SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

84 / 100
HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
74%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation

0 Benchmark Score
Top 26% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX paired with the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is an unusual laptop combination: a flagship-class mobile CPU sitting alongside a mid-tier professional mobile GPU. The data tells a story of asymmetry. The processor lands in the 89th percentile against all CPUs, while the GPU sits at exactly the 50th percentile of all GPUs — a capable compute engine driving a graphics solution that is, statistically, the median of the market. This page examines what that mismatch means for real workloads, and who benefits from a build where the CPU clearly outclasses the GPU.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7845HX is a Dragon Range part — AMD's Zen 4 architecture fabricated on TSMC's 5 nm process, built as two 71 mm² dies holding 13,140 million transistors. It is designed for the AMD Socket FL1, a mobile-integrated package, which means the practical "upgrade path" is not the traditional socket swap a desktop builder enjoys. The CPU is soldered into the platform; the upgrade path is the next laptop, or the next chassis generation. Within that constraint, the platform itself is well specified for longevity.

Memory support is DDR5 on a dual-channel bus, delivering 83.2 GB/s of bandwidth, and ECC memory is supported — a notable feature that pushes this part toward workstation credibility rather than pure consumer gaming. That ECC support is rare in mobile silicon and matters for users running long simulations or rendering jobs where memory integrity is a concern.

PCIe connectivity is generous: Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU alone. That lane budget is what allows a laptop to feed a discrete GPU on PCIe 4.0 x16 while still leaving bandwidth for fast NVMe storage. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide a fallback for light display duties when the discrete GPU is idle.

Power draw is modest for this performance class: a 55 W TDP for the CPU and a 115 W TDP for the GPU. In a laptop chassis there is no user-selectable PSU to size, but the combined thermal envelope of these two parts defines what kind of machine can host them — a thick, cooling-focused workstation or gaming chassis rather than an ultrabody. A sensible next upgrade within this platform family would be a move toward a higher-tier mobile Ada GPU, since the data (examined below) suggests graphics, not compute, is the limiting factor in this pairing. The CPU already sits near the top of the stack; there is little headroom to be gained there.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU benchmark picture is consistent and strong across every suite in the database. Cinebench R23 returns a multi-core score of 26,876 and a single-core score of 1,852. Cinebench R15 shows the same shape: 4,320 multi-core, 295 single-core. Geekbench posts 16,633 multi-core and 2,389 single-core. PassMark's multithread score of 45,010 is accompanied by a single-thread figure of 3,935.

The scaling data is where the analysis gets interesting. 3DMark CPU profile scores climb from 1,988 at two threads, to 3,807 at four, to 7,140 at eight, to 10,068 at sixteen, and finally 11,108 at the maximum thread count. The jump from eight threads to sixteen is large — the chip clearly rewards heavily threaded code. But the step from sixteen threads to the full twenty-four is comparatively small, suggesting diminishing returns past two-thirds of the thread pool. Twelve physical cores with SMT is the sweet spot; the extra logical threads add a modest tail of performance rather than a transformative leap.

Single-thread performance of 1,025 in 3DMark and 2,389 in Geekbench places this chip comfortably in modern-flagship territory, which matters because many real applications — compilers, game engines, DCC tools — still lean on a few fast threads.

Context comes from the nearest rivals. The 7845HX's average benchmark score of 46,654 is statistically inseparable from the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46,653, delta 0 percent), marginally ahead of the Ryzen 9 3900X (46,487, delta 0.4 percent), and fractionally behind the Core i7-13700K (46,881, delta -0.5 percent) and Ryzen 9 5900 (46,971, delta -0.7 percent). Those deltas are within noise. What is striking is the company the chip keeps: a desktop Xeon workstation CPU and a desktop i7. A mobile part holding its own against desktop silhouettes is the headline here.

The GPU side of the ledger is blank — the database contains no benchmark entries for the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation, with an average benchmark score of zero and no listed rivals. Its 50th percentile placement is the only positioning data available. The combined build percentile of 70 reflects a strong CPU pulling an average GPU upward: the pairing as a whole outranks 70 percent of tracked combinations, but that figure is carried almost entirely by the processor.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination — the database contains no measured frame-rate data for this pairing, so every gaming figure in this section is an estimate extrapolated from the benchmark scores, not a measurement.

What can be said with confidence is directional. The 3DMark CPU profile indicates the processor is not the constraint: a max-threads score of 11,108 and a physics score of 2,346 in PassMark are figures associated with smooth frame delivery in CPU-bound scenarios. Whatever frame-rate ceiling exists in games, it will be set by the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada, not the Ryzen 9.

Estimating from the GPU's mid-percentile position: at 1080p with ultra settings, frame rates in esports and competitive titles should comfortably reach high-refresh territory on the strength of a 1695 MHz boost clock and 15.62 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput. Demanding AAA titles at ultra settings are a different matter — 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with 256 GB/s of bandwidth, is the configuration of a mid-tier card, and texture-heavy modern games at maximum settings will press against that VRAM ceiling. Estimated frame rates in the most demanding titles at ultra would likely land in the standard-refresh range rather than high-refresh, and ray-traced effects would further reduce them given the 36 RT cores are modest in count relative to flagship Ada parts.

At 1440p the picture tightens further; the sensible estimated play style is high settings rather than ultra, or ultra with selective ray tracing. At 4K ultra, this GPU is not the right tool. These are estimates derived from percentile positioning and hardware specifications — treat them as informed expectation, not measurement.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data describes a clearly GPU-bottlenecked pairing, at least for graphics workloads. The evidence is structural: a CPU at the 89th percentile versus a GPU at the 50th, a gap of nearly forty percentile points. In any workload that scales with GPU capability — gaming at higher resolutions, GPU rendering, path tracing — the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada is the ceiling, and it is a median ceiling.

Flip the workload, and the bottleneck inverts. In CPU-bound tasks the picture reverses sharply. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26,876 and Geekbench multi-core of 16,633 describe a machine that will chew through compilation, simulation, and CPU rendering far faster than the median laptop. PassMark sub-scores reinforce this: 155,118 in integer math, 94,287 in floating point, 543,539 in data compression, and 32,789 in encryption are the numbers of a compute-first machine.

Is the imbalance a flaw? Not necessarily. A developer or content creator who games occasionally gets workstation-grade CPU throughput and adequate — not exceptional — graphics. A gamer who buys this pairing expecting flagship frames would be mismatched. The 3DMark thread scaling suggests the CPU would only become the limiter in games at low resolution with unlocked frame rates, where the single-thread score of 1,025 and eight-thread score of 7,140 are more relevant than the twenty-four-thread figure.

One further nuance: PCIe Gen 5 with 28 CPU lanes means the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface is fully satisfied with lanes to spare. Bandwidth between CPU and GPU is not a bottleneck in this design. Memory may be, in specific scenarios — 83.2 GB/s of system bandwidth is adequate but not lavish for a 24-thread part feeding large datasets, and the GPU's own 256 GB/s is the more likely constraint in texture-heavy rendering.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7845HX is a Dragon Range implementation of Zen 4: 12 cores, 24 threads, a 3.00 GHz base clock and 5.20 GHz boost, produced on TSMC's 5 nm node. The dual-die construction — two 71 mm² chiplets — is how AMD fits desktop-class core counts into a mobile envelope, and the benchmark results suggest the approach works: the chip trades blows with the desktop Core i7-13700K and a Xeon workstation part within a fraction of a percent on average score.

The cache hierarchy is deep: 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a 64 MB shared L3. That large shared L3 is a significant asset for workloads with data reuse — game engines, virtual machines, compilation — and partially offsets the dual-channel memory limitation. There is no 3D V-Cache on this part.

What do the scores mean for real workloads? The R23 multi-core score of 26,876 places long-running all-core tasks — video encodes, CPU renders, code builds — solidly in high-end territory, and the near-linear scaling from four to sixteen threads in 3DMark (3,807 to 10,068) means the chip rewards software that parallelizes well. Single-core numbers (1,852 R23, 2,389 Geekbench, 3,935 PassMark) keep latency-sensitive work — editor responsiveness, browser tabs, scripting — from being a weakness. The multiplier is unlocked, giving system integrators thermal headroom to tune, though in a laptop the cooling solution, not the silicon, will set the practical limit at the 55 W TDP.

The PassMark sub-scores sketch a broad competence: 41,020 in extended instructions shows AVX-512-class throughput is being exploited, and 63,223 in string sorting plus 329 in prime finding round out a profile with no obvious weak flank. The 89th percentile placement against all CPUs is the summary statistic: this is a top-decile processor, full stop.

Who Should Build It

The natural audience for this pairing is the professional-first buyer. Developers and data scientists get the most direct benefit: 24 threads, 12 cores, ECC-capable DDR5, and PassMark encryption and compression scores that indicate fast builds, container workloads, and dataset processing. Students in engineering or computer science programs get a machine that will outlast a degree program — the platform's PCIe Gen 5 lanes and DDR5 support keep it relevant as storage and peripherals accelerate.

Content creators are well served on the CPU side. The Cinebench R23 multi-core figure of 26,876 translates into quick timeline scrubbing, export, and encode times. 3D artists doing CPU-based rendering benefit directly; those relying on GPU rendering will find the 8 GB VRAM buffer the practical limit for large scenes.

Small business workstations are a strong fit — the Xeon w3-2535 appearing as a statistical rival is telling, since that is a workstation-class comparison the 7845HX survives intact. ECC support strengthens this case for reliability-sensitive deployments.

Gamers should calibrate expectations. This is a fine pairing for high-refresh 1080p gaming in competitive titles and a reasonable 1440p machine with adjusted settings, but the 50th-percentile GPU means it is not a flagship gaming rig. The esports-focused player who also compiles code or edits video is the ideal gaming profile here; the pure enthusiast chasing maximum frames at ultra settings is not.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming. Estimated from benchmark positioning rather than measurement: the CPU's physics score of 2,346 and single-thread strength will not limit frames, and the GPU's 15.62 TFLOPS of shading throughput should sustain high frame rates in competitive titles at 1080p. Demanding AAA games at ultra settings will run at standard refresh rates, not high ones.

Streaming. This is a genuine strength on paper. Streaming while gaming requires spare CPU threads for encoding and compositing, and with 24 threads plus an eight-to-sixteen-thread 3DMark jump from 7,140 to 10,068, there is ample threaded headroom to run a broadcast pipeline alongside a game without starving either.

Video editing. The R23 multi-core score of 26,876 and 64 MB of L3 cache make timeline work and CPU-accelerated effects responsive. The 8 GB of GPU VRAM assists with GPU-accelerated preview, but heavy GPU effects stacks may hit the buffer ceiling. Data compression performance of 543,539 in PassMark also aids media management and archiving.

3D rendering. CPU renders will complete quickly — the Geekbench multi-core score of 16,633 and the chip's near-parity with a Xeon workstation CPU are the relevant markers. GPU rendering on the RTX 3000 Mobile Ada is viable for small-to-medium scenes via its 144 tensor cores and 36 RT cores, but the 256 GB/s memory bandwidth and 8 GB VRAM bound scene size.

Software development. Arguably the best-fit scenario. The 3DMark scaling profile shows the chip accelerating well past eight threads, ideal for parallel builds, and the single-core scores keep interactive tooling fast. ECC support adds integrity for long test runs and virtualized environments.

Student and office work. Vast overkill for documents and browsing, which is not a criticism — it means the machine absorbs everything a multi-year academic or office workload throws at it without strain. The 89th-percentile CPU guarantees longevity; the responsive single-thread figures guarantee a smooth daily experience.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build, and that classification is important context for every number on this page. A mobile Dragon Range CPU at 55 W and a mobile Ada GPU at 115 W are thermal-envelope-constrained parts, yet the CPU delivers average benchmark performance statistically indistinguishable from desktop rivals — a 0 percent delta against the Xeon w3-2535 and under one percent against the i7-13700K and Ryzen 9 5900.

Overall tier: the combined percentile of 70 places the pairing in the upper third of tracked builds, a position earned almost entirely by the processor. The architecture story is coherent — both chips are TSMC 5 nm products, both released in early 2023, and the pairing represents a compute-heavy professional laptop rather than a gaming flagship. The build's identity is best summarized as a mobile workstation with credible but unremarkable graphics.

FAQ

Q: Does this pairing have measured frame-rate data in the database?

A: No. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination; all gaming performance discussion on this page is estimated from the benchmark scores and percentile data.

Q: How does the Ryzen 9 7845HX compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average benchmark score of 46,654 is within one percent of the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46,653), AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (46,487), Intel Core i7-13700K (46,881), and Ryzen 9 5900 (46,971) — effectively a dead heat across desktop and workstation parts.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in games?

A: The GPU. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile of all CPUs while the GPU sits at the 50th percentile, so graphics workloads are limited by the median-placed RTX 3000 Mobile Ada.

Q: Does the platform support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7845HX supports ECC, which is notable for a mobile part and relevant to workstation and reliability-sensitive use.

Q: How well does the CPU scale across threads?

A: 3DMark CPU scores rise from 1,988 at two threads to 11,108 at maximum threads, with strong gains through sixteen threads (10,068) and diminishing returns at the full twenty-four.

Q: What memory does the GPU have, and is it enough for modern games?

A: 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256 GB/s of bandwidth. It is adequate for estimated high-refresh play at 1080p, but texture-heavy titles at ultra settings, especially with ray tracing via its 36 RT cores, will press against the buffer.

Q: What PCIe support does the build offer?

A: The CPU provides PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes, more than enough to run the GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface at full width with lanes remaining for fast storage.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 3000 Mobile Ada Generation is built on the AD106 chip, fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, packing 22,900 million transistors into a 188 mm² die — a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimetre. It belongs to NVIDIA's Ada Lovelace family, succeeding the Ampere mobile generation and preceding Blackwell mobile parts.

The hardware inventory is respectable rather than spectacular: 4,608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, 48 render outputs, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. Clocks run from a 1,395 MHz base to a 1,695 MHz boost, with memory at 2,000 MHz effective at 16 Gbps. The resulting throughput figures are 15.62 TFLOPS FP32, 244.1 GTexel/s of texture fill, and 81.36 GPixel/s of pixel fill.

For rendering workloads, what do these numbers mean? The tensor core count matters for AI-accelerated denoising and upscaling in modern renderers and creative applications — 144 tensor cores give the GPU genuine capability in OptiX- and AI-assisted pipelines. The 36 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing, but at a count suited to moderate RT workloads rather than heavy path tracing. The hard constraint for rendering is the 8 GB of GDDR6 across a 128-bit bus: large scenes, high-resolution textures, and multi-layer composites will exhaust the buffer before the compute resources saturate. FP16 throughput at 1:1 with FP32 (15.62 TFLOPS) helps half-precision workloads in some renderers and AI tools.

The database holds no benchmark entries for this GPU, so its 50th-percentile placement is the sole performance anchor — a literal median among tracked GPUs. In this pairing, that translates to a professional mobile GPU that complements an exceptional CPU without ever challenging it. For viewport work, AI tooling, and moderate GPU rendering it is sufficient; for graphics-bound gaming or heavyweight rendering, it is the defined ceiling of the build.