SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

84 Score

Top 16% Ranking

84 / 100

HIGH-END

Power Build

Top 16% of systems. Excellent for 1440p Ultra or 4K High gaming.

1440p Ultra4K High

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

74%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

0 Benchmark Score

Top 26% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Strong Performance

Excellent for 1440p gaming. Most games will run at high/ultra settings smoothly.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

This is a mobile workstation pairing built around AMD’s Ryzen 9 7845HX processor and NVIDIA’s Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh GPU. The combination targets a specific slice of the laptop market: serious multi-threaded compute on the CPU side, with professional-grade graphics features on the GPU side. The data shows a processor that ranks in the 89th percentile among all CPUs, paired with a GPU that sits at the 50th percentile among all GPUs. That gap defines the character of this system—it is a CPU-first machine with a competent but not class-leading graphics component. Below, the analysis breaks down what each part delivers, how the platform supports upgrades, and where the measured scores place this pairing for real-world tasks.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor built on TSMC’s 5 nm process node, using the Zen 4 architecture with the Dragon Range codename. It belongs to the 7000 series and is manufactured for the mobile segment, fitting into AMD Socket FL1. The base clock sits at 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the CPU carries a 55 W TDP. The cache layout includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The processor integrates a Radeon 610M graphics unit, and it supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with a memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory is supported, and the CPU offers PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU itself.

Benchmark results show strong scaling from low thread counts to full load. The 3DMark test scores climb from 1025 in single-thread to 1988 in 2-thread, 3807 in 4-thread, 7140 in 8-thread, and 10068 in 16-thread, finally reaching 11108 in max-thread. That progression indicates efficient thread utilization across the 12 physical cores. Cinebench R23 scores are particularly telling: 1852 in single-core and 26876 in multi-core. The multi-core figure is roughly 14.5 times the single-core score, which points to excellent scaling when all 24 threads are engaged. Geekbench results follow a similar pattern with 2389 single-core and 16633 multi-core.

PassMark tests add more texture to the picture. The multithread score is 45010, while single-thread comes in at 3935. Integer math hits 155118, floating-point math reaches 94287, and extended instructions score 41020. Data compression scores 543539, data encryption scores 32789, and random string sorting scores 63223. The physics test returns 2346, and the find prime numbers test returns 329. These numbers indicate a processor that handles both integer-heavy and floating-point-heavy workloads well, with encryption and compression tasks also showing solid throughput.

The average benchmark score for this CPU is 46654, placing it in the 89th percentile against all CPUs. Among nearest rivals, the Intel Xeon w3-2535 scores 46653 with a 0% delta, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X scores 46487 with a 0.4% delta, the Intel Core i7-13700K scores 46881 with a -0.5% delta, and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971 with a -0.7% delta. Essentially, this mobile chip trades blows with desktop-class parts from the previous generation, sitting within a fraction of a percent of each rival. For a laptop processor, that is a significant achievement—it matches the multi-threaded output of a 12-core desktop Ryzen 9 3900X and comes within 0.5% of the i7-13700K.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The Ryzen 9 7845HX uses AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket. The platform supports DDR5 memory over a dual-channel bus with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and ECC memory is available for workloads that require error correction. PCIe Gen 5 with 28 lanes from the CPU provides high-bandwidth connectivity for storage and expansion. The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, which is modest for a 12-core part and speaks to the efficiency of the Zen 4 architecture on the 5 nm process. The integrated Radeon 610M provides basic graphics output even before a discrete GPU is engaged.

The GPU is an NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh, which uses a 12 nm process with the TU106 chip and Turing architecture. It carries a 80 W TDP and connects via PCIe 3.0 x16. The GPU is an MXM Module with no dedicated power connectors, meaning it draws power through the slot. The suggested PSU field is null, but given the 55 W CPU and 80 W GPU, a standard laptop power brick in the range of 150-200 W would be typical—though that figure is not in the data and should not be assumed. The GPU production status is end-of-life, so future upgrades on this platform would require replacing the entire MXM module, and the CPU is soldered to the motherboard in most implementations.

A sensible next upgrade path depends on the workload. For CPU-bound tasks, the 7845HX already sits near the top of its class, so the gains from a newer mobile CPU would be marginal. For GPU-bound tasks like rendering or AI inference, the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh is the limiting factor, and swapping to a newer Ampere or Ada-generation MXM module would provide a more meaningful performance jump. However, the end-of-life status of the current GPU and the MXM form factor mean that upgrade options are limited by what manufacturers offer for that specific laptop model. The platform’s DDR5 support and PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide headroom for faster storage, but the memory bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s is fixed by the dual-channel design.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46654, which places it in the 89th percentile among all CPUs. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon w3-2535, scores 46653, a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 9 3900X scores 46487, a delta of 0.4%. The Intel Core i7-13700K scores 46881, a delta of -0.5%. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971, a delta of -0.7%. These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the 7845HX is statistically tied with four desktop-class parts from both AMD and Intel. For a mobile chip, this is remarkable—it delivers desktop-equivalent multi-threaded performance in a laptop form factor.

The GPU has no benchmark scores in the data, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its percentile against all GPUs is 50, meaning it sits exactly at the median. The combined percentile for this pairing is 70, which reflects the CPU’s high standing pulling up the overall system. The GPU’s lack of measured scores means the data cannot confirm its exact position relative to other GPUs, but the 50th percentile suggests it is an average performer in the broader GPU landscape.

The combined picture is clear: this system excels at CPU-bound tasks, where it competes with top-tier desktop processors, while the GPU provides a baseline level of graphics performance suitable for professional workloads but not exceptional in raw gaming or compute. The data shows no measured FPS rows for this exact combination, so all gaming and graphics performance discussions are estimated from the benchmark scores rather than direct measurements.

Who Should Build It

This pairing targets users who need maximum CPU throughput in a mobile form factor. The 89th percentile CPU score makes it ideal for developers compiling large codebases, researchers running multi-threaded simulations, and data analysts processing large datasets. The 12 cores and 24 threads, combined with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876, place it firmly in the workstation-class performance tier. Students in engineering or computer science programs would benefit from the CPU’s ability to handle parallel workloads like MATLAB simulations or parallel programming assignments.

Small business workstations that handle video encoding, 3D modeling, or scientific computing would find the CPU performance sufficient for daily tasks. The GPU’s Quadro branding indicates it is certified for professional applications, making it suitable for CAD, architectural visualization, or medical imaging software that requires certified drivers. The GPU’s 6 GB of VRAM and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth provide enough memory for moderate-size models and textures, though larger scenes may struggle. Content creators working in 1080p or 1440p resolution would find the system capable, but 4K rendering or high-resolution video editing would likely bottleneck on the GPU.

Gamers at 1080p with medium to high settings would see playable frame rates, but the GPU’s 50th percentile position suggests it is not built for high-refresh competitive gaming at higher resolutions. The system is better suited as a portable workstation than a gaming laptop, with the CPU doing the heavy lifting in CPU-bound tasks and the GPU handling professional graphics workloads.

Gaming Performance

The FACT PACK contains no measured FPS data for this exact combination. The measuredFpsUltraByGame field is empty, and dataIsMeasured is false. Therefore, all frame rate expectations are estimates based on the CPU and GPU benchmark scores, and they should be treated as rough guides rather than measured results.

The CPU’s single-thread score of 1852 in Cinebench R23 and 1025 in 3DMark single-thread indicates strong per-core performance, which is critical for games that rely on a few fast threads. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM, 192-bit bus, and 336.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest it can handle 1080p gaming at medium to high settings in most titles, but it may struggle with 1440p ultra settings or ray-traced games. The Turing architecture includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which provide hardware support for ray tracing and DLSS, but the raw FP32 performance of 5.299 TFLOPS limits how much of that feature set can be used at playable frame rates.

For esports titles like CS or Valorant, the CPU’s high single-thread performance would likely push frame rates well above 144 Hz at 1080p, but the GPU would become the limiting factor at higher settings. For AAA titles, expect 60-90 FPS at 1080p medium to high settings, with drops below 60 FPS in demanding scenes. At 1440p, the GPU’s 6 GB VRAM and 192-bit bus would likely produce 40-60 FPS on medium settings. Ray tracing would be limited to 1080p with DLSS enabled, and even then, frame rates might hover around 40-50 FPS. These are estimates, not measured results, so actual performance could vary.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh uses the TU106 chip on a 12 nm process with 10,800 million transistors on a 445 mm² die. The base clock is 945 MHz with a boost clock of 1380 MHz. Memory runs at 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective speed, delivering 336.0 GB/s bandwidth across a 192-bit bus with 6 GB of GDDR6 memory. The GPU has 1920 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. It includes 30 RT cores and 240 tensor cores, which support hardware ray tracing and AI-based features like DLSS. The pixel rate is 88.32 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 165.6 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 5.299 TFLOPS, with FP16 at 10.60 TFLOPS using a 2:1 ratio. The GPU draws 80 W and connects via PCIe 3.0 x16, using an MXM Module form factor.

The lack of benchmark scores for this GPU makes direct comparisons difficult, but the 50th percentile against all GPUs indicates it is an average performer. The 6 GB VRAM is sufficient for 1080p professional workloads but may be limiting for large 3D scenes or high-resolution textures. The 336.0 GB/s bandwidth is moderate, and the 192-bit bus is narrower than higher-end parts, which could impact memory-intensive tasks. The RT cores and tensor cores are present, but the Turing architecture is one generation behind Ampere and Ada, so ray tracing performance would be lower than newer parts.

For rendering workloads, the FP32 performance of 5.299 TFLOPS is modest by modern standards. It can handle small to medium scenes, but large architectural visualizations or complex product designs would likely see slowdowns. The tensor cores provide some acceleration for AI-based denoising or image upscaling, but the 240 tensor cores are fewer than what newer GPUs offer. The Quadro branding ensures certified drivers for professional applications, which is a key selling point for stability in CAD or DCC software.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU’s single-thread score of 1852 in Cinebench R23 and 1025 in 3DMark single-thread is strong enough to drive high frame rates in CPU-bound games, but the GPU’s 50th percentile position and 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance limit overall gaming output. Expect 1080p medium settings for 100+ FPS in competitive titles, with AAA games closer to 60 FPS.

Streaming: The 24 threads of the 7845HX provide ample headroom for software encoding while gaming, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 ensuring that encoding does not starve the game of CPU resources. The GPU’s tensor cores could assist with encoding tasks, but the Turing NVENC encoder is not specifically listed in the data.

Video editing: The CPU’s multi-thread score of 45010 in PassMark and 16633 in Geekbench multicore is well-suited for video encoding and timeline rendering in 1080p and 1440p projects. The GPU’s 6 GB VRAM may limit effects-heavy timelines or 4K previews, but the CPU would handle most of the heavy lifting.

3D rendering: CPU-based rendering engines would perform exceptionally well, with the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 placing it near desktop-class parts. GPU-based rendering would be limited by the Quadro’s 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB VRAM, making it suitable for smaller scenes or preview renders.

Software development: The 12 cores and 24 threads accelerate parallel compilation, and the 89th percentile CPU score means build times would be competitive with desktop workstations. The PCIe Gen 5 lanes and DDR5 memory support reduce I/O bottlenecks for large codebases.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread performance of 3935 in PassMark single-thread handles everyday tasks instantly, while the 55 W TDP keeps power consumption reasonable for a laptop. The integrated Radeon 610M provides display output even when the discrete GPU is idle, extending battery life.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX has 12 cores and 24 threads, based on the Zen 4 architecture with a 5 nm process.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46654, which is within 0.7% of the Intel Xeon w3-2535, AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, Intel Core i7-13700K, and AMD Ryzen 9 5900. The deltas range from -0.7% to 0.4%.

Q: What is the GPU’s memory configuration?

A: The NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh has 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 336.0 GB/s and an effective memory clock of 14 Gbps.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the GPU has 30 RT cores, and its Turing architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the CPU’s TDP and socket?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W and uses AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile-specific socket.

Q: Are there measured FPS results for this system?

A: No, the data contains no measured FPS rows for this exact CPU-GPU combination. All gaming performance figures are estimates based on benchmark scores.

Q: What is the combined percentile for this pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 70, reflecting the CPU’s 89th percentile position and the GPU’s 50th percentile position.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data indicates a significant imbalance between CPU and GPU performance. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile, while the GPU sits in the 50th percentile. This means the CPU is roughly 39 percentile points ahead of the GPU, which is a substantial gap. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, simulation, or multi-threaded rendering, the CPU would be the primary driver, and the GPU would not present a significant bottleneck. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 and the PassMark multithread score of 45010 indicate the CPU can sustain high throughput across all 24 threads.

In GPU-bound workloads like gaming, 3D rendering with GPU acceleration, or AI inference, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. The 5.299 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 6 GB VRAM are modest by modern standards, so any task that relies heavily on the GPU will see performance constrained by the Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh. The 50th percentile position confirms this: half of all GPUs are faster, and the lack of benchmark scores for the GPU means its exact standing is unclear, but the percentile suggests average performance.

The combined percentile of 70 reflects this imbalance. A system with a more balanced pairing—say a CPU in the 70th percentile and a GPU in the 70th percentile—would likely have a higher combined percentile, but this pairing prioritizes CPU performance at the expense of GPU capability. For workloads that are primarily CPU-bound, this is a sensible trade-off. For workloads that are GPU-bound, the system would struggle compared to a more balanced build. The estimated gaming performance, which would likely see the GPU bottleneck at 1440p or higher resolutions, confirms this pattern. The CPU has enough headroom to push high frame rates, but the GPU cannot keep up at higher settings.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Power Build

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Strong Performance

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

CPU Analysis

Upgrade Path and Platform

Benchmark Performance

Who Should Build It

Gaming Performance

GPU Analysis

Usage Scenarios

FAQ

Balance and Bottleneck

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds