SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + AMD Radeon RX 7400

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

86 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 14% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
79%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 7400

2,467 Benchmark Score
Top 21% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 anchors this desktop build as a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael) and manufactured on TSMC's 5 nm process. The chip integrates 13,140 million transistors across a dual 71 mm² die configuration, with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This is a 65 W TDP part, which is notably efficient for a 12-core design, and it carries an unlocked multiplier for those who wish to push beyond stock clocks.

The cache hierarchy is substantial: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. This large L3 pool benefits workloads that repeatedly access the same data sets, such as game engines and database queries. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with ECC capability, providing 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for feeding 12 cores in memory-intensive tasks. The CPU also features integrated Radeon Graphics, offering a fallback display output if the discrete GPU is removed.

Benchmark results position this CPU firmly in the upper tier of all processors. It holds a 90th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 49,228. The multi-threaded performance is strong: Cinebench R23 multicore scores 24,776, while the single-core score is 1,966. Geekbench results show 17,726 in multicore and 2,495 in single-core. PassMark multithread score reaches 48,347, with a single-thread score of 4,130. The 3DMark threaded tests scale predictably from 2,067 with 2 threads to 10,953 with max threads, indicating good scaling across the 12 cores.

Comparing to nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7900 is essentially neck-and-neck with the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (0.1% ahead) and the Intel Core i5-14600KF (0.3% behind). It is 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H. These deltas are negligible in real-world terms, meaning the 7900 trades blows with these competitors within a 1.4% band. The practical takeaway is that the 7900 offers top-tier multi-core throughput for its class, while the single-core score of 1,966 in Cinebench R23 indicates strong responsiveness in lightly threaded applications like web browsing and office productivity.

The data compression score of 577,847 in PassMark suggests rapid archive handling and file transfer operations, while the encryption score of 34,708 indicates capable AES-NI performance for VPN and disk encryption tasks. Floating-point math at 97,943 and integer math at 164,075 further reinforce the CPU's versatility across scientific and general computing workloads. The find prime numbers score of 380 is a weaker showing, but this is a synthetic test that does not reflect typical user workloads.

# Balance and Bottleneck

The pairing of a 90th percentile CPU with a 17th percentile GPU creates a pronounced imbalance. The Ryzen 9 7900 is capable of driving far more graphics horsepower than the Radeon RX 7400 can deliver. In gaming scenarios, the GPU will be the limiting factor at virtually every resolution, as the CPU's single-threaded performance (1,966 in Cinebench R23) is more than adequate for modern game engines. The GPU's 17th percentile ranking among all GPUs means it sits near the bottom of the performance distribution, which will cap frame rates well below what the CPU can feed.

This imbalance is quantified by the combined percentile of 54, which places the overall system in the middle of the pack despite the CPU's top-tier standing. The CPU's 90th percentile and the GPU's 17th percentile average out to this middling position, reflecting that the GPU drags the system's gaming potential down significantly. For CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the bottleneck shifts entirely to the CPU, and the GPU becomes nearly irrelevant. The RX 7400's passmark G2D score of 1,209 and G3D score of 11,897 indicate it can handle basic display output, but it will not contribute meaningfully to compute-heavy tasks.

The FPS scaling evidence is absent from the measured data — no measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination. However, the benchmark scores suggest that in CPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform at the level of the 7900's nearest rivals, which are all within 1.1% of its average score. In GPU-bound scenarios, the system will perform at the level of the RX 7400's nearest rivals (AMD Radeon 8040S, NVIDIA GeForce 710M, Intel HD Graphics 610, NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M), all within 1.9% of its average score. This means the user experience will be defined by whichever component is the bottleneck for a given task, and for gaming, that will always be the GPU.

# FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's multi-threaded performance relative to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900 scores 49,228 on average, which is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-14600KF, 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H.

Q: Does the CPU support overclocking?

A: Yes, the multiplier is unlocked, allowing users to adjust clock multipliers on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, though the base clock is 3.70 GHz and boost clock is 5.40 GHz.

Q: What memory type does this build use?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with ECC capability, offering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon RX 7400 has an average benchmark score of 2,467, which is 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon 8040S, 1.4% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 710M, 1.8% ahead of the Intel HD Graphics 610, and 1.9% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M.

Q: What is the GPU's VRAM capacity and bandwidth?

A: The GPU has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Is the CPU suitable for ECC memory configurations?

A: Yes, ECC memory is supported, which is relevant for workstation and server use cases where data integrity is critical.

Q: What is the combined system percentile?

A: The build sits at the 54th percentile among all systems, reflecting the CPU's high standing and the GPU's low standing.

# Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: This scenario is heavily constrained by the GPU. The RX 7400's 17th percentile ranking means it will struggle to maintain high frame rates at demanding settings. The CPU's strong single-threaded performance (1,966 Cinebench R23) ensures no CPU-side frame pacing issues, but the GPU will be the ceiling. For esports titles at lower settings, the system may achieve playable rates, but high-refresh 144 Hz or 240 Hz gaming is not realistic with this GPU.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads provide ample headroom for encoding video while gaming. The PassMark multithread score of 48,347 indicates strong parallel processing capability, and the data encryption score of 34,708 suggests the CPU can handle the overhead of stream encoding. However, the GPU's limited graphics performance will constrain the gaming side of the stream, making this a poor pairing for streaming high-quality gameplay.

Video editing: The CPU excels here. Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,776 and Geekbench multicore of 17,726 indicate fast rendering and export times. The 64 MB of L3 cache helps with timeline scrubbing and effect processing. The GPU will accelerate some effects but is not powerful enough for GPU-accelerated 4K editing workflows. This is a competent CPU-first editing machine.

3D rendering: Similar to video editing, the CPU carries the load. The 3DMark max threads score of 10,953 and Cinebench R15 multicore of 4,020 demonstrate strong multi-threaded rendering performance. The GPU's 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.97 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) provide some compute acceleration, but the 17th percentile ranking limits its contribution. For CPU-based renderers, this is a solid choice.

Software development: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads handle parallel compilation efficiently. The PassMark integer math score of 164,075 and random string sorting score of 68,474 indicate strong performance in code compilation and text processing. The GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks, making this a well-suited CPU for developers.

Student and office work: This is overkill for the CPU and adequate for the GPU. The 90th percentile CPU handles spreadsheets, documents, and web browsing with ease, while the GPU's 1,209 PassMark G2D score is sufficient for 2D desktop acceleration. The 65 W TDP keeps power consumption low, and the integrated Radeon Graphics provide a backup if the discrete GPU fails.

# Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score of 49,228 places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, scores 49,196 (0.1% behind), and the Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49,394 (0.3% ahead). The GPU's average benchmark score of 2,467 places it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 8040S, scores 2,440 (1.1% behind), and the NVIDIA GeForce 710M scores 2,433 (1.4% behind).

The GPU's individual benchmark results show a mixed picture. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 is a modern graphics test, while PassMark DirectX scores range from 44 (DirectX 12) to 176 (DirectX 9). The PassMark G3D score of 11,897 and GPU compute score of 5,152 indicate basic compute capability but far below what modern games require. The combined system percentile of 54 reflects the wide gap between the CPU and GPU tiers.

The combined picture is one of extreme imbalance. The CPU is a top-tier performer that can handle any workload thrown at it, while the GPU is an entry-level part that will limit the system to light gaming and basic graphics tasks. In CPU-bound benchmarks, the system will perform at the level of the 7900's rivals, but in GPU-bound tasks, it will fall to the level of the RX 7400's rivals. Users should be aware that the system's overall performance is dictated by the GPU in most real-world scenarios.

# Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses the AMD Socket AM5 platform, which supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with ECC capability. The 65 W TDP means the CPU is power-efficient, and the platform provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU. This gives headroom for future GPU upgrades that can leverage PCIe Gen 5 bandwidth, though the current GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU has a 43 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 200 W, which is very low. This means the existing power supply has significant headroom for a more powerful GPU upgrade. The GPU uses a single 6-pin power connector, and a future upgrade would likely require additional connectors, but the PSU headroom is ample given the CPU's low 65 W draw.

A sensible next upgrade would be to replace the RX 7400 with a higher-tier GPU. The CPU's 90th percentile performance can drive much more powerful graphics cards, and the platform's PCIe Gen 5 support ensures future compatibility. The 12-core CPU with 24 threads will remain relevant for years, so the GPU is the clear bottleneck to address first. The DDR5 memory and AM5 socket are current-generation, so no platform change is needed for a GPU upgrade.

# Who Should Build It

This build targets users who prioritize CPU performance over graphics. Software developers will benefit from the 12 cores and 24 threads for parallel compilation, and the 164,075 PassMark integer math score indicates strong code processing. Students and office workers will find the CPU's 90th percentile performance more than adequate for productivity tasks, though the GPU is overkill for their needs. Small business workstations that run CPU-intensive applications like database management or financial modeling will see excellent performance, with ECC memory support adding reliability for critical data.

Content creators working in video editing or 3D rendering will appreciate the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 24,776, which accelerates export and render times. However, they should be aware that the GPU will not accelerate GPU-dependent effects or previews. Gamers at 1080p with low settings may find the GPU sufficient for older titles, but modern games will require significant settings reductions. The system is not suitable for high-refresh gaming or VR, as the GPU's 17th percentile ranking and 8 GB VRAM are insufficient for demanding graphics workloads.

# Build Overview

This is a desktop build pairing the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (12 cores, 24 threads, Zen 4 architecture) with the AMD Radeon RX 7400 (RDNA 3.0 architecture, Navi 33 chip). The CPU is a 90th percentile performer, while the GPU sits at the 17th percentile, creating a system that is heavily CPU-biased. The combined percentile of 54 places this system in the middle of all builds, but the performance profile is lopsided.

The class is desktop, meaning this is a stationary system for home or office use. The overall tier from the percentiles is "upper-midrange" in aggregate, but that label hides the extreme disparity between components. In CPU-bound tasks, this system performs like a top-tier workstation; in GPU-bound tasks, it performs like an entry-level machine. The 65 W TDP CPU and 43 W TDP GPU keep power consumption low, making this an efficient system for its CPU performance class.

# Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the FACT PACK contains no measuredFps data. All frame rate discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores and should be treated as approximations.

The GPU's 17th percentile ranking and PassMark G3D score of 11,897 suggest that gaming performance will be limited to 1080p with low-to-medium settings in modern titles. The 8 GB VRAM and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for 1080p textures but will struggle with high-resolution texture packs. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 1,103 indicates that DirectX 12 titles will run but at low frame rates. The DirectX 11 score of 97 (PassMark) and DirectX 9 score of 176 (PassMark) suggest that older titles will run more smoothly.

The CPU's strong single-threaded performance (1,966 Cinebench R23) ensures that the GPU is the sole bottleneck in gaming. For esports titles like Counter-Strike or League of Legends, the system may achieve 60+ FPS at 1080p low settings. For AAA titles, frame rates will likely drop below 30 FPS at medium settings, making the experience suboptimal. The GPU's 43 W TDP and 200 W suggested PSU indicate it is designed for low-power systems, not high-performance gaming. Users seeking a gaming-focused build should consider a different GPU.

# GPU Analysis

The AMD Radeon RX 7400 is based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip (codenamed Hotpink Bonefish), manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process with 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. The GPU has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units, along with 28 ray tracing cores. The base clock is 1,452 MHz, with a boost clock of 2,300 MHz and a game clock of 2,200 MHz.

Memory consists of 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock is 2,250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Compute performance is rated at 16.49 TFLOPS FP32 and 32.97 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1). Pixel rate is 147.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 257.6 GTexel/s.

Benchmark results show the GPU holds a 17th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average score of 2,467. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 1,103, while PassMark DirectX scores are 59 (DX10), 97 (DX11), 44 (DX12), and 176 (DX9). The PassMark G2D score of 1,209 and G3D score of 11,897 indicate basic graphics capability, while the GPU compute score of 5,152 shows limited compute throughput. The 8 GB VRAM is adequate for 1080p gaming but will limit texture quality in modern titles. The 28 ray tracing cores provide some ray tracing capability, but the low overall performance means ray tracing will be impractical in most games. The GPU's nearest rivals are all within 1.9% of its average score, indicating it sits at the very bottom of the graphics performance hierarchy.