SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + AMD Radeon 8060S

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

97%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 8060S

55,757 Benchmark Score

Top 3% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and AMD Radeon 8060S combination represents a high-end mobile platform built around AMD’s Zen 4 and RDNA 3.5 architectures. This pairing targets a laptop build class, and the data indicates a system that sits comfortably in the upper echelon of both CPU and GPU performance. The processor is an 8-core, 16-thread part based on the Phoenix silicon, manufactured on TSMC’s 4 nm process node with 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The graphics solution is an integrated part using the Strix Halo chip, also on 4 nm, with a notably larger 308 mm² die. Together, they form a cohesive platform where the CPU’s high boost clocks and the GPU’s substantial compute resources are designed to complement each other in a power-efficient mobile package.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H is a mobile processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Phoenix. It provides 8 physical cores and 16 threads, a configuration that has become the sweet spot for high-end laptops balancing multi-threaded application performance with power consumption. The base clock is set at 4.00 GHz, which is already high for a 35 W TDP part, and the boost clock reaches up to 5.20 GHz. This clock headroom is significant for single-threaded tasks, as evidenced by the single-core benchmark results. The processor is built on a 4 nm TSMC process, which allows for this level of performance within a mobile thermal envelope.

The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 16 MB L3 cache. This is a standard layout for Zen 4, and the 16 MB of shared L3 is sufficient for feeding the eight cores in gaming and productivity workloads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, a feature that is uncommon in mobile consumer parts and may appeal to professionals who require data integrity for long compute jobs. The PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, which provides ample bandwidth for a discrete GPU and fast NVMe storage, though the integrated GPU in this system uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The processor also includes the Radeon 780M integrated graphics, which serves as a fallback for basic display tasks when the main GPU is idle.

Benchmark results for the CPU show a strong all-round performer. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score is 24703, and the single-core score is 3487. These numbers indicate a processor that is not only capable of heavy multi-threaded rendering but also excels in lightly-threaded applications that rely on high clock speeds. The PassMark single-thread score is 3952, reinforcing the strong single-core performance. In multi-threaded PassMark tests, the CPU scores 29063, with specific sub-tests showing high throughput: integer math at 101977, floating-point math at 62057, and data compression at 352077. The data encryption score of 21096 is solid, and extended instructions score of 26804 suggests good performance with modern SIMD workloads. The CPU’s average benchmark score across all tests is 40431, placing it in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, which means it outperforms the vast majority of processors on the market.

Looking at nearest rivals, the 7940H is effectively neck-and-neck with several other high-end parts. It has a 0% deltaPct compared to the Intel Xeon 6507P, meaning they are statistically identical in average score. It is 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H and 0.3% behind the Intel Xeon 6369P and Intel Core i9-13905H. This places the 7940H in a tight cluster of top-tier mobile and server processors, confirming that it is a flagship-level part for its generation.

Benchmark Performance

The synthetic benchmark data paints a clear picture of a system that is balanced at a high level. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 40431, and the GPU’s average benchmark score is 55757. Both components sit at the 87th percentile when compared to their respective categories. This alignment in percentile is notable, as it suggests neither component is drastically holding back the other in a general sense, though specific workloads will still be bound by one or the other.

For the CPU, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 is a strong indicator for rendering and video encoding tasks. This is a score that would have been considered high-end desktop territory just a few years ago, and it shows the 7940H can handle sustained all-core loads. The single-core score of 3487 in the same test is equally important for responsiveness in everyday tasks and for games that are not heavily multi-threaded. The PassMark results further break down the CPU’s capabilities: the high integer math score of 101977 suggests strong performance in code compilation and spreadsheet calculations, while the floating-point score of 62057 indicates good capability in scientific simulations and 3D rendering physics.

The GPU benchmark results are equally impressive for an integrated solution. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2162, which is a modern test that stresses DX12 features and ray tracing. GeekBench scores are even more telling: OpenCL at 84626 and Vulkan at 80483. These are very high scores for a system-on-chip GPU, indicating that the Radeon 8060S is designed to compete with dedicated mobile graphics cards. The GPU’s average benchmark score of 55757 places it at the 87th percentile of all GPUs. Comparing it to rivals, it is virtually tied with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB (0.1% ahead), is 0.6% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080, and is 1.7% and 2.8% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080, respectively. This places the 8060S in a performance class that rivals some of the most powerful discrete laptop GPUs and even some desktop parts.

The combined picture is a system that has no obvious weak link in general-purpose benchmarks. The CPU is competitive with the fastest mobile processors, and the GPU is competitive with high-end discrete GPUs. This makes the platform exceptionally well-suited for tasks that can leverage both components, such as gaming while streaming or rendering while the GPU handles compute.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 8060S is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the Strix Halo chip from the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. It is manufactured on the same 4 nm TSMC process as the CPU, but its die size is 308 mm², which is significantly larger than the CPU’s 178 mm², reflecting the substantial number of compute units packed into it. The GPU has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It also includes 40 dedicated ray tracing cores, which is a high count for an iGPU and explains its strong performance in modern graphics APIs.

The clock speeds are set at a base of 1295 MHz and a boost of 2900 MHz. The high boost clock is crucial for extracting performance from the RDNA 3.5 architecture in short bursts, such as frame rendering. The GPU’s memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses a portion of the system’s DDR5 memory rather than having its own dedicated VRAM. The bandwidth is therefore "System Dependent," but given the CPU’s dual-channel 89.6 GB/s memory bus, the GPU has access to a substantial amount of bandwidth. This shared memory architecture is efficient for a mobile platform because it reduces component count and allows the GPU to access as much memory as needed, though it can be a bottleneck in scenarios requiring extremely high bandwidth.

The compute capabilities are impressive: the GPU delivers 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same 14.85 TFLOPS for FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The pixel rate is 185.6 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 464.0 GTexel/s. These figures indicate a GPU that can handle high-resolution rendering and complex texture filtering. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it compatible with the latest gaming titles and professional applications that rely on these APIs.

In terms of benchmark performance, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2162 is a strong indicator of DX12 gaming performance, while the GeekBench OpenCL score of 84626 and Vulkan score of 80483 show excellent raw compute throughput. These scores are particularly notable for an integrated part, outperforming many previous-generation discrete GPUs. The percentile ranking of 87th among all GPUs confirms that this is a top-tier performer, and its near-tie with the RX 6750 GRE 12 GB and RTX 5080 in average scores suggests it can match or exceed the performance of those dedicated cards in many workloads. For rendering, this means the 8060S is capable of handling demanding 3D scenes in applications that leverage OpenCL or Vulkan for GPU acceleration.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is based on the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket that is not designed for user upgrades. This is a laptop build, so the CPU and GPU are soldered onto the motherboard. The data indicates the CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, and the integrated GPU shares this system memory. For an upgrade path, the primary consideration is memory capacity and speed, as increasing system RAM will directly increase the GPU’s available memory and potentially its bandwidth. The CPU supports ECC memory, but this is typically not available in consumer laptops, so standard DDR5 SODIMMs would be the usual choice.

The PCIe implementation is Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the GPU’s bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16. This means the iGPU has a high-bandwidth connection to the CPU, but the system also has lanes available for other devices like NVMe SSDs. The CPU’s TDP is 35 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 55 W, making a combined thermal envelope of 90 W for the core components. This is a reasonable figure for a high-performance laptop, and it suggests that a capable cooling solution is necessary but not extreme. There is no suggested PSU listed, but for a laptop, this is less relevant as the power delivery is handled by the integrated power adapter. The power connector requirement is "None" for the GPU since it is an IGP.

A sensible next upgrade for a user on this platform would be to ensure the system has sufficient high-speed DDR5 memory, as this is the only user-serviceable component that directly impacts both CPU and GPU performance. Adding more memory will allow the iGPU to allocate more VRAM for games and rendering tasks. Additionally, upgrading storage to a fast NVMe Gen 4 drive would reduce load times and improve overall system responsiveness, as the CPU has the lanes to support it. There is no upgrade path for the CPU or GPU themselves, so users should max out the memory and storage at the time of purchase to future-proof the system.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2162 and high FP32 throughput of 14.85 TFLOPS indicate it can drive high frame rates in competitive titles like esports shooters. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3487 ensures that the game logic and AI updates are handled quickly, preventing CPU bottlenecks at high refresh rates. The 87th percentile GPU ranking suggests it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming with high settings in most titles, though not necessarily at the absolute highest frame rates in the most demanding AAA games.

Streaming: The CPU’s 8 cores and 16 threads, paired with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703, provide ample headroom for encoding a video stream while gaming. The high integer math score of 101977 indicates that the CPU can handle the compression workload without stealing too many cycles from the rendering thread. The GPU’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate also means it can handle hardware-accelerated encoding, though the CPU has enough headroom for software encoding if needed.

Video editing: The combination of a strong CPU and GPU is ideal for video editing. The CPU’s multi-core score of 24703 will accelerate timeline rendering and effect processing, while the GPU’s OpenCL score of 84626 will speed up tasks like color grading and motion tracking. The 16 MB of L3 cache and high memory bandwidth help keep the system responsive when working with high-resolution footage.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 is a strong indicator for CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D. The GPU’s Vulkan score of 80483 suggests it can also accelerate GPU-based renderers, making this a dual-pronged system for 3D work. The 40 ray tracing cores provide a significant boost for ray-traced renders in supported applications.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 101977 and data encryption score of 21096 are relevant for code compilation and running secure development environments. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the high single-thread score of 3952 ensures that the IDE remains responsive. The ECC memory support, while not commonly available, is a plus for developers who run long test suites.

Student and office work: The system is overkill for basic office tasks, but the high single-core score of 3952 means that spreadsheet calculations and web browsing are instant. The 4 nm process and 35 W CPU TDP make it efficient enough for all-day battery life, and the integrated GPU is more than sufficient for video conferencing and multitasking with multiple monitors. The 87th percentile CPU ranking ensures it will remain fast for years.

Who Should Build It

This platform is aimed at power users who need a single device that can handle both demanding productivity tasks and serious gaming. The 87th percentile CPU and GPU performance makes it suitable for gamers who want to play at 1440p with high refresh rates, as the GPU’s performance is comparable to a discrete RTX 5080 or RX 6750 GRE, while the CPU’s single-core performance ensures high frame rates in CPU-bound titles. Content creators, particularly video editors and 3D artists, will benefit from the balanced CPU and GPU performance, as tasks like 4K video export and ray-traced rendering are accelerated by both components.

Developers who write and compile code will find the 16 threads and high integer math score useful for parallel builds, and the large L3 cache helps with large codebases. Students in engineering or computer science programs will appreciate the ability to run simulations and compile code on the same machine they game on. Small business workstations that need to handle data-heavy tasks like financial modeling or database management will find the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 352077 and encryption score of 21096 beneficial. The system is not for users on a tight budget, as the components are high-end, but for professionals and enthusiasts who need top-tier mobile performance, this is a compelling package.

Balance and Bottleneck

The system shows a high degree of balance, with both CPU and GPU at the 87th percentile of their respective categories. However, bottleneck analysis depends on the workload. In gaming at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor, as the GPU is capable of high frame rates but the CPU’s single-thread performance will cap the maximum FPS. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3487 is high but not the absolute fastest, so in very CPU-intensive games, it may hold back the GPU from reaching its full potential.

In contrast, at higher resolutions like 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck. The GPU’s performance is comparable to a discrete RTX 5080, but the shared memory architecture means it relies on system bandwidth. If the system has slower DDR5 memory, the GPU could be starved for bandwidth, reducing its effective performance. The CPU’s 35 W TDP also means that sustained all-core workloads may cause the clocks to drop, but the 24703 Cinebench R23 score suggests this is not a major issue.

In non-gaming workloads, the balance shifts. For tasks like video editing that use both CPU and GPU, the system is well-balanced. For CPU-only tasks like code compilation, the CPU is the sole performer, and its 87th percentile ranking means it will not be a bottleneck. For GPU-only tasks like certain rendering passes, the GPU’s 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the key metric, and its 87th percentile ranking indicates it is not holding back. Overall, the data suggests that this is a well-matched pair, with neither component being a clear outlier in performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and how does it affect single-threaded performance?

A: The CPU has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. This high clock speed directly contributes to the single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3487 and PassMark single-thread score of 3952, making it very responsive in tasks that rely on a single core.

Q: How much memory bandwidth does the GPU have access to?

A: The GPU uses "System Shared" memory, so its bandwidth is "System Dependent." It relies on the CPU’s dual-channel DDR5 memory bus, which provides 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The exact bandwidth available to the GPU depends on the system memory configuration.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 40 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2162 indicates it can handle ray-traced workloads, though performance will vary by title.

Q: Is the CPU compatible with ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU specification lists ECC memory support as true. This is a feature typically found in server or workstation parts, and it may be available in certain laptop configurations for professional use.

Q: How does the GPU compare to a discrete NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 55757, which is 0.6% behind the RTX 5080’s average score of 56083. This means the integrated Radeon 8060S performs nearly identically to the RTX 5080 on average across the benchmark suite.

Q: What is the thermal design power of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 35 W, and the GPU has a TDP of 55 W. The combined thermal envelope is 90 W, which is a reasonable figure for a high-performance mobile platform.

Q: Can the CPU be overclocked?

A: No, the CPU has `multiplierUnlocked` set to false, meaning the clock multiplier is locked. Overclocking is not supported on this mobile processor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU and GPU combination in the FACT PACK. Therefore, all frame rate figures below are estimates derived from the synthetic benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations rather than tested results. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2162 and its 87th percentile ranking suggest it is capable of high-performance gaming. The CPU’s single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3487 indicates it can feed the GPU at high frame rates.

For esports titles like Valorant or Counter-Strike 2, which are heavily CPU-bound, the system should be able to achieve very high frame rates at 1080p, likely exceeding 200 FPS. The GPU’s 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is more than enough for these light graphical loads. For AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Microsoft Flight Simulator, the GPU’s performance, comparable to an RTX 5080, suggests it can handle 1440p at high settings with frame rates in the 60-80 FPS range. At 4K resolution, the shared memory bandwidth may become a limiting factor, and frame rates are estimated to drop to 30-50 FPS at ultra settings. The GPU’s 40 ray tracing cores will enable ray tracing at playable frame rates, but turning on full ray tracing at 4K will likely require upscaling technologies to maintain smooth performance. Overall, this system is estimated to be a strong 1080p and 1440p gaming platform, with 4K gaming possible but requiring settings adjustments.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + AMD Radeon 8060S

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

AMD Radeon 8060S

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Usage Scenarios

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

FAQ

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds