SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + AMD Radeon 780M

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

91 Score

Top 9% Ranking

91 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 9% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

92%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

40,431 Benchmark Score

Top 8% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon 780M

17,588 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7940H and AMD Radeon 780M pairing represents a high-end mobile platform built on a unified 4nm TSMC process, combining the CPU and GPU on a single die. The CPU is an 8-core, 16-thread Zen 4 part from the 7000 series, codenamed Phoenix, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. It features 16 MB of shared L3 cache, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 KB of L1 cache per core, operating within a 35 W TDP. This is a mobile-focused design, as indicated by the AMD Socket FP8 interface, and it supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, alongside ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes.

The benchmark data positions this CPU strongly in the overall landscape. Its average benchmark score of 40431 places it in the 87th percentile against all CPUs, indicating top-tier performance for a mobile processor. In Cinebench R23, it scores 24703 points in multi-core and 3487 in single-core tests. The multi-core result is particularly telling for a 35 W part, suggesting efficient power scaling. The single-core score of 3487 demonstrates that Zen 4 architecture delivers excellent responsiveness in lightly-threaded tasks. The nearest rivals, based on average score, include the Intel Xeon 6507P with a score of 40426 (a 0% delta), the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H with 40518 (-0.2% delta), the Intel Xeon 6369P with 40327 (0.3% delta), and the Intel Core i9-13905H with 40313 (0.3% delta). These tight deltas, all within 0.3%, show that the 7940H sits in a highly competitive performance cluster, effectively matching these desktop-class and high-end mobile chips in aggregate workload performance.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7940H is built on the Zen 4 architecture, a significant generational shift that prioritizes instructions per clock (IPC) improvements and power efficiency. The 4nm process node from TSMC allows for a dense transistor layout, with 25,000 million transistors packed into a 178 mm² die. This density is key to achieving the observed performance within a 35 W TDP envelope. The architecture supports modern instruction sets, as evidenced by the PassMark extended instructions score of 26804, which indicates strong performance in workloads that utilize AVX-512 or similar extensions, such as scientific computing or media encoding.

The core configuration of 8 cores and 16 threads is standard for a high-end mobile processor, balancing multi-threaded throughput with single-thread headroom. The Cinebench R20 scores reinforce this, with a multi-core score of 10375 and a single-core score of 1464. The R15 results, 2490 multi-core and 351 single-core, show a consistent scaling ratio. More granularly, PassMark tests provide insight into specific workloads. The integer math score of 101977 and floating-point math score of 62057 suggest robust general-purpose and scientific computational ability. The data compression score of 352077 is exceptionally high, indicating that the CPU excels in file archiving and data-heavy applications. Encryption performance, at 21096, is solid for secure data handling. The single-thread score of 3952 confirms that the boost clock of 5.20 GHz is effective in latency-sensitive tasks like web browsing and office productivity.

The memory architecture is a critical component of the CPU's performance. Dual-channel DDR5 support with a theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s ensures that the 16 MB L3 cache is fed adequately for most workloads. While the L3 cache is not as large as some desktop parts, the combination of high bandwidth and efficient Zen 4 memory controller mitigates potential bottlenecks. The ECC memory support is a professional-grade feature, making this platform suitable for workstations where data integrity is paramount. The PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes provides ample connectivity for modern SSDs and external GPU enclosures, though the integrated GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which shares bandwidth with other devices.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 9 7940H compare to the Intel Core i9-13905H?

A: The data shows a near-tie in aggregate performance. The Ryzen 9 7940H has an average benchmark score of 40431, while the Intel Core i9-13905H scores 40313, resulting in a deltaPct of 0.3% in favor of the AMD part. In practical terms, this means the two processors are effectively interchangeable in multi-threaded and mixed workloads, with the 7940H holding a marginal lead.

Q: What is the significance of the CPU's 87th percentile ranking?

A: The 87th percentile against all CPUs indicates that the Ryzen 9 7940H outperforms approximately 87% of all processors in the benchmark database. This places it in the top tier of available CPUs, particularly impressive for a mobile part with a 35 W TDP, as it competes with higher-power desktop and workstation chips.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory, and why does that matter?

A: Yes, the fact pack confirms ECC memory support is true. This is a feature typically found in server and workstation platforms. For users running long-duration computational tasks, video rendering, or database operations, ECC memory can detect and correct data corruption, providing stability that standard consumer memory lacks.

Q: What are the key differences between the Cinebench R23 multi-core and single-core scores?

A: The R23 multi-core score is 24703, while the single-core score is 3487. The multi-core score reflects the CPU's ability to handle parallel workloads across all 8 cores and 16 threads, such as 3D rendering or video encoding. The single-core score reflects performance in tasks that rely on one core, like gaming physics or legacy software. The ratio between them, roughly 7:1, is typical for an 8-core processor.

Q: How does the integrated Radeon 780M GPU affect overall system performance?

A: The Radeon 780M is a substantial integrated GPU built on RDNA 3.0 architecture. While it shares system memory, its inclusion means the system can handle light gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks without a discrete graphics card. The CPU and GPU share the same 4nm process and thermal package, making this a cohesive APU (Accelerated Processing Unit) solution for thin-and-light laptops.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 7940H a good choice for software development?

A: The benchmark scores suggest it is highly capable. The PassMark integer math score of 101977 indicates fast compilation times for code, and the high data compression score of 352077 is beneficial for version control operations and handling large codebases. The 16 threads provide smooth multitasking for running virtual machines or containers, and the ECC support adds reliability for long builds.

Benchmark Performance

The combined performance picture of this CPU and GPU pairing is strong, with a combined percentile of 74 against all system configurations. However, it is crucial to note that the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming performance discussions are estimates based on the component benchmark scores. The CPU's average benchmark score of 40431 is the primary driver of the system's overall percentile, placing it at 87% against all CPUs. The GPU, an AMD Radeon 780M, has an average benchmark score of 17588, placing it at the 61st percentile against all GPUs. This disparity in percentiles is the first indication that the CPU is significantly more powerful than the integrated GPU.

In specific GPU benchmarks, the Radeon 780M scores 480 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 18602 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 33683 in Geekbench Vulkan. These scores indicate that the GPU is capable of driving modern APIs, but the absolute performance level is modest. The GPU's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Radeon Pro 560 (avgScore 17551, deltaPct 0.2%), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (avgScore 17639, deltaPct -0.3%), the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (avgScore 17666, deltaPct -0.4%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 460 (avgScore 17509, deltaPct 0.5%). The presence of the RTX 4060, a discrete desktop GPU, as a close rival is notable; it shows that the 780M's raw compute performance is in the range of budget discrete GPUs, though the RTX 4060 has dedicated memory and higher power limits that would lead to better sustained gaming performance.

The CPU's passmark multi-thread score of 29063 and physics score of 1300 further illustrate its multi-core prowess. The data compression and encryption scores, 352077 and 21096 respectively, are strong indicators of productivity performance. The combined picture is that of a system where the CPU can handle demanding professional workloads with ease, but the GPU will be the limiting factor for graphically intensive tasks. For general use, video playback, and 2D rendering, this pairing is more than sufficient. For 3D workloads or high-end gaming, the CPU has headroom that the GPU cannot utilize.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FP8, which is a mobile-specific socket. This physically limits upgradeability, as the CPU is soldered to the motherboard in most laptops. Therefore, a "sensible next upgrade" involves replacing the entire system rather than swapping the processor or GPU. The platform supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a maximum theoretical bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Users should ensure they install matched DDR5 modules to achieve dual-channel operation, as single-channel memory would severely impact the integrated GPU's performance, given its "System Shared" memory type.

The CPU's TDP is 35 W, and the GPU's TDP is 15 W, totaling 50 W for the core silicon. This is a low-power configuration, meaning that the system's power supply requirements are modest. The fact pack lists no suggested PSU, but the low TDPs indicate that a standard laptop charger (typically 65-100 W) would be sufficient to run the system at full load, with headroom for the display and other components. The PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 CPU lanes allows for fast NVMe SSDs. An upgrade path for storage would be to install a PCIe Gen 4 SSD to take advantage of the available bandwidth, which would improve load times and file transfer speeds.

The platform does not support CPU multiplier unlocking, so overclocking is not an option. However, the 5.20 GHz boost clock is already high, and the 35 W TDP suggests that the silicon is power-constrained rather than clock-constrained. A user looking to upgrade would see the most benefit from ensuring the laptop has adequate cooling and a high-performance DDR5 memory kit, as the 89.6 GB/s bandwidth is a shared resource for both the CPU and GPU. The Radeon 780M's memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," meaning faster system memory directly translates to better GPU performance. This makes memory selection a critical upgrade consideration for this platform.

GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon 780M is an integrated GPU based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, manufactured on the same 4nm process as the CPU. It features 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 render output units (ROPs). The GPU operates with a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. These clocks are high for an iGPU, and the boost clock is particularly aggressive, helping to close the gap with entry-level discrete GPUs. The GPU has 12 ray tracing (RT) cores, which is surprising for an integrated part and indicates support for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, albeit at lower performance levels than discrete solutions.

The memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses the system's DDR5 memory. The bus width and bandwidth are also "System Shared" and "System Dependent," respectively. This is the single biggest bottleneck for the GPU. While the CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is high, it is shared between the CPU and GPU, and the GPU's access to it is not as efficient as a dedicated VRAM interface. The pixel rate is 92.80 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 139.2 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance is 8.909 TFLOPS, with FP16 performance also at 8.909 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), which is unusual and indicates that the GPU does not have dedicated accelerated FP16 hardware. This limits its potential for AI workloads that rely on FP16 matrix operations.

In terms of API support, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This ensures compatibility with the latest games and graphics APIs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 is a measure of modern gaming performance. The Geekbench scores, 18602 for OpenCL and 33683 for Vulkan, show that the GPU is more capable in Vulkan, which is a lower-overhead API. The percentile ranking of 61 against all GPUs means that it outperforms most integrated graphics and some older discrete GPUs, but it sits below the median for modern discrete gaming GPUs. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, which scores 17639, has a deltaPct of -0.3%, meaning the 780M is slightly ahead in this aggregate test. However, the RTX 4060's dedicated VRAM and higher power budget would lead to significantly better real-world performance in texture-heavy scenarios.

Who Should Build It

This CPU+GPU pairing is targeted at users who prioritize CPU performance and portability over gaming fidelity. The build class is "laptop," making it a mobile solution. The 87th percentile CPU performance makes it ideal for professionals who need to run demanding CPU-bound applications on the go. Content creators who work in video editing or 3D rendering will find that the CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 and PassMark floating-point math score of 62057 handle complex timelines and scene renders efficiently. Software developers, particularly those working on large codebases, will benefit from the high integer math score of 101977 and the data compression score of 352077, which speed up compilation and version control operations.

Students in engineering or data science fields will appreciate the ECC memory support and the ability to run simulations or data analysis tools. The GPU, while not a gaming powerhouse, is sufficient for 2D design software, CAD (with software rendering), and general GPU acceleration in productivity apps. Small business workstations that require reliable multi-threaded performance for tasks like financial modeling or database management would find this platform adequate, with the ECC support adding a layer of data integrity. Gamers at 1080p with low settings or esports titles will find the Radeon 780M usable, but it is not the primary target audience. The system is best suited for users who need a high-end CPU in a laptop form factor and are willing to accept integrated graphics as a compromise for size and power efficiency.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This is not the primary strength of this system. The Radeon 780M's average benchmark score of 17588 (61st percentile) suggests it can handle esports titles at 1080p with high refresh rates, but demanding AAA games will likely require lower settings to maintain playable frame rates. Users should expect consistent performance in lighter games but should temper expectations for newer, graphically intensive releases.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for streaming. The 16 threads of the Ryzen 9 7940H can handle the encoding workload (via x264) while simultaneously running a game, provided the game is not too GPU-bound. The PassMark multi-thread score of 29063 indicates ample headroom for software encoding alongside other tasks. However, using the GPU for encoding (AMF) would offload the CPU, but the 780M's compute resources are limited.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for the CPU. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24703 and the high data compression score of 352077 are directly relevant to video codecs and timeline scrubbing. The GPU's 8.909 TFLOPS FP32 performance can accelerate effects and transitions, though it may struggle with complex 4K timelines with heavy color grading.

3D rendering: The CPU is the workhorse here. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 10375 and the PassMark floating-point math score of 62057 will produce respectable render times for CPU-based renderers like Blender Cycles (CPU mode) or V-Ray. The GPU can assist with OpenCL-based rendering, but its performance is limited compared to discrete GPUs, as indicated by its 61st percentile ranking.

Software development: The CPU excels here. The PassMark integer math score of 101977 means faster compilation of C++ or Rust code. The 16 threads allow for parallel builds, and the ECC memory support ensures stability during long compile sessions. The data encryption score of 21096 is beneficial for secure coding and handling sensitive data.

Student and office work: This system is overqualified in the CPU department but perfectly adequate. The single-thread score of 3952 ensures snappy responsiveness in web browsers and document editors. The low 35 W TDP means long battery life, and the integrated GPU is sufficient for 4K video playback and presentation software. The 87th percentile CPU is overkill for this scenario, but it ensures the system will not become slow for several years.

Build Overview

This build is a high-end laptop configuration that leverages AMD's Phoenix APU. The build class is "laptop," emphasizing portability and power efficiency. The pairing of the Ryzen 9 7940H CPU and Radeon 780M GPU represents a "system-on-chip" approach, where both components share the same die and power envelope. The combined percentile of 74 indicates that this system outperforms 74% of all configurations in the database. This is a strong overall tier, but the breakdown is uneven: the CPU's 87th percentile is the main driver, while the GPU's 61st percentile pulls the combined score down. The system is best understood as a CPU-first platform, with the GPU providing a competent but secondary level of graphics performance. It is a top-tier choice for mobile workstations and thin-and-light gaming laptops where CPU performance is the priority.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU's average benchmark score of 40431 (87th percentile) is more than double that of the GPU's average score of 17588 (61st percentile). In nearly any workload that stresses both components, the GPU will be the limiting factor. For example, in gaming, the CPU can easily process game logic and physics, but the GPU will struggle to render frames at high resolutions and settings. The CPU's high single-thread score of 3952 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios, meaning the GPU is fully saturated before the CPU reaches its limits.

However, in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering, the CPU's performance is the bottleneck, but it is a "good" bottleneck, as it is highly performant. The GPU's 8.909 TFLOPS can help in some tasks, but its "System Shared" memory and lack of dedicated VRAM will cause it to lag behind the CPU. The FPS scaling in gaming would show that lower resolutions (720p) would be more CPU-bound, while higher resolutions (1440p) would be more GPU-bound. Since the GPU has only 32 ROPs and a 92.80 GPixel/s pixel rate, its fill rate is limited, which will constrain performance at higher resolutions. The CPU's 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth is shared, so GPU memory-intensive tasks will also be limited by this shared resource.

Gaming Performance

Note: The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. All figures below are estimates based on the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations, not measured results.

Given the Radeon 780M's performance level (61st percentile, 17588 avg score), gaming expectations are modest. The GPU is comparable to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 in aggregate compute, but the RTX 4060's dedicated VRAM and higher power budget give it a distinct advantage in real games. In esports titles like Counter-Strike 2 or Valorant, the 780M could potentially achieve 60-100 FPS at 1080p with medium-to-high settings, given its high boost clock of 2900 MHz and 8.909 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. However, in AAA titles like Cyberpunk 2077 or Alan Wake 2, the estimate drops to 20-30 FPS at 1080p with low settings, primarily due to the limited memory bandwidth and only 32 ROPs.

The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 480 is a modern benchmark; scores in this range typically correspond to entry-level gaming performance. For 1080p gaming, the GPU will be the limiting factor. At 720p, the CPU's high single-thread score might help push higher FPS, but the GPU will still be constrained. The presence of 12 RT cores is interesting, but ray tracing performance will be poor due to the lack of dedicated memory bandwidth; expect RT to be unusable at playable frame rates in most titles. For older games or indie titles, the 780M is perfectly capable. The CPU's performance will not be a limiting factor in any gaming scenario, meaning that the GPU's limitations are the sole reason for the modest gaming expectations.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7940H + AMD Radeon 780M

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7940H

AMD Radeon 780M

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

GPU Analysis

Who Should Build It

Usage Scenarios

Build Overview

Balance and Bottleneck

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds