SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

95%

GPU

89%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

53,288 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score

Top 11% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM form a desktop pairing that presents a stark contrast in capability: a top-tier 12-core processor paired with an entry-level Ampere graphics card. The data shows a system where the CPU operates in the 91st percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU sits at the 57th percentile, indicating a significant performance imbalance that shapes every workload. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and percentile positions of the individual components.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Since the FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this CPU+GPU combination, all gaming performance figures are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 11857 places it at the 57th percentile, which is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% higher) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (0.6% higher). This suggests the RTX 3050 OEM delivers frame rates comparable to those older mid-range cards, meaning it is suited for 1080p gaming at medium to high settings, but will struggle at higher resolutions or with ultra settings in demanding titles.

The CPU’s single-thread performance, measured at 1093 in 3DMark single-thread and 2016.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, is exceptionally strong, ranking in the 91st percentile overall. This means the Ryzen 9 7900X will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, even at lower resolutions where CPU overhead is higher. However, the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth is a limiting factor for texture-heavy games at 1440p or 4K. Estimated 1080p ultra settings frame rates would likely fall in the 40-60 FPS range for AAA titles, while esports titles like CS:GO or Valorant could see 100+ FPS due to the CPU’s strong single-core scores, though the GPU’s PassMark DirectX 12 score of 58 indicates modest API-level performance.

At 1440p, the RTX 3050 OEM would likely see frame rates drop below 40 FPS in graphically intensive games, as the 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth become increasingly strained. The GPU’s pixel rate of 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate of 126.4 GTexel/s are low by modern standards, suggesting that resolution scaling will be poor. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7798 shows ample headroom, but the GPU will be the definitive bottleneck at any resolution above 1080p. For 4K gaming, this pairing is not viable for anything beyond older or very light titles, as the GPU’s FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS is insufficient for modern AAA workloads at that resolution.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the GA106 chip using Samsung’s 8 nm process, with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s, which is modest compared to higher-tier cards. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective), while the GPU core operates at a base of 1515 MHz and a boost of 1755 MHz. The card has 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, which explains its mid-range rasterization performance.

For ray tracing and AI workloads, the RTX 3050 OEM includes 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores. The presence of RT cores means it can handle ray-traced effects in games, but the low compute throughput (8.087 TFLOPS FP32) suggests that enabling ray tracing will significantly reduce frame rates. The tensor cores support DLSS, which could help recover some performance, but the GPU’s PassMark GPU compute score of 5779 indicates that compute-heavy tasks like rendering or machine learning will be slow. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 are moderate, positioning the card well below current mid-range options.

The benchmark scores show a GPU that is 0.2% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600 and 0.5% faster than the AMD Radeon 680M integrated graphics, placing it in a strange niche. Its PassMark G2D score of 973 suggests decent 2D acceleration, but the DirectX 11 score of 86 and DirectX 12 score of 58 indicate that modern API performance is not a strength. For rendering, the 8 GB VRAM is a hard limit for large scenes, and the 224.0 GB/s bandwidth will cause texture streaming bottlenecks. The GPU’s 57th percentile rank means it is above average, but not by much, and it is clearly the weaker half of this pairing.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The Ryzen 9 7900X’s single-thread score of 2016.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures that CPU-bound scenarios, such as competitive shooters at 1080p, can achieve high frame rates. However, the RTX 3050 OEM’s PassMark G3D score of 11857 will cap most AAA titles at 60 FPS or lower, making 144Hz monitors only useful for esports titles where the GPU is less stressed.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, reflected in a 3DMark max-thread score of 12536 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29300, provide ample headroom for software encoding. Streamers can use x264 encoding without impacting gaming performance, though the GPU’s NVENC is available but limited by its 57th percentile compute performance.

Video editing: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 169273 and floating-point math score of 103952 indicate strong processing power for codecs and effects. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth can handle 1080p timelines, but 4K editing will be slow, as the GPU’s compute score of 5779 is low for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29300 makes CPU-based rendering fast, but GPU rendering in Blender or Octane will be limited by the RTX 3050 OEM’s 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 and 72 tensor cores. The GPU’s 57th percentile rank suggests it is adequate for small scenes, but not for professional workloads.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 632505 and encryption score of 37263 show rapid compilation and code processing. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a strong pairing for developers who need CPU muscle.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 91st percentile ranking makes it overkill for office tasks, but the system is responsive. The GPU’s PassMark G2D score of 973 ensures smooth 2D desktop rendering, and the 8 GB VRAM is more than enough for productivity apps.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 74, indicating that this system outperforms 74% of all desktop configurations in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 3050 OEM compare to the AMD Radeon RX 7600?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has an average benchmark score of 15199, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600’s score of 15171, making them nearly identical in performance.

Q: What is the CPU’s single-thread performance?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X scores 1093 in 3DMark single-thread, 323 in Cinebench R15 single-core, and 2016.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, placing it in the 91st percentile among all CPUs.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 3050 OEM has 18 RT cores, but its FP32 performance of 8.087 TFLOPS means ray tracing will significantly impact frame rates.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900X has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz.

Q: Is the GPU end-of-life?

A: Yes, the production status for the RTX 3050 OEM is listed as End-of-life, with a release date of 2022-01-03.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors. It has a base clock of 4.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz, with a TDP of 170 W. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes integrated Radeon Graphics. It is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and uses the AMD Socket AM5 with 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29300 is 0.6% higher than the Intel Core i7-14700F and 0.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 7313P, placing it among the top consumer CPUs. The PassMark multithread score of 51406 and 3DMark max-thread score of 12536 confirm this, showing that the CPU can handle heavily threaded tasks like video rendering, scientific simulations, and software compilation with ease. The single-thread score of 4238 in PassMark and 1093 in 3DMark single-thread indicate strong per-core performance, which is critical for gaming and legacy software.

The L3 cache of 64 MB (shared) and L2 cache of 1 MB per core provide ample fast memory for workloads, while the 5 nm process node ensures high efficiency relative to the 170 W TDP. The CPU’s 91st percentile rank means it outperforms 91% of all CPUs in the database, and its nearest rivals include server-class parts like the AMD EPYC 7313P, indicating that its multi-threaded performance rivals enterprise hardware. For real-world use, this CPU is a powerhouse for content creation, 3D rendering, and any task that can utilize 24 threads, but it is overkill for basic office work.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This pairing is best suited for users who prioritize CPU performance and are willing to accept GPU limitations. Gamers at 1080p playing esports titles will benefit from the CPU’s strong single-thread scores (2016.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core), but those seeking 1440p or 4K gaming will find the GPU’s 57th percentile rank insufficient. Content creators who rely on CPU-based rendering, such as video editors using x264 or 3D artists using CPU renderers, will see excellent performance from the 12-core, 24-thread setup, but GPU-accelerated tasks will be slow.

Software developers and data scientists will appreciate the CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 632505 and encryption score of 37263, which speed up compilation and data processing. Students and office workers will find the system more powerful than needed, but the integrated graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU fails. Small business workstations that run virtual machines or heavy spreadsheets will benefit from the CPU’s multi-threading, but the GPU is only necessary for light CAD or 2D design work. The system is not ideal for gamers at 1440p or above, nor for professionals who need GPU compute for machine learning or 3D rendering, as the GPU’s 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 and 5779 PassMark compute score are limiting.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 53288, placing it in the 91st percentile with a combined percentile of 74 for the system. Its nearest rivals include the AMD EPYC 7313P (0.2% higher), Intel Xeon Phi 7290 (0.3% lower), Intel Xeon 634 (0.6% higher), and Intel Core i7-14700F (0.6% lower). The CPU’s strongest scores include Cinebench R23 multicore at 29300, PassMark multithread at 51406, and Geekbench multicore at 19267, all confirming its high-end status.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 15199, placing it in the 57th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% higher), AMD Radeon 680M (0.5% lower), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 (0.5% lower), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 (0.6% lower). The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 11857 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 are mid-range figures. The combined picture is a system where the CPU is a top-tier performer, but the GPU drags the overall benchmark score down, resulting in a 74th percentile ranking. This means the system is above average, but not exceptional, and the CPU is clearly the dominant component.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop-class build, as indicated by the buildClass field, combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on Zen 4 architecture, while the GPU is an Ampere-based card from the GeForce 30-series. The pairing is unusual because it matches a 91st percentile CPU with a 57th percentile GPU, resulting in a combined percentile of 74. This places the system in the upper-middle tier of all desktop configurations, above average but far from the top.

The CPU’s launch MSRP was $549, and it is an active production part, while the GPU is end-of-life, which may affect availability. The system is designed for users who need maximum CPU throughput for productivity tasks, but it is not a high-end gaming rig. The 74th percentile combined rank suggests that this build is a compromise, offering excellent CPU performance for tasks like rendering or compilation, but mediocre GPU performance for gaming or GPU-accelerated workloads. It is a desktop system that could serve as a workstation, but it would not be the first choice for a dedicated gaming PC.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data clearly shows that the GPU is the bottleneck in almost every scenario. The CPU’s 91st percentile rank versus the GPU’s 57th percentile rank indicates a substantial imbalance, with the CPU capable of far more than the GPU can handle. In gaming, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 11857 will limit frame rates, especially at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s single-thread score of 2016.5 in Cinebench R23 ensures that CPU-bound tasks are not the limiting factor. For example, at 1080p, the GPU is likely to cap performance at around 60 FPS in AAA titles, despite the CPU being able to push 100+ FPS.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, or software compilation, the CPU is the dominant component, and the GPU is underutilized. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 29300 and PassMark multithread score of 51406 show that it handles these tasks efficiently, and the GPU’s low compute score of 5779 means it will not accelerate these tasks much. The bottleneck shifts depending on the workload: gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks are limited by the GPU, while CPU-heavy tasks are limited by the CPU’s 170 W TDP and cooling. The 0.2% difference between the GPU and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 shows that the GPU is not a weak point in isolation, but relative to the CPU, it is severely underpowered.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5, which is a current platform with support for DDR5 memory and PCIe Gen 5, providing 24 lanes from the CPU. The memory support is dual-channel DDR5 with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the motherboard but may not take full advantage of the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The CPU’s TDP is 170 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 130 W, and the suggested PSU for the GPU is 300 W, meaning a 500-600 W power supply would provide ample headroom.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 3050 OEM with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU has plenty of headroom to support a more powerful card. The CPU’s 91st percentile rank means it will not bottleneck any current GPU, so upgrading to a card with a higher percentile rank (e.g., above 70th) would balance the system. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is a limitation, but a newer GPU with PCIe 4.0 x16 would still work, though it would not fully utilize the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 capabilities. The platform supports DDR5, so upgrading to faster memory could improve performance, but the current 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is already high. The CPU is unlocked, so overclocking is an option, but the 170 W TDP would require adequate cooling. The end-of-life status of the GPU suggests that users should consider upgrading the GPU first, as the CPU is a long-term investment.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds