SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

96 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 4% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
98%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090

79,842 Benchmark Score
Top 2% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combine a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 processor with a 32 GB GDDR7 Blackwell flagship GPU, producing a desktop build that sits at the 91st percentile overall. The CPU posts a 90th-percentile average benchmark score of 49,228, while the GPU lands at the 92nd percentile with an average score of 79,842, yet no measured FPS rows exist for this exact pairing, so all frame-rate discussions in this analysis are estimates derived from synthetic scores rather than direct game testing.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 5090 is a 5 nm TSMC part with 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It carries 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, yielding 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth — a figure that positions it far beyond typical 16 GB cards for memory-bound workloads. The GPU’s 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores are the dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI acceleration, and the FP32 throughput of 104.8 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1), gives it a massive raw compute envelope for both raster and compute tasks.

Clock behavior shows a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz, with memory at 1750 MHz, or 28 Gbps effective. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 reflects a modern DirectX 12 workload, and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,728 versus 334,370 in OpenCL indicates strong API-specific scaling. The PassMark G3D score of 39,650, combined with a G2D score of 1,413, suggests that 2D and desktop composition tasks are not the primary strength; this GPU is built for sustained 3D and compute. The average benchmark score of 79,842 places it at the 92nd percentile of all GPUs, with the nearest rivals being the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB at 79,605 (0.3% delta), Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79,396 (0.6% delta), and Radeon RX 6850M XT at 78,940 (1.1% delta). Notably, the RTX 5090 is 1.4% behind the Radeon Pro Vega 64X, which scores 80,959, indicating that while the 5090 leads the majority, it is not uniformly top-of-the-chart in every benchmark aggregate.

For rendering, the 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM make the GPU suitable for high-resolution textures and large scenes, and the 176 ROPs with a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,636.8 GTexel/s indicate it can push a massive number of pixels per second, which is critical for 4K or multi-monitor setups. The PassMark GPU compute score of 26,756 further supports heavy compute use, though the DirectX 10/11/12 and DirectX 9 scores are low (226, 341, 185, and 395 respectively), which is typical for a modern GPU where older APIs are not optimized. Overall, the data shows a GPU that is in the top 8% of all GPUs, and its nearest rival deltas are small, meaning the 5090 is not an outlier but rather the top of a tight performance cluster. The lack of measured game data means that the 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 are the primary quantitative anchors for estimating gaming capability.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 5090’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can push high frame rates at demanding resolutions, but with no measured FPS, the estimate is that the 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth will avoid VRAM capacity limits in most titles. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1,069 and PassMark single-thread of 4,130 are moderate, so frame rates at lower resolutions may be constrained by the CPU, while at 4K the GPU will likely dominate.

Streaming: The GPU’s 680 tensor cores and 170 RT cores are relevant for encoding and AI-based features, but the benchmark data does not include specific streaming metrics. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,728 suggests strong API performance for video capture and overlays, and the 32 GB VRAM can hold multiple frame buffers, but streaming relies more on the CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities; the 7900’s PassMark multithread score of 48,347 and 24 threads indicate it can handle concurrent encoding, though the data does not specify encoder hardware.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,776 and Geekbench multicore of 17,726 show a solid multi-threaded foundation for rendering timelines, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL of 334,370 and PassMark GPU compute of 26,756 indicate strong GPU-accelerated effects. The 32 GB VRAM is a clear advantage for scrubbing and previewing 4K or 8K footage, and the 1.79 TB/s bandwidth ensures that large file transfers between memory and compute units are not a bottleneck.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 12 cores with 64 MB L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth provide a balanced platform, but the GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 and 680 tensor cores are the primary drivers for GPU-based renderers. The Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4,020 and R23 multicore of 24,776 indicate that CPU-only rendering is still viable, but the GPU will significantly accelerate ray-traced scenes, given its 170 RT cores.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 164,075 and data encryption of 34,708 show strong compute for compilation and cryptographic tasks, while the GPU’s compute scores can accelerate parallel workloads like machine learning. The 5 nm process and 13,140 million transistors on the CPU make it a capable desktop chip, and the 90th percentile rank means it is ahead of 90% of CPUs, though not the absolute top.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Geekbench single-core of 2,495 and Cinebench R23 single-core of 1,966, is solid for daily tasks, but the GPU is overkill for this segment. The CPU’s TDP of 65 W is low for a 12-core part, which implies power efficiency for non-gaming workloads, and the integrated Radeon Graphics (no benchmark) provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is idle.

Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of a 90th-percentile CPU with a 92nd-percentile GPU creates a system where the GPU is slightly stronger relative to its own pool than the CPU is to its pool. The CPU’s average score of 49,228 is 0.1% above the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49,196) and 0.3% below the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49,394), while the GPU’s average of 79,842 is 0.3% above the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79,605) and 1.1% above the RX 6850M XT (78,940). This means the GPU has a larger gap to its nearest competitor, suggesting it is more of a performance outlier than the CPU.

In gaming, the bottleneck depends on resolution. The CPU’s 3DMark 2-thread score of 2,067 and 8-thread score of 7,454 are moderate for modern games that use 6-8 cores, so at 1080p, the CPU may limit frame rates, but the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth will not be the constraint. At 4K, the GPU’s raw pixel rate and compute will dominate, shifting the bottleneck to the GPU. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is low, meaning it will not power-throttle the GPU, but the GPU’s 575 W TDP is the dominant power draw, and the suggested 950 W PSU provides headroom.

The PassMark multithread score of 48,347 indicates that the CPU is not a weak link in multi-threaded tasks, but the CPU’s single-thread score of 4,130 is only average, so single-thread-bound games or applications could see the CPU as the limiting factor. The combined percentile of 91 reflects the balanced, top-tier nature, but the lack of measured FPS means the exact balance is speculative; the data suggests that the GPU will be the primary performance driver in most gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads, while the CPU handles multi-threaded productivity well. The 5-nm process for both parts, with the CPU at 13,140 million transistors and the GPU at 92,200 million, shows the GPU is 7x larger in transistor count, further indicating the GPU is the heavier workload processor.

Who Should Build It

The target user is a desktop enthusiast seeking high-end performance in both CPU and GPU tasks. The CPU’s 90th percentile and GPU’s 92nd percentile mean this system is in the top 10% of CPUs and top 8% of GPUs, so it suits gamers who play at 1440p or 4K with high refresh rates, where the GPU’s 32 GB VRAM and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth prevent VRAM limitations. The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads make it a solid choice for content creators who use video editing (Cinebench R23 multicore 23,776) and 3D rendering (PassMark floating point 97,943), while the GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 accelerates GPU renderers.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU’s PassMark integer math score of 164,075 and extended instructions of 42,253, which are strong for compilation and scientific computing, and the GPU’s tensor cores can handle AI/ML workloads. Students and office workers would be over-provisioned with this build, but the CPU’s low 65 W TDP and integrated Radeon Graphics make it a quiet workstation when the GPU is idle. Small business workstations that need to handle complex simulations or heavy multitasking can rely on the CPU’s 48,347 PassMark multithread score, but the GPU’s 575 W TDP and dual-slot size require a suitable case. The build is not for budget or entry-level users; it is for those who need a top-tier GPU for gaming or compute and a strong 12-core CPU for parallel tasks, with the launch MSRP of $1,999 for the GPU and $429 for the CPU (once each) being the only cost reference allowed.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on Zen 4 (Raphael) architecture, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with 13,140 million transistors on a 2x 71 mm² die. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost of 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W, which is low for a 12-core part and indicates a focus on efficiency. The L3 cache is 64 MB shared, with 1 MB L2 per core and 64 KB L1 per core, and it supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, plus ECC memory support, which is a feature for workstation reliability. The socket is AMD AM5, and it has PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), so it can support fast NVMe storage and future GPU connections.

The benchmark scores show a clear pattern: the CPU is strong in multi-threaded tests but moderate in single-threaded. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,776 and Geekbench multicore of 17,726 are high, but the Cinebench R23 single-core of 1,966 and Geekbench single-core of 2,495 are not top-tier. The 3DMark scores scale from 2,067 (2-thread) to 10,953 (max threads), indicating good scaling up to 12 cores. The PassMark scores show data compression at 577,847, integer math at 164,075, floating-point at 97,943, and extended instructions at 42,253, which are solid for productivity, but the single-thread score of 4,130 and the Cinebench R15 single-core of 315 are below the top CPUs. The CPU’s average score of 49,228 is 90th percentile, with the nearest rivals being the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49,196, +0.1%), Intel Core i5-14600KF (49,394, -0.3%), Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (48,995, +0.5%), and Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (48,698, +1.1%). This shows the CPU is in a tight cluster of mid-high performance, not a class leader, but the 12-core count and 24 threads give it a multi-threaded edge over lower-core rivals.

The 65 W TDP is remarkable for a 12-core, suggesting it can be cooled by a capable air cooler, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a backup, though no benchmark scores exist for it. The release date of January 2023 and active production status mean it is a current part, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, which is not reflected in the base scores. For real workloads, the CPU is a multi-threaded workhorse for productivity but not the best for single-thread-heavy games; the 24 threads help with streaming and encoding, but the CPU’s benchmark cluster indicates it is not a class-leading single-thread performer.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined percentile rank of this CPU and GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 91, meaning it is in the top 9% of all CPU+GPU combinations in the database.

Q: How much L3 cache does the Ryzen 9 7900 have, and is it shared?

A: The CPU has 64 MB of shared L3 cache, with 1 MB L2 and 64 KB L1 per core.

Q: Does the RTX 5090 have more VRAM than the nearest rivals?

A: The 5090 has 32 GB GDDR7, while its nearest rivals (Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB) have 16 GB and 12 GB respectively, but the rival specifications are not provided in the data.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 5090 has 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth, with a 512-bit bus.

Q: Does the Ryzen 9 7900 support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory, and it uses a dual-channel DDR5 memory bus.

Q: How does the CPU’s PassMark multithread score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The 7900 has a PassMark multithread score of 48,347, which is 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49,196) and 0.3% below the Intel Core i5-14600KF (49,394).

Q: What is the GPU’s FP32 performance in TFLOPS?

A: The RTX 5090 has 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance, and FP16 is also 104.8 TFLOPS (1:1).

Q: What is the CPU’s 3DMark 16-thread score?

A: The 3DMark 16-thread score is 10,056, which is lower than the max-thread score of 10,953.

Q: Does the GPU have any integrated graphics?

A: The GPU is a discrete part, but the CPU includes Radeon Graphics, which are not benchmarked.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49,228, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its single-thread performance is modest: 3DMark single-thread 1,069, Cinebench R23 single-core 1,966, Geekbench single-core 2,495, and PassMark single-thread 4,130. Multi-threaded scores are stronger: Cinebench R23 multicore 24,776, Geekbench multicore 17,726, and PassMark multithread 48,347. The 3DMark scaling from 2 threads (2,067) to max threads (10,953) shows good multi-core efficiency, but the CPU’s nearest rivals are within a 1.1% delta, indicating it is not a performance outlier.

The GPU’s average score is 79,842, at the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. Its key benchmark is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 18,355, with Geekbench OpenCL 334,370 and Vulkan 376,728. PassMark G3D 39,650, GPU compute 26,756, and G2D 1,413. The GPU’s nearest rivals are the Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB at 79,605 (+0.3%), Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB at 79,396 (+0.6%), RX 6850M XT at 78,940 (+1.1%), and Radeon Pro Vega 64X at 80,959 (-1.4%). The GPU’s delta to the top rival is negative (-1.4%), meaning the Radeon Pro Vega 64X scores higher, so the 5090 is not the absolute highest GPU in its immediate cluster.

The combined percentile is 91, which is higher than the CPU’s 90 but lower than the GPU’s 92, indicating that the CPU is the weaker link in the pairing. The data shows a CPU that is solidly upper-mid-range and a GPU that is top-tier, so the overall system is balanced but leans on the GPU for peak performance. The lack of measured FPS means the CPU and GPU scores are the only quantitative anchors; the 90th percentile CPU and 92nd percentile GPU suggest a system that will excel in GPU-bound tasks but may be slightly limited in CPU-bound scenarios.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU is on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which is a current desktop socket, and it supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. The PCIe is Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), so the motherboard can support fast Gen 5 NVMe SSDs and a Gen 5 GPU, though the RTX 5090 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is compatible. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, so a modest cooler suffices, but the GPU has a 575 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 950 W, meaning the system needs a high-wattage PSU with a 16-pin connector.

The CPU has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is possible, but the TDP is low, which may limit headroom. The GPU is dual-slot, 304 mm long, 137 mm high, and 40 mm wide, so a full-tower case is required. The upgrade path is straightforward: the AM5 socket has a clear upgrade path to newer Zen 4 or future AM5 CPUs, and the GPU is the top of the GeForce 50-series, so a sensible next upgrade would be a newer GPU generation (successor is GeForce 60) or a higher-tier CPU if the 12 cores are insufficient. The platform’s PCIe 5.0 and DDR5 support future-proof the build, but the GPU’s 575 W TDP and 950 W PSU requirement mean any upgrade will need to respect that power envelope. The CPU’s 65 W TDP is a stark contrast to the GPU’s 575 W, so the system is power-hungry overall, but the CPU is efficient.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (12 cores, 24 threads, 65 W TDP) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 (32 GB GDDR7, 575 W TDP). The build class is desktop, and the combined percentile is 91, placing it in the top 9% of all CPU-GPU pairs. The CPU is 90th percentile, and the GPU is 92nd percentile, so the overall tier is high-end but not the absolute highest, as the GPU’s 1.4% delta below the Radeon Pro Vega 64X indicates a performance ceiling. The pairing is a classic high-end gaming and workstation setup: the CPU provides strong multi-threaded throughput (PassMark multithread 48,347) and the GPU provides massive compute (104.8 TFLOPS FP32) and VRAM (32 GB), making it suitable for 4K gaming, 3D rendering, and AI workloads. The lack of measured FPS data means the build’s gaming performance is estimated, but the component scores suggest it will be GPU-bound at 4K and CPU-bound at 1080p.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame rate figures are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores. The GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 18,355 and its 92nd percentile rank imply it is capable of high frame rates in modern games, but the CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1,069 and 2-thread score of 2,067 are moderate, suggesting that at lower resolutions, the CPU may be the limiting factor. At 1440p or 4K, the GPU’s 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 32 GB VRAM will likely handle texture and resolution loads without issue, so frame rates will be high, but the exact numbers cannot be derived from the data.

The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,776 indicates strong multi-threaded performance for games that use many cores, but the single-core score of 1,966 is not top-tier, so frame rate stability may vary. The GPU’s PassMark G3D of 39,650 and Vulkan of 376,728 are high, but the API-specific scores (DX10/11/12) are lower, which may affect older games. The lack of measured FPS rows means that all frame expectations are estimates; the user should treat them as directional, not precise. The GPU’s 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 is a raw indicator of peak throughput, but real game FPS is also influenced by CPU, drivers, and memory, which are not fully captured in the benchmark scores. In summary, the gaming performance is expected to be excellent at 4K, good at 1440p, and potentially CPU-limited at 1080p, but without measured data, these are reasonable inferences, not verified results.