SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

94%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

49,228 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

AMD Radeon RX 6800

30,095 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 and AMD Radeon RX 6800 form a high-end desktop pairing that sits comfortably above average in the current hardware landscape. The processor, a 12-core Zen 4 part, delivers top-tier multi-threaded performance, while the graphics card, an RDNA 2 flagship from the previous generation, remains a formidable 1440p and 4K contender. This analysis examines the benchmark data for this specific CPU+GPU combination, interpreting scores and percentiles to provide a clear picture of its capabilities for gaming, content creation, and professional workloads.

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

The AMD Radeon RX 6800 is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture and the Navi 21 chip, fabricated on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It is a substantial piece of silicon, with 26,800 million transistors on a 520 mm² die. The card operates at a base clock of 1700 MHz and a boost clock of 2105 MHz, with a game clock rated at 1815 MHz. Memory is a standout feature: 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, running at 2000 MHz (or 16 Gbps effective), which yields a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s. This large frame buffer and high bandwidth are critical for modern high-resolution textures and demanding rendering workloads.

The GPU is equipped with 3840 shading units, 240 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 96 render output units (ROPs). Its compute capabilities are rated at 16.17 TFLOPS for FP32 and 32.33 TFLOPS for FP16 (2:1 ratio). The pixel rate is 202.1 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 505.2 GTexel/s. For hardware-accelerated ray tracing, it includes 60 dedicated RT cores. It does not have dedicated tensor cores like NVIDIA's DLSS hardware, relying instead on general-purpose compute for AI tasks. The card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with the latest graphics APIs.

Benchmark results for the RX 6800 show a strong all-around performer. In 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12), it scores 3188 points. The Geekbench compute scores are particularly telling: a Metal score of 153635 indicates excellent performance in Apple's graphics API, while the Vulkan score of 115107 shows robust cross-platform capability. The OpenCL score of 24508 is significantly lower, which is typical for this architecture and suggests that some compute workloads may not scale as well as they do on competing hardware. In PassMark, the G3D score is 22067, placing it in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. The G2D score of 990 is modest, but this is rarely a bottleneck for gaming or rendering.

The GPU's overall average benchmark score is 30095. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, scores 29945, meaning the RX 6800 is 0.5% ahead. It also leads the RTX 5070 Mobile by 0.6% and the RTX 2080 Ti by 1.0%. However, it trails the AMD Radeon RX 6700 by 1.1%, which posts an average score of 30433. For rendering, the 16 GB VRAM is a decisive advantage over many rivals with less memory, allowing larger scenes and higher-resolution textures to be loaded without stuttering. The high memory bandwidth of 512 GB/s ensures that texture streaming and data transfer between the GPU and its memory are not bottlenecks, which is essential for both gaming and content creation.

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

The combined benchmark picture shows a system with an overall percentile ranking of 83 among all desktop configurations. This places it in the upper echelon of PCs, though not at the absolute top. The CPU and GPU each contribute significantly to this position, with the processor being the stronger component relative to its peers.

The CPU's average benchmark score is 49228, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. Its single-threaded performance is strong, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1069 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1966. Multi-threaded performance is where this chip excels, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24776 and a Geekbench multi-core score of 17726. The PassMark multi-thread score of 48347 further underscores its high core-count advantage. This is a CPU that can handle heavily threaded workloads with ease.

The GPU, as noted, has an average score of 30095 and sits in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. While this is a solid position, it is notably lower than the CPU's 90th percentile. This disparity suggests that the processor has more headroom than the graphics card in many scenarios. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3188 and PassMark G3D score of 22067 are respectable, but they do not match the relative dominance of the CPU's benchmark results.

The combined picture is one of a powerful CPU paired with a capable, but less exceptional, GPU. In CPU-bound tasks like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the Ryzen 9 7900 will push far ahead of its rivals. In GPU-bound tasks like high-resolution gaming with maxed settings, the RX 6800 will deliver strong frame rates, but it will be the limiting factor in the system. The data suggests that this is a workstation-leaning build that also games very well, rather than a pure gaming machine where the GPU is the star.

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is a 12-core, 24-thread processor from the 7000 series, based on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Raphael). It is manufactured on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 13,140 million transistors spread across two 71 mm² dies. The base clock is 3.70 GHz, and it boosts up to 5.40 GHz. This high boost clock is key to its strong single-threaded performance. The CPU has a 65 W TDP, which is remarkably efficient for a 12-core part. It uses the AMD Socket AM5 and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with an ECC memory option and 83.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It also provides PCIe Gen 5 with 24 lanes from the CPU, and it includes an integrated Radeon Graphics unit for basic display output. The CPU is unlocked, allowing for overclocking, and it was released on 2023-01-13 with a launch MSRP of $429.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that is exceptional in both single-thread and multi-thread workloads. The 3DMark scores show excellent scaling: 2067 for 2 threads, 3994 for 4 threads, 7454 for 8 threads, 10056 for 16 threads, and 10953 for max threads. This near-linear scaling in the early thread counts indicates that the Zen 4 cores are highly efficient and that the processor can effectively utilize additional threads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24776 is a strong result, placing it well above many previous-generation high-end desktop CPUs. The single-core score of 1966 confirms that it is not just a multi-threaded monster but also a snappy performer for lightly threaded tasks.

The PassMark results provide more granular detail. The data compression score of 577847 and data encryption score of 34708 indicate excellent performance for archival and security tasks. The floating-point math score of 97943 and integer math score of 164075 are both very high, reflecting the powerful FPU and ALU capabilities of Zen 4. The extended instructions score of 42253 shows strong performance in AVX-512 workloads. The physics score of 3059 is also solid. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 9 7900 is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H. It is 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-14600KF. For real workloads, this means the CPU is ideal for video editing, 3D rendering, software development, and any task that can use 12 or more cores. The high boost clock ensures that everyday tasks like web browsing and office applications feel responsive.

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

The balance between the Ryzen 9 7900 and the RX 6800 is skewed toward the CPU. The CPU's 90th percentile ranking versus the GPU's 75th percentile ranking is the primary evidence of this imbalance. In heavily CPU-bound workloads, such as physics simulation, data compression, or multi-threaded video encoding, the CPU will be the star performer, with the GPU merely keeping up. The CPU's PassMark physics score of 3059 and multi-thread score of 48347 demonstrate its capability to process complex calculations and manage numerous threads without breaking a sweat.

Conversely, in GPU-bound workloads, particularly gaming at high resolutions with ultra settings, the RX 6800 will be the limiting factor. While it is a strong card, its 75th percentile position means that it will not keep pace with the CPU's raw processing power. For example, in a game that is heavily reliant on pixel fill rate and texture bandwidth, the GPU's 202.1 GPixel/s pixel rate and 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth will determine the maximum frame rate, regardless of the CPU's speed. The CPU could likely push far more frames if paired with a more powerful GPU, but it will be waiting on the graphics card to finish rendering each frame.

The FPS scaling in games will show this dynamic. At 1080p, the CPU can often feed the GPU enough data, but the GPU will still be the primary constraint at high settings. At 1440p and 4K, the GPU's load increases significantly, and the gap between CPU and GPU utilization will widen. The data does not include measured FPS for this combination, so specific frame rates cannot be cited. However, the percentile gap strongly suggests that users upgrading from a weaker CPU will see significant gains in CPU-bound scenarios, while users upgrading from a weaker GPU will see more modest gains in GPU-bound scenarios. This is a system where the CPU is future-proofed for several GPU generations, while the GPU is the current ceiling for gaming performance.

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU+GPU combination, and the `dataIsMeasured` field is set to false. Therefore, all frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores and component characteristics. The RX 6800's 75th percentile ranking and its 16.17 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power indicate that it is a capable high-refresh-rate 1440p card and a solid 4K card for many titles.

At 1080p, this pairing will deliver very high frame rates in most games, likely exceeding 144 FPS in esports titles and competitive shooters, given the CPU's strong single-thread score of 1966 in Cinebench R23. The CPU will rarely be a bottleneck at this resolution. At 1440p, the GPU will become more of a factor. With its 512 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM, it can handle the increased resolution and texture loads. Frame rates will remain high, typically in the 100-144 FPS range for demanding AAA games on ultra settings, but will be lower than at 1080p.

At 4K, the RX 6800 will still be playable but will require settings adjustments in the most demanding titles. The 16 GB VRAM is a significant advantage here, preventing texture pop-in and stuttering. The GPU's pixel rate of 202.1 GPixel/s and texture rate of 505.2 GTexel/s will be the limiting factors. Users should expect frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for many games, but may need to lower settings to achieve a stable 60 FPS in the latest releases. The lack of dedicated tensor cores means that NVIDIA's DLSS is not available, so users must rely on AMD's FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution) for upscaling, which is supported by the card's DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 APIs. Overall, this is a strong gaming platform that excels at 1440p and offers a playable 4K experience, with the CPU ensuring that frame times are stable and stutter-free.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance tier of the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + RX 6800 combination?

A: The combined system holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all desktop configurations, indicating a high-end build that outperforms the vast majority of PCs.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: With an average benchmark score of 49228, the Ryzen 9 7900 is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, 0.5% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245, and 1.1% ahead of the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H, while being 0.3% behind the Intel Core i5-14600KF.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The Radeon RX 6800 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 512.0 GB/s, which is crucial for high-resolution textures and rendering.

Q: Does the RX 6800 support hardware ray tracing?

A: Yes, it includes 60 dedicated RT cores as part of its RDNA 2.0 architecture, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing in supported games.

Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Ryzen 9 7900 scores 1966 points in the Cinebench R23 single-core test, indicating excellent performance for lightly threaded tasks like gaming and general desktop use.

Q: Is the GPU's benchmark score higher or lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti?

A: The RX 6800's average benchmark score is 30095, which is 0.5% higher than the RTX 3070 Ti's average score of 29945.

Q: What is the TDP of the Ryzen 9 7900 CPU?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 65 W, which is notably low for a 12-core processor, contributing to its efficiency.

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

High-Refresh Gaming: This system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at 1440p. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 1966 in Cinebench R23 ensures high minimum frame rates, while the GPU's 75th percentile ranking and 16.17 TFLOPS of compute power can drive frame rates well above 144 FPS in many titles. The 16 GB VRAM is ample for modern game assets.

Streaming: The 12-core, 24-thread Ryzen 9 7900 is an excellent choice for streaming. Its multi-threaded score of 24776 in Cinebench R23 means it can handle game encoding and streaming software simultaneously without significant performance drops. The GPU's hardware encoding capabilities further offload this work, though specific encoder scores are not in the data.

Video Editing: Video editing software heavily utilizes both CPU and GPU. The CPU's high multi-thread score of 48347 in PassMark and floating-point math score of 97943 will accelerate timeline rendering and effects processing. The GPU's 512.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 16 GB VRAM will handle 4K video previews and color grading efficiently.

3D Rendering: This is a primary strength of the Ryzen 9 7900. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24776 and 3DMark max-thread score of 10953 indicate exceptional performance in CPU-based rendering engines. The GPU also contributes with its OpenCL score of 24508, though this is lower than its Vulkan score of 115107, suggesting some renderers may prefer the latter API.

Software Development: Developers will benefit from the CPU's compilation speeds. The PassMark data compression score of 577847 and integer math score of 164075 show rapid code compilation and data processing. The 24 threads allow for parallel builds, significantly reducing wait times.

Student and Office Work: For standard productivity, this system is overpowered but highly responsive. The CPU's single-thread score of 4130 in PassMark ensures instant application launches and smooth multitasking. The integrated Radeon Graphics on the CPU also provides a fallback display output, though discrete GPU performance is not needed for basic office tasks.

Build Overview

This is a desktop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 CPU with the AMD Radeon RX 6800 GPU. The processor is a 12-core Zen 4 part on the AM5 platform, representing the high end of AMD's mainstream lineup. The graphics card is an RDNA 2 architecture flagship from the RX 6000 series, now in its end-of-life production status but still a powerful performer. The combined system achieves an 83rd percentile ranking, placing it in the upper tier of desktop PCs. The CPU is the dominant component, sitting in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 75th percentile of all GPUs. This indicates a configuration that prioritizes processor-heavy workloads while still delivering excellent graphics performance. The pairing is well-balanced for a high-end workstation that also serves as a formidable gaming rig, with the CPU providing long-term headroom for future GPU upgrades.

Who Should Build It

This build is ideal for users who need serious multi-threaded processing power and also enjoy gaming. Content creators working with 4K video, complex 3D scenes, or large datasets will benefit from the CPU's 24 threads and high Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 24776. Software developers compiling large codebases will see significant time savings from the CPU's PassMark integer math score of 164075. Gamers targeting high refresh rates at 1440p will be well-served by the RX 6800's strong 75th percentile performance and 16 GB VRAM, ensuring smooth gameplay in current titles. Students in engineering or computer science fields will have more than enough power for simulations, virtual machines, and development environments. Small business workstations handling video editing, graphic design, or data analysis will find this combination to be a reliable and fast workhorse. Users who primarily play at 4K with max settings may find the GPU to be the limiting factor, but it remains a capable 4K card for most games. This is not a budget-oriented build; it is a high-performance investment for those who demand top-tier CPU performance without compromising on GPU capability.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7900 + AMD Radeon RX 6800

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

AMD Radeon RX 6800

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

GPU Analysis — VRAM, bandwidth, clocks, RT/tensor hardware, what the benchmark scores mean for rendering

Benchmark Performance — exact CPU and GPU scores, percentile positions, and what the combined picture is

CPU Analysis — cores, clocks, architecture, what the benchmark scores mean for real workloads

Balance and Bottleneck — which component limits which workload, using percentiles and FPS scaling as evidence

Gaming Performance — measured FPS by game and resolution from measuredFpsUltraByGame (or, if dataIsMeasured is false, frame expectations qualitatively from the benchmark scores and say the figures are estimates)

FAQ

Usage Scenarios — grounded in the scores: high-refresh gaming, streaming, video editing, 3D rendering, software development, student and office work. One short paragraph per scenario, citing the numbers that support the verdict

Build Overview

Who Should Build It

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds