the GPU to finish rendering frames, which is a classic CPU-bound scenario.

Conversely, in CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or data analysis, the GPU's limitations are less impactful. The Ryzen 9 7940H can stretch its legs, and the system will perform near the level of the CPU's potential. The FPS scaling evidence, while not measured, can be inferred from the score disparity. A game that is heavily threaded might see better performance than a game that relies on single-core speed, but the GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS will cap the maximum frame rate regardless of the CPU's strength. For users who prioritize gaming, this imbalance is a drawback. For users who primarily run professional applications that are CPU-bound, such as software development or financial modeling, this pairing is well-suited.

The memory system also plays a role in balancing. The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, which is more than sufficient for the GPU's needs. The GPU has its own dedicated 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, so there is no contention for system memory. The PCIe interface for the GPU is Gen 3.0 x16, which is an older standard compared to the CPU's Gen 4 support, but this does not significantly impact performance for a GPU of this class. The bottleneck is purely the GPU's compute capability, not its connection to the rest of the system.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the FACT PACK. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and the measuredFpsUltraByGame object is empty. All frame rate discussions are therefore estimates based on the benchmark scores and hardware specifications. The CPU's Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3487 suggests strong per-thread performance, which is beneficial for games that are not well-optimized for multi-threading. However, the GPU's modest FP32 throughput of 5.299 TFLOPS and 6 GB of VRAM will limit gaming to 1080p with medium to high settings in modern titles.

At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU will likely be the limiting factor. Games like esports titles (e.g., counter-strike style shooters) that are not graphically demanding may run at high frame rates, potentially exceeding 100 FPS, because they rely more on CPU performance. The Ryzen 9 7940H's high boost clock of 5.20 GHz will help in these scenarios. For AAA games with heavy graphics requirements, frame rates will be lower, likely in the 30-60 FPS range depending on the title and scene complexity. At 1440p, the GPU will be even more stressed, and ultra settings may be unplayable in many games, requiring a drop to medium settings to achieve playable frame rates. At 4K, this GPU is not suitable for gaming, as the 6 GB VRAM will be insufficient for high-resolution textures, and the compute power will be too low.

The 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores provide some ray tracing and DLSS capability, but the Turing architecture's RT performance is significantly weaker than newer generations. Ray tracing at 1080p with DLSS enabled might be playable in some titles, but users should expect to lower settings to maintain smooth performance. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it is an average performer among all GPUs, which aligns with a mid-range mobile graphics solution from several years ago. The estimated gaming experience is best described as adequate for 1080p gaming with settings tuned down, but not competitive with modern gaming laptops.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system is not ideal for high-refresh gaming at 1080p in demanding titles. The GPU's 5.299 TFLOPS will struggle to push frame rates above 100 FPS in modern AAA games, even with settings lowered. The CPU is capable of high frame rates, but the GPU will bottleneck. For esports titles that are CPU-bound, the Ryzen 9 7940H's single-core score of 3487 could allow frame rates above 144 FPS, but this is dependent on the specific game's optimization.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads are well-suited for streaming. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 indicates strong encoding capability, allowing for software x264 encoding at high quality without significantly impacting game performance. The GPU also has NVENC support, but the older Turing encoder is less efficient than newer versions. Overall, this system can handle 1080p60 streaming with a game running on the same machine.

Video editing: This is a strong use case. The CPU's multi-threaded performance will accelerate export times and timeline rendering in software like Premiere Pro or DaVinci Resolve. The PassMark multi-thread score of 29063 and data compression score of 352077 support this, as video codecs rely heavily on these operations. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p editing and basic 4K work, but it may struggle with complex effects or color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU will be the primary driver for CPU-based renders. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10375 indicates it can handle complex scenes, but render times will be longer than with a desktop high-core-count chip. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the Quadro RTX 3000's 1920 shading units will provide moderate performance, but the 6 GB VRAM will limit the size of scenes that can be rendered.

Software development: This is an excellent use case. The CPU's single-thread performance is top-notch, and the multi-thread score is high. Compilation times will be fast, and the 16 threads allow for parallel builds. The PassMark integer math score of 101977 is particularly relevant for code execution. The GPU's limitations are irrelevant for most development tasks.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for standard office tasks like word processing, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The CPU's performance is far beyond what these tasks require, but this means the system will remain responsive for years. The battery life may be a concern due to the discrete GPU, but for students in engineering or computer science programs, the CPU power is an advantage for simulations and coding assignments.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-core performance in Cinebench R23?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H scores 24703 in the Cinebench R23 multi-core test.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7940H has an average benchmark score of 40431, which is 0% different from the Intel Xeon 6507P, 0.2% slower than the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H, and 0.3% slower than both the Intel Xeon 6369P and Intel Core i9-13905H.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the GPU's FP32 performance?

A: The GPU delivers 5.299 TFLOPS of FP32 performance.

Q: Is the GPU suitable for ray tracing?

A: The GPU has 30 RT cores, but its Turing architecture is an older implementation. Ray tracing performance is expected to be modest, and DLSS may be needed to maintain playable frame rates.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 69, indicating it performs better than the majority of laptop configurations.

Who Should Build It

This configuration is targeted at professionals and power users who need heavy CPU compute in a laptop form factor. The Ryzen 9 7940H's 87th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for software developers who compile large codebases, data scientists running simulations, or engineers using CAD tools that are single-threaded but require high clock speeds. The 5.20 GHz boost clock is particularly beneficial for these tasks. Content creators who work primarily with CPU-based rendering, such as video editors using software encoders, will also benefit from the 16 threads.

Gamers at 1080p who prioritize esports titles and are willing to lower settings in AAA games may find this system acceptable, but it is not a gaming-first laptop. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means it is an average performer, and users should expect to play at medium settings for modern games. Small business workstations that run financial analysis, database management, or virtualization will perform well, as the CPU's multi-threaded scores are strong. Students in STEM fields who need a powerful CPU for coursework, but do not require a high-end GPU, will find this a suitable and durable option.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class system (buildClass: laptop) that pairs a high-end mobile processor with a mid-range professional mobile GPU. The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is an 8-core, 16-thread CPU from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture and manufactured on a 4 nm process. It is a current-generation part with a 35 W TDP. The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is a professional GPU based on the Turing architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process, with a 80 W TDP. It is marked as end-of-life production status, indicating it is an older component.

The overall tier of this system, based on the combined percentile of 69, is upper-midrange. It is not a flagship gaming or workstation machine, but it is above average. The CPU is the standout component, offering performance that rivals top-tier desktop and server chips. The GPU is the weak link, holding back the system's potential in graphics-intensive tasks. This is a configuration that favors compute-heavy workloads over visual rendering, and it is best suited for users who understand this trade-off.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. The platform supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s and ECC memory. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, while the GPU uses a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. This means the system is limited to the components that are already installed, as the socket and form factor are not user-upgradeable in the traditional sense. The GPU is an MXM Module, which theoretically could be replaced, but the end-of-life status of the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and the availability of compatible modules make this a difficult and impractical upgrade path.

The TDP values are 35 W for the CPU and 80 W for the GPU. There is no suggested PSU listed, and the power connectors for the GPU are listed as "None," which suggests the system uses a fixed power delivery design. The memory support is DDR5, and the system is limited to the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth provided by the dual-channel configuration. A sensible next upgrade for this system would be increasing the amount of system RAM, as the CPU's performance benefits from larger memory capacity in multi-threaded workloads. However, the core CPU and GPU combination is fixed, and users should view this as a complete, non-upgradeable package rather than a platform with headroom for future enhancements. The PCIe Gen 4 support from the CPU is not fully utilized by the GPU's PCIe 3.0 interface, but this does not create a bottleneck for the GPU's performance level.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Who Should Build It

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds