SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP: A Desktop Analysis

This desktop pairing combines a 12-core Zen 4 processor with an Ampere-based graphics card, landing at the 70th percentile overall. The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming frame rate discussion below is estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct observation.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Since the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries for this build, there are no direct frame rate figures to report from the data. All FPS expectations must be inferred from the underlying component scores. The GPU sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs, which places it squarely at the midpoint of the performance distribution — neither a high-end card nor an entry-level one. The CPU, by contrast, ranks at the 90th percentile, indicating substantial headroom in processing power relative to the graphics hardware.

At 1080p, the RTX 3060 3840SP's 14.22 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth suggest it can handle modern titles at high settings, though the 6 GB VRAM capacity may become a limiting factor in texture-heavy scenarios. The 48 ROPs and 120 TMUs provide a balanced rasterization pipeline for its class. At 1440p, the 192-bit memory bus and 6 GB frame buffer would likely constrain performance more noticeably, as the GPU's mid-pack percentile ranking indicates it lacks the raw fillrate and bandwidth headroom for consistently high frame rates at increased resolutions.

For ultra settings specifically, the data suggests this GPU would deliver playable but not exceptional performance at 1080p, with frame rates dropping more sharply at 1440p due to VRAM and bandwidth limitations. The CPU's high single-thread score of 1069 in 3dmark_single_thread and 1966 in cinebench_r23_singlecore means it would not bottleneck the GPU at typical gaming loads; rather, the GPU would be the limiting factor in most gaming scenarios. Ray tracing workloads, given the 30 RT cores, would see significant performance penalties compared to rasterized rendering, and the 6 GB memory capacity further compounds this in RT-enabled titles that require larger frame buffers.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The CPU's average benchmark score is 49228, placing it at the 90th percentile among all processors. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G at 49196 (0.1% faster), the Intel Core i5-14600KF at 49394 (0.3% slower), the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 at 48995 (0.5% faster), and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H at 48698 (1.1% faster). These tiny deltas — all within roughly one percent — indicate the Ryzen 9 7900 sits in an extremely competitive cluster where no single processor holds a decisive edge.

In multi-threaded workloads, the CPU scores 24776 in cinebench_r23_multicore and 17726 in geekbench_multicore, with a 3dmark_max_threads score of 10953. Its 12 cores and 24 threads scale well from 2-thread (2067) to 16-thread (10056) workloads, with the max-threads score showing only modest gains over the 16-thread result — suggesting diminishing returns beyond 16 threads for many tasks. The passmark_multithread score of 48347 and integer math score of 164075 reinforce this strong multi-core capability.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, with an avgBenchmarkScore of 0 and an empty nearestRivals list. Its percentileVsAllGpus of 50 places it exactly at the median — a stark contrast to the CPU's 90th percentile. This creates a notable imbalance: the processor is near top-tier while the graphics card is mid-pack. The combined percentile of 70 reflects this gap, landing the overall build in the upper-midrange tier for desktop systems.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-refresh gaming: The CPU's 90th percentile ranking and single-thread score of 1069 in 3dmark_single_thread ensure it can feed frames rapidly, but the GPU's 50th percentile and 6 GB VRAM limit the achievable frame rates at high refresh rates. At 1080p, competitive titles could likely reach high refresh territory, but the 14.22 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 88.90 GPixel/s pixel rate suggest diminishing returns at 1440p or with ultra settings.

Streaming: The 12-core CPU with passmark_data_encryption score of 34708 and data compression score of 577847 provides ample headroom for encoding overhead while gaming. The 24 threads handle concurrent game and encode workloads effectively, though the GPU's 6 GB VRAM may require adjusting texture quality to accommodate streaming software overhead.

Video editing: The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 24776 and passmark_floating_point_math of 97943 indicate strong rendering performance for video timelines. Memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s from the dual-channel DDR5 interface supports smooth preview and export workflows, though the GPU's mid-range position means GPU-accelerated effects would not be as fast as higher-tier cards.

3D rendering: The CPU's 3dmark_max_threads score of 10953 and passmark_integer_math of 164075 provide solid CPU-based rendering performance. The GPU's 14.22 TFLOPS FP32 and 120 tensor cores offer moderate GPU-accelerated rendering capability, but the 6 GB VRAM limits scene complexity and texture sizes for larger projects.

Software development: The 3dmark_2_threads score of 2067 and 3dmark_4_threads of 3994 show strong responsiveness for compilation tasks. The passmark_extended_instructions score of 42253 indicates robust SIMD capabilities for code optimization, while 24 threads handle parallel builds efficiently.

Student and office work: The 90th percentile CPU ranking and 4130 passmark_single_thread score ensure snappy application responsiveness. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 10056 means even heavily multithreaded office workloads, such as data analysis or virtualization, would run smoothly, though the discrete GPU is overkill for typical productivity tasks.

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Gamers targeting 1080p with medium-to-high settings are the primary audience, as the GPU's 50th percentile and 6 GB VRAM align with that resolution class. At 1440p, the data suggests compromises would be needed, making this build less suitable for enthusiasts seeking maximum fidelity. The CPU's 90th percentile means gamers upgrading their GPU later could do so without immediately rebuilding the rest of the system.

Content creators working with CPU-heavy workloads — video encoding, 3D scene rendering, data processing — would benefit from the 24 threads and cinebench_r23_multicore score of 24776. The 64 MB shared L3 cache and 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth support large datasets, making this suitable for video editors and 3D artists who prioritize CPU over GPU performance.

Software developers compiling large codebases would appreciate the passmark_multithread score of 48347 and the 3dmark_16_threads score of 10056, which indicate strong parallel compilation capability. The 5 nm process node and 65 W TDP also make it energy-efficient for continuous operation.

Students and office users would find the CPU's 90th percentile overkill, but the build's balanced midrange GPU means it can handle occasional gaming or creative tasks. Small business workstations requiring multi-threaded performance for databases or financial modeling would benefit from the ECC memory support and 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes for storage expansion.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The data clearly indicates the GPU is the bottleneck in gaming and GPU-accelerated workloads. With the CPU at the 90th percentile and the GPU at the 50th, the graphics card limits frame rates in most scenarios. The 6 GB VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth are modest by current standards, and the 48 ROPs constrain fillrate-bound scenarios. In CPU-bound workloads — compilation, rendering, data processing — the processor is far less likely to be the limiting factor, given its 24 threads and 24776 cinebench_r23_multicore score.

The 3dmark scaling from 2 threads (2067) to 16 threads (10056) to max threads (10953) shows the CPU has near-linear scaling up to 16 threads, with only a 8.9% gain beyond that. This suggests workloads using fewer than 16 threads are well-served, while those needing more see diminishing returns. The GPU's lack of benchmark scores prevents direct comparison, but its 50th percentile ranking against all GPUs places it below the CPU's performance tier, confirming the imbalance.

For mixed workloads like streaming while gaming, the CPU's 24 threads can handle encode overhead without impacting game performance significantly, but the GPU's 6 GB VRAM may force lower texture settings to maintain stable frame times. The combined 70th percentile reflects a system where the CPU significantly outperforms the GPU, making GPU upgrades the logical path to better overall balance.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The RTX 3060 3840SP features 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 336.0 GB/s bandwidth. The memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate. This configuration provides adequate bandwidth for 1080p gaming but becomes strained at higher resolutions or with large textures, as the 6 GB capacity can fill quickly in modern titles.

The GPU's 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs produce a pixel rate of 88.90 GPixel/s and texture rate of 222.2 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 14.22 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 14.22 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating no dedicated FP16 acceleration advantage. The 30 RT cores handle ray tracing workloads, while 120 tensor cores provide AI acceleration for DLSS and similar features.

The 8 nm Samsung process node and 276 mm² die size with 12,000 million transistors place this as a mid-size chip. The 185 W TDP requires a 450 W suggested PSU, and the dual-slot cooler with a single 12-pin connector fits standard desktop cases. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs.

With no benchmark scores in the FACT PACK, the 50th percentile ranking serves as the primary performance indicator. This mid-pack position means the GPU delivers average performance relative to all GPUs, suitable for 1080p gaming but not for high-end rendering or 4K workloads. The 6 GB VRAM is the most limiting factor, as modern games increasingly require 8 GB or more for high-quality textures.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The Ryzen 9 7900 packs 12 cores and 24 threads on AMD's Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Raphael, built on TSMC's 5 nm process. The 13,140 million transistors span two 71 mm² chiplets, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The 65 W TDP is remarkably efficient for a 12-core part, enabled by the 5 nm process node.

Cache architecture includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB shared L3. This large L3 cache benefits workloads with repeated data access patterns, such as databases or scientific computing. The dual-channel DDR5 memory interface provides 83.2 GB/s bandwidth with ECC support, suitable for data-integrity-sensitive applications.

Benchmark scores reveal strong performance across the board. The cinebench_r23_multicore score of 24776 and single-core of 1966 demonstrate excellent scaling. The 3dmark scores show a progression from 2067 at 2 threads to 10953 at max threads, indicating efficient thread utilization. Passmark scores of 48347 multithread, 164075 integer math, and 97943 floating point math confirm versatility across different workload types.

The 90th percentile ranking places it among the top processors, with nearest rivals within one percent. The 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) provide high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion. The integrated Radeon Graphics provide basic display output, though the discrete GPU handles all rendering tasks. The unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, and the launch MSRP was $429.

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

This is a desktop build pairing AMD's Ryzen 9 7900 with NVIDIA's GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP. The CPU represents the 90th percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile. The combined percentile of 70 places this system in the upper-midrange tier of desktop builds — powerful enough for demanding CPU workloads but limited by the mid-range GPU.

The pairing is somewhat unusual: a top-tier processor with a mid-range graphics card. This configuration makes sense for users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound, such as content creators, developers, or researchers, with gaming as a secondary consideration. The 12-core, 24-thread CPU provides exceptional multi-threaded performance that will remain relevant for years, while the GPU is adequate for current 1080p gaming but likely to become a bottleneck sooner.

The build class is desktop, indicating a full-size system with standard expansion capabilities. The CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 185 W TDP together suggest a modest total power draw, with the 450 W suggested PSU providing sufficient headroom. The AM5 socket and DDR5 memory platform offer a modern foundation, though the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface means it does not take full advantage of the CPU's PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

FAQ

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70, placing it in the upper-midrange tier of desktop builds.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score is 49228, with nearest rivals all within 1.1% — the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G is 0.1% faster, the Intel Core i5-14600KF is 0.3% slower, the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is 0.5% faster, and the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H is 1.1% slower.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this build?

A: No, the FACT PACK contains no measuredFpsUltraByGame entries for this exact combination, so all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the component benchmark scores.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and memory bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 336.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth at 14 Gbps effective speed.

Q: What socket and memory type does the CPU use?

A: The CPU uses AMD Socket AM5 with dual-channel DDR5 memory support, providing 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth with ECC capability.

Q: What is the suggested power supply wattage for this GPU?

A: The GPU's suggested PSU is 450 W, with a 185 W TDP for the graphics card itself.

Q: How many cores and threads does the CPU have?

A: The CPU has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.40 GHz.

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

The AM5 socket supports the current Ryzen 7000 series and provides a forward-looking platform. The CPU's 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes (CPU only) offer high-bandwidth connectivity for next-generation storage and expansion cards, though the GPU currently uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The dual-channel DDR5 memory interface supports ECC, and the 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provides a solid foundation, though higher-speed DDR5 modules could improve performance further.

The CPU's 65 W TDP and GPU's 185 W TDP combine for a modest 250 W total component draw. The 450 W suggested PSU leaves approximately 200 W of headroom for the rest of the system — motherboard, drives, fans, and peripherals. This is sufficient for the current configuration, but a GPU upgrade would likely require a larger PSU, as higher-tier cards typically draw more power.

The most sensible upgrade path is the GPU. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking means it can support significantly more powerful graphics cards without becoming a bottleneck. Upgrading to a higher-tier GPU with more VRAM and bandwidth would address the current 6 GB VRAM limitation and improve gaming performance at higher resolutions. The CPU's 24 PCIe Gen 5 lanes would accommodate future GPUs and NVMe drives, though current GPUs use PCIe 4.0.

Memory upgrades are also possible, as the dual-channel DDR5 interface can be populated with higher-capacity or higher-speed modules. The 83.2 GB/s bandwidth is a baseline; faster DDR5 kits could improve memory-bound workloads. Storage expansion is straightforward given the PCIe Gen 5 lanes, allowing for high-speed NVMe drives.

The platform's longevity is supported by the AM5 socket's active production status and the CPU's 2023-01-13 release date. The 5 nm process node and 65 W TDP make it energy-efficient for continuous operation, and the unlocked multiplier allows overclocking headroom for users seeking additional performance. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor, meaning future driver optimizations may be limited.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 3840SP

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Who Should Build It — target users and industries (gamers at specific resolutions, content creators, developers, students, small business workstations) tied strictly to the measured performance

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Build Overview — what this CPU+GPU pairing is, its class (desktop/laptop from buildClass), and overall tier from the percentiles

FAQ

Upgrade Path and Platform — socket, memory support, PCIe, PSU headroom from suggestedPsu/tdp, what a sensible next upgrade looks like

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds