SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

32,456 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# Opening paragraph

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE is a desktop-class combination that sits in the 84th percentile of all tracked CPU+GPU pairings. The CPU alone lands in the 90th percentile of all processors in the database, while the GPU occupies the 77th percentile, which frames the build immediately: a strong twelve-core compute platform feeding a competent but not flagship graphics card. Both parts are active, current-generation components from AMD, with the processor arriving in January 2023 and the graphics card following in July 2023. One important caveat applies throughout this analysis: no measured FPS data exists in the database for this exact combination, so all gaming figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct in-game measurements.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on AMD's Zen 4 architecture under the Raphael codename, manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process node. It carries 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die layout of 2x 71 mm². The chip runs a 3.70 GHz base clock with boost up to 5.40 GHz, and does so within a modest 65 W TDP — a notably restrained thermal envelope for a processor of this core count. The cache hierarchy consists of 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3. There is no 3D V-Cache variant data attached to this part; the L3 figure stands as listed.

The benchmark data sketches a processor that is strong everywhere but exceptional in sustained multi-threaded work. Cinebench R23 returns 24,776 points multi-core against 1,966 points single-core — a ratio that reflects the 24-thread count doing real work rather than sitting idle. Cinebench R15 shows the same shape: 4,020 multi-core, 315 single-core. Geekbench 5 delivers 17,726 multi-core and 2,495 single-core. PassMark puts the multithread score at 48,347 with a single-thread figure of 4,130. PassMark's granular tests add texture: 164,075 for integer math, 97,943 for floating point, 577,847 for data compression, 34,708 for encryption, and 68,474 for string sorting. Physics sits at 3,059.

In 3DMark's CPU scaling profile, the scores climb from 1,069 single-thread to 2,067 at two threads, 3,994 at four threads, 7,454 at eight threads, 10,056 at sixteen threads, and 10,953 at maximum threads. Two observations follow. First, the four-to-eight-thread jump is nearly linear, indicating that games and applications that scale to eight threads get almost full use of those cores. Second, the sixteen-to-max-thread delta is small — 10,056 to 10,953 — because the test saturates beyond sixteen threads; the 7900 still posts its best result there. The 90th percentile position against all CPUs confirms this is an upper-tier desktop processor, and the average benchmark score of 49,228 places it essentially dead level with its nearest rivals.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU and GPU pairing in the database — dataIsMeasured is false and measuredFpsUltraByGame is empty. Every frame-rate statement in this section is therefore an estimate extrapolated from the benchmark scores, not a recorded measurement.

Working from the GPU's numbers, the RX 7900 GRE scores 48,314... more precisely, 4,814 in 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) and 27,089 in PassMark G3D. Its Vulkan result of 99,850 and OpenCL result of 175,758 in Geekbench further indicate a card with substantial rasterization throughput. With 45.98 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 359.2 GPixel/s of pixel fill, the estimates point toward high-refresh gameplay at 1440p and playable ultra-settings performance at 4K in most modern titles, with ray tracing imposing a heavier penalty than on rival architectures with more dedicated RT throughput per the 80 RT cores figure. The CPU side supports these estimates well: a 3,994 four-thread 3DMark score and 4,130 PassMark single-thread score indicate the Ryzen 9 7900 will rarely be the frame limiter at 4K, where the GPU's 77th percentile position defines the ceiling. At 1080p with high refresh targets, the ten-plus thousand point multi-thread results suggest the processor can feed fast frame pipelines without stutter, though the GPU remains the governing component.

GPU Analysis

The RX 7900 GRE is built on the Navi 31 chip under the RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed Plum Bonito, also on TSMC's 5 nm node. The die measures 529 mm² and packs 57,700 million transistors at a density of 109.1M per mm². The hardware configuration includes 5,120 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, 160 render output units, and 80 RT cores. There are no tensor cores listed — the field is null — so AI-assisted workloads on this card rely on shader-based paths rather than dedicated matrix hardware.

Clocks are specified as a 1,287 MHz base, a 2,245 MHz boost, and a 1,880 MHz game clock. Memory is 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That bandwidth figure matters for rendering: large textures, high-resolution frame buffers, and compute workloads that stream data heavily all benefit. The 16 GB capacity is equally relevant for content creation, where scene complexity can exceed the capacity of smaller cards.

Rendering throughput numbers tell the story. FP32 compute is 45.98 TFLOPS, FP16 is 91.96 TFLOPS at a 2:1 rate, texture fill is 718.4 GTexel/s, and pixel fill is 359.2 GPixel/s. The compute benchmarks corroborate the raw specs: Geekbench OpenCL at 175,758, Geekbench Vulkan at 99,850, and PassMark GPU Compute at 15,016. For GPU rendering engines that run on OpenCL or Vulkan, these scores indicate the card can function as a legitimate mid-to-high-tier compute device. The 77th percentile against all GPUs places it in the upper quartile — capable, but clearly below halo-tier cards. Its average benchmark score of 32,456 lands within a fraction of a percent of every listed rival, from the FirePro S10000 at a 0.2% gap to the Radeon Pro 570X at 0.9%.

The card connects over PCIe 4.0 x16, occupies a dual-slot footprint, measures 276 mm long by 110 mm tall by 51 mm wide, and draws power through two 8-pin connectors. Output selection covers 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, and 1x USB Type-C.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. With estimated frame rates derived from a 4,814 Steel Nomad score and 27,089 PassMark G3D, the build targets high-refresh 1440p play. The CPU's 4,130 single-thread PassMark score and 3,994 four-thread 3DMark result indicate the processor will not throttle frame delivery.

Streaming. Twelve cores and twenty-four threads, backed by a 48,347 PassMark multithread score, give the build ample headroom to run a game plus encoder plus chat overlays concurrently. The 8-thread 3DMark score of 7,454 shows the mid-thread range is not a weak spot.

Video editing. The 577,847 data compression score and 24,776 Cinebench R23 multi-core result support timeline scrubbing, export encoding, and proxy generation. The GPU's 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth and 16 GB of GDDR6 assist with effects playback and GPU-accelerated export paths.

3D rendering. Cinebench R23 multi-core at 24,776 and Geekbench multi-core at 17,726 make CPU rendering a genuine strength. The GPU's 175,758 OpenCL score allows hybrid workflows where the renderer supports OpenCL or Vulkan.

Software development. Compilation, container workloads, and parallel test suites scale across the 24 threads; the near-linear 3DMark thread scaling through eight threads and continued gains to 10,953 at max threads indicate efficient use of the full core count. ECC memory support adds a stability option for long-running builds on supported platforms.

Student and office work. This is overkill for documents and browsing, but the 2,495 Geekbench single-core score means everyday application launch and responsiveness are top-tier, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provides display output without the discrete card if needed.

Benchmark Performance

The full CPU scorecard: 3DMark single-thread 1,069, two threads 2,067, four threads 3,994, eight threads 7,454, sixteen threads 10,056, max threads 10,953. Cinebench R15: 4,020 multi-core, 315 single-core. Cinebench R23: 24,776 multi-core, 1,966 single-core. Geekbench: 17,726 multi-core, 2,495 single-core. PassMark: 48,347 multithread, 4,130 single-thread, 3,059 physics, 164,075 integer math, 97,943 floating point, 577,847 compression, 34,708 encryption, 42,253 extended instructions, 68,474 string sorting, 380 prime finding. The CPU average benchmark score is 49,228 at the 90th percentile.

The GPU scorecard: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 4,814; Geekbench OpenCL 175,758; Geekbench Vulkan 99,850; PassMark G3D 27,089; PassMark GPU Compute 15,016; PassMark DirectX 9/10/11/12 at 310/139/300/107; PassMark G2D 1,180. The GPU average benchmark score is 32,456 at the 77th percentile.

The combined picture is a build at the 84th percentile — higher than the GPU alone, lower than the CPU alone, which is exactly what a compute-forward pairing should produce. Rival comparison is strikingly tight on both sides. The CPU sits 0.1% above the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49,196), 0.3% below the Core i5-14600KF (49,394), 0.5% above the Core Ultra 5 245 (48,995), and 1.1% above the Xeon Gold 5318H (48,698). The GPU sits 0.2% above the FirePro S10000 (32,388), 0.3% below the FirePro S9300 X2 (32,540), 0.4% below the RX 590 GME (32,601), and 0.9% above the Radeon Pro 570X (32,176). Both components hold their clusters.

Who Should Build It

Gamers targeting 1440p at high refresh rates are the primary fit: the GPU's 77th percentile and 4,814 Steel Nomad score place ultra-settings 1440p as the card's natural home, with 4K as a settings-adjusted stretch target. Content creators benefit most from the CPU's 90th percentile standing — the 24,776 R23 multi-core score handles video exports, and the 16 GB of GPU VRAM covers effects-heavy timelines. Developers get 24 threads with strong scaling to the 10,953 max-thread result, plus ECC support on the memory controller. Students in technical fields get a machine that compiles fast and games well. Small business workstations doing CAD, data analysis (97,943 floating point, 34,708 encryption), or light GPU compute (15,016 PassMark GPU Compute) fit the profile too. Buyers chasing maximum 4K ray-traced fidelity should look higher in the GPU rankings; this pairing is not that.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a CPU-forward build. The processor sits at the 90th percentile; the graphics card at the 77th. In gaming terms, the GPU is the limiter at 4K and likely at 1440p in demanding titles — the CPU's four-thread 3DMark score of 3,994 and single-thread PassMark of 4,130 describe a processor with frame-generation capacity to spare relative to the card's rasterization throughput. The estimated FPS behavior follows the classic pattern: GPU-bound at high resolution, with the gap closing as resolution drops and the CPU's 8-thread score of 7,454 begins to matter at high refresh rates. For productivity workloads — rendering, encoding, compiling — the roles reverse and the CPU's 48,347 multithread score dominates, with the GPU contributing through its 175,758 OpenCL result where software permits. There is no pathological bottleneck in either direction; the imbalance is one of emphasis, roughly thirteen percentile points wide.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is AMD Socket AM5 with DDR5 dual-channel memory support delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC support. The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the processor alone — note that the GPU itself connects over PCIe 4.0 x16, so the Gen 5 lanes are available for future cards and fast storage rather than exploited by the current graphics card. The CPU's 65 W TDP plus the GPU's 260 W TDP against a suggested PSU of 600 W leaves the build within the recommended envelope as specified. The multiplier is unlocked, giving an overclocking path on the processor side.

A sensible next upgrade is the graphics card. Because the CPU holds the 90th percentile with headroom evidenced by its max-thread 10,953 score, a substantially faster GPU could be installed without creating a processor bottleneck at higher resolutions. The dual-slot, 276 mm card footprint and two 8-pin connectors are standard, and the AM5 socket itself provides a CPU upgrade path within the platform. Memory upgrades within DDR5 and Gen 5 storage expansion round out the path.

FAQ

Q: How many cores and threads does the Ryzen 9 7900 have?

A: 12 cores and 24 threads, built on Zen 4 (Raphael) at 5 nm from TSMC, with a 3.70 GHz base and 5.40 GHz boost clock.

Q: How much VRAM does the RX 7900 GRE have, and what is its bandwidth?

A: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 18 Gbps effective memory speed.

Q: Is there measured FPS data for this exact pairing?

A: No. The database contains no measured FPS rows for this combination; all gaming figures discussed are estimates derived from the benchmark scores.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It sits within about one percent of all four listed rivals: 0.1% above the Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, 0.3% below the Core i5-14600KF, 0.5% above the Core Ultra 5 245, and 1.1% above the Xeon Gold 5318H by average benchmark score.

Q: What PSU is suggested?

A: A 600 W unit is the suggested PSU, against a 65 W CPU TDP and a 260 W GPU TDP.

Q: Does the build support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 80 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, though it has no tensor cores listed.

Q: Can this CPU run without a discrete graphics card?

A: It lists integrated Radeon Graphics, so display output is possible without the RX 7900 GRE installed.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class pairing: a 90th-percentile twelve-core Zen 4 processor joined to a 77th-percentile RDNA 3 graphics card, combining for an overall 84th percentile among tracked builds. The CPU was launched at an MSRP of $429 and the GPU at 549 USD. The pairing is best characterized as a compute-heavy upper-tier desktop — strong multi-threaded throughput (24,776 Cinebench R23 multi-core), capable single-thread speed (2,495 Geekbench), and graphics performance suited to high-refresh 1440p and pragmatic 4K, all on a modern AM5 platform with DDR5, ECC support, and PCIe Gen 5 lanes available for future expansion.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Balance and Bottleneck

Upgrade Path and Platform

FAQ

Build Overview

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds