SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

79%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

2,893 Benchmark Score

Top 21% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is an unusual combination, pitting a high-end 12-core desktop processor against an entry-level, low-power GPU. Benchmark data shows the CPU performing in the 90th percentile against all processors, while the GPU sits in the 18th percentile, creating a stark imbalance that defines this build’s character. There are no measured FPS rows for this exact pairing in the data, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates derived from the component benchmark scores, not direct measurements.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) and fabricated on TSMC’s 5 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps power demands modest for a processor of this capability. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache, providing ample fast storage for frequently accessed data. This is a desktop part with an unlocked multiplier, supporting DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth and ECC memory support, which appeals to workstation users.

Benchmark results for the CPU are consistently strong. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score reaches 24776, while the single-core score is 1966, indicating excellent scaling across all 24 threads. Geekbench multi-core hits 17726 and single-core 2495, reinforcing the same pattern. The 3DMark thread tests show a progression from 2067 at 2 threads to 7454 at 8 threads, then 10056 at 16 threads and 10953 at max threads, demonstrating that performance scales nearly linearly as more cores are utilized. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 48347 and a single-thread score of 4130, with specialized workloads like floating-point math at 97943 and integer math at 164075. The average benchmark score for this CPU is 49228, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

Relative to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7900 is essentially tied with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (deltaPct 0.1) and the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (deltaPct 0.5), while being slightly behind the Intel Core i5-14600KF (deltaPct -0.3) and modestly ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (deltaPct 1.1). These deltas are all within a couple of percent, meaning real-world differences are negligible for most workloads. What distinguishes the Ryzen 9 7900 is its combination of high thread count and efficient power draw, making it suitable for heavily threaded tasks like 3D rendering, video encoding, and software compilation, where the multi-core scores indicate strong parallel throughput.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU and GPU combination, so all gaming frame rates discussed here are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The data is not measured, and this should be considered a qualitative projection rather than empirical testing. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1966 in Cinebench R23 and 4130 in PassMark single-thread indicates it can feed a GPU with instructions rapidly, but the GPU’s low percentile ranking limits overall frame output.

The RTX 4010, with a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2893 and an 18th percentile standing among all GPUs, is the clear bottleneck in gaming. At 1080p with ultra settings, expect low to moderate frame rates in esports titles, but demanding AAA games will likely struggle to maintain smooth play. At 1440p, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth become further constraints, pushing frame rates down. At 4K, this pairing is not viable for ultra settings, as the GPU’s compute resources are far too limited. The CPU’s high single-thread performance ensures that frame pacing will be consistent, but the absolute frame counts will be dictated by the GPU, which ranks below nearly all modern discrete graphics cards.

For competitive gaming at lower settings, the RTX 4010 might deliver playable results in lighter titles, but the absence of measured data means these are speculative estimates. The 18th percentile GPU score suggests performance comparable to entry-level cards from several generations ago, so expectations should be modest.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread performance (1966 in Cinebench R23 single-core) is more than capable of driving high frame rates, but the GPU’s 2893 Steel Nomad score and 18th percentile ranking prevent this build from achieving high-refresh at ultra settings. At lower graphical presets, 1080p esports titles may reach acceptable rates, but this is not a high-refresh gaming rig.

Streaming: The 12-core, 24-thread CPU offers plenty of headroom for encoding and streaming workloads, as evidenced by its 24776 multi-core Cinebench R23 score. However, the GPU lacks the tensor cores and VRAM capacity to handle modern streaming enhancements, so CPU-based encoding would be the practical path, consuming some of that thread headroom.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-threaded capabilities, shown in the 48347 PassMark multi-thread score and 164075 integer math score, are well-suited for video editing and rendering timelines. The GPU’s low compute (2.706 TFLOPS FP32) and 4 GB VRAM limit hardware-accelerated effects, so GPU-accelerated renders will be slow, but CPU-based workflows will perform admirably.

3D rendering: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 24776 and 3DMark max threads at 10953 indicate strong CPU rendering performance. The GPU’s 2.706 TFLOPS FP32 and 6 RT cores are too weak for GPU rendering, so this build is a CPU-rendering workhorse with minimal GPU acceleration.

Software development: The CPU’s 24 threads and high cache (64 MB L3) handle compilation and parallel builds efficiently, as shown by the 10056 3DMark 16-thread score. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, so the RTX 4010’s low performance has little impact here.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 2495 in Geekbench and 4130 in PassMark single-thread ensures snappy responsiveness in office applications, spreadsheets, and web browsing. The GPU is sufficient for basic display output but adds no meaningful acceleration for productivity software beyond standard 2D workloads.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly identifies the GPU as the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU sits in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49228, while the GPU sits in the 18th percentile with an average score of 2893. This 72-percentage-point gap means that in any GPU-bound workload like gaming or GPU rendering, the RTX 4010 will be the bottleneck, holding back the Ryzen 9 7900’s full potential.

In CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering on the CPU, or software compilation, the processor’s high multi-core scores (24776 in Cinebench R23, 48347 in PassMark multi-thread) will dominate, and the GPU’s role is negligible. The FPS scaling, while not measured, would theoretically show that frame rates remain nearly flat regardless of CPU settings because the GPU cannot produce more frames. Conversely, CPU-intensive tasks like physics calculations (PassMark physics score of 3059) would show no GPU influence.

The pairing is fundamentally unbalanced: a top-tier CPU with a bottom-tier GPU. Upgrading the GPU would transform the system’s capabilities far more than any CPU change, as the processor already outperforms its nearest rivals (Intel Core i5-14600KF at -0.3 deltaPct) and has headroom for years.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010 is an entry-level part within the GeForce 40-series, built on the Ampere architecture (chip GA107) using Samsung’s 8 nm process. It has 768 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with 6 RT cores and 24 tensor cores, indicating basic ray tracing and AI acceleration capabilities. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1417 MHz and a boost clock of 1762 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 96.00 GB/s, which is low by modern standards and will limit texture-heavy workloads.

The single benchmark score in the data is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 2893, placing the GPU in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB (deltaPct -0.5), NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF (deltaPct -0.6), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB (deltaPct -0.7), all of which score essentially the same, indicating that the RTX 4010’s performance is comparable to mid-range cards in this specific test, despite its lower market positioning. The pixel rate is 28.19 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 42.29 GTexel/s, with FP32 compute at 2.706 TFLOPS and FP16 at the same rate (1:1). The TDP is just 50 W, requiring no power connectors and a suggested PSU of only 250 W, making it a low-power, single-slot card with 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

For rendering, the low FP32 throughput and 4 GB VRAM mean the GPU is unsuitable for professional 3D rendering or heavy video effects. The 6 RT cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low compute limits its effectiveness. The 24 tensor cores can assist with DLSS in supported titles, but the overall GPU performance will be the limiting factor in any graphics-intensive application.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7900 uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with ECC capability. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes (CPU only), so the motherboard and storage can take advantage of next-generation PCIe devices. The integrated Radeon Graphics provides a fallback display output if the discrete GPU fails or is removed, which is a useful redundancy.

The RTX 4010 uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is compatible with the AM5 platform’s PCIe Gen 5 slots, though it will run at the GPU’s native Gen 4 speed. The GPU’s 50 W TDP and 250 W suggested PSU mean that the power supply headroom is enormous when paired with a 65 W CPU, leaving ample room for future upgrades.

The most sensible next upgrade is the GPU. Replacing the RTX 4010 with a higher-tier card would immediately eliminate the bottleneck, as the CPU has the headroom to support much faster graphics hardware. The AM5 socket also supports future Ryzen processors, so a CPU upgrade path exists, though the 12-core 7900 is already near the top of the product stack. Memory upgrades to higher-capacity DDR5 kits would benefit memory-intensive workloads, given the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is fixed by the CPU’s memory controller.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49228, ranking in the 90th percentile of all processors. This is driven by strong multi-threaded results: Cinebench R23 multi-core at 24776, Geekbench multi-core at 17726, and PassMark multi-thread at 48347. Single-thread performance is also solid, with 1966 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2495 in Geekbench single-core. The CPU’s nearest rivals are all within 1.1% of its score, indicating a very competitive mid-to-high-end segment.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 2893, ranking in the 18th percentile of all GPUs. This single data point from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 places it near the RTX 4060 Ti variants (deltaPct -0.5 to -0.7) in this specific test, but the 4 GB VRAM and low bandwidth suggest it will underperform in real-world gaming compared to those cards. The combined percentile for this build is 54, reflecting the average of the CPU’s high standing and the GPU’s low standing.

The combined picture is a system with exceptional processing power and minimal graphics capability. In CPU-intensive tasks, this build ranks in the top 10% of all systems, but in GPU-intensive tasks, it falls to the bottom fifth. The data shows that the CPU’s performance is not the limiting factor in any workload, while the GPU’s performance is the sole constraint in graphics scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s multi-core performance compared to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49228 on average, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and 1.1% higher than the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, but 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i5-14600KF.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4010 has 6 RT cores based on the Ampere architecture, but its low FP32 compute of 2.706 TFLOPS limits ray tracing performance.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of the GPU?

A: The GPU has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU’s TDP suitable for a small form factor build?

A: The CPU has a 65 W TDP, and the GPU has a 50 W TDP, with a suggested PSU of 250 W, so the combined power draw is low enough for compact systems.

Q: How does the CPU perform in single-threaded tasks?

A: The CPU scores 1966 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4130 in PassMark single-thread, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs for single-thread performance.

Q: What is the GPU’s position among all GPUs?

A: The GPU is in the 18th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 2893.

Q: Can this build handle 4K gaming?

A: No, the GPU’s 4 GB VRAM and 96.00 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K ultra settings, and its 18th percentile ranking indicates it is not suited for high-resolution gaming.

Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU compute over graphics. For software developers, the 12-core, 24-thread processor with a 24776 Cinebench R23 multi-core score accelerates compilation and parallel testing, while the GPU’s limitations are irrelevant to code editing. Students and office workers benefit from the CPU’s fast single-thread performance (2495 Geekbench) for everyday tasks, and the low-power components (65 W CPU, 50 W GPU) keep the system quiet and cool. Small business workstations handling data analysis or virtualization can leverage the 24 threads and ECC memory support, though the GPU adds little beyond basic display output.

Content creators focused on CPU-based rendering will find this build viable, given the 48347 PassMark multi-thread score, but they should avoid GPU-accelerated effects. Gamers at 1080p with low settings might find the RTX 4010 passable for esports, but this is not a gaming-focused system. The build is best suited for professionals and hobbyists who need maximum processing power at minimal cost, accepting that any future graphics upgrade will be necessary for GPU-bound work. The 90th percentile CPU with an 18th percentile GPU is a clear statement: buy this for the processor, not the graphics.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4010

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

Usage Scenarios

Balance and Bottleneck

GPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

FAQ

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds