SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

92 Score

Top 8% Ranking

92 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

90%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

17,639 Benchmark Score

Top 10% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing represents a high-core-count desktop CPU combined with a mainstream 40-series GPU. The data shows a system built for heavy multi-threaded productivity at 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the CPU serving as the dominant performance driver. This analysis draws exclusively from the provided benchmark and specification data to interpret what this combination means for real-world workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture using the AD107 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC with 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU operates with a base clock of 1830 MHz and a boost clock of 2460 MHz, paired with 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. Memory bandwidth is listed at 272.0 GB/s, with memory clocks at 2125 MHz (17 Gbps effective). This bandwidth figure is a critical constraint for the GPU, as the narrow 128-bit bus means the RTX 4060 relies on its 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores to compensate in ray-traced workloads where memory access patterns are less predictable.

The GPU’s compute specifications include 3072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. Pixel rate is 118.1 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 236.2 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is rated at 15.11 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), indicating that the GPU does not have specialized FP16 acceleration for AI workloads—it relies on the tensor cores for that. The tensor cores are the key differentiator for DLSS and ray tracing, allowing the GPU to offload denoising and upscaling tasks. The RT cores handle the BVH traversal and ray intersection tests, which are the most demanding parts of real-time ray tracing.

Benchmark results show the RTX 4060 scoring 2302 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, 95057 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 48643 in Geekbench Vulkan. The PassMark G3D score is 19545, with a GPU compute score of 9213. The percentile vs all GPUs is 61, placing it in the upper-midrange tier. The nearest rivals in the data are the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (avgScore 17666, deltaPct -0.2), AMD Radeon 780M (avgScore 17588, deltaPct 0.3), AMD Radeon Pro 560 (avgScore 17551, deltaPct 0.5), and AMD Radeon Pro 460 (avgScore 17509, deltaPct 0.7). These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the RTX 4060’s average benchmark score of 17639 is essentially tied with those older or integrated GPUs in raw compute, though the 4060’s architectural advantages in ray tracing and tensor operations are not captured in those legacy tests.

For rendering, the data suggests the RTX 4060 is capable but not exceptional. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p and some 1440p content creation, but the 272.0 GB/s bandwidth could be a limiting factor in complex scenes with high-resolution textures. The FP32 throughput of 15.11 TFLOPS is competitive for a mainstream card, but the 1:1 FP16 ratio means no half-precision boost for compute workloads. The 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores are the hardware that enables DLSS 3 frame generation, which can significantly improve gaming performance in supported titles. The GPU’s dual-slot design and single 12-pin power connector indicate a power draw of 115 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 300 W—this is a low-power, efficient part that does not require a robust power supply.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 show a strong multi-threaded performer. The 3DMark scores are 10056 for 16 threads, 2067 for 2 threads, 3994 for 4 threads, 7454 for 8 threads, 10953 for max threads, and 1069 for single thread. Cinebench R23 scores are 24776 for multi-core and 1966 for single-core, while Cinebench R15 scores are 4020 for multi-core and 315 for single-core. Geekbench scores are 17726 for multi-core and 2495 for single-core. PassMark results include 48347 for multi-thread, 4130 for single-thread, 97943 for floating-point math, 164075 for integer math, 577847 for data compression, 34708 for data encryption, 42253 for extended instructions, 380 for finding prime numbers, 3059 for physics, and 68474 for random string sorting.

The CPU’s percentile vs all CPUs is 90, meaning it outperforms 90% of all tested CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 49228. The nearest rivals are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (avgScore 49196, deltaPct 0.1), Intel Core i5-14600KF (avgScore 49394, deltaPct -0.3), Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (avgScore 48995, deltaPct 0.5), and Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (avgScore 48698, deltaPct 1.1). These deltas are all within 1.1%, indicating the Ryzen 9 7900 is positioned directly against Intel’s midrange Core i5 and low-end Xeon parts in overall CPU performance. The 0.3% deficit to the i5-14600KF is negligible in real-world terms, but the 90th percentile placement shows this is a high-tier CPU.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 17639, with a 61st percentile vs all GPUs. The combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing is 76, placing the system in the upper quartile of all builds. The data reveals a significant imbalance: the CPU is in the 90th percentile while the GPU is in the 61st percentile. This means the CPU has substantially more compute headroom than the GPU can utilize in most gaming scenarios. The CPU’s multi-threaded scores (Cinebench R23 24776, PassMark 48347) are excellent for productivity, but the GPU’s scores (PassMark G3D 19545, 3DMark Steel Nomad 2302) are merely average for a modern discrete GPU. The combined picture is a workstation-class CPU paired with a midrange gaming GPU, creating a system that excels in CPU-bound tasks but is limited by GPU performance in graphics-heavy workloads.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination—the measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty. Therefore, all frame rate discussions below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores and should be treated as qualitative projections, not measured data.

Based on the GPU’s 61st percentile ranking and its PassMark G3D score of 19545, the RTX 4060 is positioned for 1080p gaming at high or ultra settings. In esports titles that are CPU-bound, the Ryzen 9 7900’s strong single-thread performance (Cinebench R23 single-core 1966, PassMark single-thread 4130) will allow the GPU to reach its full potential, likely delivering high frame rates at 1080p. However, in demanding AAA titles at 1440p, the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will become limiting factors, with frame rates likely dropping below the 60 FPS threshold in the most graphically intensive scenes.

The RTX 4060’s ray tracing performance is supported by its 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, which enable DLSS 3 frame generation. In ray-traced games at 1080p, DLSS can boost frame rates significantly, but the underlying raster performance (15.11 TFLOPS FP32) is moderate. The GPU’s nearest rivals—the Radeon 780M integrated graphics and Radeon Pro 460—suggest that in raw compute, the 4060 is not dramatically ahead of more modest parts, though its architectural advantages in RT and tensor workloads are substantial. For gaming, this means the RTX 4060 is best suited for 1080p ultra or 1440p medium settings, with DLSS enabled for higher frame rates. At 4K, the GPU would likely struggle, as the 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB VRAM would be severely taxed.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data shows a pronounced bottleneck imbalance. The CPU’s 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU’s 61st percentile means the processor is fundamentally more capable than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads—such as software compilation, data compression (PassMark 577847), or physics simulations (PassMark 3059)—the Ryzen 9 7900 will dominate, and the GPU will be irrelevant. In gaming, the bottleneck shifts depending on resolution. At 1080p, the CPU’s fast single-thread performance (1069 in 3DMark single-thread) can feed the GPU effectively, but the GPU’s moderate compute power (15.11 TFLOPS) will still cap frame rates in many titles.

At 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the primary bottleneck. The RTX 4060’s 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors, as higher resolutions require more memory bandwidth and capacity. The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19545 is only slightly above its nearest rival, the Radeon HD 7790 (17666), which is a much older architecture—this indicates the 4060’s raw rasterization is not exceptionally high. The combined percentile of 76 suggests that in mixed workloads, the system performs well overall, but the GPU will hold back the CPU in graphics-intensive tasks. The FPS scaling evidence is absent (no measured FPS data), but the benchmark scores imply that the CPU has significant headroom that the GPU cannot utilize in gaming, making the GPU the definitive limiting factor in most gaming scenarios.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4060’s 61st percentile and 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance support 1080p high-refresh (144Hz+) gaming in esports and lighter titles, but the 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates in AAA games. The CPU’s 3DMark single-thread score of 1069 ensures no CPU bottleneck at 1080p, but the GPU is the limiting factor for sustained high FPS in demanding titles.

Streaming: The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads, with a PassMark multi-thread score of 48347, provide ample headroom for software x264 encoding while gaming. The GPU’s NVENC encoder (not specified in the data) is present, but the 115 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU indicate a power-efficient setup. The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities make it ideal for streaming at 1080p60 with moderate bitrate.

Video editing: The Ryzen 9 7900’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24776 and PassMark floating-point math score of 97943 indicate strong performance for video encoding and rendering. The GPU’s 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p timelines, but 4K multi-layer edits may exceed VRAM. The system is well-suited for 1080p/1440p video editing with effects.

3D rendering: The CPU’s 90th percentile and Geekbench multi-core score of 17726 excel in CPU-based renderers, while the GPU’s 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced rendering in supported apps. The 8 GB VRAM limits scene complexity, but the 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance is adequate for small-to-medium scenes. The combined 76th percentile indicates a capable entry-level rendering workstation.

Software development: The CPU’s PassMark data compression score of 577847 and integer math score of 164075 indicate rapid compilation times and fast code execution. The 12 cores/24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently, and the 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors ensures low power draw (65 W TDP). The GPU is less relevant here, making this an excellent developer machine.

Student and office work: The CPU’s 90th percentile and integrated Radeon Graphics provide sufficient performance for office tasks, with the discrete GPU adding support for light graphics work. The 65 W CPU TDP and 300 W suggested PSU mean a quiet, low-power system. The 8 GB GPU VRAM is overkill for office use, but the system’s multi-threaded strength (PassMark multi-thread 48347) handles multitasking with ease.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over GPU performance. Gamers at 1080p who play esports titles or older AAA games will benefit from the CPU’s 90th percentile and the GPU’s 61st percentile, as the CPU ensures no bottleneck in most titles. Gamers at 1440p who are willing to lower settings or use DLSS (supported by the 96 tensor cores) will find the RTX 4060 adequate, but 4K gamers should look elsewhere due to the 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Content creators focused on video editing, 3D modeling, and software development will find the Ryzen 9 7900’s 12 cores and 24 threads ideal, with Cinebench R23 multi-core 24776 and PassMark multi-thread 48347 indicating strong rendering performance. The RTX 4060 provides GPU acceleration for effects and ray tracing in supported apps, but the 8 GB VRAM limits large 4K projects. Students and office workers will benefit from the CPU’s efficiency (65 W TDP) and integrated graphics for basic tasks, with the discrete GPU available for occasional graphics work. Small business workstations that run multi-threaded applications like data analysis (PassMark data compression 577847) or virtualization will see excellent performance from the CPU, making this a versatile productivity build.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The platform is built on AMD Socket AM5, which supports the Ryzen 9 7900’s Zen 4 architecture (Raphael). The CPU supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, providing 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, while the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8—this means the CPU has more bandwidth than the GPU can utilize, offering headroom for future GPUs that may use PCIe 5.0. The CPU’s TDP is 65 W, and the GPU’s TDP is 115 W, with a suggested PSU of 300 W. This leaves significant PSU headroom for a more powerful GPU upgrade, as the total system draw (180 W for CPU+GPU) is well below the 300 W recommendation.

A sensible next upgrade would be replacing the RTX 4060 with a higher-tier GPU, as the CPU’s 90th percentile can easily support a more powerful graphics card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface on the GPU is a potential bandwidth limitation for future high-end cards, but the CPU’s PCIe Gen 5 lanes mean a newer GPU could use the full bandwidth. The 8 GB VRAM on the RTX 4060 is the most likely upgrade driver—moving to a GPU with more VRAM (e.g., 16 GB) would alleviate memory constraints at 1440p and 4K. The AM5 socket also supports future Ryzen 7000-series upgrades, though the 7900 is already a high-end part. The platform’s DDR5 support and ECC capability make it suitable for workstation use, and the 65 W CPU TDP means a modest cooler is sufficient, leaving room for a higher-TDP GPU without PSU changes.

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking compared to all CPUs?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is in the 90th percentile vs all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49228.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 4060 have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile for the Ryzen 9 7900 and RTX 4060 is 76, placing the system in the upper quartile of all builds.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7900 has ECC memory support, along with dual-channel DDR5 memory.

Q: What is the TDP of the GPU and the suggested PSU wattage?

A: The RTX 4060 has a TDP of 115 W, and the suggested PSU is 300 W.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock speed?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900 has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz.

Q: Are there any measured FPS figures available for this build?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination—all frame rate discussions are estimates from benchmark scores.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It contains 13,140 million transistors across a die size of 2x 71 mm². The base clock is 3.70 GHz, boosting to 5.40 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR5 memory (dual-channel, 83.2 GB/s bandwidth) and ECC memory, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 24 lanes. Integrated Radeon Graphics are present, and the multiplier is unlocked. The release date is January 13, 2023, with a launch MSRP of $429.

The benchmark scores reveal a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24776 and PassMark multi-thread score of 48347 are strong indicators of performance in rendering, compilation, and data processing. The Geekbench multi-core score of 17726 confirms this, while the single-core scores (Cinebench R23 1966, Geekbench 2495, PassMark 4130) show respectable single-thread performance. The 3DMark scores scale from 1069 (single-thread) to 10953 (max threads), demonstrating good multi-thread scaling across 12 cores. The PassMark data compression score of 577847 and integer math score of 164075 are particularly high, indicating excellent performance in file compression, database operations, and code compilation.

The 90th percentile ranking places it among the top-tier CPUs, with rivals including the Intel Core i5-14600KF (deltaPct -0.3) and Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (deltaPct 0.5). The 0.3% deficit to the i5-14600KF is within noise, but the 7900’s 12 cores provide more consistent multi-threaded performance. The 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 12-core CPU, making it highly energy-efficient. The architecture’s 5 nm process and Zen 4 design deliver high instructions-per-clock, which is reflected in the strong single-thread scores. For real workloads, this CPU handles video editing, 3D rendering, and software development with ease, while the integrated graphics provide a fallback for basic tasks. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, though the boost clock of 5.40 GHz is already high.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build (buildClass: "desktop") combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 GPU. The CPU is in the 90th percentile vs all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile vs all GPUs, resulting in a combined percentile of 76. This places the system in the upper-middle tier of all builds, but with a distinct CPU-heavy bias. The pairing is unusual in that the CPU is a high-end workstation part (12 cores, 24 threads) while the GPU is a midrange consumer card (8 GB VRAM, 128-bit bus).

The build is best described as a productivity-first system with gaming capabilities. The CPU’s 90th percentile makes it suitable for demanding multi-threaded tasks like video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation, while the GPU’s 61st percentile provides adequate 1080p gaming performance. The 8 GB VRAM and 272.0 GB/s bandwidth are the primary limitations, capping the system at 1080p ultra or 1440p medium settings in most games. The 76th percentile overall indicates a balanced but not exceptional system; the CPU is a top-tier part, but the GPU holds the system back from the upper echelons of gaming performance.

The GPU’s nearest rivals—the Radeon 780M integrated graphics and Radeon Pro 460—underscore its midrange positioning, while the CPU’s rivals include the Core i5-14600KF and Xeon Gold 5318H, highlighting its workstation-class performance. This is a machine for users who need massive CPU compute power but only moderate GPU performance. It is not a high-refresh 1440p gaming rig, nor is it a professional 3D rendering workstation—it sits between those categories, excelling at CPU-bound tasks while offering competent but not exceptional graphics performance. The 300 W suggested PSU and 65 W CPU TDP make it an energy-efficient build, and the AM5 platform offers a clear upgrade path to a more powerful GPU in the future.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

FAQ — 5-7 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data (format: Q: ... A: ...)

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds