SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

Build Configuration

Select your components

PROCESSOR (CPU)

▼

GRAPHICS CARD (GPU)

▼

94 Score

Top 6% Ranking

94 / 100

ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio

Well Balanced

CPU

94%

GPU

95%

PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score

Top 6% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

38,349 Benchmark Score

Top 5% Market Ranking

View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others

Budget

0-30

Mid-Range

30-60

High-End

60-85

Enthusiast

85-100

Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles

View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready

70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High

50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med

30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports

0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile form a high-end laptop pairing that targets the upper tier of mobile performance. The CPU is a 12-core/24-thread Zen 4 Dragon Range part, while the GPU is a Blackwell 2.0 flagship with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory. The combined benchmark percentile sits at 85, indicating this platform outperforms the vast majority of desktop and mobile configurations in the database, though the specific balance between the two components reveals distinct workload characteristics.

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark results indicate a configuration where neither component consistently dominates, but the nature of the bottleneck shifts dramatically depending on the workload. The CPU’s 3dmark_max_threads score of 11108 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 demonstrate substantial multi-threaded throughput, while the GPU’s 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 4952 and Passmark G3D score of 27711 place it firmly in high-end territory. At lower thread counts, the CPU’s performance scales predictably: 2-thread score of 1988, 4-thread score of 3807, and 8-thread score of 7140, showing near-linear scaling that indicates the Zen 4 architecture can feed the GPU without significant stutter in lightly threaded scenarios.

The data suggests that in gaming workloads, the GPU is likely the primary constraint at high resolutions, given its 81st percentile ranking versus the CPU’s 89th percentile. The CPU’s single-thread score of 1025 in 3dmark and 1852 in Cinebench R23 are strong, meaning frame pacing at 1080p or 1440p will be limited by the GPU’s rendering capacity rather than the CPU’s ability to issue draw calls. Conversely, in productivity tasks that scale across all 24 threads, such as the Passmark multithread score of 45010, the CPU becomes the limiting factor if the workload cannot fully utilize the GPU’s compute units. The presence of 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores on the GPU means ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads will offload heavily to the GPU, shifting the balance further toward the GPU in those specific scenarios.

The Passmark integer math score of 155118 and floating point math score of 94287 indicate the CPU handles arithmetic-heavy tasks efficiently, but the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 23.04 TFLOPS dwarfs any CPU-side computation. For mixed workloads like video encoding or 3D scene compositing where both processors are active, the data shows a balanced system where the CPU’s 12 cores and the GPU’s 7680 shading units can operate concurrently without one stalling the other, assuming adequate power delivery and thermal headroom within the laptop chassis.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 46654, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon w3-2535 with an identical average score of 46653 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X at 46487 (0.4% slower), the Intel Core i7-13700K at 46881 (0.5% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 at 46971 (0.7% faster). This clustering shows the 7845HX sits in a very competitive performance band, trading blows with desktop-class parts from previous generations despite its mobile 55 W TDP envelope.

The GPU posts an average benchmark score of 38349, ranking in the 81st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are unusual: the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 at 38299 (0.1% slower), the RTX 4080 Mobile at 38135 (0.6% slower), the MX570 A at 38691 (0.9% faster), and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X at 38706 (0.9% faster). The close deltaPct values against these disparate parts—from entry-level mobile chips to previous-generation high-end mobile GPUs—suggest the average score masks significant variance across different benchmark types. The 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 4952 is a strong indicator of modern DX12 gaming performance, while the Geekbench OpenCL score of 166986 and Vulkan score of 169754 show robust compute capabilities. The Passmark GPU compute score of 12134 confirms the GPU’s strength in general-purpose compute, which is critical for rendering and machine learning tasks.

The combined picture shows a platform where the CPU outperforms the GPU in relative percentile terms (89 vs 81), but the GPU’s absolute performance is more than sufficient to drive high-refresh displays at high settings. The combined percentile of 85 reflects a system that is better than roughly seven out of eight configurations in the database, making it a top-tier mobile workstation or gaming laptop.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform, and supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a peak bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. ECC memory support is present, which is a notable feature for workstation use cases where data integrity is paramount. The CPU provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes, while the GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, ensuring ample bandwidth for the RTX 5080 Mobile and future expansion devices like high-speed NVMe storage.

The CPU’s TDP is 55 W, while the GPU’s TDP is 80 W, for a combined thermal envelope of approximately 135 W before accounting for other system components. The GPU has no power connectors listed and a slot width of "IGP", meaning it is soldered to the motherboard and draws power through the board’s power delivery system. The suggested PSU field is null for the GPU, so power supply headroom cannot be quantified from the data, but the lack of external connectors implies the system is designed for a dedicated laptop power brick rather than a desktop PSU. A sensible next upgrade path would involve maximizing the CPU’s unlocked multiplier—the multiplierUnlocked field is true—for overclocking if the laptop’s cooling solution allows, though this is limited by the 55 W TDP. For the GPU, no upgrade path exists beyond the soldered chip, so users should focus on memory capacity or storage expansion via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all frame rate figures discussed here are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The dataIsMeasured field is false, and any FPS expectations must be framed qualitatively from the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 4952 and the Passmark DirectX 11 score of 253. Given the GPU’s 81st percentile ranking and the CPU’s strong single-thread performance, this system is expected to handle modern titles at high settings in 1440p and 4K resolutions with playable frame rates, though exact numbers cannot be confirmed.

The CPU’s 8-thread score of 7140 and 16-thread score of 10068 indicate that multi-threaded game engines will be well-served, while the single-thread score of 1025 ensures that older or less optimized titles that rely on a few cores will still perform adequately. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth provides ample headroom for high-resolution textures and ray tracing workloads. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 API coverage mean the system is fully compatible with current and upcoming game APIs. For esports titles at 1080p, the CPU’s Passmark single-thread score of 3935 suggests frame rates will be high, but the GPU will likely not be the bottleneck at that resolution; rather, the CPU’s 5.20 GHz boost clock and 12 cores will drive the frames. At 4K, the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 23.04 TFLOPS will be the determining factor, and the data suggests it is capable of high-detail gaming, though users should expect to adjust settings for the most demanding titles.

Who Should Build It

This laptop configuration targets gamers who play at 1440p or 4K resolutions and demand high refresh rates without compromising visual fidelity. The GPU’s 81st percentile ranking and the CPU’s 89th percentile ranking indicate a system that can handle AAA titles at ultra settings, while the 16 GB VRAM ensures future-proofing for upcoming releases. Content creators who work with 4K video editing or 3D rendering will benefit from the CPU’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 and the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 166986, which together accelerate both CPU-bound and GPU-accelerated workflows.

Software developers compiling large codebases will appreciate the Passmark data compression score of 543539 and data encryption score of 32789, which indicate strong integer performance. Students and small business users who run virtual machines or heavy spreadsheet workloads will find the 12 cores and 24 threads sufficient, though the high performance tier may be overkill for basic office tasks. The ECC memory support makes this a credible option for professionals in finance or scientific computing where data accuracy is critical. The laptop class designation means all components are integrated, so this is not a DIY build but rather a specification for a high-end mobile workstation.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU’s core and thread count?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX has 12 cores and 24 threads, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what type?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the CPU support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Ryzen 9 7845HX supports ECC memory in a dual-channel DDR5 configuration.

Q: What is the GPU’s architecture and process node?

A: The GPU uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture (chip GB203) on a 5 nm process from TSMC.

Q: What is the CPU’s average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 46654, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs.

Q: What are the GPU’s nearest rivals in benchmark scores?

A: The nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (0.1% slower), RTX 4080 Mobile (0.6% slower), MX570 A (0.9% faster), and AMD Radeon Pro 580X (0.9% faster).

Q: What is the combined percentile of this CPU+GPU pairing?

A: The combined percentile is 85, indicating this configuration outperforms 85% of all systems in the database.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a dual-die design of 2x 71 mm². It has a 64 MB shared L3 cache, with 64 KB L1 and 1 MB L2 per core. The base clock is 3.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and the multiplier is unlocked for overclocking. Memory support includes dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and the CPU provides 28 PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The integrated Radeon 610M graphics provide basic display output, though the system relies on the discrete GPU for heavy lifting.

Benchmark scores show a processor that excels in multi-threaded workloads: Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 and single-core score of 1852 indicate strong per-core performance and excellent scaling. Geekbench multi-core score of 16633 and single-core score of 2389 confirm the competitive position. The Passmark multithread score of 45010 and integer math score of 155118 highlight strength in compute-heavy applications like compilation and data processing. The 3dmark 16-thread score of 10068 versus the max-thread score of 11108 shows that the CPU gains only about 10% performance when moving from 16 to 24 threads, suggesting diminishing returns beyond 16 threads for most workloads. The nearest rival, the Intel Xeon w3-2535, matches the average score exactly at 46653, while the Ryzen 9 3900X trails by only 0.4%, showing this mobile chip rivals desktop parts from the previous generation.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build combining the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX CPU with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile GPU. The combined percentile of 85 places this system in the upper echelon of all configurations in the database, outperforming 85% of alternatives. The CPU holds the 89th percentile position, while the GPU sits at the 81st percentile, making this a CPU-leaning configuration in relative terms, though both components are high-end. The pairing is designed for users who need maximum mobile performance without compromise. The CPU’s 12 cores and 24 threads handle heavy multi-threading, while the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 7680 shading units deliver high-end graphics. The 5 nm process for both components (TSMC foundry) ensures power efficiency, with the CPU TDP at 55 W and GPU TDP at 80 W. The GPU’s predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile series, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, making it fully compatible with modern software stacks. This build represents a top-tier mobile solution for gaming and professional work, with benchmark scores that rival desktop systems from just a few years ago.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The GPU’s 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 4952 and the CPU’s 8-thread score of 7140 indicate this system can drive high refresh rates at 1440p in competitive titles, with the CPU’s 5.20 GHz boost clock ensuring minimal frame pacing issues. At 4K, the GPU’s 16 GB VRAM and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth will handle ultra textures, though frame rates will be lower than at 1440p.

Streaming: The CPU’s Passmark data encryption score of 32789 and the GPU’s tensor cores (240) enable hardware-accelerated encoding and real-time effects without significant performance loss. The 24 threads provide headroom for encoding while gaming, as the 16-thread score of 10068 shows strong multi-thread capability.

Video editing: The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26876 accelerates timeline rendering and export, while the GPU’s Geekbench OpenCL score of 166986 speeds up effects and color grading. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports 4K multi-stream editing.

3D rendering: The CPU’s Passmark floating point math score of 94287 and the GPU’s FP32 throughput of 23.04 TFLOPS combine to reduce render times in both CPU-based and GPU-accelerated renderers. The 60 RT cores handle ray-traced scenes efficiently, as evidenced by the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score.

Software development: The Passmark integer math score of 155118 and data compression score of 543539 accelerate compilation and package management. The 12 cores allow parallel builds, and the ECC memory support ensures data integrity during long compile sessions.

Student and office work: The CPU’s single-thread score of 3935 in Passmark handles spreadsheet recalculation and document processing with ease, while the GPU remains idle. The 55 W CPU TDP and 80 W GPU TDP keep the system cool and quiet for daily use, though this configuration is overkill for basic tasks.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB203 chip, manufactured on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die. It features 7680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output pipelines, along with 60 RT cores and 240 tensor cores. The memory subsystem consists of 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Clock speeds are 975 MHz base and 1500 MHz boost, with memory running at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The pixel rate is 144.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 360.0 GTexel/s, while FP32 and FP16 throughput are both 23.04 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The GPU connects via PCIe 5.0 x16 and has a TDP of 80 W.

Benchmark results show a GPU that performs well in modern APIs: the 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 4952 is a strong indicator of DX12 gaming performance, while Geekbench Vulkan score of 169754 and OpenCL score of 166986 demonstrate excellent compute capability. The Passmark G3D score of 27711 confirms overall graphics performance, though the DirectX 10 and 11 scores (171 and 253 respectively) are lower, suggesting the GPU is optimized for newer APIs. The Passmark GPU compute score of 12134 indicates solid general-purpose compute performance. The nearest rival, the RTX 4080 Mobile, is 0.6% slower on average, showing this GPU is a modest generational improvement over its predecessor. The 81st percentile ranking places it above the majority of GPUs, and the 16 GB VRAM capacity ensures it can handle large textures and complex scenes, making it suitable for both gaming and professional rendering workloads. The transistor density of 120.6M per mm² and 1:1 FP16/FP32 ratio highlight the efficiency of the Blackwell architecture for AI and compute tasks.

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Apex Performer

System Balance Analysis

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

Market Position

Game Performance Benchmarks

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Performance Insights

Optimal Performance

4K Gaming Ready

Performance Tiers Explained

Ultimate

High-End

Mid-Range

Entry Level

Legacy

Balance and Bottleneck

Benchmark Performance

Upgrade Path and Platform

Gaming Performance

Who Should Build It

FAQ

CPU Analysis

Build Overview

Usage Scenarios

GPU Analysis

4K Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1440p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

1080p Gaming Performance

Cyberpunk 2077

Red Dead Redemption 2

Microsoft Flight Simulator

Control

Call of Duty: Warzone

Fortnite

Related Processors

Related Graphics Cards

Compare Your CPU

Compare Your GPU

Related PC Builds

Same CPU with Different GPUs

Same GPU with Different CPUs

Other Popular Builds