SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

87 Score

Top 13% Ranking

87 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 13% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

80%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

3,596 Benchmark Score

Top 20% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation form a laptop pairing that presents a stark contrast in benchmark performance. The CPU is a high-end 12-core Zen 4 part, while the GPU, despite its professional name and 16 GB of memory, posts benchmark scores that place it in a surprisingly low percentile. Analysis of the data reveals a system where the processor is the dominant component, and the graphics card is the primary limiting factor for gaming and GPU-accelerated tasks.

Usage Scenarios

High-Refresh Gaming: The data indicates this is not a suitable platform for high-refresh gaming. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596 places it at the 21st percentile of all GPUs, a figure that is statistically indistinguishable from the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545. The CPU's single-thread performance, scoring 1025 in 3DMark single-thread tests, is sufficient to drive frames, but the GPU's low compute throughput will cap frame rates well below the thresholds required for 144Hz or higher displays.

Streaming: The CPU is well-equipped for the encoding and multitasking demands of streaming. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, providing ample headroom for game capture and encoding. However, the GPU's weak rendering performance will likely bottleneck the overall stream quality, as the system will struggle to maintain high frame rates in demanding titles while simultaneously encoding the video feed.

Video Editing: The 16 GB of VRAM on the GPU is a positive asset for video editing, providing space for large timelines and effects. The GPU's 41.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are adequate for basic effects and color grading. However, the low GPU percentile suggests that export times and complex effects will be slower than on a system with a more powerful graphics processor. The CPU's multi-core strength will help with timeline scrubbing and rendering, but the GPU is the limiting factor for GPU-accelerated effects.

3D Rendering: This workload is heavily dependent on both CPU and GPU. The CPU's Zen 4 architecture and high multi-core score of 26876 in Cinebench R23 will handle CPU-based rendering tasks efficiently, rivaling desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-13700K. For GPU-accelerated rendering, the RTX 5000's 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores are present, but the low overall benchmark score indicates that render times will be prolonged when compared to higher-tier GPUs.

Software Development: This is a strong use case for this pairing. The 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with a Passmark multi-thread score of 45010, will handle code compilation with relative ease. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache also supports large project files. The GPU's capabilities are less critical for this workload, meaning the CPU's high percentile rank is the primary driver of good performance.

Student and Office Work: The system is overpowered for standard office tasks. The CPU's single-core performance, scoring 3935 in Passmark, ensures snappy application responsiveness. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a fallback for basic display tasks, though the dedicated GPU is present for any GPU-accelerated workloads. The 55W TDP of the CPU suggests efficient power draw for a high-performance part.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The platform is built around the AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the mobile Dragon Range series. This means the CPU is not upgradeable in the traditional sense; a user is limited to the processor soldered onto the motherboard. The system supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, providing a maximum theoretical bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. This is the primary upgrade path for improving system performance, as increasing memory capacity and speed can benefit both CPU and GPU-bound tasks.

The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, offering high bandwidth for future NVMe storage devices. The GPU connects via a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The CPU's 55W TDP and the GPU's 120W TDP suggest a combined thermal load that requires a robust cooling solution. The GPU has no power connectors listed, meaning it draws power directly from the motherboard, which is typical for a mobile IGP-form-factor chip. A sensible next upgrade for this platform would be increasing the DDR5 memory to the maximum supported capacity, as the CPU and GPU are not swappable.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It is manufactured on TSMC's 5nm process node, featuring 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design (2x 71 mm²). With a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, it is designed for high-performance mobile workloads. The CPU supports ECC memory and has an unlocked multiplier, indicating it is intended for enthusiasts.

Benchmark results confirm its high standing. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, matching the performance of desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-13700K (which scores 46881 on average, a -0.5% delta). The single-core Cinebench R23 score of 1852 is solid for gaming and lightly-threaded tasks. The Geekbench multi-core score of 16633 further validates its multi-threaded prowess. The Passmark data shows strong integer math performance (155118) and floating-point math (94287), indicating capability in a wide range of computational tasks. The 64 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial and helps reduce memory latency.

FAQ

Q: What is the performance tier of the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX?

A: The CPU is a high-end mobile processor, ranking in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 46654.

Q: How does the RTX 5000 Mobile compare to other GPUs?

A: Its average benchmark score of 3596 places it in the 21st percentile of all GPUs, with its closest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545, which scores 3594.

Q: What type of memory does this platform support?

A: The CPU supports DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and it also supports ECC memory.

Q: What is the transistor count for the GPU?

A: The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation has 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die.

Q: What is the CPU's boost clock speed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX has a maximum boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Does the GPU support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, the GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the combined performance percentile of this pairing?

A: The combined build is at the 55th percentile of all systems.

