SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

83 Score

Top 17% Ranking

83 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 17% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This CPU+GPU pairing represents a high-tier laptop configuration where the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is the dominant component, with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q serving as a capable but secondary partner. The combined percentile of 69 places this build in the upper-midrange tier of all laptop configurations, but the data indicates a significant performance imbalance: the CPU sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile among all GPUs. This 37-point gap is the defining characteristic of the platform — it is a CPU-first machine where processor-heavy workloads will shine, while graphics-bound tasks will be limited by the mid-tier GPU.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a clear and consistent bottleneck structure: the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU has substantial headroom in nearly every scenario. The Ryzen 9 7940H posts an average benchmark score of 40,431, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs — a top-tier result. In contrast, the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q has no benchmark scores in the database and sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, which is exactly the median. This means that in gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the Quadro will cap performance well below what the CPU can feed it.

The CPU's multi-threaded scores are particularly strong: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 24,703, while single-core reaches 3,487. The multi-core score is more than seven times the single-core score, indicating excellent scaling across the 8 cores and 16 threads. PassMark multi-thread score of 29,063 further confirms this, with integer math at 101,977 and floating-point math at 62,057. These numbers suggest that workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation will be CPU-bound and will run exceptionally well, while the GPU's 50th-percentile position means it will struggle to keep pace in pure graphics tasks.

The bottleneck manifests differently depending on the workload. In CPU-heavy tasks such as data compression (PassMark score 352,077) or encryption (21,096), the system will perform near the CPU's full potential. In GPU-heavy tasks, the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q's specifications — 1,920 shading units, 30 RT cores, 240 tensor cores, and 4.666 TFLOPS FP32 performance — will be the ceiling. The GPU's 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p and some 1440p gaming, but it will not push high frame rates at 4K. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is more than double the GPU's, reinforcing that the processor is operating in a different performance class than the graphics card.

FPS scaling data is absent from the record, so frame rates cannot be directly quantified. However, the percentile gap strongly suggests that lowering resolution or graphical settings will yield diminishing returns beyond a certain point — the CPU will still be waiting on the GPU. For competitive esports titles that are CPU-bound, the system will excel; for AAA titles with heavy GPU demands, the Quadro will be the limiting factor. The 35 W TDP of the CPU versus the 60 W TDP of the GPU further indicates that the GPU is designed for efficiency in a thin chassis, not maximum performance.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 7940H delivers benchmark scores that place it firmly in the upper echelon of mobile processors. The average benchmark score of 40,431 puts it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon 6507P (40,426, 0% difference), Intel Core Ultra X7 368H (40,518, -0.2%), Intel Xeon 6369P (40,327, +0.3%), and Intel Core i9-13905H (40,313, +0.3%). This means the 7940H is effectively tied with these top-tier competitors — the deltas are all within 0.3%, which is within run-to-run variance. The data shows a tightly clustered group of high-performance processors, with the 7940H holding its own against both workstation-class Xeons and other high-end mobile chips.

Cinebench results tell a detailed story about the CPU's capabilities. R23 multi-core scores 24,703, which is a strong result for an 8-core, 16-thread processor at 35 W TDP. R23 single-core scores 3,487, indicating excellent per-core performance from the Zen 4 architecture at up to 5.20 GHz boost clock. R20 multi-core (10,375) and single-core (1,464) follow the same pattern, as do R15 multi-core (2,490) and single-core (351). The multi-core to single-core ratios are consistent across all Cinebench versions, confirming that the processor scales well with thread count.

PassMark results provide additional context for real-world workloads. Multi-thread score of 29,063 is strong, with integer math at 101,977 and floating-point math at 62,057. Data compression scores 352,077, which is exceptionally high and suggests rapid file archiving and compression. Extended instructions score 26,804, indicating strong SIMD performance for workloads that use AVX-512 or similar. Single-thread score of 3,952 is competitive with the best mobile processors. The 87th percentile ranking means the 7940H outperforms roughly 87% of all CPUs in the database, making it a top-tier choice for processor-intensive tasks.

The GPU has no benchmark scores recorded, so its performance must be inferred from its specifications and percentile. The 50th-percentile ranking among all GPUs means it is exactly average — neither a high-end gaming GPU nor a low-end integrated solution. The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q's specs — 1,920 shading units, 120 TMUs, 64 ROPs, 30 RT cores, 240 tensor cores — are typical of a mid-range Turing-generation GPU from 2019. The 4.666 TFLOPS FP32 performance is modest by modern standards. The combined picture is a CPU that outperforms nearly all rivals, paired with a GPU that is average at best, resulting in a system that is far better suited to compute tasks than gaming.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. The record contains no entries for measuredFpsUltraByGame, and dataIsMeasured is false. All frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and component specifications, not measured results.

Based on the CPU's strong single-core score of 3,952 in PassMark and the GPU's 4.666 TFLOPS FP32 performance, this system is estimated to handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles. The 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth will be sufficient for 1080p textures, but may become a limiting factor in games that require more than 6 GB of VRAM at higher settings. The GPU's 30 RT cores enable ray tracing, but the 4.666 TFLOPS compute will likely produce low frame rates with ray tracing enabled at 1080p, requiring DLSS or reduced settings for playable performance.

At 1440p, the system will struggle in demanding AAA titles, with the GPU bottleneck becoming pronounced. The 50th-percentile GPU ranking suggests average performance relative to all GPUs, and the 60 W TDP limits sustained boost clocks. Esports titles like competitive shooters or MOBAs, which are CPU-bound, will likely run at high frame rates due to the CPU's top-tier single-thread performance. The 87th-percentile CPU ensures that the processor will never be the bottleneck in gaming, but the 50th-percentile GPU will cap overall frame rates in GPU-intensive scenes.

The 4 nm Zen 4 CPU with Radeon 780M integrated graphics provides a fallback for light gaming when the discrete GPU is disabled, but the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is the primary graphics solution. Given the GPU's 2019 release date and 12 nm Turing architecture, modern titles at high settings will likely push the GPU to its limits. The system is best suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings, with the understanding that the CPU has substantial headroom for future GPU upgrades — though in a laptop, this is not a practical option.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance above all else, with gaming as a secondary consideration. The 87th-percentile CPU makes this an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, or software development — tasks that leverage the 8 cores, 16 threads, and strong multi-threaded scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,703 and PassMark multi-thread score of 29,063 indicate that heavy compute workloads will complete quickly, and the 35 W TDP means the CPU can sustain these workloads in a laptop chassis without excessive thermal throttling.

Gamers at 1080p who play esports or less demanding titles will find this system adequate, but those seeking high-refresh-rate 1440p or 4K gaming should look elsewhere. The GPU's 50th-percentile ranking and 6 GB VRAM will limit performance in modern AAA titles. The system is well-suited for students in engineering or computer science programs, where CPU-heavy compilation and simulation tasks benefit from the processor's performance, while the GPU handles standard graphics workloads. Small business workstations that run data analysis, virtualization, or financial modeling will also benefit from the CPU's strong integer and floating-point performance.

The 69th combined percentile places this build in the upper-midrange tier of all laptop configurations. It is not a top-tier gaming machine, but it is a high-performance workstation-class laptop for users who spend more time computing than gaming. The Radeon 780M integrated graphics provide a backup for GPU tasks when the discrete GPU is under load or disabled, adding flexibility for different usage modes.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p, the system can likely push high frame rates in CPU-bound esports titles due to the CPU's PassMark single-thread score of 3,952 and R23 single-core score of 3,487. However, GPU-bound AAA titles will be limited by the Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q's 4.666 TFLOPS FP32 performance, so expect lower frame rates at high settings.

Streaming: The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide ample headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,703 suggests that software encoding at 1080p will not significantly impact gaming performance, though the GPU's modest performance may require lower in-game settings to maintain stream quality.

Video editing: The CPU excels at this task, with PassMark data compression at 352,077 and integer math at 101,977 indicating fast export times and smooth timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192-bit bus will handle 1080p editing comfortably, but 4K multi-stream editing may strain the GPU.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering will be very fast, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 24,703 and floating-point math at 62,057. GPU-accelerated rendering using the Quadro's 4.666 TFLOPS will be adequate for previews but slower than dedicated rendering GPUs, making this a CPU-primary rendering workstation.

Software development: Compilation and test workloads will benefit from the CPU's strong multi-threaded performance, with PassMark multi-thread at 29,063 and extended instructions at 26,804. The 16 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 87th-percentile CPU ranking ensures responsiveness under heavy load.

Student and office work: This configuration is overkill for basic productivity, but the CPU's efficiency at 35 W TDP means long battery life during document work, while the Radeon 780M integrated graphics provide a low-power option for everyday tasks. The 50th-percentile GPU is more than sufficient for office applications.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile relative to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40,431. This means it outperforms roughly 87% of all processors in the database.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The closest rival is the Intel Xeon 6507P with an average score of 40,426 (0% difference). The Intel Core Ultra X7 368H scores 40,518 (-0.2%), the Intel Xeon 6369P scores 40,327 (+0.3%), and the Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40,313 (+0.3%). All deltas are within 0.3%, indicating a statistical tie.

Q: What are the CPU's clock speeds?

A: The base clock is 4.00 GHz and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz. The processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, built on the Zen 4 architecture with a 4 nm process from TSMC.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the CPU support?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, making it suitable for workstation-class reliability.

Q: What is the GPU's performance percentile?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which is exactly the median. It has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: What are the GPU's key specifications?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. It features 1,920 shading units, 30 RT cores, and 240 tensor cores, with 4.666 TFLOPS FP32 performance.

Q: Is this a desktop or laptop build?

A: This is a laptop build, as indicated by the buildClass field. The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8 and the GPU is marked as "IGP" slot width, confirming a mobile form factor.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is a high-end mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The CPU is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores demonstrate strong all-around performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24,703 is particularly notable for a 35 W TDP mobile processor, indicating efficient power scaling. The single-core score of 3,487 confirms that the Zen 4 architecture delivers excellent per-thread performance, which is critical for lightly-threaded applications. PassMark results show a balanced profile: integer math at 101,977, floating-point math at 62,057, and data compression at 352,077. The extended instructions score of 26,804 suggests strong SIMD performance for workloads that utilize AVX-512 or similar instruction sets.

The 87th-percentile ranking places the 7940H among the top mobile processors available. Its nearest rivals are all within 0.3% in average score, meaning that real-world differences between these CPUs will be negligible. The 35 W TDP is modest for a processor with this performance level, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops that still need workstation-class compute. The integrated Radeon 780M GPU provides a secondary graphics option, and the CPU supports DDR5 memory with ECC, which is unusual for a mobile chip and adds to its workstation appeal.

Build Overview

This configuration pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H with the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q in a laptop form factor. The CPU is a top-tier mobile processor at the 87th percentile, while the GPU is a mid-range mobile graphics solution at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile of 69 places this build in the upper-midrange tier of all laptop configurations, indicating a system that is strong for compute tasks but only average for graphics.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q is a Turing-architecture GPU from 2019, manufactured on a 12 nm process with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. It features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory, 1,920 shading units, and 4.666 TFLOPS FP32 performance. The Max-Q designation indicates a power-optimized version with a 60 W TDP, designed for thinner laptops with reduced cooling capacity. The GPU's 50th-percentile ranking confirms that it is an average performer by modern standards.

This build is best characterized as a CPU-centric workstation laptop with mild gaming capability. The 69th combined percentile reflects the imbalance: the CPU boosts the overall tier, while the GPU holds it back from the top tier. For users who need maximum CPU performance for productivity, this is a strong choice. For users who need balanced gaming performance, the GPU will be the primary limitation.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FP8, which is a laptop-specific socket with no desktop equivalent. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The CPU provides 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, which is sufficient for the GPU and NVMe storage. The GPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16, which is a generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 4 support, but this does not represent a significant bottleneck for the GPU's performance class.

The CPU has a 35 W TDP, and the GPU has a 60 W TDP, for a combined thermal budget of 95 W. The suggested PSU is not specified in the data, and the GPU has no power connectors, indicating that it draws power from the motherboard. In a laptop, the upgrade path is essentially non-existent — the CPU and GPU are soldered to the motherboard. The only practical upgrade is adding more DDR5 memory, up to the platform's maximum capacity, which is not specified in the data.

The GPU has a 6 GB memory capacity and a 192-bit memory bus, which is adequate for 1080p gaming at medium settings but will limit high-texture workloads. The GPU's successor is listed as Ampere-MW, indicating that newer mobile GPUs are available, but these cannot be installed in this laptop. The CPU's production status is active, meaning it is still in production, but the GPU is marked as end-of-life. For users seeking better graphics performance, the only option is to purchase a different laptop with a newer GPU — this platform is at the end of its upgrade path.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds