SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

29,945 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti form a desktop pairing that sits at the 83rd percentile overall, combining a high-core-count Zen 4 processor with a 30-series Ampere graphics card. The CPU achieves a 90th percentile rank among all processors, while the GPU holds a 75th percentile rank, indicating a processor-favored balance. This build targets users who need heavy multi-threaded compute and solid 1440p-class rendering, though no measured frame rates exist for this exact combination, so all gaming discussion below is estimated from benchmark scores.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is built on the GA104 chip using Samsung’s 8 nm process, containing 17,400 million transistors on a 392 mm² die. Its memory subsystem consists of 8 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 608.3 GB/s — a figure that places it well above typical mid-range cards of its generation. The memory clock runs at 1188 MHz, with 19 Gbps effective speed. The base clock is 1575 MHz, boosting to 1770 MHz, and the card draws a 290 W TDP with a 600 W suggested PSU. Power delivery uses a single 12-pin connector, and the card occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height.

The compute configuration includes 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. Ray tracing is handled by 48 RT cores, and AI acceleration by 192 tensor cores. The card’s FP32 throughput is 21.75 TFLOPS, with FP16 also rated at 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1). Pixel fill rate reaches 169.9 GPixel/s, and texture rate hits 339.8 GTexel/s. For API support, it offers DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16.

Benchmark scores show a Passmark G3D result of 23356, which places the GPU at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 3478, while Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are 119718 and 139541 respectively. Passmark GPU compute scores 11601, indicating strong general compute ability. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile with an average score of 29928 (0.1% higher), followed by the AMD Radeon RX 6800 at 30095 (0.5% higher than the 3070 Ti), the RTX 2080 Ti at 29783 (0.5% lower), and the RX 6700 at 30433 (1.6% higher). The average benchmark score for this GPU is 29945.

For rendering workloads, the data suggests the 3070 Ti is a capable 1440p performer but its 8 GB VRAM may constrain ultra-texture settings in modern titles. The 608.3 GB/s bandwidth helps maintain throughput in memory-heavy scenes, while the 48 RT cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced effects, though performance will trail higher-tier Ampere cards. The Passmark DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12 scores of 261, 155, 192, and 91 respectively show a mixed legacy API picture, with DX12 being the weakest relative score — likely reflecting driver optimization rather than raw capability.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

High-refresh gaming: At 1080p and 1440p, the RTX 3070 Ti’s Passmark G3D score of 23356 and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 suggest it can drive high frame rates in esports titles, though the 8 GB VRAM may force texture quality reductions at 1440p ultra. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7454 and single-thread score of 1069 indicate strong per-core performance, which helps maintain high minimum frame rates in CPU-bound scenes.

Streaming: The 192 tensor cores on the GPU provide hardware-accelerated encoding capabilities, while the CPU’s 24 threads handle concurrent encoding and gameplay without contention. The Passmark multithread score of 48347 and data compression score of 577847 suggest smooth background task handling during live broadcasts, though the lack of measured FPS data means streaming headroom is inferred rather than quantified.

Video editing: The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 and Geekbench multicore score of 17726 indicate strong rendering performance for timeline previews and exports. The GPU’s 608.3 GB/s bandwidth and 339.8 GTexel/s texture rate accelerate effects processing and color grading, while the 12 cores and 24 threads handle multi-layer timelines efficiently. Data encryption score of 34708 and floating-point math of 97943 suggest robust computational throughput for codec conversions.

3D rendering: For CPU-based rendering, the Ryzen 9 7900’s Cinebench R15 multicore score of 4020 and R23 multicore score of 24776 position it well above typical desktop processors. GPU-accelerated rendering benefits from the 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 and 11601 Passmark GPU compute score, making this pairing suitable for hybrid rendering pipelines that leverage both CPU and GPU resources.

Software development: The CPU’s Passmark integer math score of 164075 and extended instructions score of 42253 support fast compilation of large codebases. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequent recompilations, while the 24 threads handle parallel builds. The GPU’s compute capability aids in testing GPU-accelerated algorithms, though 8 GB VRAM may limit larger neural network training batches.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread Passmark score of 4130 and 3DMark 2-thread score of 2067 handle everyday productivity tasks with ease. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback display output, though the discrete GPU is more than sufficient for spreadsheet, document, and browser workloads. The 65 W CPU TDP keeps power draw modest for dorm or small office environments, while the GPU’s 290 W TDP is the primary power consideration.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on Zen 4 architecture with the Raphael codename. It uses a 5 nm process from TSMC, containing 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, boosting up to 5.40 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. It supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration, yielding 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. The socket is AMD Socket AM5, with PCIe Gen 5 providing 24 lanes from the CPU. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and a shared 64 MB L3 cache. The multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking, and the processor integrates Radeon Graphics for basic display output. It was released on 2023-01-13 with a launch MSRP of $429.

Benchmark results show the CPU at the 90th percentile of all processors, with an average benchmark score of 49228. The 3DMark scores scale from 1069 single-thread to 10953 max-threads, with intermediate results of 2067 for 2 threads, 3994 for 4 threads, and 7454 for 8 threads. This scaling pattern indicates strong multi-threaded efficiency, with the 12-core design delivering near-linear gains up to 12 threads. Cinebench R23 scores are 1966 single-core and 24776 multi-core, while R15 scores are 315 single-core and 4020 multi-core. Geekbench results show 2495 single-core and 17726 multi-core. Passmark benchmarks include a multithread score of 48347, single-thread of 4130, floating-point math of 97943, and integer math of 164075.

The nearest CPU rivals show tight competition: the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G scores 49196 (0.1% lower), Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49394 (0.3% higher), Intel Core Ultra 5 245 scores 48995 (0.5% lower), and Intel Xeon Gold 5318H scores 48698 (1.1% lower). The Ryzen 9 7900’s position is notable — it sits between the 14600KF and the Ultra 5 245, meaning it trades blows with Intel’s mid-range and high-end offerings. For real workloads, the data implies strong multi-threaded performance for video encoding, 3D rendering, and scientific computing, while the single-thread score of 1069 in 3DMark ensures snappy responsiveness in everyday tasks.

The 64 MB L3 cache is a significant asset for data-intensive applications, reducing main memory access frequency. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports high-throughput workloads like data compression (Passmark score 577847) and random string sorting (68474). The 13,140 million transistor count on 5 nm suggests a dense design that balances power efficiency with performance, evidenced by the 65 W TDP despite high boost clocks.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The combined percentile of 83, with the CPU at 90 and GPU at 75, indicates a processor-heavy balance. In CPU-bound workloads like software compilation, 3D rendering, and data processing, the Ryzen 9 7900 will be the primary driver, with the GPU playing a secondary role. The CPU’s Passmark multithread score of 48347 and Cinebench R23 multicore of 24776 provide ample headroom for such tasks, meaning the GPU rarely becomes a compute bottleneck in these scenarios.

For GPU-bound workloads like gaming at high resolutions and ray-traced rendering, the RTX 3070 Ti becomes the limiting factor. Its Passmark G3D score of 23356 is solid but trails the CPU’s relative percentile, so frame rates will be constrained by the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 in graphically intense titles. The lack of measured FPS data prevents exact bottleneck quantification, but the percentile gap (90 vs 75) suggests that in balanced gaming workloads, the GPU will saturate before the CPU reaches its limits.

The memory subsystem creates a potential bottleneck for mixed workloads. The CPU’s 83.2 GB/s DDR5 bandwidth is ample for its 12 cores, while the GPU’s 608.3 GB/s GDDR6X bandwidth is sufficient for 1440p rendering. However, in workloads that transfer large data between CPU and GPU (e.g., physics simulations), the PCIe 4.0 x16 interface provides adequate bandwidth, with the CPU’s 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes allowing future expansion.

FPS scaling estimates from benchmark scores suggest that at 1080p, the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1069) will keep frame rates high even in CPU-heavy scenes, while at 1440p and 4K, the GPU’s workload increases, making its 75th percentile position the primary limiter. The CPU’s 2-thread score of 2067 and 4-thread score of 3994 indicate that even lightly-threaded games will run well, but the GPU’s 8 GB VRAM may cause texture streaming issues in open-world titles at 4K ultra settings.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. Therefore, all frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores of the CPU and GPU, not direct measurements.

Based on the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 23356 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3478, the RTX 3070 Ti is estimated to deliver high frame rates at 1080p in most competitive titles, with 1440p being the card’s sweet spot for balanced quality and performance. The CPU’s 3DMark 8-thread score of 7454 and single-thread score of 1069 suggest that at 1080p, the processor will easily keep up with the GPU’s output, meaning frame rates will be GPU-limited in most scenarios. At 1440p, the GPU’s 608.3 GB/s bandwidth and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 should maintain smooth gameplay in AAA titles at high settings, though 8 GB VRAM may require reducing textures to ultra-high presets in memory-hungry games.

At 4K, the GPU’s 75th percentile rank becomes more apparent, with estimated frame rates dropping below 60 FPS in demanding titles at ultra settings. The CPU’s performance headroom means that lowering graphics settings will yield proportionally higher frame rates, as the processor is unlikely to become a bottleneck until frame rates exceed 200 FPS in esports titles. The GPU’s Geekbench Vulkan score of 139541 suggests strong API efficiency, which may translate to better-than-expected performance in Vulkan-based games, while the DirectX 12 Passmark score of 91 is relatively low, possibly indicating driver overhead in some DX12 titles.

For ray tracing, the 48 RT cores provide hardware acceleration, but with only 8 GB VRAM, enabling high-quality RT effects at 1440p may cause memory pressure. The tensor cores (192) support DLSS, which can offset the performance cost of RT, but the specific DLSS version and quality settings are not detailed in the data. The CPU’s integrated Radeon Graphics offer a fallback for non-gaming tasks but are not relevant for gaming performance.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

This build suits gamers targeting 1080p high-refresh or 1440p high-settings play, given the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 23356 and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread 1069). The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p ultra and 1440p high in most current titles, but 4K gaming would require lowered settings. Esports enthusiasts benefit from the CPU’s high boost clock of 5.40 GHz and the GPU’s 339.8 GTexel/s texture rate, which support high frame rates in competitive shooters.

Content creators working with video editing or 3D rendering will find the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 and Passmark multithread score of 48347 invaluable for shortening render times. The GPU’s 11601 Passmark GPU compute score accelerates effects rendering, while the 608.3 GB/s bandwidth handles large video buffers. For software developers, the CPU’s Passmark integer math of 164075 and extended instructions of 42253 enable fast compilation, and the 24 threads allow parallel builds. The 64 MB L3 cache reduces recompilation latency.

Students and office workers on a budget will appreciate the CPU’s 65 W TDP, which keeps power costs low, while the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a backup display output. The Passmark single-thread score of 4130 ensures snappy application launches, and the 12 cores handle multitasking with many open tabs or virtual machines. Small business workstations benefit from the ECC memory support and 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for fast NVMe storage and future expansion. The GPU’s end-of-life production status may concern some buyers, but its 75th percentile rank means it remains competitive for most productivity and gaming tasks.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 49228, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Key scores include 3DMark max-threads at 10953, Cinebench R23 multicore at 24776, Geekbench multicore at 17726, and Passmark multithread at 48347. Single-thread results are 1069 (3DMark), 1966 (Cinebench R23), 2495 (Geekbench), and 4130 (Passmark). The nearest rival is the Intel Core i5-14600KF with an average score of 49394, just 0.3% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G trails by 0.1% at 49196.

The GPU’s average benchmark score is 29945, placing it at the 75th percentile of all GPUs. The Passmark G3D score is 23356, with 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 at 3478, Geekbench OpenCL at 119718, and Vulkan at 139541. The nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile at 29928, just 0.1% lower, while the AMD Radeon RX 6800 leads by 0.5% at 30095.

The combined percentile is 83, indicating a system that outperforms the majority of desktop builds. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank is notably higher than the GPU’s 75th, meaning the processor is the stronger component relative to its peers. This creates a system where CPU-bound tasks (rendering, compilation, data processing) will perform excellently, while GPU-bound tasks (gaming at high resolutions, ray tracing) will be limited by the graphics card’s comparative position. The 0.1-1.6% deltas to the nearest rivals show that both components are tightly clustered with their competitors, so real-world differences will depend on specific workload optimization.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on Zen 4 architecture with a 5 nm process.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 Ti have, and what type?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 608.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the CPU’s boost clock and TDP?

A: The boost clock is 5.40 GHz, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7900 supports ECC memory, along with DDR5 in dual-channel configuration (83.2 GB/s bandwidth).

Q: What is the GPU’s ray tracing capability?

A: The RTX 3070 Ti has 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores, with FP32 performance of 21.75 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The average benchmark score is 49228, placing it at the 90th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What is the GPU’s Passmark G3D score and percentile?

A: The Passmark G3D score is 23356, and the GPU sits at the 75th percentile of all GPUs.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5, which supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration. The platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, allowing for high-speed NVMe storage and future GPU upgrades. The GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x16, which is backward compatible with PCIe 5.0 slots, so a newer GPU can be installed without changing the motherboard. The suggested PSU for the GPU is 600 W, and the CPU’s TDP is 65 W, leaving headroom for additional components. The GPU’s 290 W TDP is the dominant power draw, so a 600 W PSU provides adequate wattage for the entire system, though a higher-wattage unit would allow for future upgrades.

A sensible next upgrade would be a higher-tier GPU with more VRAM, as the 8 GB on the RTX 3070 Ti is the primary limitation for 4K gaming and large texture workloads. The CPU’s 90th percentile rank means it has several years of relevance, so a GPU upgrade would balance the system better. The motherboard’s AM5 socket supports future Ryzen processors, so a CPU upgrade path exists, though the 12-core/24-thread configuration is already strong. The 64 MB L3 cache and 5.40 GHz boost clock suggest the CPU will not bottleneck a more powerful GPU in most workloads. The platform’s ECC memory support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes make it suitable for workstation use, where ECC stability and fast storage are priorities.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (12-core, 24-thread, Zen 4) with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti (Ampere, 8 GB GDDR6X). The CPU ranks at the 90th percentile, while the GPU ranks at the 75th, resulting in a combined percentile of 83. This indicates a high-end desktop configuration that excels in multi-threaded compute, with solid gaming performance at 1080p and 1440p. The CPU’s 65 W TDP and the GPU’s 290 W TDP make it a reasonable power draw for a performance desktop, with a 600 W PSU recommended.

The build class is desktop, targeting users who need both strong CPU throughput and capable GPU rendering. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24776 and Passmark multithread of 48347 make it suitable for content creation and development, while the GPU’s 608.3 GB/s bandwidth and 21.75 TFLOPS FP32 handle gaming and GPU compute. The lack of measured FPS data means gaming performance is estimated from benchmark scores, but the overall picture is a well-balanced system with a processor that outperforms its graphics card relative to their respective markets. For users prioritizing CPU-heavy workloads, this pairing is ideal; for pure gaming at 4K, a GPU with more VRAM would be a better match. The end-of-life status of the GPU suggests considering availability, but its performance remains competitive at the 75th percentile.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds