SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

47,908 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D paired with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 is a desktop combination that blends a high-core-count 3D V-Cache processor with a professional-grade mobile GPU adapted for embedded use. This pairing targets a specific niche: users who need substantial CPU throughput for multi-threaded workloads alongside GPU acceleration for rendering and AI tasks, all within a desktop form factor. The data shows a system with strong CPU-centric performance, while the GPU component presents a more specialized profile.

GPU Analysis

The GPU in this configuration is the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2, a 5 nm chip from TSMC based on the Ada Lovelace architecture. It features the AD103 chip with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die. The memory subsystem is substantial: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s. This is a significant amount of VRAM for professional workloads, allowing large datasets and complex 3D scenes to reside locally on the GPU. The clock speeds are set at a base of 930 MHz and a boost of 1680 MHz, with memory running at 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

The compute core configuration is robust. The GPU packs 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 ROPs. For accelerating modern workloads, it includes 76 RT cores for ray tracing and 304 tensor cores for AI and deep learning tasks. The raw compute performance is rated at 32.69 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), which indicates a strong capability for both traditional graphics rendering and compute-heavy tasks. The texture rate is 510.7 GTexel/s, and the pixel rate is 188.2 GPixel/s. In terms of API support, it is fully featured with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest software standards.

However, the benchmark data for this GPU is notably absent. The JSON shows the `benchmarks` array is empty, and the `avgBenchmarkScore` is 0. The `percentileVsAllGpus` is 50, which places it in the middle of the database’s GPU ranking, but this is based on no specific benchmark scores. This makes direct quantitative comparison impossible. The performance picture must be inferred from its specifications. The 16 GB VRAM and 304 tensor cores suggest it is designed for professional visualization, machine learning inference, and content creation rather than purely for gaming. The "Embedded" designation and 150 W TDP, with no power connectors listed, indicate a power-efficient, mobile-derived component intended for specialized systems. In rendering scenarios, the combination of high VRAM and tensor cores would be beneficial for GPU-accelerated effects, while the RT cores would handle ray-traced lighting, though the exact FPS impact cannot be quantified from the available data.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmarks provide a clear and detailed picture of the Ryzen 9 7900X3D's performance. In synthetic tests, it scores 10,144 in 3DMark 16 threads, 7,315 in 8 threads, 4,041 in 4 threads, and 2,071 in 2 threads. The single-thread score is 1,049. Scaling from 8 threads to 16 threads shows a gain of 2,829 points, indicating good multi-threading efficiency. The max threads score is 11,480, which is a significant jump from the 16-thread score, showing the benefit of the full 24-thread count.

In Cinebench, the processor achieves 4,310 points in R15 multi-core and 608 in single-core. In R20, it scores 17,962 multi-core and 2,535 single-core. The R23 results are 42,767 multi-core and 6,037 single-core. Geekbench reports 18,808 multi-core and 2,456 single-core. PassMark results are also strong: 50,317 in multi-thread, 4,126 in single-thread, 160,779 in integer math, 97,246 in floating point math, 593,838 in data compression, and 44,567 in extended instructions. The average benchmark score for the CPU is 47,908.

The CPU's `percentileVsAllCpus` is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals provide context: the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 has an average score of 47,918, a delta of 0%, placing them at parity. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T scores 47,697, which is 0.4% slower. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 scores 48,171, which is 0.5% faster, and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235A scores 48,201, 0.6% faster. This shows the 7900X3D is in a tight competitive cluster around the 48,000-point mark, with no clear leader among these four.

The combined picture is a system where the CPU is the dominant performer. With a combined percentile of 70 and the GPU sitting at a mid-tier 50th percentile, the overall system performance is heavily influenced by the processor's capabilities. The CPU's high percentile and strong absolute scores in multi-threaded tests like Cinebench R23 and PassMark indicate a machine built for heavy processing tasks. The GPU, while undefined by benchmarks, is not a top-tier gaming component based on its percentile. This creates a profile of a workstation where CPU-bound tasks will see excellent performance, but GPU-bound tasks may not reach the same relative heights.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4,126 in PassMark and 6,037 in Cinebench R23 will provide a solid foundation for gaming. However, the GPU's 50th percentile ranking and lack of benchmark data suggest it may not consistently drive high refresh rates at high resolutions. The pairing is likely more suited for 1440p gaming at high settings rather than 4K at maximum refresh rates. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for current titles, but the overall GPU performance is the limiting factor.

Streaming: The CPU has 12 cores and 24 threads, which is excellent for encoding and handling streaming overhead. The high multi-thread score of 42,767 in Cinebench R23 means it can simultaneously run a game and encode video without significant performance drops. The GPU's 304 tensor cores could also accelerate encoding with AI-based features if the software supports it, though the exact impact is unquantified.

Video editing: This is a strong scenario for this build. The CPU's multi-core performance, evidenced by the 50,317 PassMark multi-thread score, will handle timeline scrubbing, effects, and rendering efficiently. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is beneficial for 4K and 8K timeline previews, and the 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 compute can accelerate effects processing. The large VRAM buffer allows for complex compositions without running out of memory.

3D rendering: The CPU's 12 cores and high Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,767 will excel in CPU-based rendering engines like V-Ray or Blender's Cycles. The GPU, with its 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, is also well-suited for GPU-accelerated rendering and ray tracing. The 16 GB VRAM is crucial for large scenes. This system is a capable 3D workstation for both CPU and GPU rendering paths.

Software development: The Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a strong choice for compilation. The high multi-thread performance, shown by the 10,144 3DMark 16-thread score, will reduce build times for large codebases. The data encryption score of 35,293 in PassMark and data compression score of 593,838 indicate good performance for tasks involving cryptography and archive handling. The 128 MB of L3 cache also helps with frequently accessed data.

Student and office work: This system is overkill for standard office tasks. The CPU's single-thread performance is more than sufficient for document editing and web browsing. The integrated Radeon Graphics provides a display output, but the dedicated RTX 5000 GPU will handle any graphics acceleration. For students in engineering or computer science, the multi-thread performance is a benefit for simulations and complex calculations. However, the cost of the CPU and GPU makes it a premium, not a budget, choice for basic work.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data suggests a clear imbalance in this pairing. The CPU is a top-tier performer, sitting at the 90th percentile, while the GPU is at the 50th percentile. This indicates that the CPU will not be the limiting factor in most workloads. The bottleneck will almost always be the GPU. In gaming, the CPU can easily feed frames to the GPU, but the GPU's performance will cap the frame rate. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,126 in PassMark ensures it won't hold back the GPU in frame generation.

In compute-heavy tasks like 3D rendering, the balance depends on the workload. For CPU-based rendering, the system is well-balanced, as the CPU is the primary engine. For GPU-based rendering, the RTX 5000 Embedded's performance is the limiting factor. The CPU's 24 threads will be underutilized if the renderer only uses the GPU. The FPS scaling in gaming is directly tied to the GPU's capability; the CPU can maintain high frame pacing, but the average FPS will be determined by the GPU's 50th percentile standing. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this: the strong CPU pulls the average up, but the weaker GPU prevents a higher overall score. The system is effectively a powerful CPU with a mid-range GPU, meaning users will see excellent CPU-bound performance but only average GPU-bound performance.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at users who prioritize CPU performance above all else. The Ryzen 9 7900X3D is ideal for professionals and enthusiasts who run heavily multi-threaded applications. Specifically, this targets:

Content creators who work with video editing and 3D rendering. The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads are perfect for rendering and encoding, while the GPU's 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for most creative projects. The balanced CPU and GPU compute (32.69 TFLOPS) is a good match for this group.
Software developers who compile large codebases. The high multi-thread scores (42,767 in Cinebench R23) will significantly speed up build times, making this a productive workstation.
Gamers at 1440p resolution who want high frame rates in CPU-intensive games. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (1,049 in 3DMark single-thread) and large L3 cache (128 MB) will provide a smooth experience, though the GPU will limit performance at 4K.
Students in STEM fields who need to run simulations and data analysis. The CPU's floating-point performance (97,246 in PassMark) is excellent for mathematical computations, and the 128 MB L3 cache aids in data-heavy workloads.
Small business workstations that require a reliable, high-performance CPU for tasks like financial modeling or database management, where the CPU's multi-thread scores (50,317 in PassMark multi-thread) are more important than the GPU. This is not a system for budget-conscious buyers, as the component selection is premium.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. The FACT PACK contains no `measuredFps` data, so all FPS figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking suggests it is a mid-tier performer. The CPU's high single-thread score of 4,126 in PassMark indicates it can handle any game's logic without bottlenecking.

Based on these scores, the estimated performance would be:

1080p Ultimate: The CPU can easily handle the frame rendering, but the GPU will be the limiting factor. Expect high frame rates in esports titles, but demanding AAA games may not reach maximum refresh rates. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM is not an issue at this resolution.
1440p Ultimate: This is likely the sweet spot for this system. The GPU should provide a good balance of visual quality and frame rate. The CPU will have no trouble keeping up. Estimated FPS in AAA titles would be in the 60-100 range, depending on the title.
4K Ultimate: The GPU's performance will be the primary constraint. Expect lower frame rates, potentially in the 30-60 range for demanding titles. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for most games at 4K, but the raw compute power of the GPU may not be enough for ultra settings with high frame rates.

These are estimates. The actual performance will vary by game and driver optimization. The CPU's performance is not a factor in these estimates; it is more than capable of supporting any GPU.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's percentile ranking compared to all CPUs?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X3D has a `percentileVsAllCpus` of 90, meaning it performs better than 90% of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The `combinedPercentile` for this configuration is 70.

Q: Does this system have measured FPS data for games?

A: No. The FACT PACK contains no `measuredFps` data for this combination. All FPS figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the CPU's architecture and process node?

A: The CPU is based on AMD's Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, and is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC.

Q: How does the CPU's average benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 47,908. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900, has a score of 47,918, a delta of 0%. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is 0.4% slower with a score of 47,697.

Q: What kind of memory does this CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X3D supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D processor with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2 GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread part based on the Zen 4 architecture, designed for high-end desktop platforms. The GPU is an embedded professional component with 16 GB of VRAM and a 50th percentile ranking. The combined system percentile is 70, indicating an overall above-average system, but one that is heavily skewed by the CPU's excellent performance. The pairing is unusual, as it couples a top-tier consumer CPU with a mid-tier professional mobile GPU. This results in a build that is a powerful CPU workstation, but a moderate gaming or GPU-compute system.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture (codename Raphael) and manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It has a base clock of 4.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The CPU includes a substantial cache hierarchy: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a massive 128 MB of shared L3 cache, which includes a 64 MB 3D V-Cache slice. This large cache is a key feature, designed to reduce memory latency and improve performance in cache-sensitive workloads like gaming and data analysis. The CPU has a TDP of 120 W and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth. It also has 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and an unlocked multiplier for overclocking.

Benchmark results show its strengths. In Cinebench R23, it scores 42,767 in multi-core and 6,037 in single-core. The multi-core score is exceptional, placing it in the top 10% of all CPUs. The single-core score is also strong, ensuring responsiveness in everyday tasks. In PassMark, the multi-thread score is 50,317, and the single-thread score is 4,126. The integer math score is 160,779, and the floating-point math score is 97,246, showing balanced compute capability. The data compression score of 593,838 is particularly high, indicating excellent performance for archiving and data-heavy applications. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking confirms its position as a high-end processor, with its nearest rivals being within 0.6% of its average score. This CPU is clearly a powerhouse for multi-threaded workloads, with the 3D V-Cache providing an edge in latency-sensitive tasks.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is the current mainstream desktop socket for AMD. This provides a clear upgrade path within the same generation. The platform supports DDR5 memory, as used in this build. The CPU provides 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, which is more than sufficient for the RTX 5000 Embedded GPU, which uses PCIe 4.0 x16. This means the GPU will run at its full bandwidth without bottlenecking. The CPU also has an integrated Radeon Graphics unit, which can serve as a fallback display output or for troubleshooting.

The GPU's TDP is 150 W, and the CPU's is 120 W, meaning a power supply with sufficient wattage is required. A typical 650-750W PSU would be a sensible choice for this system. The suggested PSU is null in the data, so a standard calculation based on the 120 W CPU and 150 W GPU would suggest a 550W unit as a minimum, with headroom for other components. A sensible next upgrade would be to the GPU. Since the CPU is at the 90th percentile, it has significant headroom to support a more powerful GPU. Upgrading to a higher-tier desktop GPU would balance the system and improve gaming and GPU compute performance. The CPU's strong performance means it would not be a bottleneck for several generations of GPUs. The platform itself is current, so there is no immediate need to upgrade the motherboard or memory. The primary upgrade path is to replace the GPU with a more powerful part to match the CPU's capabilities.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation X2

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis

Benchmark Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

FAQ

Build Overview

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds