SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 combined with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 represents a desktop pairing that prioritizes high-end processing throughput over raw graphical extremes. The data shows a system where the CPU operates in the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits precisely at the 50th percentile, creating a significant performance hierarchy. The combined percentile for this build is 70, indicating that as a unit, it outperforms the majority of desktop configurations, but the imbalance between the components dictates that its overall character is defined by the CPU’s dominance. This analysis relies solely on synthetic benchmark scores, as no measured FPS data exists for this exact combination; all performance discussions regarding frame rates are estimated from the respective component scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using a 5 nm process, featuring 22,900 million transistors on a 188 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, providing the fundamental speed for its operations. Memory configuration includes 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s, a figure that is adequate for 1080p and entry-level 1440p textures but not exceptional for high-resolution asset streaming. The memory clock runs at 2125 MHz, translating to 17 Gbps effective.

In terms of compute hardware, the RTX 4060 AD106 houses 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 raster operation processors. For accelerated workloads, it includes 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which are essential for ray-traced lighting effects and AI-driven features like DLSS. The raw compute figures are a FP32 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS and a matching FP16 performance of 15.11 TFLOPS (1:1), indicating that the card does not have dedicated half-rate FP16 throughput. The pixel rate is calculated at 118.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate at 236.2 GTexel/s, showing a balanced ratio between pixel fill and texture filtering that supports standard rasterization tasks.

The GPU’s benchmark performance is presented without specific scores; the data lists an average benchmark score of 0 and no individual test results. The critical metric is the percentileVsAllGpus of 50, which places this GPU at the median of all graphics cards. This means that in a rendering context, the RTX 4060 AD106 will deliver performance that is exactly average—neither a high-end enthusiast card nor a low-end budget part. For rendering workloads such as 3D scene compositing or video effects, the 8 GB VRAM capacity is a limiting factor for large, complex scenes, but the 24 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced renders that would be significantly slower on older architectures without such dedicated units. The 96 tensor cores also enable AI-accelerated denoising and upscaling, which can offset the modest bandwidth in practical use.

The absence of measured FPS data means that gaming performance must be inferred from the 50th percentile ranking. This suggests that at 1080p resolution, the GPU will handle most titles at medium to high settings, but at 1440p, it will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding AAA games, particularly with ray tracing enabled, which will tax the RT cores and memory bandwidth. The 272.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for the 8 GB frame buffer, but it is a bottleneck for higher resolutions where data transfer demands increase.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4060 AD106’s 50th percentile position indicates it is an average performer for gaming, meaning it is not suited for 1440p high-refresh monitors (144Hz+) in modern titles. At 1080p, it can plausibly achieve frame rates above 60 FPS in less demanding games, but the lack of measured FPS data prevents a definitive claim; the CPU’s high single-thread score of 1069 in 3dmark_single_thread ensures that the processor will not be the limiting factor for frame generation, but the GPU’s median status caps the overall output.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The passmark_multithread score of 48347 and the 3dmark_max_threads score of 10953 show that the Ryzen 9 7900 can handle the parallel workload of game logic and stream encoding simultaneously, allowing for a smooth streaming experience. The GPU’s tensor cores can also offload encoding tasks via NVENC, but the CPU’s raw throughput is the primary asset here.

Video editing: For video editing, the CPU is the dominant component, with a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 24776 and a geekbench_multicore score of 17726, which are strong indicators of fast timeline scrubbing and effect application. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance are sufficient for hardware-accelerated effects and color grading in 1080p projects, but the median GPU performance means that complex 4K edits with heavy effects will rely more on the CPU’s rendering power than the GPU’s acceleration.

3D rendering: In CPU-based rendering, the Ryzen 9 7900 excels, with a cinebench_r15_multicore score of 4020 and a passmark_floating_point_math score of 97943, indicating rapid computation for physics and ray tracing algorithms. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 4060 AD106’s 24 RT cores and 15.11 TFLOPS provide a baseline capability, but its 50th percentile ranking means it is not a professional-grade renderer; it will be slower than higher-tier cards, and the 8 GB memory could be insufficient for high-poly scenes.

Software development: The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking is ideal for compilation tasks, where the 3dmark_16_threads score of 10056 and the passmark_data_compression score of 577847 show strong parallel processing for building large codebases. The GPU’s average performance is adequate for UI rendering and basic testing, but the system is not optimized for GPU-intensive development like machine learning training, where the 8 GB VRAM is a limiting constraint.

Student and office work: This pairing is overpowered for standard office tasks, where the CPU’s single-thread performance (passmark_single_thread score of 4130) ensures snappy application launches and document processing. The GPU is overkill for spreadsheets and web browsing, but the 65W TDP of the CPU and 115W TDP of the GPU mean that the system remains power-efficient for a desktop, making it a viable, albeit high-end, workstation for students in engineering or design fields who need occasional rendering capability.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on the Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It is manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC, containing 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die size. The base clock is 3.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the TDP is rated at 65W, which is notably low for a 12-core part, suggesting efficient power scaling. The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it includes ECC memory support, making it suitable for error-sensitive workloads.

The benchmark scores paint a clear picture of a processor that excels in multi-threaded environments. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 24776 is a strong indicator of heavy rendering and encoding performance, while the 3dmark_max_threads score of 10953 confirms sustained throughput under full load. The passmark_multithread score of 48347 and the passmark_integer_math score of 164075 show robust integer and general-purpose computation, which translates to fast code compilation and data processing. The passmark_floating_point_math score of 97943 is particularly high, indicating excellent performance for scientific simulations and 3D physics calculations.

Single-thread performance is also competitive, with a cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 1966 and a geekbench_singlecore score of 2495, ensuring that legacy applications and lightly-threaded games run smoothly. The 3dmark_single_thread score of 1069 is moderate, but the passmark_single_thread score of 4130 is above average, suggesting strong clock scaling for everyday responsiveness. The L3 cache is 64 MB shared, which is a substantial pool that helps with gaming and data-heavy workloads, while the L1 and L2 caches are 64 KB and 1 MB per core, respectively.

The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus of 90 places it in the top 10 percent of all processors, and its average benchmark score of 49228 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. Specifically, the data shows a 0.1% lead over the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, a 0.3% deficit to the Intel Core i5-14600KF, a 0.5% lead over the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, and a 1.1% lead over the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H. This indicates that the Ryzen 9 7900 is a mid-high-end desktop processor that competes closely with modern mid-range and some workstation chips, but it does not dominate them. The real-world implication is that for multi-threaded tasks, the Ryzen 9 7900 will finish workloads in the same time frame as these rivals, with the deltaPct values being virtually imperceptible to a user. The 24 threads are fully utilized in video rendering and batch processing, making this a capable workstation CPU, though not a flagship server part.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The most striking aspect of this build is the significant gap between the CPU’s 90th percentile and the GPU’s 50th percentile. This disparity defines the bottleneck characteristics of the system. In gaming workloads, the GPU is the limiting factor. The CPU’s high multi-thread scores, such as the 3dmark_16_threads score of 10056, indicate that it can easily feed data to the GPU, but the RTX 4060 AD106’s median performance means that frame rates will be capped by the graphics card’s rendering capability. The estimated FPS scaling would show that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU has significant headroom, but the GPU will reach its limits first, preventing the system from achieving the high frame rates that the CPU could otherwise support.

In CPU-bound workloads such as 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, the balance shifts. The GPU’s 50th percentile is less relevant, and the CPU’s 90th percentile dominates the processing. For tasks like Cinebench rendering, the GPU is not involved, and the Ryzen 9 7900’s cinebench_r23_multicore score of 24776 will be the sole determinant of performance. Here, the system is well-balanced because the GPU is not a hindrance; it simply sits idle. However, in hybrid workloads like gaming with streaming or game development that uses both CPU and GPU, the bottleneck is more nuanced. The CPU can handle the encoding and game logic, but the GPU’s average performance will lower the overall visual fidelity and frame rate, making the GPU the primary constraint.

The combinedPercentile of 70 is a weighted average, but it masks the imbalance. The data suggests that the system is not well-suited for high-refresh competitive gaming, where the GPU’s 50th percentile would result in frame rates that do not justify the CPU’s power. Conversely, for productivity tasks, the system is efficient because the CPU does the heavy lifting, and the GPU is not a bottleneck. The lack of measuredFps data means that any FPS discussion is theoretical, but the percentile gap is clear evidence that the GPU will limit gaming performance, while the CPU will limit productivity performance only in terms of its absolute speed, not as a bottleneck.

Who Should Build It

This system is designed for users who prioritize CPU-intensive workloads over gaming. The primary target is content creators and 3D modelers who rely on CPU rendering engines. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 24776 and the passmark_physics score of 3059 indicate that this build will handle complex physics simulations and ray-traced CPU renders with ease. For video editors working in 1080p or light 4K, the CPU’s geekbench_multicore score of 17726 ensures fast export times, while the GPU provides adequate acceleration for effects. The intended user is a professional or enthusiast who spends more time in rendering software than in games.

For software developers, the CPU’s 90th percentile ranking is a strong draw. The passmark_data_compression score of 577847 and the passmark_extended_instructions score of 42253 show that compilation and code analysis tasks will be exceptionally fast. This build is also suitable for data scientists working with large datasets, as the 24 threads and 64 MB L3 cache facilitate parallel data processing, and the ECC memory support offers data integrity for long-running computations. However, the 8 GB GPU memory is a limitation for machine learning training, so this is not a deep learning workstation.

Gamers at 1080p who play less demanding titles will find this build adequate, but it is not recommended for high-refresh 1440p gaming due to the GPU’s 50th percentile. For students in STEM fields, the system offers a future-proof platform with the AM5 socket, but the cost is high relative to the GPU’s performance, making it better suited for those who need the CPU power for academic projects. Small business workstations that require heavy spreadsheet analysis or database management will benefit from the CPU’s passmark_integer_math score of 164075, but the GPU is unnecessary unless the business does CAD or graphic design, where the 24 RT cores provide some acceleration.

FAQ

Q: What is the primary performance characteristic of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900?

A: The CPU is a 12-core, 24-thread processor with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, a TDP of 65W, and a percentileVsAllCpus of 90, indicating strong multi-threaded performance.

Q: Is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 suitable for high-end 4K gaming?

A: No, the GPU has a percentileVsAllGpus of 50 and 8 GB of VRAM, which places it at the median performance level, making it unsuitable for high-end 4K gaming where higher VRAM and bandwidth are required.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49228, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i5-14600KF, 0.5% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, and 1.1% higher than the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the system?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and the GPU has its own dedicated memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile is 70, indicating that the system outperforms 70% of all desktop configurations, but the GPU’s median score drags down the overall ranking.

Q: Does this system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has ECC memory support, which is a feature typically found in workstation processors.

Q: What is the power consumption of the GPU, and what PSU is recommended?

A: The GPU has a TDP of 115W, and the suggested PSU for the system is 300W, which is sufficient for this pairing given the CPU’s low 65W TDP.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s benchmark scores are extensive, with notable results including a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 24776 and a cinebench_r23_singlecore score of 1966. The geekbench_multicore score is 17726, and the geekbench_singlecore score is 2495. In 3DMark tests, the CPU achieves a max_threads score of 10953, a 16_threads score of 10056, an 8_threads score of 7454, a 4_threads score of 3994, a 2_threads score of 2067, and a single_thread score of 1069. PassMark results show a multithread score of 48347 and a single thread score of 4130, with specific workloads like floating point math at 97943 and integer math at 164075. The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49228, and its percentileVsAllCpus is 90.

The GPU has no individual benchmark scores listed; its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentileVsAllGpus is 50. The combined picture is one of stark contrast: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is average. The combinedPercentile of 70 reflects this, showing that the build is better than most, but the GPU’s median status prevents it from being a high-end gaming or rendering machine. The CPU’s performance in multi-threaded tasks is exceptional, as evidenced by its near-tie with the Intel Core i5-14600KF, but the system’s overall capability is capped by the GPU’s inability to keep pace in graphics-intensive workloads.

Build Overview

This is a desktop build classified by the buildClass field as a desktop, pairing a high-end AMD Ryzen 9 7900 CPU with a mid-range NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 GPU. The CPU is from the 7000 series, using the Zen 4 architecture, and is designed for the AM5 socket. The GPU is from the GeForce 40-series, using the Ada Lovelace architecture, and is noted as end-of-life in production status. The overall tier of this build is defined by the percentiles: the CPU sits in the 90th percentile, the GPU in the 50th percentile, and the combined system in the 70th percentile. This places the build in the upper-middle tier of desktop systems, with a clear emphasis on processing power over graphical performance. The release dates show the CPU launched on 2023-01-13 with a launch MSRP of $429, while the GPU launched on 2024-03-31 with no listed MSRP. The build is a capable workstation for CPU-heavy tasks, but it is not a balanced gaming machine.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The motherboard platform is based on the AMD Socket AM5, which supports the AMD Ryzen 9 7900. The CPU supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it has ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, which is a high-bandwidth interface for future expansion. The GPU uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, which is compatible with the CPU’s PCIe lanes but does not take advantage of the newer Gen 5 standard, leaving headroom for a future GPU upgrade that could utilize the full bandwidth.

The TDP of the CPU is 65W, and the GPU is 115W, with a suggested PSU of 300W. This low power requirement means that the existing power supply likely has ample headroom for a more powerful GPU. The upgrade path is clear: the CPU is a long-term investment, but the GPU is the bottleneck. A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RTX 4060 AD106 with a higher-tier GPU that has a higher percentileVsAllGpus ranking, as the CPU’s 90th percentile performance will not be a limiting factor. The 24 RT cores and 8 GB VRAM of the current GPU are adequate for entry-level ray tracing, but a future GPU with more VRAM and higher bandwidth would better match the CPU’s capabilities. The platform supports this upgrade via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, although the current GPU only uses PCIe 4.0, so there is no immediate need to change the motherboard. The memory support for DDR5 is current, but a future upgrade to a higher-capacity kit could improve performance in memory-sensitive applications, given the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is a potential constraint for the CPU. Overall, the upgrade path is straightforward: keep the CPU and platform, and invest in a more powerful GPU to balance the system.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Who Should Build It

FAQ

Benchmark Performance

Build Overview

Upgrade Path and Platform

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds