SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

92 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 8% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
91%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

19,049 Benchmark Score
Top 9% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

# AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

This pairing combines AMD's top-tier mobile CPU with NVIDIA's entry-level 40-series laptop GPU, creating a configuration where the processor substantially outclasses the graphics chip. The CPU sits in the 89th percentile of all processors, while the GPU lands in the 63rd percentile, a gap that shapes every workload discussed below. No measured FPS rows exist for this exact combination, so all frame-rate discussions are estimates derived from the benchmark scores rather than direct game testing.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The RTX 4050 Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 14423 places it in the 63rd percentile, which indicates capability for 1080p gaming at moderate settings. The GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 192.0 GB/s memory bandwidth suggest it can push frame rates in the 60-100 FPS range for esports titles at 1080p, but the 6 GB VRAM capacity will limit texture quality in newer AAA releases. The CPU's single-thread score of 1025 in 3DMark and 1852 in Cinebench R23 ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most gaming scenarios.

Streaming: The 12-core, 24-thread Ryzen 9 7845HX provides substantial headroom for simultaneous gaming and encoding workloads. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 45010 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 indicate that software encoding on the CPU is viable without crippling game performance. The GPU's NVENC capability (implied by the 80 tensor cores and Ada Lovelace architecture) offers an alternative hardware encoding path, though the data does not quantify encoding quality or speed.

Video editing: Multi-core performance is the primary driver here, and the 7845HX delivers. A Geekbench multicore score of 16633 and PassMark integer math score of 155118 suggest smooth timeline scrubbing and reasonably fast export times in applications that leverage multiple cores. The GPU's 5947 PassMark compute score provides hardware acceleration for effects and color grading, but the 6 GB VRAM may limit working with high-resolution timelines or complex effects stacks. The CPU's 64 MB shared L3 cache helps with large media files.

3D rendering: The CPU excels at this workload. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 places it near processors like the Intel Core i7-13700K (which has an average score of 46881, only 0.5% higher than this chip's average of 46654). The 12 Zen 4 cores with 24 threads handle CPU-based rendering efficiently, while the GPU's 2560 shading units and 20 RT cores provide a secondary rendering path. The 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance indicates the RTX 4050 Mobile can handle GPU-accelerated rendering in Blender or similar applications, though its 63rd percentile standing means it is not a high-end rendering solution.

Software development: The CPU's balanced performance profile suits compilation workloads. The PassMark data compression score of 543539 and random string sorting score of 63223 indicate strong performance in text processing and data manipulation tasks common in software builds. The 24 threads handle parallel compilation well, while the single-thread score of 3935 in PassMark ensures responsive UI interactions and fast single-threaded build steps. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large codebases and virtual machines.

Student and office work: This configuration is massively overprovisioned for typical productivity tasks. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking means it outperforms the vast majority of installed processors, while the GPU's 63rd percentile provides more graphics capability than spreadsheets or document editing require. The 5 nm process node and 55 W TDP suggest efficient operation for all-day battery use, though the data does not specify battery capacity or actual power draw under load.

GPU Analysis

The RTX 4050 Mobile uses the AD107 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process, containing 18,900 million transistors on a 159 mm² die. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1455 MHz and boosts to 1755 MHz, with memory running at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus yields 192.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is a limiting factor for high-resolution textures and heavy compute workloads.

The GPU's compute configuration includes 2560 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 48 render output units. The 20 RT cores and 80 tensor cores provide dedicated hardware for ray tracing and AI-accelerated features like DLSS. The pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s and texture rate of 140.4 GTexel/s are modest figures that reflect the entry-level positioning. The FP32 throughput of 8.986 TFLOPS matches the FP16 rate at a 1:1 ratio, indicating that the GPU does not have dedicated FP16 acceleration hardware.

Benchmark results show a PassMark G3D score of 14423, placing the GPU in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs. This is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6600, which scores 19036 (0.1% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 at 19030 (0.1% higher). The Geekbench OpenCL score of 74748 and Vulkan score of 75235 demonstrate consistent performance across API boundaries. The DirectX 12 score of 61 in PassMark suggests the GPU handles modern graphics APIs adequately, though the DirectX 9 score of 184 and DirectX 11 score of 130 indicate strong legacy API performance.

For rendering workloads, the 20 RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but the modest 63rd percentile standing means real-time ray tracing at high settings will likely require DLSS or reduced resolution. The 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is adequate for 1080p gaming but will struggle with 1440p or 4K textures. The GPU's TDP of 50 W and IGP slot width indicate it is designed for thin-and-light laptops rather than high-performance gaming notebooks.

Benchmark Performance

The CPU achieves an average benchmark score of 46654, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival is the Intel Xeon w3-2535 with an identical average score of 46653 (0% delta), followed by the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X at 46487 (0.4% higher). The Intel Core i7-13700K scores 46881 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 5900 scores 46971 (0.7% lower). This places the 7845HX in the same performance tier as desktop processors from the previous generation, a remarkable result for a mobile chip.

In specific CPU benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 and single-core score of 1852 demonstrate strong multi-threaded and competitive single-threaded performance. The Geekbench multicore score of 16633 and single-core score of 2389 reinforce this picture. The 3DMark results show scaling from 1988 (2 threads) to 11108 (max threads), with intermediate scores of 3807 (4 threads), 7140 (8 threads), and 10068 (16 threads). This scaling curve indicates efficient thread utilization across the 12-core, 24-thread configuration.

The GPU's average benchmark score of 19049 places it in the 63rd percentile. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6600 at 19036 (0.1% higher), NVIDIA Quadro K6000 at 19030 (0.1% higher), NVIDIA Tesla K20m at 19089 (0.2% lower), and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation at 18954 (0.5% higher). The combined percentile for this CPU-GPU pairing is 76, reflecting the substantial gap between the processor's 89th percentile and the graphics card's 63rd percentile.

The combined picture shows a system where the CPU is the dominant component. In CPU-bound workloads like compilation, rendering, and multitasking, this system performs at the level of high-end desktop processors from the previous generation. In GPU-bound workloads like gaming and GPU compute, performance aligns with mid-range desktop graphics cards from several generations ago. This asymmetry is the defining characteristic of this build.

Who Should Build It

Gamers at 1080p: This system targets gamers who prioritize CPU performance for competitive titles and are willing to accept medium-to-high settings at 1080p. The RTX 4050 Mobile's 63rd percentile and 6 GB VRAM support 1080p gaming, while the 89th percentile CPU ensures maximum frame rates in CPU-bound esports titles. The 192.0 GB/s bandwidth is sufficient for 1080p textures but not for 1440p or 4K.

Content creators: Video editors and 3D artists who work primarily in CPU-bound applications will benefit from the 12-core, 24-thread processor. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 and PassMark multithread score of 45010 indicate strong rendering and export performance. The GPU provides adequate acceleration for effects and previews, though the 6 GB VRAM will limit complex GPU-accelerated work.

Software developers: The CPU's balanced performance makes it ideal for developers who compile large codebases, run virtual machines, and switch between multiple applications. The high data compression score of 543539 and integer math score of 155118 suggest strong performance in build tools and data processing. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth supports large working sets.

Students and small business workstations: This configuration exceeds the requirements for typical student or office workloads, providing headroom for future applications and multitasking. The 55 W TDP suggests reasonable power consumption for a laptop, though the data does not specify battery life. The integrated Radeon 610M GPU provides a fallback graphics path that could reduce power draw when the RTX 4050 is idle.

Balance and Bottleneck

The data clearly shows the CPU is the stronger component. With a 26-percentile gap (89th vs 63rd), the GPU will be the limiting factor in graphics-intensive workloads. In gaming, the RTX 4050 Mobile's 14423 PassMark G3D score and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth will cap frame rates well below what the CPU could support. The CPU's 3DMark 8-thread score of 7140 and 16-thread score of 10068 indicate it can feed frames faster than the GPU can render them.

In CPU-bound workloads, the bottleneck reverses. The GPU's 5947 PassMark compute score and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance are sufficient for most compute tasks, but the CPU's 45010 PassMark multithread score means CPU-bound tasks will complete faster than GPU-accelerated equivalents. The 83.2 GB/s memory bandwidth and 64 MB L3 cache help the CPU maintain high utilization without memory stalls.

The FPS scaling evidence, though estimated, reinforces this imbalance. At 1080p, the GPU will likely be the bottleneck in graphically intensive games, with the CPU having substantial headroom. At lower resolutions or in CPU-bound games, the CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1025, Cinebench R23 single-core of 1852) will support high frame rates, but the GPU's 63rd percentile will still cap maximum FPS. The memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s on the GPU side is a particular constraint for high-refresh gaming.

Upgrade Path and Platform

The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is specific to the Dragon Range mobile platform. The chip supports DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s, and ECC memory is supported. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 28 lanes (CPU only) provides substantial bandwidth for future devices, though the GPU uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The GPU's TDP of 50 W with no power connectors and IGP slot width indicates it is soldered to the motherboard, making it non-upgradeable in most laptop designs. The CPU's 55 W TDP, combined with the GPU's 50 W TDP, suggests a total system power draw that is manageable for a laptop chassis, though the data does not provide a suggested PSU rating.

A sensible next upgrade would focus on the GPU, but the mobile form factor and soldered components make this impossible in most cases. The more practical upgrade path is to the rest of the platform: increasing memory capacity or speed (within the DDR5 standard) or adding storage via the PCIe Gen 5 lanes. The CPU's unlocked multiplier and active production status suggest it will remain relevant for several years, but the GPU's 63rd percentile and 6 GB VRAM will likely become a limitation sooner.

CPU Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts to 5.20 GHz, with a TDP of 55 W. The chip is built on TSMC's 5 nm process with 13,140 million transistors across a 2x 71 mm² die configuration. It features 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 64 MB of shared L3 cache.

The benchmark scores paint a picture of a processor that rivals desktop chips from the previous generation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 is within 0.5% of the Intel Core i7-13700K's average score of 46881, while the single-core score of 1852 provides strong performance for lightly-threaded workloads. The Geekbench scores of 16633 (multicore) and 2389 (single-core) confirm this positioning.

The PassMark results show specialized strengths: data compression at 543539, data encryption at 32789, extended instructions at 41020, floating-point math at 94287, integer math at 155118, and multithread at 45010. The find prime numbers score of 329 is notably lower, indicating this workload is not a strength of the Zen 4 architecture. The 3DMark thread scaling from 1988 (2 threads) to 11108 (max threads) demonstrates good scaling efficiency across the 24 threads.

The 89th percentile ranking places this CPU above the vast majority of installed processors. Its nearest rivals — the Intel Xeon w3-2535, AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, Intel Core i7-13700K, and AMD Ryzen 9 5900 — are all desktop processors, highlighting the performance level this mobile chip achieves. The 5 nm process node and 55 W TDP indicate strong efficiency, with performance-per-watt that exceeds older desktop processors.

Build Overview

This is a laptop-class build (buildClass: "laptop") combining AMD's top-tier mobile processor with NVIDIA's entry-level 40-series mobile GPU. The pairing occupies the 76th combined percentile, reflecting a system that is well above average overall but with significant asymmetry between components. The CPU's 89th percentile makes it the standout component, while the GPU's 63rd percentile is the limiting factor.

The Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 4 processor with a 5.20 GHz boost clock, 64 MB L3 cache, and DDR5 memory support. The RTX 4050 Mobile is an Ada Lovelace GPU with 2560 shading units, 20 RT cores, 80 tensor cores, and 6 GB GDDR6 memory on a 96-bit bus. The combination targets users who need maximum CPU performance for productivity, development, and creative work, while accepting mid-range GPU performance for gaming and graphics acceleration.

The overall tier from the percentiles places this system in the upper-middle range. The CPU is top-tier, comparable to desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-13700K and AMD Ryzen 9 3900X. The GPU is mid-range, comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 6600 and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation. The combined 76th percentile indicates a system that will handle most tasks well but will show its GPU limitation in graphics-intensive workloads.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU or GPU stronger in this pairing?

A: The CPU is substantially stronger, sitting in the 89th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 46654, while the GPU sits in the 63rd percentile with an average score of 19049. The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 rivals desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-13700K.

Q: What resolution is this system best suited for?

A: The GPU's 6 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, combined with its 63rd percentile standing, indicate 1080p is the appropriate resolution for gaming. The GPU's PassMark G3D score of 14423 and 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance support 1080p gaming at moderate settings.

Q: Can this CPU handle video editing and 3D rendering?

A: Yes, the 12-core, 24-thread CPU with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 and Geekbench multicore score of 16633 is well-suited for these workloads. The PassMark multithread score of 45010 and floating-point math score of 94287 support rendering and export tasks.

Q: How does the GPU compare to desktop graphics cards?

A: The RTX 4050 Mobile's average benchmark score of 19049 is nearly identical to the AMD Radeon RX 6600 (19036, 0.1% higher) and the NVIDIA Quadro K6000 (19030, 0.1% higher). It also closely matches the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation (18954, 0.5% higher).

Q: Does the system support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the CPU supports ECC memory per the data, along with DDR5 memory in dual-channel configuration with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s.

Q: What is the power consumption of this configuration?

A: The CPU has a TDP of 55 W and the GPU has a TDP of 50 W. The data does not provide a suggested PSU rating, but the combined 105 W TDP indicates a manageable power draw for a laptop.

Q: Is the GPU upgradeable?

A: The GPU uses an IGP slot width with no power connectors, indicating it is soldered to the motherboard. The CPU uses AMD Socket FL1, which is a mobile socket. The data does not indicate any upgrade path for either component.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS data exists for this exact CPU-GPU combination, so all frame-rate figures below are estimates derived from the benchmark scores. The RTX 4050 Mobile's 63rd percentile ranking, 14423 PassMark G3D score, and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth suggest 1080p is the target resolution. The 6 GB VRAM will support high texture settings in most games at 1080p, but may require reduced settings in titles with large texture packs.

The GPU's 8.986 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 20 RT cores indicate that ray tracing is possible but will likely require DLSS or reduced resolution to maintain playable frame rates. The 80 tensor cores support DLSS, which can significantly improve frame rates in supported titles. The CPU's single-thread performance (3DMark single-thread score of 1025, Cinebench R23 single-core of 1852) ensures it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games.

For esports titles like Counter-Strike, Valorant, or League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-thread performance and the GPU's adequate pixel rate of 84.24 GPixel/s should support frame rates well above 144 FPS at 1080p with competitive settings. For AAA titles at high settings, the GPU's 48 ROPs and 140.4 GTexel/s texture rate will likely produce frame rates in the 60-90 FPS range at 1080p. For the most demanding titles with ray tracing enabled, frame rates may drop below 60 FPS without DLSS.

The 16 Gbps effective memory speed and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are adequate for 1080p but will not support 1440p gaming at high settings. The 6 GB VRAM capacity is the primary constraint, as newer games increasingly require 8 GB or more for maximum texture quality. The CPU's 89th percentile means it has substantial headroom for future GPU upgrades, but the laptop form factor and soldered components prevent such upgrades. These estimates assume the system has adequate cooling and power delivery; actual performance may vary based on laptop design and thermal management.