SYSTEM ANALYZER

Rate My PC: AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

Get a comprehensive performance analysis of your gaming rig with detailed benchmarks, bottleneck detection, and upgrade recommendations

94 / 100
ULTIMATE READY

Apex Performer

Top 6% of systems. Capable of 4K Ultra gaming and advanced rendering.

4K 60+ FPSVR ReadyRay Tracing

System Balance Analysis

CPU vs GPU performance ratio
Well Balanced
CPU
94%
VS
GPU
94%
PROCESSOR

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX

46,654 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →
GRAPHICS CARD

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile

33,170 Benchmark Score
Top 6% Market Ranking
View Full Specs →

Market Position

How your build compares to others
Budget
0-30
Mid-Range
30-60
High-End
60-85
Enthusiast
85-100
Your Build

Game Performance Benchmarks

Real-world 4K FPS in popular titles
View All Games →

Performance Insights

Tips to maximize your system

Optimal Performance

Your system is in the top tier. You can run any modern game at maximum settings.

4K Gaming Ready

Consider a 4K 144Hz monitor to fully utilize your hardware capabilities.

Compatible Games See what you can play Compare CPUs Find upgrades Compare GPUs Find upgrades

Performance Tiers Explained

90-100

Ultimate

4K Ultra gaming, VR ready, ray tracing enabled, professional workloads

4K 60+ FPS VR Ready
70-89

High-End

1440p Ultra or 4K High settings, excellent for modern AAA titles

1440p Ultra 4K High
50-69

Mid-Range

1080p Ultra or 1440p Medium, great value for most gamers

1080p Ultra 1440p Med
30-49

Entry Level

1080p Medium settings, suitable for eSports and older titles

1080p Med eSports
0-29

Legacy

Basic gaming, older titles, consider upgrading for modern games

720p-1080p Low Older Games

The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor built on TSMC's 5 nm process node, part of the Zen 4 "Dragon Range" family. Launched in early 2023 for the mobile segment, this CPU is paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile GPU in this specific build configuration. The CPU's base clock is 3.00 GHz, boosting up to 5.20 GHz, with a 55 W TDP. It supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s and includes 64 MB of shared L3 cache, alongside 1 MB of L2 cache per core.

CPU Analysis

The Ryzen 9 7845HX is a high-core-count mobile processor designed for demanding workloads, and the benchmark data underscores its dual nature: exceptional multi-threaded throughput with a single-thread performance that keeps it competitive in everyday tasks. With 12 cores and 24 threads, the CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 places it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, a strong indicator for content creation and rendering workloads. This score is essentially tied with the Intel Xeon w3-2535, which has an average score of 46653, and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, which scores 46487 — a delta of 0.4%. In contrast, the Intel Core i7-13700K edges it out slightly by 0.5%, showing that this mobile chip trades blows with desktop-class silicon from previous generations.

The multi-threaded performance scales well with core count, as evidenced by the 3DMark tests: the score jumps from 10068 with 16 threads to 11108 with max threads, while the 8-thread score of 7140 is nearly double the 4-thread score of 3807. This scaling indicates that the Zen 4 architecture handles thread scheduling efficiently, making it suitable for parallel workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. The Geekbench multicore score of 16633 reinforces this positioning, though the single-core score of 2389 shows a more modest advantage in lightly-threaded tasks.

For real-world productivity, the PassMark tests reveal specific strengths. The integer math score of 155118 and floating-point math score of 94287 are substantial figures that translate to fast compilation and simulation tasks. Data compression scores hit 543539, while encryption reaches 32789, suggesting solid performance for database and security workloads. The single-thread PassMark score of 3935 confirms that the CPU does not lag in everyday responsiveness, though it is not the absolute leader in this category. The 3DMark single-thread score of 1025 and Cinebench R15 single-core score of 295 are consistent with a 5.20 GHz boost clock delivering strong per-core performance. The 89th percentile ranking against all CPUs means that, in a typical laptop, this processor will outperform the vast majority of installed hardware, making it a top-tier choice for mobile workstations.

Benchmark Performance

The overall benchmark picture for this build is dominated by the CPU's high percentile placement, while the GPU sits slightly lower but still respectable. The CPU's average benchmark score is 46654, placing it in the 89th percentile, while the GPU's average score of 33170 lands in the 78th percentile. The combined percentile for the build is 84, indicating that as a pairing, it outperforms most laptops but is not at the absolute current-generation of mobile performance.

Looking at the CPU's specific scores, the Cinebench R23 multicore result of 26876 is the headline number, representing a 30% improvement over the 8-thread score of 7140 in 3DMark, which shows that the extra cores are effectively utilized. The Geekbench multicore score of 16633 is 7 times the single-core score of 2389, a ratio that highlights the strong scaling in multi-threaded applications. In the PassMark suite, the multithread score of 45010 is nearly 11 times the single-thread score of 3935, again confirming that this is a processor built for parallel workloads.

For the GPU, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 421 is a modern test that reflects DirectX 12 Ultimate performance. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 50038 and Vulkan score of 49051 show that the GPU can handle compute tasks, with Vulkan performance being slightly lower than OpenCL. The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA T550 Mobile, which scores 33161 (a 0% delta), and the NVIDIA T600 Mobile, which scores 32849 (1% ahead). This puts the RTX 3050 Mobile in the same class as professional mobile GPUs, but the 78th percentile indicates that it is not a high-end gaming part.

The combined picture is clear: this build prioritizes CPU compute power, making it more suited for CPU-bound tasks like compilation, rendering, and data processing, while the GPU provides adequate but not exceptional graphics performance. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that gaming performance must be inferred from the benchmark scores, which suggest that the CPU will rarely be the bottleneck in games, but the GPU will limit frame rates at higher resolutions.

GPU Analysis

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile is built on the Ampere architecture using Samsung's 8 nm process, with a chip size of 200 mm² and 8,700 million transistors. It features 2048 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, with 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. The GPU has a base clock of 1065 MHz and a boost clock of 1343 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s, which is adequate for 1080p gaming but may be limiting for higher resolutions or texture-heavy titles.

The RT and tensor cores enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS, though the 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores are modest in number. The pixel rate is 42.98 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 85.95 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 5.501 TFLOPS. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, ensuring compatibility with modern APIs. The 45 W TDP is typical for a mobile GPU, and the PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for this class of part.

In benchmark terms, the GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 421 places it in the 78th percentile of all GPUs. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 50038 and Vulkan score of 49051 show that the GPU is capable of compute workloads, though the scores are not outstanding. The nearest rival, the NVIDIA T550 Mobile, has an average score of 33161, which is virtually identical to the RTX 3050 Mobile's 33170, indicating that these two GPUs perform at the same level. The AMD Radeon Pro 570 is 0.1% behind, and the NVIDIA P104-100 is 0.6% ahead, so the RTX 3050 Mobile sits in a tight cluster of mid-range mobile GPUs.

For rendering workloads, the GPU's 5.501 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is sufficient for basic 3D modeling and rendering, but it is not a professional-grade part. The 4 GB VRAM is a significant constraint for large scenes or high-resolution textures, and the 192.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause bottlenecks in memory-intensive operations. The RT cores provide ray tracing capability, but performance will be limited compared to higher-end parts.

FAQ

Q: What is the CPU's core and thread count, and how does it impact performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX has 12 cores and 24 threads. This configuration allows it to achieve a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, which is ideal for multi-threaded workloads like video editing and 3D rendering.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. This is sufficient for 1080p gaming but may limit performance in high-resolution or texture-heavy scenarios.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 46654 is nearly identical to the Intel Xeon w3-2535 (46653, 0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X (46487, 0.4% delta). It is 0.5% behind the Intel Core i7-13700K and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 5900.

Q: Does the GPU support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 3050 Mobile has 16 RT cores, which enable hardware-accelerated ray tracing. However, with only 16 RT cores and 5.501 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, ray tracing performance will be modest.

Q: What is the combined percentile of this build?

A: The combined percentile for the CPU and GPU pairing is 84, indicating that this laptop outperforms 84% of all builds in the database, driven primarily by the CPU's strong 89th percentile ranking.

Q: What is the CPU's memory support and bandwidth?

A: The CPU supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory, which is beneficial for workstation tasks that require data integrity.

Q: What is the GPU's production status?

A: The GPU is marked as "End-of-life" in production status, with a release date of May 2021. This means it is an older part that may still be available in laptops but is not current-generation hardware.

Who Should Build It

This build is targeted at users who need high CPU compute performance in a laptop form factor, with less emphasis on GPU gaming power. The Ryzen 9 7845HX's 89th percentile ranking makes it an excellent choice for content creators who work with video editing, 3D rendering, and software compilation. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 and PassMark multithread score of 45010 indicate that this CPU can handle heavy multi-threaded workloads without breaking a sweat.

Software developers will benefit from the CPU's integer math score of 155118 and data compression score of 543539, which speed up code compilation and database operations. Students in engineering or computer science fields will find the CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads useful for running simulations and virtual machines, while the 89th percentile ensures it will handle any academic software.

Small business workstations that run data analysis or financial modeling will appreciate the CPU's encryption score of 32789 and floating-point math score of 94287. The GPU, while not a gaming powerhouse, provides adequate performance for basic CAD work and 2D design, with its 78th percentile ranking ensuring it is above average. However, gamers looking for high refresh rates at 1440p or 4K will be disappointed, as the GPU's 4 GB VRAM and 192.0 GB/s bandwidth are better suited for 1080p gaming at medium settings.

Gaming Performance

No measured FPS rows exist for this exact CPU+GPU combination, so all gaming frame rate discussions are estimates based on the benchmark scores. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 421 and its 78th percentile ranking suggest that it is a mid-range mobile GPU capable of running most games at 1080p. The 4 GB VRAM will limit texture quality in newer titles, and the 192.0 GB/s bandwidth may cause stuttering in memory-intensive scenes.

For esports titles like CS:GO or League of Legends, the CPU's strong single-thread score of 3935 in PassMark and 1025 in 3DMark single-thread will ensure high frame rates, but the GPU will cap performance at around 60-100 FPS at 1080p on high settings. In AAA games, the GPU's 5.501 TFLOPS of FP32 performance will handle medium settings at 1080p, with ray tracing disabled to maintain playable frame rates. The CPU's 89th percentile means it will not bottleneck the GPU in most games, but the GPU will be the limiting factor at resolutions above 1080p.

Usage Scenarios

High-refresh gaming: The CPU is more than capable of feeding a high-refresh monitor, but the GPU will restrict frame rates to around 60-80 FPS in modern titles at 1080p. This pairing is not ideal for 144Hz monitors unless playing older or less demanding games.

Streaming: The CPU's 12 cores and 24 threads handle encoding workloads well, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 ensuring smooth streaming while gaming. The GPU's NVENC encoder is not specified in the data, but the 64 tensor cores may assist with AI-based features.

Video editing: The CPU's Geekbench multicore score of 16633 and PassMark floating-point score of 94287 make it excellent for rendering timelines and applying effects in software like Premiere Pro. The GPU can assist with effects, but 4 GB VRAM may limit the use of GPU-accelerated plugins with large previews.

3D rendering: The CPU's Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 places it in the 89th percentile, making it a strong choice for CPU-based renderers like Blender's Cycles. The GPU's 5.501 TFLOPS can handle GPU rendering, but the 4 GB VRAM will limit scene complexity.

Software development: The CPU's integer math score of 155118 and data compression score of 543539 speed up compilation and code analysis. The 12 cores and 24 threads allow for fast parallel builds, and the 55 W TDP is manageable in a laptop.

Student and office work: The CPU's single-thread score of 3935 ensures snappy response in office applications, while the 89th percentile means it will handle any academic software. The GPU is overkill for office tasks but provides headroom for light photo editing or basic CAD.

Build Overview

This build pairs the AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX, a 12-core Zen 4 mobile processor, with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile, an Ampere-based GPU. The build class is a laptop, and the combined percentile of 84 indicates that it outperforms most laptops in the database. The CPU is in the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 78th percentile, creating an asymmetric pairing where the CPU is the dominant component.

The CPU's architecture, Dragon Range, is a high-performance mobile platform designed for gaming laptops and mobile workstations. The GPU, while from the previous generation, remains competitive in the mid-range mobile segment, as evidenced by its similarity to the NVIDIA T550 Mobile and T600 Mobile. This build is best described as a CPU-centric laptop that sacrifices GPU performance for raw compute power.

Balance and Bottleneck

In this pairing, the CPU is clearly the stronger component, with an 89th percentile ranking compared to the GPU's 78th percentile. This means that in CPU-bound workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, and software compilation, the CPU will perform at a high level, and the GPU will not be a significant bottleneck. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 26876 and PassMark multithread score of 45010 are indicators of the CPU's capability in these tasks.

However, in gaming workloads, the GPU will be the limiting factor. The GPU's 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 421 and its 4 GB VRAM will constrain frame rates at 1080p, and the CPU's strong single-thread performance will not compensate for the GPU's limitations. The FPS scaling in games will be capped by the GPU, meaning that even though the CPU could drive higher frame rates, the GPU will not deliver them.

For mixed workloads like video editing with GPU-accelerated effects, the balance is more even. The CPU handles timeline processing, while the GPU assists with effects and rendering. The CPU's 89th percentile and GPU's 78th percentile mean that the overall system will perform well, but the GPU's lower ranking suggests that it will be the first component to show its age in future applications. The lack of measured FPS data for this exact combination means that these bottleneck assessments are based on benchmark scores rather than direct gameplay testing.