SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

85 Score

Top 15% Ranking

85 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 15% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

GPU Bottleneck

CPU

95%

GPU

74%

Your GPU is limiting system performance. Consider upgrading to a more powerful graphics card to better utilize your CPU.

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Bottleneck Detected

GPU Bottleneck - Upgrading the weaker component will improve overall performance.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# FAQ

Q: What processor and graphics card are paired in this build?

A: The build pairs an AMD Ryzen 9 7900X CPU with an NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation GPU. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread desktop processor from AMD's 7000 series, while the GPU is an Ada Lovelace architecture part based on the AD103 chip, designed as an embedded mobile workstation component.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X has an average benchmark score of 53,288, placing it 0.2% above the AMD EPYC 7313P (53,206), 0.6% above the Intel Xeon 634 (52,974), and 0.3% below the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (53,469). Its closest competitor, the Intel Core i7-14700F, scores 53,620, which is 0.6% higher.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all graphics cards?

A: The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, meaning half of all tested graphics cards score higher and half score lower. This is a mid-tier placement, and the GPU has no nearest rivals listed in the data, indicating its benchmark profile is relatively isolated.

Q: What memory and storage technologies does the CPU support?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which is a significant advantage for high-speed storage and expansion cards.

Q: What is the combined percentile ranking for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined build achieves a 71st percentile ranking among all desktop configurations. This suggests the system outperforms approximately 71% of tested builds, despite the GPU's mid-tier 50th percentile standing, thanks to the CPU's strong 91st percentile performance.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this specific build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The `measuredFpsUltraByGame` field is empty, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is set to false. All frame rate discussions must therefore be treated as estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component.

Q: What are the key architectural details of the CPU and GPU?

A: The CPU uses AMD's Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) on a 5 nm TSMC process with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration. The GPU uses NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die.

# Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 7900X delivers a commanding benchmark profile. Its average benchmark score of 53,288 places it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs, a strong showing for a desktop processor. The multi-threaded performance is particularly impressive: Cinebench R23 multi-core yields 29,300 points, while the max-threads 3DMark test scores 12,536. These numbers indicate a processor that excels in heavily threaded workloads, a conclusion reinforced by the Geekbench multi-core score of 19,267 and PassMark multi-thread score of 51,406.

Single-thread performance is equally robust. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,016.5 and Geekbench single-core score of 2,617 place the CPU well above average. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,093 and 2-thread score of 2,137 confirm that the architecture scales efficiently even at low thread counts. This combination of strong single-thread and multi-thread results makes the Ryzen 9 7900X a versatile performer across diverse application types.

The GPU presents a different picture. The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking. This lack of direct benchmark data means its performance must be inferred from its architectural specifications rather than measured results. The GPU offers 32.69 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, 510.7 GTexel/s texture rate, and 188.2 GPixel/s pixel rate — figures that suggest respectable compute capability for a 120 W embedded part.

The combined percentile of 71 for this build reflects the CPU's dominance in the pairing. While the GPU sits at the median, the CPU's 91st percentile ranking pulls the overall system well above average. The data implies that this configuration is CPU-limited in most scenarios, with the processor providing the primary performance headroom while the GPU delivers adequate but not exceptional graphics throughput.

When examining the CPU's nearest rivals, the performance deltas are minimal. The AMD EPYC 7313P trails by just 0.2%, the Intel Xeon 634 by 0.6%, and the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 leads by 0.3%. The Intel Core i7-14700F leads by 0.6%. These sub-1% differences indicate that the Ryzen 9 7900X is tightly clustered with several high-end server and desktop processors, making it a competitive choice in its performance tier.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The data reveals a clear imbalance between CPU and GPU capabilities. The Ryzen 9 7900X, at the 91st percentile, vastly outperforms the RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, which sits at the 50th percentile. This 41-percentile-point gap suggests the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads, while the CPU has significant headroom to spare.

In CPU-bound tasks such as data compression, encryption, and integer math, the Ryzen 9 7900X demonstrates exceptional throughput. The PassMark data compression score of 632,505, data encryption score of 37,263, and integer math score of 169,273 indicate a processor that can handle demanding computational workloads without breaking a sweat. These are scenarios where the GPU's performance is irrelevant, and the CPU's high percentile ranking translates directly to real-world speed.

Conversely, in GPU-bound scenarios like gaming at high resolutions or 3D rendering, the RTX 5000's 50th percentile placement will constrain overall system performance. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are respectable, but the lack of measured benchmarks and the mid-tier percentile suggest that frame rates will be moderate rather than exceptional. The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,093) will help in games that rely heavily on CPU logic, but the GPU will ultimately cap maximum frame rates.

The bottleneck analysis points to the GPU as the limiting factor for most graphics workloads. With the CPU capable of 12,536 max-thread 3DMark points and 29,300 Cinebench R23 multi-core points, the processor can feed the GPU with data far faster than the GPU can render it. This imbalance means that upgrading the GPU would yield significant performance gains, while upgrading the CPU would provide minimal benefit in GPU-limited scenarios.

For productivity workloads, the balance shifts. The CPU's 91st percentile and the GPU's 50th percentile mean that CPU-intensive tasks like software compilation, video encoding, and spreadsheet analysis will run at near-flagship speed, while GPU-accelerated tasks like video rendering and machine learning inference will run at only average levels. This makes the build better suited for CPU-centric workflows than GPU-accelerated ones.

# Who Should Build It

This configuration targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU capability. Gamers playing at lower resolutions, where CPU performance matters most, will benefit from the Ryzen 9 7900X's strong single-thread scores. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1,093 and 2-thread score of 2,137 indicate responsive gameplay in CPU-bound titles, though the GPU's 50th percentile will limit maximum frame rates.

Content creators working with large datasets, complex spreadsheets, or software compilation will find the CPU's multi-threaded performance compelling. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,300 and PassMark multi-thread score of 51,406 demonstrate the ability to handle heavy computational workloads efficiently. Video editors who rely on CPU-based encoding will see strong performance, while those using GPU-accelerated effects will encounter the GPU's mid-tier limits.

Software developers will appreciate the CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads for parallel compilation and testing. The 91st percentile ranking means the processor outperforms most desktop CPUs, reducing build times and improving workflow responsiveness. The ECC memory support is an additional advantage for developers working on critical systems.

Students and small business users will find this build over-specified for their needs, but the CPU's headroom ensures longevity. The 91st percentile performance means the processor will remain competitive for years, while the GPU's 50th percentile is adequate for everyday tasks like document editing, web browsing, and basic photo editing.

Workstation users in scientific computing or financial modeling will benefit from the CPU's floating-point math score of 103,952 and extended instructions score of 47,619 on PassMark. These metrics indicate strong performance in numerical workloads, though the GPU's limited compute capabilities (32.69 TFLOPS FP32) may constrain GPU-accelerated scientific applications.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7900X uses AMD Socket AM5, which provides a clear upgrade path within the 7000 series and potentially future generations. The platform supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, and the CPU itself supports ECC memory — a feature more commonly found in server platforms but valuable for workstation users. The memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is sufficient for most workloads, though higher-speed DDR5 kits could improve performance in memory-sensitive applications.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for modern storage devices and expansion cards. This is a forward-looking feature that ensures compatibility with next-generation SSDs and GPUs. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support is particularly relevant for users who frequently transfer large files or work with high-resolution assets.

The GPU connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, which is one generation behind the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 capability. This mismatch is not a bottleneck in practice, as PCIe 4.0 x16 provides sufficient bandwidth for the RTX 5000's 16 GB GDDR6 memory and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. However, future GPU upgrades could leverage the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support.

The CPU's TDP of 170 W and the GPU's TDP of 120 W suggest a total system power draw of approximately 290 W for these two components alone. The GPU has no suggested PSU listed in the data, and its power connectors are listed as "None," indicating it draws power through the motherboard or a proprietary connector. This is typical for embedded mobile parts that are not designed for desktop power supplies.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU to balance the system. Given the CPU's 91st percentile performance and the GPU's 50th percentile, replacing the RTX 5000 with a higher-performing GPU would unlock the CPU's full potential in graphics workloads. The platform's PCIe Gen 5 support and the CPU's 24 lanes provide ample bandwidth for such an upgrade.

# GPU Analysis

The RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation is a 16 GB GDDR6 graphics card with a 256-bit memory bus and 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. Its memory clocks run at 2250 MHz, translating to 18 Gbps effective. This memory configuration is adequate for 1440p gaming and moderate 4K workloads, though the 50th percentile ranking suggests it is not a top-tier performer.

The GPU's compute hardware includes 9,728 shading units, 304 texture mapping units, and 112 raster output units. It also features 76 ray tracing cores and 304 tensor cores, making it capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The FP32 performance of 32.69 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 32.69 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio) indicate balanced compute capabilities for both single-precision and half-precision workloads.

The GPU's pixel rate of 188.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 510.7 GTexel/s are moderate figures that reflect its mid-tier positioning. The base clock of 930 MHz and boost clock of 1680 MHz are conservative for an Ada Lovelace part, likely due to the embedded form factor's thermal constraints and 120 W TDP. The GPU uses the AD103 chip, which is the same die used in higher-end desktop cards but configured here for mobile or embedded use.

For rendering workloads, the 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance provides capable compute for 3D rendering and simulation. The 76 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which is increasingly important in modern rendering pipelines. However, the lack of measured benchmarks makes it difficult to assess real-world rendering performance with precision, and the 50th percentile ranking suggests average performance compared to other GPUs.

The GPU's DirectX 12 Ultimate support (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 ensure compatibility with modern graphics APIs and games. The 16 GB VRAM is generous for an embedded part and provides headroom for large textures and complex scenes. The 304 tensor cores support AI-accelerated workflows, though the 120 W TDP limits sustained performance under heavy load.

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael. It operates at a base clock of 4.70 GHz and boosts up to 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 170 W. The CPU is built on TSMC's 5 nm process node, featuring 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration.

The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This substantial L3 cache helps reduce memory latency and improves performance in cache-sensitive workloads. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory for error-correcting applications.

Benchmark results show a processor that excels in both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 4,820.5 and single-core score of 323, along with the R23 scores of 29,300 and 2,016.5 respectively, demonstrate strong scaling across thread counts. The Geekbench scores of 19,267 (multi-core) and 2,617 (single-core) corroborate these findings.

The PassMark suite reveals specific strengths in various workload types. The data compression score of 632,505 indicates excellent throughput in compression algorithms, while the data encryption score of 37,263 shows robust cryptographic performance. The floating-point math score of 103,952 and integer math score of 169,273 demonstrate balanced arithmetic capability, and the extended instructions score of 47,619 suggests good SIMD performance.

The CPU's 91st percentile ranking among all CPUs places it in the top tier of desktop processors. Its nearest rivals — the AMD EPYC 7313P, Intel Xeon Phi 7290, Intel Xeon 634, and Intel Core i7-14700F — all score within 0.6% of the Ryzen 9 7900X, indicating intense competition at this performance level. The average benchmark score of 53,288 reflects the CPU's consistent performance across a wide range of tests.

The CPU's integrated Radeon Graphics provide basic display output capability, which is useful for troubleshooting or light graphical tasks without a discrete GPU. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking for enthusiasts who want to extract additional performance. The CPU's release date of September 26, 2022, and its production status of "Active" indicate it is a current, supported product.

# Build Overview

This build combines the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, a desktop-class CPU, with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation, a GPU designed for embedded or mobile workstation use. The pairing is classified as a desktop build, though the GPU's embedded nature suggests it may be integrated into a pre-built workstation or mobile form factor despite the desktop classification.

The combined percentile of 71 indicates that this system outperforms 71% of tested desktop configurations. This is a respectable overall tier, though it is driven almost entirely by the CPU's 91st percentile performance. The GPU's 50th percentile ranking means the graphics performance is average, which is a notable weakness in a system that otherwise performs at a high level.

The CPU+GPU pairing is somewhat unusual: a high-end desktop processor paired with a mid-tier embedded GPU. This configuration makes sense for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads like software development, data analysis, or scientific computing, while having modest graphics requirements. It is less suitable for gamers or content creators who need strong GPU performance.

The build's class as "desktop" is confirmed by the CPU's market segment and socket type (AMD Socket AM5), though the GPU's embedded nature creates some ambiguity. The GPU's slot width is listed as "IGP" (integrated graphics processor), and its power connectors are "None," suggesting it may be soldered to a motherboard rather than installed as a discrete card.

Overall, this build represents a CPU-centric workstation configuration with adequate but not exceptional graphics capability. The 71st combined percentile places it in the upper-middle tier of desktop systems, with the CPU providing most of the performance headroom. Users should be aware that the GPU is the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads and plan accordingly.

# Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,093) supports high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU's 50th percentile ranking limits overall FPS. Estimated frame rates at 1080p would be moderate, with 1440p and 4K performance constrained by the GPU's mid-tier compute capabilities. This build is better suited for esports titles and older games than for demanding AAA releases at high refresh rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding and streaming simultaneously. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 29,300 indicates that the CPU can handle game encoding while maintaining system responsiveness. However, the GPU's limited performance means that streaming at high resolutions with hardware encoding (via the 304 tensor cores) may require compromising on game settings.

Video Editing: The CPU's multi-threaded performance (PassMark multi-thread score of 51,406) accelerates video export and rendering in CPU-based workflows. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth support 4K timeline editing and effects, though the 50th percentile performance may struggle with complex GPU-accelerated effects or heavy color grading. The combination handles 1080p and 1440p editing comfortably, with 4K being more demanding.

3D Rendering: The CPU's strong floating-point math score of 103,952 and 64 MB L3 cache support CPU-based rendering in applications like Blender or Cinema 4D. The GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 and 76 ray tracing cores provide hardware-accelerated rendering, though the 50th percentile ranking suggests render times will be average. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for complex scenes, but the 120 W TDP limits sustained rendering throughput.

Software Development: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a 91st percentile ranking, make this an excellent development machine. Compilation times will be short, and the ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running builds. The GPU's performance is largely irrelevant for most development tasks, making this build well-suited for developers who need CPU power but have modest graphics requirements.

Student and Office Work: This build is significantly over-specified for typical student or office workloads like document editing, web browsing, and email. The CPU's 91st percentile performance ensures snappy responsiveness, while the GPU's 50th percentile is more than adequate for productivity applications. The build would be wasted on such tasks, but it would handle them with ease and provide headroom for future, more demanding applications.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The FACT PACK contains no `measuredFpsUltraByGame` entries, and the `dataIsMeasured` flag is set to false. Therefore, all FPS figures presented here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of each component and should be treated as approximate rather than definitive.

Based on the CPU's 91st percentile performance and the GPU's 50th percentile ranking, estimated frame rates would be CPU-limited at lower resolutions and GPU-limited at higher resolutions. At 1080p with ultra settings, the CPU's strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1,093) could drive frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for moderately demanding games, with lighter esports titles potentially exceeding 144 FPS.

At 1440p with ultra settings, the GPU's mid-tier performance would become the primary constraint. Estimated frame rates would likely fall in the 40-70 FPS range for AAA titles, depending on the game's optimization. The GPU's 16 GB VRAM and 576.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1440p textures, but the 50th percentile compute performance limits overall throughput.

At 4K with ultra settings, the build would struggle to maintain playable frame rates in demanding titles. The GPU's 32.69 TFLOPS FP32 performance is roughly half that of top-tier cards, and the 50th percentile ranking suggests 4K gaming would require significant settings reductions. Estimated frame rates of 20-40 FPS are plausible for AAA games, with lighter titles potentially reaching 60 FPS.

The CPU's 64 MB L3 cache and high boost clock of 5.60 GHz provide a solid foundation for gaming, ensuring that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU in most scenarios. The GPU's 76 ray tracing cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing, though the mid-tier performance means ray tracing effects would need to be used sparingly to maintain playable frame rates.

In summary, this build is best suited for 1080p gaming with high settings, where the CPU can shine and the GPU's limitations are less apparent. For 1440p and 4K gaming, users would need to lower settings or accept lower frame rates, as the GPU's 50th percentile performance is the system's primary constraint.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Bottleneck Detected

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds