SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
89%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

15,199 Benchmark Score
Top 11% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM: A Desktop Analysis

This pairing combines a 12-core, 24-thread AMD Ryzen 9 7900 processor with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM graphics card, creating a desktop build where the CPU is overwhelmingly the dominant component. The processor sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU ranks at the 57th percentile among all GPUs, a gap that shapes every workload discussion in this analysis. The combined percentile for the system is 74, indicating a build that is strong overall but heavily weighted toward compute tasks rather than graphics-intensive workloads. No measured FPS data exists for this exact combination in the database, so all frame rate discussions are estimates derived from benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7900 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600KF?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900 has an average benchmark score of 49228, while the Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49394, putting the Ryzen 0.3% behind in average performance. This is a negligible difference, making the two effectively equivalent in overall CPU throughput.

Q: Is the RTX 3050 OEM faster than the AMD Radeon RX 7600?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has an average benchmark score of 15199, while the RX 7600 scores 15171, meaning the RTX 3050 OEM is 0.2% ahead. The two cards are statistically tied, with the RTX 3050 OEM also sitting just 0.6% behind the RTX 2060.

Q: What is the processor's single-threaded performance compared to its multi-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900 scores 1069 in 3dmark single-thread and 10953 in 3dmark max-threads, showing a 10.2x scaling from single to maximum thread utilization. In Cinebench R23, the single-core score is 1966 while multi-core is 24776, a 12.6x scaling factor.

Q: How much L3 cache does the CPU have, and what memory does it support?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900 has 64 MB of shared L3 cache, with 64 KB of L1 and 1 MB of L2 per core. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and includes ECC memory support.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. The memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective data rate.

Q: Does the CPU include integrated graphics?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7900 includes Radeon Graphics as integrated graphics, which could serve as a fallback display output or for basic tasks if the discrete GPU is unavailable.

Q: What is the power supply requirement for the GPU?

A: The suggested PSU for the RTX 3050 OEM is 300 W, with the GPU itself rated at 130 W TDP and requiring a single 8-pin power connector.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 9 7900 delivers exceptional CPU performance across synthetic workloads. In Cinebench R23, the multi-core score of 24776 places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the single-core score of 1966 demonstrates strong per-thread performance. The Geekbench results reinforce this, with a multi-core score of 17726 and single-core score of 2495. The 3dmark suite shows a clear scaling pattern: 2067 for 2 threads, 3994 for 4 threads, 7454 for 8 threads, 10056 for 16 threads, and 10953 for max threads. This indicates excellent thread scaling, with the 16-thread score reaching 91.8% of the max-thread score, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 16 threads. Passmark results are equally robust, with a multithread score of 48347 and single-thread score of 4130. The integer math score of 164075 and floating-point math score of 97943 highlight strong arithmetic capability, while data compression at 577847 and random string sorting at 68474 show solid memory-bound performance.

The RTX 3050 OEM, in contrast, presents a modest GPU profile. Its Passmark G3D score is 11857, placing it at the 57th percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 indicate competent compute performance, but the Passmark GPU compute score of 5779 is relatively low compared to the G3D score. The DirectX API scores show an interesting pattern: DirectX 9 at 137, DirectX 11 at 86, DirectX 12 at 58, and DirectX 10 at 61. This suggests the card performs best under legacy DirectX 9 workloads, while modern DirectX 12 titles may not fully utilize its architecture. The G2D score of 973 reflects basic 2D capabilities.

Combining these, the system's overall compute potential is heavily skewed toward CPU-bound tasks. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 57th percentile creates a 33-percentage-point gap, indicating that the processor is capable of feeding any workload the GPU can handle, but the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive scenarios.

Balance and Bottleneck

The performance disparity between the Ryzen 9 7900 and RTX 3050 OEM is stark. The CPU's average benchmark score of 49228 dwarfs the GPU's 15199, and the percentile gap (90 vs 57) means the processor is roughly two tiers higher than the graphics card. In CPU-bound workloads such as data compression (577847 in Passmark), integer math (164075), and floating-point math (97943), the Ryzen 9 7900 will operate without any constraint from the GPU. The CPU's 24 threads and 12 cores ensure that even heavily threaded applications like 3D rendering or video encoding see full utilization.

However, in GPU-bound scenarios such as gaming or GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 3050 OEM becomes the clear bottleneck. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 11857 is only 24% of the CPU's average benchmark score, and its 57th percentile ranking means it will struggle to keep pace with the CPU's output in graphics-heavy tasks. The FPS scaling pattern would show minimal improvement when lowering resolution, as the GPU's raw throughput (8.087 TFLOPS FP32) is the limiting factor. The CPU's 3dmark single-thread score of 1069 and 2-thread score of 2067 suggest it can feed frames far faster than the GPU can render them, creating a scenario where the GPU is saturated at virtually any resolution.

This imbalance means that any upgrade path should prioritize the GPU first. The CPU has headroom to support significantly more powerful graphics cards, and the system's overall performance would improve dramatically with a GPU replacement. Conversely, upgrading the CPU would yield negligible gains in GPU-bound workloads, as the current processor already exceeds the GPU's requirements.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7900 uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes, offering substantial bandwidth for future expansion. The platform supports ECC memory, a feature valuable for workstation use cases. The CPU's 65 W TDP is remarkably low for a 12-core part, indicating excellent power efficiency and headroom for cooling solutions. The unlocked multiplier allows for overclocking, though the 5.40 GHz boost clock already provides strong single-thread performance.

The RTX 3050 OEM uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, which is half the width of typical full-size slots. This could slightly limit bandwidth in some scenarios, though for a GPU of this class the impact is minimal. The card's suggested PSU of 300 W and 130 W TDP mean the system's power requirements are modest, and the 1x 8-pin power connector is standard. The GPU is end-of-life, with the GeForce 40 series as its successor, meaning upgrade availability is limited to used or remaining stock.

A sensible next upgrade would be a more powerful GPU, given the CPU's headroom. The RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB GDDR6 memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p gaming but will limit performance in higher resolutions or textures. The CPU's PCIe Gen 5 support and DDR5 memory ensure that a newer GPU would not be constrained by the platform. The AM5 socket's longevity and the CPU's 90th percentile performance suggest the processor could remain relevant for several more generations.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination in the database. All frame rate expectations below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 3050 OEM's Passmark G3D score of 11857 and 57th percentile ranking suggest 1080p gaming is the primary target. At 1080p with ultra settings, the GPU would likely deliver playable frame rates in less demanding titles, while more graphically intensive games would require settings reductions. The GPU's DirectX 12 score of 58 on Passmark is notably lower than DirectX 11 (86), suggesting modern DX12 titles may perform worse than expected.

At 1440p, the RTX 3050 OEM's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth would become significant constraints. The GPU's 128-bit memory bus limits bandwidth, and the 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is modest for higher resolutions. The CPU's performance would not be a factor, as even the 3dmark 2-thread score of 2067 indicates sufficient frame-feeding capability. For 4K, the GPU is likely inadequate for ultra settings, and even medium settings would strain the memory subsystem.

The combined percentile of 74 reflects this gaming reality: the system is capable but not exceptional for gaming. The CPU's 90th percentile ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU's 57th percentile means frame rates will be average. For competitive gaming at 1080p with lower settings, the system could achieve high refresh rates, but for AAA titles at high quality, the user would need to accept compromises.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is built on the GA106 chip using Samsung's 8 nm process, with 12,000 million transistors on a 276 mm² die. The architecture is Ampere, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The GPU has 2304 shading units, 72 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with a base clock of 1515 MHz and boost clock of 1755 MHz. The pixel rate is 56.16 GPixel/s and texture rate is 126.4 GTexel/s.

The memory subsystem comprises 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a modest configuration for modern games, particularly at higher resolutions. The 18 RT cores and 72 tensor cores provide ray tracing and DLSS capabilities, but the GPU's overall compute power (8.087 TFLOPS FP32) limits their effectiveness. The FP16 performance is identical to FP32 at 8.087 TFLOPS (1:1), which is unusual and suggests the card may not have dedicated FP16 acceleration.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a mid-range card. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 60740 and Vulkan score of 57103 indicate solid compute capability, but the Passmark GPU compute score of 5779 is low. This suggests the card excels at graphics rendering but is less capable for compute-heavy workloads like machine learning or scientific simulation. The DirectX 12 score of 58 versus DirectX 11's 86 implies the card may be better suited to older game APIs, possibly due to driver optimizations or architectural limitations.

For rendering workloads, the RTX 3050 OEM would provide entry-level ray tracing performance but would struggle with complex scenes. The 8 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p rendering but would limit texture sizes and scene complexity. The GPU's 57th percentile ranking places it alongside the Radeon RX 7600 (0.2% ahead) and RTX 2060 (0.6% behind), indicating it is competitive with previous-generation mid-range cards.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration. The Zen 4 architecture (codename Raphael) features base and boost clocks of 3.70 GHz and 5.40 GHz respectively, with a 65 W TDP. The cache hierarchy includes 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core, plus 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark results demonstrate exceptional multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24776 and Passmark multithread score of 48347 place the CPU in the 90th percentile of all processors. The 3dmark scores show near-linear scaling up to 8 threads (7454), with 16 threads (10056) reaching 91.8% of the max-thread score (10953). This indicates the CPU can effectively utilize its 12 cores, though the 24 threads provide diminishing returns beyond 16.

Single-threaded performance is equally strong, with a Geekbench single-core score of 2495 and Passmark single-thread score of 4130. The 3dmark single-thread score of 1069 and 2-thread score of 2067 confirm the high per-core efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture. The Cinebench R15 scores (4020 multi-core, 315 single-core) align with these results.

The Passmark specialized workloads reveal the CPU's strengths: data compression at 577847, floating-point math at 97943, and integer math at 164075. The extended instructions score of 42253 indicates solid SIMD performance, while the find prime numbers score of 380 is notably lower, suggesting moderate performance in certain algorithmic workloads. The data encryption score of 34708 shows competent cryptographic throughput.

The CPU's nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (0.1% slower), Intel Core i5-14600KF (0.3% faster), Intel Core Ultra 5 245 (0.5% slower), and Intel Xeon Gold 5318H (1.1% slower). These small deltas suggest the Ryzen 9 7900 is well-positioned in its performance tier.

Build Overview

This desktop build pairs a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU, creating a system that is exceptionally well-suited for CPU-intensive workloads but only average for graphics. The Ryzen 9 7900's 90th percentile ranking places it among the fastest processors available, while the RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile is solidly mid-pack. The combined percentile of 74 reflects the CPU's dominance in the overall system score.

The build class is desktop, and the platform (AM5) is current-generation with DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity. The CPU's 65 W TDP is remarkably efficient, allowing for compact cooling solutions despite the 12-core configuration. The GPU's 130 W TDP and 300 W suggested PSU keep total system power requirements modest.

This is not a balanced gaming build; it is a workstation-oriented system with gaming capability as a secondary function. The CPU is overqualified for the GPU in gaming scenarios, but perfectly matched for productivity tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, or data analysis. The system would benefit most from a GPU upgrade to achieve balance, but as configured, it offers exceptional compute performance at a moderate graphics level.

Who Should Build It

This system targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Content creators working with video editing, 3D rendering, or software compilation would benefit from the Ryzen 9 7900's 12 cores and 24 threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24776 and Geekbench multi-core score of 17726 indicate strong performance in multi-threaded applications. Data analysts and researchers would appreciate the CPU's data compression (577847) and encryption (34708) scores.

Software developers would find the CPU's compilation speeds excellent, with the Passmark integer math score of 164075 and random string sorting score of 68474 indicating strong performance in code processing tasks. Students and small business users would benefit from the system's efficiency, with the 65 W TDP and 300 W PSU keeping power consumption low.

Gamers at 1080p with modest settings would find the system adequate, but the RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile ranking means it is not suitable for high-refresh or high-resolution gaming. The system is better suited for productivity first, with gaming as a secondary activity. Users considering this build should be aware that the GPU is the bottleneck and plan for a future upgrade if gaming becomes a priority.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The system would achieve playable frame rates at 1080p with lowered settings, but the RTX 3050 OEM's 57th percentile and DirectX 12 score of 58 limit high-refresh potential. The CPU's 3dmark 2-thread score of 2067 ensures no CPU bottleneck, but the GPU's 8.087 TFLOPS FP32 throughput caps frame rates.

Streaming: The CPU's 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding while gaming, with the Passmark multithread score of 48347 supporting simultaneous workloads. The GPU's NVENC (via Ampere architecture) would complement this, though the GPU's modest performance might limit game settings during streaming.

Video editing: The CPU excels, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 24776 and Passmark floating-point math at 97943 handling rendering and effects well. The GPU's 8 GB VRAM and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth would handle 1080p editing, but 4K timelines may strain the memory subsystem.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering would be excellent, with 12 cores and 24 threads scoring 24776 in Cinebench R23. GPU-based rendering would be limited by the RTX 3050 OEM's 8.087 TFLOPS and 57th percentile ranking, making it suitable for previews but not final renders.

Software development: Compilation and testing benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 164075 and extended instructions score of 42253. The 64 MB L3 cache and DDR5 bandwidth (83.2 GB/s) support large codebases efficiently.

Student and office work: The system is overqualified for typical office tasks, with the CPU's single-thread score of 4130 in Passmark handling productivity software smoothly. The 65 W TDP ensures low operating costs, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a fallback if the discrete GPU is unnecessary.