Balance and Bottleneck

The benchmark data reveals a significant imbalance between the CPU and GPU. The CPU is a top-tier performer, sitting at the 89th percentile, while the GPU is at the 21st percentile. This means the GPU is the definitive bottleneck in almost any workload that relies on graphics processing. In gaming, the CPU's 3DMark single-thread score of 1025 is more than adequate to feed the GPU, but the GPU's low compute score will be the limiting factor for frame rates.

For CPU-intensive tasks like video encoding or 3D rendering on the CPU, the system will perform exceptionally well. However, in GPU-accelerated scenarios such as gaming or GPU rendering, the GPU's low percentile will cap performance, preventing the user from fully utilizing the CPU's potential. The GPU's 16 GB of VRAM may prevent memory-related stutters, but the raw compute throughput is too low to be balanced with the CPU. The CPU is the clear performance leader, and the GPU holds the system back from being a high-end gaming or creative workstation.

Who Should Build It

This pairing is best suited for users whose primary workloads are CPU-bound and who require a professional-grade GPU for its memory capacity or features, not raw frame-rendering speed.

Gamers at 1080p: This is a poor choice for gaming, even at 1080p. The GPU's low percentile ranking will result in frame rates that are only comparable to much older, less powerful cards like the GeForce GTX 1050.

Content Creators: This could appeal to video editors who prioritize CPU-based rendering and need the 16 GB of VRAM for large projects. The CPU's high multi-core score will speed up timeline operations and exports, while the GPU provides adequate, though not spectacular, acceleration for effects.

Software Developers: This is an excellent match. The 12-core CPU with a 26876 Cinebench R23 score is ideal for compiling large codebases, and the GPU is irrelevant for most development tasks.

Students and Office Workers: This system is massively overkill. The CPU's performance is far beyond what is needed for word processing or spreadsheets, and the GPU adds unnecessary cost and power draw without providing a benefit for these tasks.

Small Business Workstations: For tasks like financial modeling or data analysis that are CPU-intensive, the system is very capable. The GPU's presence offers CUDA acceleration for any compatible professional applications, even if its gaming performance is low.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture and the AD103 chip, manufactured on a 5nm process by TSMC. It features 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a substantial 576.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The GPU has 9728 shading units, 304 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. It also includes 76 RT cores and 304 tensor cores, which are dedicated to ray tracing and AI processing, respectively.

Its clock speeds are listed at a base of 1425 MHz and a boost of 2115 MHz. The GPU offers 41.15 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and the same for FP16 (1:1). Its pixel rate is 236.9 GPixel/s and its texture rate is 643.0 GTexel/s. Despite these specifications, its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is only 3596, which places it in the 21st percentile. This score is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (3594) and GeForce GT 735M (3616). This suggests that while the GPU has modern features and a large memory buffer, its raw rasterization performance is not competitive with other modern parts.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, combining the high-end AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX CPU with the NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation GPU. The pairing is an unusual one, as the CPU is a top-tier performer (89th percentile) while the GPU is a low-tier performer (21st percentile). The combined percentile for this build is 55. The CPU offers excellent multi-core performance for demanding applications, but the GPU's low benchmark scores categorize it as a weak link for graphics-intensive tasks. This is not a balanced gaming platform but rather a system where the CPU is the clear focus of its performance capabilities.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU's average benchmark score is 46654, placing it in the 89th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46653), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (46487), the Intel Core i7-13700K (46881), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 (46971). The CPU leads the Ryzen 9 3900X by 0.4% and trails the Core i7-13700K by -0.5%. In specific tests, it scores 26876 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1852 in single-core. Its Passmark multi-thread score is 45010.

The GPU has an average benchmark score of 3596, placing it in the 21st percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GT 545 (3594), GeForce GT 735M (3616), GeForce GTX 1050 (3629), and AMD Radeon HD 6770 (3649). The GPU is 0.1% faster than the GT 545 and -0.9% slower than the GTX 1050. The combined picture is a system with a high-performance CPU that is severely bottlenecked by a low-performance GPU in graphics applications.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU+GPU combination. The following analysis is an estimate based on the benchmark scores of the individual components. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3596, which is comparable to the GeForce GTX 1050, indicates that gaming performance will be underwhelming for a modern system. At 1080p with ultra settings, frame rates in modern AAA titles would likely fall well below 60 FPS, and may struggle to maintain playable levels in demanding scenes. At 1440p or 4K, performance would be even lower, making the system unsuitable for high-resolution gaming. The CPU's high single-thread performance will not help overcome the GPU's low raw throughput, so the GPU will be the sole determinant of frame rates in this scenario. These figures are estimates and should be treated as such, given the lack of direct measurement data.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

NVIDIA RTX 5000 Mobile Ada Generation

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Usage Scenarios

Upgrade Path and Platform

CPU Analysis

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

Who Should Build It

GPU Analysis

Build Overview

Benchmark Performance

Gaming Performance

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds